Search

Despite powerful X-ray emission, some AGNs are known to either lack optical emission lines (so-called 'optically dull' AGNs) or have lines that fall on the star-forming branch of the BPT diagram ('misclassified' AGNs). Aperture effects have been proposed to explain such atypical spectra, especially when based on SDSS (3'') fibers. We use observations from VLT-MUSE with Adaptive Optics to explore the spatially resolved optical emission line properties of 4 optically dull and 1 misclassified X-ray AGN candidates. VLT-MUSE IFU spectra allow us to investigate the extent to which the aperture size affects the emission line measurements. The optically dull AGNs become detectable in deeper VLT-MUSE spectroscopic apertures having the same size (3'') as SDSS fibers, suggesting no AGN is truly lineless. However, in no case does the line become more detectable as the aperture decreases, as would be expected if dilution by strong continuum was responsible for making the lines appear weak. We also show that the misclassified X-ray AGN retains the same position on the BPT diagram in smaller apertures (down to 0.''5), demonstrating that its misclassification is not the result of the dilution by HII regions. Thus, we conclude that continuum swamping or star formation dilution, i.e., aperture effects, are not responsible for atypical lines. Rather, the AGN lines are intrinsically weak., Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS, 12 pages, 11 figures

In this work, we use ~500 low-redshift (z ~ 0.1) X-ray AGNs observed by XMM-Newton and SDSS to investigate the prevalence and nature of AGNs that apparently lack optical emission lines (``optically dull AGNs''). Although 1/4 of spectra appear absorption-line dominated in visual assessment, line extraction with robust continuum subtraction from the MPA/JHU catalog reveals usable [OIII] measurements in 98% of the sample, allowing us to study [OIII]-underluminous AGNs together with more typical AGNs in the context of the L$_{\mathrm{[OIII]}}$--L$_{X}$ relation. We find that ``optically dull AGNs'' do not constitute a distinct population of AGNs. Instead, they are the [OIII]-underluminous tail of a single, unimodal L$_{\mathrm{[OIII]}}$--L$_{X}$ relation that has substantial scatter (0.6 dex). We find the degree to which an AGN is underluminous in [OIII] correlates with the specific SFR or D$_{4000}$ index of the host, which are both linked to the molecular gas fraction. Thus the emerging physical picture for the large scatter seems to involve the gas content of the narrow-line region. We find no significant role for previously proposed scenarios for the presence of optically dull AGNs, such as host dilution or dust obscuration. Despite occasionally weak lines in SDSS spectra, >80% of X-ray AGNs are identified as such with the BPT diagram. >90% are classified as AGNs based only on [NII]/H$\alpha$, providing more complete AGN samples when [OIII] or H$\beta$ are weak. X-ray AGNs with LINER spectra obey essentially the same \lxo\ relation as Seyfert 2s, suggesting their line emission is produced by AGN activity., Comment: 21 pages, 14 figures, submitted to ApJ. Comments welcome

Ionization sources other than HII regions give rise to the right-hand branch in the standard ([NII]) BPT diagram, populated by Seyfert 2s and LINERs. However, because the majority of Seyfert/LINER hosts are star forming (SF), HII regions contaminate the observed lines to some extent, making it unclear if the position along the branch is merely due to various degrees of mixing between pure Seyfert/LINER and SF, or whether it reflects the intrinsic diversity of Seyfert/LINER ionizing sources. In this study, we empirically remove SF contributions in ~100,000 Seyfert/LINERs from SDSS using the doppelganger method. We find that mixing is not the principal cause of the extended morphology of the observed branch. Rather, Seyferts/LINERs intrinsically have a wide range of line ratios. Variations in ionization parameter and metallicity can account for much of the diversity of Seyfert/LINER line ratios, but the hardness of ionization field also varies significantly. Furthermore, our k-means classification on seven decontaminated emission lines reveals that LINERs are made up of two populations, which we call soft and hard LINERs. The Seyfert 2s differ from both types of LINERs primarily by higher ionization parameter, whereas the two LINER types mainly differ from each other (and from star-forming regions) in the hardness of the radiation field. We confirm that the [NII] BPT diagram more efficiently identifies LINERs than [SII] and [OI] diagnostics, because in the latter many LINERs, especially soft ones, occupy the same location as pure star-formers, even after the SF has been removed from LINER emission., Comment: Accepted to ApJ. Main results in Figures 6 and 7. Seyfert/LINER classification (Table 1) available at https://salims.pages.iu.edu/agn . Comments welcome

The interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) is of great interest as it can stabilize chiral spin structures in thin films. Experiments verifying the orientation of the interfacial DMI vector remain rare, in part due to the difficulty of separating vector components of DMI. In this study, Fe/Ni bilayers and Co/Ni multilayers were deposited epitaxially onto Cu(001) and Pt(111) substrates, respectively. By tailoring the effective anisotropy, spin reorientation transitions (SRTs) are employed to probe the orientation of the DMI vector by measuring the spin structure of domain walls on both sides of the SRTs. The interfacial DMI is found to be sufficiently strong to stabilize chiral N\'eel walls in the out-of-plane magnetized regimes, while achiral N\'eel walls are observed in the in-plane magnetized regimes. These findings experimentally confirm that the out-of-plane component of the DMI vector is insignificant in these fcc(001) and fcc(111) oriented interfaces, even in the presence of atomic steps., Comment: 19 pages, 5 figures

In this work, we investigate the reliability of the BPT diagram for excluding galaxies that host an AGN. We determine the prevalence of X-ray AGN in the star-forming region of the BPT diagram and discuss the reasons behind this apparent misclassification, focusing primarily on relatively massive ($\log(M_{*})\gtrsim10$) galaxies. X-ray AGN are selected from deep XMM observations using a new method that results in greater samples with a wider range of X-ray luminosities, complete to $\log(L_{X})>41$ for $z<0.3$. Taking X-ray detectability into account, we find the average fraction of X-ray AGN in the BPT star-forming branch is 2$\%$, suggesting the BPT diagram can provide a reasonably clean sample of star-forming galaxies. However, the X-ray selection is itself rather incomplete. At the tip of the AGN branch of the BPT diagram, the X-ray AGN fraction is only 14$\%$, which may have implications for studies that exclude AGN based only on X-ray observations. Interestingly, the X-ray AGN fractions are similar for Seyfert and LINER populations, consistent with LINERs being true AGN. We find that neither the star-formation dilution nor the hidden broad-line components can satisfactorily explain the apparent misclassification of X-ray AGN. On the other hand, $\sim40\%$ of all X-ray AGN have weak emission lines such that they cannot be placed on the BPT diagram at all and often have low specific SFRs. Therefore, the most likely explanation for "misclassified" X-ray AGN is that they have intrinsically weak AGN lines, and are only placeable on the BPT diagram when they tend to have high specific SFRs., Comment: 16 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ