Search

The spectrum of cosmogenic neutrons at Earth's surface covers a wide energy range, from thermal to several GeV. The flux of secondary neutrons varies with latitude, elevation, solar activity, and nearby material, including ground moisture. We report the results from a campaign to measure count rates in neutron detectors responding to three different energy ranges conducted near the geomagnetic North Pole at CFS Alert, Nunavut, Canada (82.5 degrees , 62.5 degrees W; vertical geomagnetic cutoff rigidity, RC = 0 GV) in June of 2016. In November 2016, we performed a follow-on measurement campaign in southern Canada at similar RC (1.5 GV) and elevations. We conducted these measurements, at varying elevation and ground moisture content, with unmoderated and moderated 3He detectors for thermal and epithermal-to-MeV sensitivity, and with EJ-299-33 pulse shape discrimination plastic scintillator detectors for fast neutrons. Background gamma rays were monitored with NaI(Tl) detectors. Using these data sets, we compared the measured count rates to a predictive model. This is the first ever data set taken from this location on Earth. We find that for the thermal and epithermal-to-MeV neutron measurements the predictive model and data are in good agreement, except at one location on rock-covered ground near 1 km elevation. The discrepancy at that location may be attributable to ground moisture variability. Other measurements, during this campaign and prior, support the assertion that ground moisture plays a critical role in determining neutron flux., Comment: 28 pages, 9 figures

The SiPM-based Compton Telescope for Safety and Security (SCoTSS) has been developed with inorganic crystalline scintillator material for gamma detection. The instrument is sensitive enough to be used in a mobile survey mode, accumulating energy deposited in any crystal second-by-second and tagging these spectra with GPS position. The SCoTSS imager of course has the additional advantage of being able to produce an image of the radioactive objects in its field of view using events that satisfy a coincidence trigger between the scatter and absorber layers. The Advanced Radiation Detector for UAV Operations (ARDUO) on the other hand, is a non-imaging directional detector intended for use aboard a small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The ARDUO detector features exactly the same volume of CsI(Tl) as is used in the absorber layer of a single SCoTSS module, giving it similar detection and alarming sensitivity, and map-making capability. However, in the ARDUO detector, the crystals are arranged closely together to optimize direction determination from self-shielding effects. Flown in a grid pattern with a UAV over an area of extended contamination, the ARDUO detector is also capable of making a map or image of that area. With its close-packed crystal arrangement, the ARDUO detector makes a poor Compton imager but does have some ability to produce a peripheral image in a fly-by. In this presentation we investigate the relative merits of Compton imaging versus mobile directional detection., Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, To appear in the proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC)