Search

The occurrence of high frequency (>1000 Hz) thermoacoustic instability (TAI) sustained by mutual feedback among the acoustic field, heat release rate oscillations, and hydrodynamic oscillations poses severe challenges to the operation and structural integrity of rocket engines. Hence, quantifying the differing levels of feedback between these variables can help uncover the underlying mechanisms behind such high frequency TAI, enabling redesign of combustors to mitigate TAI. However, so far, no concrete method exists to decipher the varying levels of mutual feedback during high-frequency TAI. In the present study, we holistically investigate the mutual influence based on the spatiotemporal directionality among acoustic pressure, heat release rate, hydrodynamic and thermal oscillations during TAI of a single-element rocket engine combustor. Using symbolic transfer entropy (STE), we identify the spatiotemporal direction of feedback interactions between those primary variables when acoustic waves significantly emerge during TAI. We unveil the influence of vorticity dynamics at the fuel collar (or the propellant splitter plate) as the primary stimulant over the heat release rate fluctuations to rapidly amplify the amplitude of the acoustic field. Further, depending on the quantification of the degree of the mutual information (i.e., the net direction of information), we identify the switches in dominating the thermoacoustic driving between the variables during TAI, each representing a distinct mechanism of a thermoacoustic state. Additionally, from this quantification, we analyze the relative dominance of the variables and rank-order the mutual feedback according to their impact on driving TAI., Comment: 48 pages, 16 figures

Turbulent flow physics regulates the aerodynamic properties of lifting surfaces, the thermodynamic efficiency of vapor power systems, and exchanges of natural and anthropogenic quantities between the atmosphere and ocean, to name just a few applications. The dynamics of turbulent flows are described via numerical integration of the non-linear Navier-Stokes equation -- a procedure known as computational fluid dynamics (CFD). At the dawn of scientific computing in the late 1950s, it would be many decades before terms such as ``carbon footprint'' or ``sustainability'' entered the lexicon, and longer still before these themes attained national priority throughout advanced economies. This paper introduces a framework designed to calculate the carbon footprint of CFD and its contribution to carbon emission reduction strategies. We will distinguish between "hero" and "routine" calculations, noting that the carbon footprint of hero calculations is largely determined by the energy source mix utilized. We will also review CFD of flows where turbulence effects are modeled, thus reducing the degrees of freedom. Estimates of the carbon footprint are presented for such fully- and partially-resolved simulations as functions of turbulence activity and calculation year, demonstrating a reduction in carbon emissions by two to five orders of magnitude at practical conditions. Beyond analyzing CO2 emissions, we quantify the benefits of applying CFD towards overall carbon emission reduction. The community's effort to avoid redundant calculations via turbulence databases merits particular attention, with estimates indicating that a single database could potentially reduce CO2 emissions by approximately O(1) million metric tons. Additionally, implementing CFD in the fluids industry has markedly decreased dependence on wind tunnel testing, which is anticipated to lead to CO2 emission reduction., Comment: 18 pages, 6 figures