Search

The permutation language P_n consists of all words that are permutations of a fixed alphabet of size n. Using divide-and-conquer, we construct a regular expression R_n that specifies P_n. We then give explicit bounds for the length of R_n, which we find to be 4^{n}n^{-(lg n)/4+Theta(1)}, and use these bounds to show that R_n has minimum size over all regular expressions specifying P_n.

Recently, Cilleruelo, Luca, & Baxter proved, for all bases b >= 5, that every natural number is the sum of at most 3 natural numbers whose base-b representation is a palindrome. However, the cases b = 2, 3, 4 were left unresolved. We prove, using a decision procedure based on automata, that every natural number is the sum of at most 4 natural numbers whose base-2 representation is a palindrome. Here the constant 4 is optimal. We obtain similar results for bases 3 and 4, thus completely resolving the problem. We consider some other variations on this problem, and prove similar results. We argue that heavily case-based proofs are a good signal that a decision procedure may help to automate the proof.

A rollercoaster is a sequence of real numbers for which every maximal contiguous subsequence, that is increasing or decreasing, has length at least three. By translating this sequence to a set of points in the plane, a rollercoaster can be defined as a polygonal path for which every maximal sub-path, with positive- or negative-slope edges, has at least three points. Given a sequence of distinct real numbers, the rollercoaster problem asks for a maximum-length subsequence that is a rollercoaster. It was conjectured that every sequence of $n$ distinct real numbers contains a rollercoaster of length at least $\lceil n/2\rceil$ for $n>7$, while the best known lower bound is $\Omega(n/\log n)$. In this paper we prove this conjecture. Our proof is constructive and implies a linear-time algorithm for computing a rollercoaster of this length. Extending the $O(n\log n)$-time algorithm for computing a longest increasing subsequence, we show how to compute a maximum-length rollercoaster within the same time bound. A maximum-length rollercoaster in a permutation of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ can be computed in $O(n \log \log n)$ time. The search for rollercoasters was motivated by orthogeodesic point-set embedding of caterpillars. A caterpillar is a tree such that deleting the leaves gives a path, called the spine. A top-view caterpillar is one of degree 4 such that the two leaves adjacent to each vertex lie on opposite sides of the spine. As an application of our result on rollercoasters, we are able to find a planar drawing of every $n$-node top-view caterpillar on every set of $\frac{25}{3}n$ points in the plane, such that each edge is an orthogonal path with one bend. This improves the previous best known upper bound on the number of required points, which is $O(n \log n)$. We also show that such a drawing can be obtained in linear time, provided that the points are given in sorted order., Comment: 17 pages

We show how to prove theorems in additive number theory using a decision procedure based on finite automata. Among other things, we obtain the following analogue of Lagrange's theorem: every natural number > 686 is the sum of at most 4 natural numbers whose canonical base-2 representation is a binary square, that is, a string of the form xx for some block of bits x. Here the number 4 is optimal. While we cannot embed this theorem itself in a decidable theory, we show that stronger lemmas that imply that the theorem can be embedded in decidable theories, and show how automated methods can be used to search for these stronger lemmas.

A rectifier network is a directed acyclic graph with distinguished sources and sinks; it is said to compute a Boolean matrix $M$ that has a $1$ in the entry $(i,j)$ iff there is a path from the $j$th source to the $i$th sink. The smallest number of edges in a rectifier network computing $M$ is a classic complexity measure on matrices, which has been studied for more than half a century. We explore two well-known techniques that have hitherto found little to no applications in this theory. Both of them build on a basic fact that depth-$2$ rectifier networks are essentially weighted coverings of Boolean matrices with rectangles. We obtain new results by using fractional and greedy coverings (defined in the standard way). First, we show that all fractional coverings of the so-called full triangular matrix have cost at least $n\log n$. This provides (a fortiori) a new proof of the tight lower bound on its depth-$2$ complexity (the exact value has been known since 1965, but previous proofs are based on different arguments). Second, we show that the greedy heuristic is instrumental in tightening the upper bound on the depth-$2$ complexity of the Kneser-Sierpi\'nski (disjointness) matrix. The previous upper bound is $O(n^{1.28})$, and we improve it to $O(n^{1.17})$, while the best known lower bound is $\Omega(n^{1.16})$. Third, using fractional coverings, we obtain a form of direct product theorem that gives a lower bound on unbounded-depth complexity of Kronecker (tensor) products of matrices. In this case, the greedy heuristic shows (by an argument due to Lov\'asz) that our result is only a logarithmic factor away from the "full" direct product theorem. Our second and third results constitute progress on open problem 7.3 and resolve, up to a logarithmic factor, open problem 7.5 from a recent book by Jukna and Sergeev (in Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science (2013)).

International audience; In 1980, Janusz A. Brzozowski presented a selection of six open problems about regular languages and mentioned two other problems in the conclusion of his article. These problems have been the source of some of the greatest breakthroughs in automata theory over the past 35 years. This survey article summarizes the state of the art on these questions and the hopes for the next 35 years.; En 1980, Janusz A. Brzozowski a présenté une sélection de six problèmes ouverts sur les langues réguliers et mentionné également deux autres problèmes dans la conclusion de son article. Ces problèmes ont été à l'origine de quelques-unes des plus grandes percées dans la théorie des automates cours des dernières 35 années. Cet article de synthèse résume l'état de l'art sur ces questions et les espoirs pour les 35 prochaines années.

The classical Frobenius problem is to compute the largest number g not representable as a non-negative integer linear combination of non-negative integers x_1, x_2, ..., x_k, where gcd(x_1, x_2, ..., x_k) = 1. In this paper we consider generalizations of the Frobenius problem to the noncommutative setting of a free monoid. Unlike the commutative case, where the bound on g is quadratic, we are able to show exponential or subexponential behavior for an analogue of g, depending on the particular measure chosen., Comment: 19 pages; preliminary announcement

We investigate the behavior of the periods and border lengths of random words over a fixed alphabet. We show that the asymptotic probability that a random word has a given maximal border length k is a constant, depending only on k and the alphabet size l. We give a recurrence that allows us to determine these constants with any required precision. This also allows us to evaluate the expected period of a random word. For the binary case, the expected period is asymptotically about n-1.641. We also give explicit formulas for the probability that a random word is unbordered or has maximum border length one.