Search

Many real-world problems have expensive-to-compute fitness functions and are multi-objective in nature. Surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithms are often used to tackle such problems. Despite this, literature about analysing the fitness landscapes induced by surrogate models is limited, and even non-existent for multi-objective problems. This study addresses this critical gap by comparing landscapes of the true fitness function with those of surrogate models for multi-objective functions. Moreover, it does so temporally by examining landscape features at different points in time during optimisation, in the vicinity of the population at that point in time. We consider the BBOB bi-objective benchmark functions in our experiments. The results of the fitness landscape analysis reveals significant differences between true and surrogate features at different time points during optimisation. Despite these differences, the true and surrogate landscape features still show high correlations between each other. Furthermore, this study identifies which landscape features are related to search and demonstrates that both surrogate and true landscape features are capable of predicting algorithm performance. These findings indicate that temporal analysis of the landscape features may help to facilitate the design of surrogate switching approaches to improve performance in multi-objective optimisation.

Volume measurement of a paraganglioma (a rare neuroendocrine tumor that typically forms along major blood vessels and nerve pathways in the head and neck region) is crucial for monitoring and modeling tumor growth in the long term. However, in clinical practice, using available tools to do these measurements is time-consuming and suffers from tumor-shape assumptions and observer-to-observer variation. Growth modeling could play a significant role in solving a decades-old dilemma (stemming from uncertainty regarding how the tumor will develop over time). By giving paraganglioma patients treatment, severe symptoms can be prevented. However, treating patients who do not actually need it, comes at the cost of unnecessary possible side effects and complications. Improved measurement techniques could enable growth model studies with a large amount of tumor volume data, possibly giving valuable insights into how these tumors develop over time. Therefore, we propose an automated tumor volume measurement method based on a deep learning segmentation model using no-new-UNnet (nnUNet). We assess the performance of the model based on visual inspection by a senior otorhinolaryngologist and several quantitative metrics by comparing model outputs with manual delineations, including a comparison with variation in manual delineation by multiple observers. Our findings indicate that the automatic method performs (at least) equal to manual delineation. Finally, using the created model, and a linking procedure that we propose to track the tumor over time, we show how additional volume measurements affect the fit of known growth functions.

Paragangliomas are rare, primarily slow-growing tumors for which the underlying growth pattern is unknown. Therefore, determining the best care for a patient is hard. Currently, if no significant tumor growth is observed, treatment is often delayed, as treatment itself is not without risk. However, by doing so, the risk of (irreversible) adverse effects due to tumor growth may increase. Being able to predict the growth accurately could assist in determining whether a patient will need treatment during their lifetime and, if so, the timing of this treatment. The aim of this work is to learn the general underlying growth pattern of paragangliomas from multiple tumor growth data sets, in which each data set contains a tumor's volume over time. To do so, we propose a novel approach based on genetic programming to learn a function class, i.e., a parameterized function that can be fit anew for each tumor. We do so in a unique, multi-modal, multi-objective fashion to find multiple potentially interesting function classes in a single run. We evaluate our approach on a synthetic and a real-world data set. By analyzing the resulting function classes, we can effectively explain the general patterns in the data.

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is an important and rapidly expanding research topic. The goal of XAI is to gain trust in a machine learning (ML) model through clear insights into how the model arrives at its predictions. Genetic programming (GP) is often cited as being uniquely well-suited to contribute to XAI because of its capacity to learn (small) symbolic models that have the potential to be interpreted. Nevertheless, like many ML algorithms, GP typically results in a single best model. However, in practice, the best model in terms of training error may well not be the most suitable one as judged by a domain expert for various reasons, including overfitting, multiple different models existing that have similar accuracy, and unwanted errors on particular data points due to typical accuracy measures like mean squared error. Hence, to increase chances that domain experts deem a resulting model plausible, it becomes important to be able to explicitly search for multiple, diverse, high-quality models that trade-off different meanings of accuracy. In this paper, we achieve exactly this with a novel multi-modal multi-tree multi-objective GP approach that extends a modern model-based GP algorithm known as GP-GOMEA that is already effective at searching for small expressions.

In model-based evolutionary algorithms (EAs), the underlying search distribution is adapted to the problem at hand, for example based on dependencies between decision variables. Hill-valley clustering is an adaptive niching method in which a set of solutions is clustered such that each cluster corresponds to a single mode in the fitness landscape. This can be used to adapt the search distribution of an EA to the number of modes, exploring each mode separately. Especially in a black-box setting, where the number of modes is a priori unknown, an adaptive approach is essential for good performance. In this work, we introduce multi-objective hill-valley clustering and combine it with MAMaLGaM, a multi-objective EA, into the multi-objective hill-valley EA (MO-HillVallEA). We empirically show that MO-HillVallEA outperforms MAMaLGaM and other well-known multi-objective optimization algorithms on a set of benchmark functions. Furthermore, and perhaps most important, we show that MO-HillVallEA is capable of obtaining and maintaining multiple approximation sets simultaneously over time.

The aim of bi-objective optimization is to obtain an approximation set of (near) Pareto optimal solutions. A decision maker then navigates this set to select a final desired solution, often using a visualization of the approximation front. The front provides a navigational ordering of solutions to traverse, but this ordering does not necessarily map to a smooth trajectory through decision space. This forces the decision maker to inspect the decision variables of each solution individually, potentially making navigation of the approximation set unintuitive. In this work, we aim to improve approximation set navigability by enforcing a form of smoothness or continuity between solutions in terms of their decision variables. Imposing smoothness as a restriction upon common domination-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms is not straightforward. Therefore, we use the recently introduced uncrowded hypervolume (UHV) to reformulate the multi-objective optimization problem as a single-objective problem in which parameterized approximation sets are directly optimized. We study here the case of parameterizing approximation sets as smooth Bezier curves in decision space. We approach the resulting single-objective problem with the gene-pool optimal mixing evolutionary algorithm (GOMEA), and we call the resulting algorithm BezEA. We analyze the behavior of BezEA and compare it to optimization of the UHV with GOMEA as well as the domination-based multi-objective GOMEA. We show that high-quality approximation sets can be obtained with BezEA, sometimes even outperforming the domination- and UHV-based algorithms, while smoothness of the navigation trajectory through decision space is guaranteed., Comment: PPSN2020 (Parallel Problem Solving from Nature)

Domination-based multi-objective (MO) evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are today arguably the most frequently used type of MOEA. These methods however stagnate when the majority of the population becomes non-dominated, preventing convergence to the Pareto set. Hypervolume-based MO optimization has shown promising results to overcome this. Direct use of the hypervolume however results in no selection pressure for dominated solutions. The recently introduced Sofomore framework overcomes this by solving multiple interleaved single-objective dynamic problems that iteratively improve a single approximation set, based on the uncrowded hypervolume improvement (UHVI). It thereby however loses many advantages of population-based MO optimization, such as handling multimodality. Here, we reformulate the UHVI as a quality measure for approximation sets, called the uncrowded hypervolume (UHV), which can be used to directly solve MO optimization problems with a single-objective optimizer. We use the state-of-the-art gene-pool optimal mixing evolutionary algorithm (GOMEA) that is capable of efficiently exploiting the intrinsically available grey-box properties of this problem. The resulting algorithm, UHV-GOMEA, is compared to Sofomore equipped with GOMEA, and the domination-based MO-GOMEA. In doing so, we investigate in which scenarios either domination-based or hypervolume-based methods are preferred. Finally, we construct a simple hybrid approach that combines MO-GOMEA with UHV-GOMEA and outperforms both.

To study radiotherapy-related adverse effects, detailed dose information (3D distribution) is needed for accurate dose-effect modeling. For childhood cancer survivors who underwent radiotherapy in the pre-CT era, only 2D radiographs were acquired, thus 3D dose distributions must be reconstructed from limited information. State-of-the-art methods achieve this by using 3D surrogate anatomies. These can lack personalization and lead to coarse reconstructions. We present and validate a surrogate-free dose reconstruction method based on Machine Learning (ML). Abdominal planning CTs ($n$=142) of recently-treated childhood cancer patients were gathered, their organs at risk were segmented, and 300 artificial Wilms' tumor plans were sampled automatically. Each artificial plan was automatically emulated on the 142 CTs, resulting in 42,600 3D dose distributions from which dose-volume metrics were derived. Anatomical features were extracted from digitally reconstructed radiographs simulated from the CTs to resemble historical radiographs. Further, patient and radiotherapy plan features typically available from historical treatment records were collected. An evolutionary ML algorithm was then used to link features to dose-volume metrics. Besides 5-fold cross-validation, a further evaluation was done on an independent dataset of five CTs each associated with two clinical plans. Cross-validation resulted in Mean Absolute Errors (MAEs) $\leq$0.6 Gy for organs completely inside or outside the field. For organs positioned at the edge of the field, MAEs $\leq$1.7 Gy for D$_{mean}$, $\leq$2.9 Gy for D$_{2cc}$, and $\leq$13% for V$_{5Gy}$ and V$_{10Gy}$, were obtained, without systematic bias. Similar results were found for the independent dataset. Our novel, ML-based organ dose reconstruction method is not only accurate but also efficient, as the setup of a surrogate is no longer needed., Comment: M. Virgolin and Z. Wang share first authorship

This report presents benchmarking results of the Hill-Valley Evolutionary Algorithm version 2019 (HillVallEA19) on the CEC2013 niching benchmark suite under the restrictions of the GECCO 2019 niching competition on multimodal optimization. Performance is compared to algorithms that participated in previous editions of the niching competition.

Model-based evolutionary algorithms (EAs) adapt an underlying search model to features of the problem at hand, such as the linkage between problem variables. The performance of EAs often deteriorates as multiple modes in the fitness landscape are modelled with a unimodal search model. The number of modes is however often unknown a priori, especially in a black-box setting, which complicates adaptation of the search model. In this work, we focus on models that can adapt to the multi-modality of the fitness landscape. Specifically, we introduce Hill-Valley Clustering, a remarkably simple approach to adaptively cluster the search space in niches, such that a single mode resides in each niche. In each of the located niches, a core search algorithm is initialized to optimize that niche. Combined with an EA and a restart scheme, the resulting Hill-Valley EA (HillVallEA) is compared to current state-of-the-art niching methods on a standard benchmark suite for multi-modal optimization. Numerical results in terms of the detected number of global optima show that, in spite of its simplicity, HillVallEA is competitive within the limited budget of the benchmark suite, and shows superior performance in the long run.

This report presents benchmarking results of the latest version of the Hill-Valley Evolutionary Algorithm (HillVallEA) on the CEC2013 niching benchmark suite. The benchmarking follows restrictions required by the GECCO 2018 competition on Niching methods for Multimodal Optimization. In particular, no problem dependent parameter tuning is performed. A number of adjustments have been made to original publication of HillVallEA that are discussed in this report.