17 results on '"Basso, Bruno"'
Search Results
2. Model Intercomparison of Maize Response to Climate Change in Low-Input Smallholder Cropping Systems
- Author
-
Falconnier, Gatien, Corbeels, Marc, Boote, Ken, Adam, Myriam, Ruane, Alexander, and Basso, Bruno
- Subjects
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
Smallholder farming systems are characterized by poor soil fertility and low agricultural input use; process-based crop growth models can help quantifying the potential impact of climate change on productivity in these systems.With limiting conditions (water and nutrients), crop models need to rigorously account for soil water, nutrient, CO2, and temperature interactions when simulating climate change effects.
- Published
- 2019
3. Climate Change Impact and Adaptation for Wheat Protein
- Author
-
Asseng, Senthold, Martre, Pierre, Maiorano, Andrea, Rötter, Reimund P, O’Leary, Garry J, Fitzgerald, Glenn J, Girousse, Christine, Motzo, Rosella, Giunta, Francesco, Babar, M. Ali, Reynolds, Matthew P, Kheir, Ahmed M. S, Thorburn, Peter J, Waha, Katharina, Ruane, Alex C, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Ahmed, Mukhtar, Balkovic, Juraj, Basso, Bruno, Biernath, Christian, Bindi, Marco, Cammarano, Davide, Challinor, Andrew J, Sanctis, Giacomo De, Dumont, Benjamin, Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi, Fereres, Elias, Ferrise, Roberto, Garcia-Vila, Margarita, Gayler, Sebastian, Gao, Yujing, Horan, Heidi, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Izaurralde, R. César, Jabloun, Mohamed, Jones, Curtis D, Kassie, Belay T, Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian, Klein, Christian, Koehler, Ann-Kristin, Liu, Bing, Minoli, Sara, Martin, Manuel Montesino San, Müller, Christoph, Kumar, Soora Naresh, Nendel, Claas, Olesen, Jørgen Eivind, Palosuo, Taru, Porter, John R, Priesack, Eckart, Ripoche, Dominique, Semenov, Mikhail A, Stockle, Claudio, Stratonovitch, Pierre, Streck, Thilo, Supit, Iwan, Tao, Fulu, Velde, Marijn Van der, Wallach, Daniel, Wang, Enli, Webber, Heidi, Wolf, Joost, Xiao, Liujun, Zhang, Zhao, Zhao, Zhigan, Zhu, Yan, and Ewert, Frank
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Wheat grain protein concentration is an important determinant of wheat quality for human nutrition that is often overlooked in efforts to improve crop production. We tested and applied a 32‐multi‐model ensemble to simulate global wheat yield and quality in a changing climate. Potential benefits of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration by 2050 on global wheat grain and protein yield are likely to be negated by impacts from rising temperature and changes in rainfall, but with considerable disparities between regions. Grain and protein yields are expected to be lower and more variable in most low‐rainfall regions, with nitrogen availability limiting growth stimulus from elevated CO2. Introducing genotypes adapted to warmer temperatures (and also considering changes in CO2 and rainfall) could boost global wheat yield by 7% and protein yield by 2%, but grain protein concentration would be reduced by −1.1 percentage points, representing a relative change of −8.6%. Climate change adaptations that benefit grain yield are not always positive for grain quality, putting additional pressure on global wheat production.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Classifying Multi-Model Wheat Yield Impact Response Surfaces Showing Sensitivity to Temperature and Precipitation Change
- Author
-
Fronzek, Stefan, Pirttioja, Nina, Carter, Timothy R, Bindi, Marco, Hoffmann, Holger, Palosuo, Taru, Ruiz-Ramos, Margarita, Tao, Fulu, Trnka, Miroslav, Acutis, Marco, Asseng, Senthold, Baranowski, Piotr, Basso, Bruno, Bodin, Per, Buis, Samuel, Cammarano, Davide, Deligios, Paola, Destain, Marie-France, Dumont, Benjamin, Ewert, Frank, Ferrise, Roberto, Francois, Louis, Gaiser, Thomas, Hlavinka, Petr, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Kersebaum, Kurt Christian, Kollas, Chris, Krzyszczak, Jaromir, Lorite, Ignacio J, Minet, Julien, Ines Minguez, M, Montesino, Manuel, Moriondo, Marco, Muller, Christoph, Nendel, Claas, Ozturk, Isik, Perego, Alessia, Rodriguez, Alfredo, Ruane, Alex C, Ruget, Francoise, Sanna, Mattia, Semenov, Mikhail A, Slawinski, Cezary, Stratonovitch, Pierre, Supit, Iwan, Waha, Katharina, Wang, Enli, Wu, Lianhai, Zhao, Zhigan, and Rotter, Reimund P
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
Crop growth simulation models can differ greatly in their treatment of key processes and hence in their response to environmental conditions. Here, we used an ensemble of 26 process-based wheat models applied at sites across a European transect to compare their sensitivity to changes in temperature (minus 2 to plus 9 degrees Centigrade) and precipitation (minus 50 to plus 50 percent). Model results were analysed by plotting them as impact response surfaces (IRSs), classifying the IRS patterns of individual model simulations, describing these classes and analysing factors that may explain the major differences in model responses. The model ensemble was used to simulate yields of winter and spring wheat at four sites in Finland, Germany and Spain. Results were plotted as IRSs that show changes in yields relative to the baseline with respect to temperature and precipitation. IRSs of 30-year means and selected extreme years were classified using two approaches describing their pattern. The expert diagnostic approach (EDA) combines two aspects of IRS patterns: location of the maximum yield (nine classes) and strength of the yield response with respect to climate (four classes), resulting in a total of 36 combined classes defined using criteria pre-specified by experts. The statistical diagnostic approach (SDA) groups IRSs by comparing their pattern and magnitude, without attempting to interpret these features. It applies a hierarchical clustering method, grouping response patterns using a distance metric that combines the spatial correlation and Euclidian distance between IRS pairs. The two approaches were used to investigate whether different patterns of yield response could be related to different properties of the crop models, specifically their genealogy, calibration and process description. Although no single model property across a large model ensemble was found to explain the integrated yield response to temperature and precipitation perturbations, the application of the EDA and SDA approaches revealed their capability to distinguish: (i) stronger yield responses to precipitation for winter wheat than spring wheat; (ii) differing strengths of response to climate changes for years with anomalous weather conditions compared to period-average conditions; (iii) the influence of site conditions on yield patterns; (iv) similarities in IRS patterns among models with related genealogy; (v) similarities in IRS patterns for models with simpler process descriptions of root growth and water uptake compared to those with more complex descriptions; and (vi) a closer correspondence of IRS patterns in models using partitioning schemes to represent yield formation than in those using a harvest index. Such results can inform future crop modelling studies that seek to exploit the diversity of multi-model ensembles, by distinguishing ensemble members that span a wide range of responses as well as those that display implausible behaviour or strong mutual similarities.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The Uncertainty of Crop Yield Projections Is Reduced by Improved Temperature Response Functions
- Author
-
Wang, Enli, Martre, Pierre, Zhao, Zhigan, Ewert, Frank, Maiorano, Andrea, Rotter, Reimund P, Kimball, Bruce A, Ottman, Michael J, White, Jeffrey W, Reynolds, Matthew P, Alderman, Phillip D, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Anothai, Jakarat, Basso, Bruno, Biernath, Christian, Cammarano, Davide, Challinor, Andrew J, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Doltra, Jordi, Fereres, Elias, Garcia-Vila, Margarita, Gayler, Sebastian, Hoogenboom, Gerrit, Hunt, Leslie A, Izaurralde, Roberto C, Jabloun, Mohamed, Jones, Curtis D, Kersebaum, Kurt C, Koehler, Ann-Kristin, Liu, Leilei, Muller, Christoph, Naresh Kumar, Soora, Nendel, Claas, O'Leary, Garry, Oleson, Jorgen E, Palosuo, Tara, Priesack, Eckhart, Eyshi, Rezaei, Ehsan, Ripoche, Dominique, Ruane, Alex C, Semenov, Mikhail A, Scherbak, Lurii, Stockle, Claudio, Stratonovitch, Pierre, Streck, Thilo, Supit, Iwan, Tao, Fulu, Thorburn, Peter, Waha, Katharina, Wallach, Daniel, Wang, Zhimin, Wolf, Joost, Zhu, Yan, and Asseng, Senthold
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Increasing the accuracy of crop productivity estimates is a key element in planning adaptation strategies to ensure global food security under climate change. Process-based crop models are effective means to project climate impact on crop yield, but have large uncertainty in yield simulations. Here, we show that variations in the mathematical functions currently used to simulate temperature responses of physiological processes in 29 wheat models account for is greater than 50% of uncertainty in simulated grain yields for mean growing season temperatures from 14 C to 33 C. We derived a set of new temperature response functions that when substituted in four wheat models reduced the error in grain yield simulations across seven global sites with different temperature regimes by 19% to 50% (42% average). We anticipate the improved temperature responses to be a key step to improve modelling of crops under rising temperature and climate change, leading to higher skill of crop yield projections.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. How Accurately Do Maize Crop Models Simulate the Interactions of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Levels With Limited Water Supply on Water Use and Yield?
- Author
-
Durand, Jean-Louis, Delusca, Kenel, Boote, Ken, Lizaso, Jon, Manderscheid, Remy, Weigel, Hans Johachim, Ruane, Alexander Clark, Rosenzweig, Cynthia E, Jones, Jim, Ahuja, Laj, Anapalli, Saseendran, Basso, Bruno, Baron, Christian, Bertuzzi, Patrick, Biernath, Christian, Deryng, Delphine, Ewert, Frank, Gaiser, Thomas, Gayler, Sebastian, Heilein, Florian, Kersebaum, Kurt Christian, Kim, Soo-Hyung, Muller, Christoph, Nendel, Claas, Olioso, Albert, Priesack, Eckart, Villegas, Julian Ramirez, Ripoche, Dominique, Rotter, Reimund P, Seidel, Sabine I, Srivastava, Amit, Tao, Fulu, Timlin, Dennis, Twine, Tracy, Wang, Enli, Webber, Heidi, and Zhao, Zhigan
- Subjects
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing ,Statistics And Probability ,Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
This study assesses the ability of 21 crop models to capture the impact of elevated CO2 concentration [CO2] on maize yield and water use as measured in a 2-year Free Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment experiment conducted at the Thunen Institute in Braunschweig, Germany (Manderscheid et al. 2014). Data for ambient [CO2] and irrigated treatments were provided to the 21 models for calibrating plant traits, including weather, soil and management data as well as yield, grain number, above ground biomass, leaf area index, nitrogen concentration in biomass and grain, water use and soil water content. Models differed in their representation of carbon assimilation and evapotranspiration processes. The models reproduced the absence of yield response to elevated [CO2] under well-watered conditions, as well as the impact of water deficit at ambient [CO2], with 50 percent of models within a range of plus/minus 1 Mg ha(exp. -1) around the mean. The bias of the median of the 21 models was less than 1 Mg ha(exp. -1). However under water deficit in one of the two years, the models captured only 30 percent of the exceptionally high [CO2] enhancement on yield observed. Furthermore the ensemble of models was unable to simulate the very low soil water content at anthesis and the increase of soil water and grain number brought about by the elevated [CO2] under dry conditions. Overall, we found models with explicit stomatal control on transpiration tended to perform better. Our results highlight the need for model improvement with respect to simulating transpirational water use and its impact on water status during the kernel-set phase.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The International Heat Stress Genotype Experiment for Modeling Wheat Response to Heat: Field Experiments and AgMIP-Wheat Multi-Model Simulations
- Author
-
Martre, Pierre, Reynolds, Matthew P, Asseng, Senthold, Ewert, Frank, Alderman, Phillip D, Cammarano, Davide, Maiorano, Andrea, Ruane, Alexander C, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Anothai, Jakarat, Basso, Bruno, Biernath, Christian, Challinor, Andrew J, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Doltra, Jordi, Dumont, Benjamin, Fereres, Elias, Garcia-Vila, Margarita, Gayler, Sebastian, Hohenheim, Gerrit, Hunt, Leslie A, Izaurralde, Roberto C, Jabloun, Mohamed, Jones, Curtis D, Kassie, Belay T, Kersebaum, Kurt T, Koehler, Ann-Kristin, Mueller, Christoph, Kumar, Soora Naresh, Liu, Bing, Lobell, David B, Nendel, Claas, O’Leary, Garry, Olesen, Jørgen E, Palosuo, Taru, Priesack, Eckart, Rezaei, Ehsan Eyshi, Ripoche, Dominique, Roetter, Reimund P, Semenov, Mikhail A, Stoeckle, Claudio, Stratonovitch, Pierre, Streck, Thilo, Supit, Iwan, Tao, Fulu, Thorburn, Peter, Waha, Katharina, Wang, Enli, White, Jeffrey W, Wolf, Joost, Zhao, Zhigan, and Zhu, Yan
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
The data set contains a portion of the International Heat Stress Genotype Experiment (IHSGE) data used in the AgMIP-Wheat project to analyze the uncertainty of 30 wheat crop models and quantify the impact of heat on global wheat yield productivity. It includes two spring wheat cultivars grown during two consecutive winter cropping cycles at hot, irrigated, and low latitude sites in Mexico (Ciudad Obregon and Tlaltizapan), Egypt (Aswan), India (Dharwar), the Sudan (Wad Medani), and Bangladesh (Dinajpur). Experiments in Mexico included normal (November-December) and late (January-March) sowing dates. Data include local daily weather data, soil characteristics and initial soil conditions, crop measurements (anthesis and maturity dates, anthesis and final total above ground biomass, final grain yields and yields components), and cultivar information. Simulations include both daily in-season and end-of-season results from 30 wheat models.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Towards a New Generation of Agricultural System Data, Models and Knowledge Products: Design and Improvement
- Author
-
Antle, John M, Basso, Bruno, Conant, Richard T, Godfray, H. Charles J, Jones, James W, Herrero, Mario, Howitt, Richard E, Keating, Brian A, Munoz-Carpena, Rafael, and Rosenzweig, Cynthia
- Subjects
Earth Resources And Remote Sensing ,Computer Systems - Abstract
This paper presents ideas for a new generation of agricultural system models that could meet the needs of a growing community of end-users exemplified by a set of Use Cases. We envision new data, models and knowledge products that could accelerate the innovation process that is needed to achieve the goal of achieving sustainable local, regional and global food security. We identify desirable features for models, and describe some of the potential advances that we envisage for model components and their integration. We propose an implementation strategy that would link a "pre-competitive" space for model development to a "competitive space" for knowledge product development and through private-public partnerships for new data infrastructure. Specific model improvements would be based on further testing and evaluation of existing models, the development and testing of modular model components and integration, and linkages of model integration platforms to new data management and visualization tools.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Toward a New Generation of Agricultural System Data, Models, and Knowledge Products: State of Agricultural Systems Science
- Author
-
Jones, James W, Antle, John M, Basso, Bruno, Boote, Kenneth J, Conant, Richard T, Foster, Ian, Godfray, H. Charles J, Herrero, Mario, Howitt, Richard E, Janssen, Sander, Keating, Brian A, Munoz-Carpena, Rafael, Porter, Cheryl H, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, and Wheeler, Tim R
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
We review the current state of agricultural systems science, focusing in particular on the capabilities and limitations of agricultural systems models. We discuss the state of models relative to five different Use Cases spanning field, farm, landscape, regional, and global spatial scales and engaging questions in past, current, and future time periods. Contributions from multiple disciplines have made major advances relevant to a wide range of agricultural system model applications at various spatial and temporal scales. Although current agricultural systems models have features that are needed for the Use Cases, we found that all of them have limitations and need to be improved. We identified common limitations across all Use Cases, namely 1) a scarcity of data for developing, evaluating, and applying agricultural system models and 2) inadequate knowledge systems that effectively communicate model results to society. We argue that these limitations are greater obstacles to progress than gaps in conceptual theory or available methods for using system models. New initiatives on open data show promise for addressing the data problem, but there also needs to be a cultural change among agricultural researchers to ensure that data for addressing the range of Use Cases are available for future model improvements and applications. We conclude that multiple platforms and multiple models are needed for model applications for different purposes. The Use Cases provide a useful framework for considering capabilities and limitations of existing models and data.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Uncertainty of Wheat Water Use: Simulated Patterns and Sensitivity to Temperature and CO2
- Author
-
Cammarano, Davide, Roetter, Reimund P, Asseng, Senthold, Ewert, Frank, Wallach, Daniel, Martre, Pierre, Hatfield, Jerry L, Jones, James W, Rosenzweig, Cynthia E, Ruane, Alex C, Boote, Kenneth J, Thorburn, Peter J, Kersebaum, Kurt Christian, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Angulo, Carlos, Basso, Bruno, Bertuzzi, Patrick, Biernath, Christian, Brisson, Nadine, Challinor, Andrew J, Doltra, Jordi, Gayler, Sebastian, Goldberg, Richie, Heng, Lee, and Steduto, Pasquale
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Projected global warming and population growth will reduce future water availability for agriculture. Thus, it is essential to increase the efficiency in using water to ensure crop productivity. Quantifying crop water use (WU; i.e. actual evapotranspiration) is a critical step towards this goal. Here, sixteen wheat simulation models were used to quantify sources of model uncertainty and to estimate the relative changes and variability between models for simulated WU, water use efficiency (WUE, WU per unit of grain dry mass produced), transpiration efficiency (Teff, transpiration per kg of unit of grain yield dry mass produced), grain yield, crop transpiration and soil evaporation at increased temperatures and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]). The greatest uncertainty in simulating water use, potential evapotranspiration, crop transpiration and soil evaporation was due to differences in how crop transpiration was modelled and accounted for 50 of the total variability among models. The simulation results for the sensitivity to temperature indicated that crop WU will decline with increasing temperature due to reduced growing seasons. The uncertainties in simulated crop WU, and in particularly due to uncertainties in simulating crop transpiration, were greater under conditions of increased temperatures and with high temperatures in combination with elevated atmospheric [CO2] concentrations. Hence the simulation of crop WU, and in particularly crop transpiration under higher temperature, needs to be improved and evaluated with field measurements before models can be used to simulate climate change impacts on future crop water demand.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Brief History of Agricultural Systems Modeling
- Author
-
Jones, James W, Antle, John M, Basso, Bruno O, Boote, Kenneth J, Conant, Richard T, Foster, Ian, Godfray, H. Charles J, Herrrero, Mario, Howitt, Richard E, Janssen, Sandor, Keating, Brian A, Munoz-Carpena, Rafael, Porter, Cheryl H, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, and Wheeler, Tim R
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Statistics And Probability ,Geosciences (General) - Abstract
Agricultural systems science generates knowledge that allows researchers to consider complex problems or take informed agricultural decisions. The rich history of this science exemplifies the diversity of systems and scales over which they operate and have been studied. Modeling, an essential tool in agricultural systems science, has been accomplished by scientists from a wide range of disciplines, who have contributed concepts and tools over more than six decades. As agricultural scientists now consider the next generation models, data, and knowledge products needed to meet the increasingly complex systems problems faced by society, it is important to take stock of this history and its lessons to ensure that we avoid re-invention and strive to consider all dimensions of associated challenges. To this end, we summarize here the history of agricultural systems modeling and identify lessons learned that can help guide the design and development of next generation of agricultural system tools and methods. A number of past events combined with overall technological progress in other fields have strongly contributed to the evolution of agricultural system modeling, including development of process-based bio-physical models of crops and livestock, statistical models based on historical observations, and economic optimization and simulation models at household and regional to global scales. Characteristics of agricultural systems models have varied widely depending on the systems involved, their scales, and the wide range of purposes that motivated their development and use by researchers in different disciplines. Recent trends in broader collaboration across institutions, across disciplines, and between the public and private sectors suggest that the stage is set for the major advances in agricultural systems science that are needed for the next generation of models, databases, knowledge products and decision support systems. The lessons from history should be considered to help avoid roadblocks and pitfalls as the community develops this next generation of agricultural systems models.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Spatial Sampling of Weather Data for Regional Crop Yield Simulations
- Author
-
Van Bussel, Lenny G. J, Ewert, Frank, Zhao, Gang, Hoffmann, Holger, Enders, Andreas, Wallach, Daniel, Asseng, Senthold, Baigorria, Guillermo A, Basso, Bruno, Biernath, Christian, Cammarano, Davide, Chryssanthacopoulos, James, Constantin, Julie, Elliott, Joshua, Glotter, Michael, Heinlein, Florian, Kersebaum, Kurt-Christian, Klein, Christian, Nendel, Claas, Priesack, Eckart, Raynal, Helene, Romero, Consuelo C, Roetter, Reimund P, Specka, Xenia, and Tao, Fulu
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Field-scale crop models are increasingly applied at spatio-temporal scales that range from regions to the globe and from decades up to 100 years. Sufficiently detailed data to capture the prevailing spatio-temporal heterogeneity in weather, soil, and management conditions as needed by crop models are rarely available. Effective sampling may overcome the problem of missing data but has rarely been investigated. In this study the effect of sampling weather data has been evaluated for simulating yields of winter wheat in a region in Germany over a 30-year period (1982-2011) using 12 process-based crop models. A stratified sampling was applied to compare the effect of different sizes of spatially sampled weather data (10, 30, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and full coverage of 34,078 sampling points) on simulated wheat yields. Stratified sampling was further compared with random sampling. Possible interactions between sample size and crop model were evaluated. The results showed differences in simulated yields among crop models but all models reproduced well the pattern of the stratification. Importantly, the regional mean of simulated yields based on full coverage could already be reproduced by a small sample of 10 points. This was also true for reproducing the temporal variability in simulated yields but more sampling points (about 100) were required to accurately reproduce spatial yield variability. The number of sampling points can be smaller when a stratified sampling is applied as compared to a random sampling. However, differences between crop models were observed including some interaction between the effect of sampling on simulated yields and the model used. We concluded that stratified sampling can considerably reduce the number of required simulations. But, differences between crop models must be considered as the choice for a specific model can have larger effects on simulated yields than the sampling strategy. Assessing the impact of sampling soil and crop management data for regional simulations of crop yields is still needed.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Town Hall
- Author
-
Ruane, Alex, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Kyle, Page, Basso, Bruno, Winter, Jonathan, and Asseng, Senthold
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
AgMIP (www.agmip.org) is an international community of climate, crop, livestock, economics, and IT experts working to further the development and application of multi-model, multi-scale, multi-disciplinary agricultural models that can inform policy and decision makers around the world. This meeting will engage the AGU community by providing a brief overview of AgMIP, in particular its new plans for a Coordinated Global and Regional Assessment of climate change impacts on agriculture and food security for AR6. This Town Hall will help identify opportunities for participants to become involved in AgMIP and its 30+ activities.
- Published
- 2015
14. Statistical Analysis of Large Simulated Yield Datasets for Studying Climate Effects
- Author
-
Makowski, David, Asseng, Senthold, Ewert, Frank, Bassu, Simona, Durand, Jean-Louis, Martre, Pierre, Adam, Myriam, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Angulo, Carlos, Baron, Chritian, Basso, Bruno, Bertuzzi, Patrick, Biemath, Christian, Boogaard, Hendrik, Boote, Kenneth J, Brisson, Nadine, Cammarano, Davide, Challinor, Andrew J, Conijn, Sjakk J. G, Corbeels, Marc, Deryng, Delphine, De Sanctis, Giacomo, Doltra, Jordi, Gayler, Sebastian, Goldberg, Richard A, Grassini, Patricio, Hatfield, Jerry L, Heng, Lee, Hoek, Steven, Hooker, Josh, Hunt, Tony L. A, Ingwersen, Joachim, Izaurralde, Cesar, Jongschaap, Raymond E. E, and Rosenzweig, Cynthia
- Subjects
Statistics And Probability ,Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Many studies have been carried out during the last decade to study the effect of climate change on crop yields and other key crop characteristics. In these studies, one or several crop models were used to simulate crop growth and development for different climate scenarios that correspond to different projections of atmospheric CO2 concentration, temperature, and rainfall changes (Semenov et al., 1996; Tubiello and Ewert, 2002; White et al., 2011). The Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP; Rosenzweig et al., 2013) builds on these studies with the goal of using an ensemble of multiple crop models in order to assess effects of climate change scenarios for several crops in contrasting environments. These studies generate large datasets, including thousands of simulated crop yield data. They include series of yield values obtained by combining several crop models with different climate scenarios that are defined by several climatic variables (temperature, CO2, rainfall, etc.). Such datasets potentially provide useful information on the possible effects of different climate change scenarios on crop yields. However, it is sometimes difficult to analyze these datasets and to summarize them in a useful way due to their structural complexity; simulated yield data can differ among contrasting climate scenarios, sites, and crop models. Another issue is that it is not straightforward to extrapolate the results obtained for the scenarios to alternative climate change scenarios not initially included in the simulation protocols. Additional dynamic crop model simulations for new climate change scenarios are an option but this approach is costly, especially when a large number of crop models are used to generate the simulated data, as in AgMIP. Statistical models have been used to analyze responses of measured yield data to climate variables in past studies (Lobell et al., 2011), but the use of a statistical model to analyze yields simulated by complex process-based crop models is a rather new idea. We demonstrate herewith that statistical methods can play an important role in analyzing simulated yield data sets obtained from the ensembles of process-based crop models. Formal statistical analysis is helpful to estimate the effects of different climatic variables on yield, and to describe the between-model variability of these effects.
- Published
- 2015
15. Multimodel Ensembles of Wheat Growth: Many Models are Better than One
- Author
-
Martre, Pierre, Wallach, Daniel, Asseng, Senthold, Ewert, Frank, Jones, James W, Rotter, Reimund P, Boote, Kenneth J, Ruane, Alexander C, Thorburn, Peter J, Cammarano, Davide, Hatfield, Jerry L, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Aggarwal, Pramod K, Angulo, Carlos, Basso, Bruno, Bertuzzi, Patrick, Biernath, Christian, Brisson, Nadine, Challinor, Andrew J, Doltra, Jordi, Gayler, Sebastian, Goldberg, Richie, Grant, Robert F, Heng, Lee, Hooker, Josh, Hunt, Leslie A, Ingwersen, Joachim, Izaurralde, Roberto C, Kersebaum, Kurt Christian, Kumar, Soora Naresh, Nendel, Claas, O'Leary, Garry, Olesen, Jorgen E, Osborne, Tom M, Palosuo, Taru, and Priesack, Eckart
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology ,Earth Resources And Remote Sensing - Abstract
Crop models of crop growth are increasingly used to quantify the impact of global changes due to climate or crop management. Therefore, accuracy of simulation results is a major concern. Studies with ensembles of crop model scan give valuable information about model accuracy and uncertainty, but such studies are difficult to organize and have only recently begun. We report on the largest ensemble study to date, of 27 wheat models tested in four contrasting locations for their accuracy in simulating multiple crop growth and yield variables. The relative error averaged over models was 2438 for the different end-of-season variables including grain yield (GY) and grain protein concentration (GPC). There was little relation between error of a model for GY or GPC and error for in-season variables. Thus, most models did not arrive at accurate simulations of GY and GPC by accurately simulating preceding growth dynamics. Ensemble simulations, taking either the mean (e-mean) or median (e-median) of simulated values, gave better estimates than any individual model when all variables were considered. Compared to individual models, e-median ranked first in simulating measured GY and third in GPC. The error of e-mean and e-median declined with an increasing number of ensemble members, with little decrease beyond 10 models. We conclude that multimodel ensembles can be used to create new estimators with improved accuracy and consistency in simulating growth dynamics. We argue that these results are applicable to other crop species, and hypothesize that they apply more generally to ecological system models.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. How Do Various Maize Crop Models Vary in Their Responses to Climate Change Factors?
- Author
-
Bassu, Simona, Brisson, Nadine, Grassini, Patricio, Durand, Jean-Louis, Boote, Kenneth, Lizaso, Jon, Jones, James W, Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Ruane, Alex C, Adam, Myriam, Baron, Christian, Basso, Bruno, Biernath, Christian, Boogaard, Hendrik, Conijn, Sjaak, Corbeels, Marc, Deryng, Delphine, DeSanctis, Giacomo, Gayler, Sebastian, Hatfield, Jerry, Hoek, Steven, Izaurralde, Cesar, Jongschaap, Raymond, Kemanian, Armen R, and Kersebaum, K. Christian
- Subjects
Meteorology And Climatology - Abstract
Potential consequences of climate change on crop production can be studied using mechanistic crop simulation models. While a broad variety of maize simulation models exist, it is not known whether different models diverge on grain yield responses to changes in climatic factors, or whether they agree in their general trends related to phenology, growth, and yield. With the goal of analyzing the sensitivity of simulated yields to changes in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations [CO2], we present the largest maize crop model intercomparison to date, including 23 different models. These models were evaluated for four locations representing a wide range of maize production conditions in the world: Lusignan (France), Ames (USA), Rio Verde (Brazil) and Morogoro (Tanzania). While individual models differed considerably in absolute yield simulation at the four sites, an ensemble of a minimum number of models was able to simulate absolute yields accurately at the four sites even with low data for calibration, thus suggesting that using an ensemble of models has merit. Temperature increase had strong negative influence on modeled yield response of roughly -0.5 Mg ha(sup 1) per degC. Doubling [CO2] from 360 to 720 lmol mol 1 increased grain yield by 7.5% on average across models and the sites. That would therefore make temperature the main factor altering maize yields at the end of this century. Furthermore, there was a large uncertainty in the yield response to [CO2] among models. Model responses to temperature and [CO2] did not differ whether models were simulated with low calibration information or, simulated with high level of calibration information.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Addressing Challenges for Mapping Irrigated Fields in Subhumid Temperate Regions by Integrating Remote Sensing and Hydroclimatic Data.
- Author
-
Tianfang Xu, Deines, Jillian M., Kendall, Anthony D., Basso, Bruno, and Hyndman, David W.
- Subjects
REMOTE sensing ,IRRIGATION ,CORN ,SOYBEAN ,MACHINE learning ,RANDOM forest algorithms - Abstract
High-resolution mapping of irrigated fields is needed to better estimate water and nutrient fluxes in the landscape, food production, and local to regional climate. However, this remains a challenge in humid to subhumid regions, where irrigation has been expanding into what was largely rainfed agriculture due to trends in climate, crop prices, technologies and practices. One such region is southwestern Michigan, USA, where groundwater is the main source of irrigation water for row crops (primarily corn and soybeans). Remote sensing of irrigated areas can be difficult in these regions as rainfed areas have similar characteristics. We present methods to address this challenge and enhance the contrast between neighboring rainfed and irrigated areas, including weather-sensitive scene selection, applying recently developed composite indices and calculating spatial anomalies. We create annual, 30m-resolution maps of irrigated corn and soybeans for southwestern Michigan from 2001 to 2016 using a machine learning method (random forest). The irrigation maps reasonably capture the spatial and temporal pattern of irrigation, with accuracies that exceed available products. Analysis of the irrigation maps showed that the irrigated area in southwestern Michigan tripled in the last 16 years. We also discuss the remaining challenges for irrigation mapping in humid to subhumid areas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.