Search

The question of Canadian national identity has long vexed both scholars of Canada and the nation's broader public. Supplementing this growing attention to Canadian militarism, Helene Vosters' I Unbecoming Nationalism: From Commemoration to Redress in Canada i examines "the precariously thin lines between reverential military commemoration, celebratory cultural nationalism, and white settler-colonial nationalism" (7). At the same time that Vosters celebrates the effective challenge to Canadian settler-colonial nationalism, she laments that a similar effort has not materialized in the effort to reject Canadian militarism. [Extracted from the article]

This article reviews three recent books on nationalism, each focusing on a different aspect of this multifaceted phenomenon. Mylonas and Radnitz's volume explores the relationships between nationalism and the politics of treason, Hadžidedic's book zooms in on the historical interdependence of capitalism and nationalism, while Maxwell's historical monograph explores nationalist habitus as a form of lived experience. These three insightful contributions show the diversity and plasticity of nationalist ideology and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stefano Bianchini's comprehensive work Liquid Nationalism focuses on the frequent redrawing of state borders, especially in Eastern Europe, the fluidity of the contours of nations, and the vagaries and idiosyncratic nature of political changes in the European continent from the 19th to the 21st centuries. The title of this work takes its inspiration from Zygmunt Bauman's famous work, Liquid Modernity (2000). Bauman's work, which was published in 2000 in the aftermath of the dissolution of the Soviet Union and also Yugoslavia that resulted in the Balkan wars of the 1990s, first posits the obvious – that fluids cannot hold their shape as solids do because the structural arrangements of solids, unlike liquids, bind their atoms together. Bauman characterizes solidity as having hardened contours and belonging to a pre-modernity with its unchanging or slowly changing social, political, and economic mores. Modernity, on the other hand, is likened to liquids in that, like time, there is a fluidity and a fast-moving quality associated with it brought about by the European Enlightenment and the development of democracy and capitalism. As he states, "When describing solids, one may ignore time altogether; in describing fluids, to leave time out of account would be a grievous mistake. Descriptions of fluids are all snapshots, and they need a date at the bottom of the picture" (2). The lightness of touch, the quickness of response to changing times that liquid modernity promised, he points out, has resulted in postmodernity or late capitalism as "deregulation, liberalization, 'flexibilization', increased fluidity, unbridling the financial, real estate and labor markets, easing the tax burden, etc." (5). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Liquid Nationalism and State Partitions in Europe is Stefano Bianchini's magnum opus , reflecting a lifetime of working on the issues of ethno-nationalism in Europe, from Southeast Europe through Central Europe and the former Soviet space to all of western Europe. It is more than a book; it is an entire seminar, ranging not only geographically but also historically, from the Enlightenment to the second decade of the 21st century. Simply a list of the gems I learned would usurp all the space I have been given for this essay and much more. I choose to focus on one small part, what I take to be the primary motivation behind this book, namely his anguish over the lessons for western Europe "not learned from the dismemberment of Yugoslavia" (the title of Chapter 10), a case he knows so well. That chapter then begins with a quotation from another specialist on Yugoslavia, Jacques Rupnik, in Le Monde in 2014, "the greatest obstacle to the Europeanization of the Balkans is the Balkanization of Europe" (185). Nor are Bianchini and Rupnik alone in this concern. Already in 2012, Ivan Krastev convened two parallel seminars at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna on what he called, "The Logics of Disintegration" – of the Soviet case (Part I) and the Habsburg and Yugoslav cases (Part II) and their lessons for the European Union. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Offering several intriguing and entertaining case studies written in a light style, I Everyday Nationalism in Hungary (1789-1867) i is clearly an excellent contribution to the history of everyday nationalism with notable methodological results in matters of nationalism studies. Alexander Maxwell's book on everyday nationalism in Hungary grew out of well-researched papers and his continuous interest in nineteenth-century nation-building across Europe. Even though Maxwell wishes to avoid a teleological and progressive narrative of Hungarian everyday nationalism, there is obviously a substantial difference between the period before and after the 1840s in how banal nationalism is created, circulated, interpreted, and experienced in Hungary. It is revealing that neither Leerssen nor even the monograph of his Brill series on Hungarian operatic nationalism by Krisztina Lajosi ( I Opera and Nationalism in nineteenth Century Hungary i ) receives any reference in Maxwell's - otherwise very well-informed - book. [Extracted from the article]

Drawing on a long career of research into the history of nationalism and ethnic politics in Europe, Stefano Bianchini has written an erudite book on how the nationality factor affects European politics – state formation and state partition in particular. He presents a wide-ranging survey over la longue durée, and also argues a case: that state partitioning should be avoided whenever possible, as it creates many more problems than it solves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Grounded Nationalisms: A Sociological Analysis has become an instant classic in nationalism studies. In just over 300 pages, Siniša Malešević, one of the world's leading nationalism scholars, has constructed a rich treatise on some of the central questions of our day: How should we think about nationalism? What is the future of nationalism? And what accounts for the ubiquity of national identities and national identification long after the so-called Age of Nationalism ended? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Siniša Malešević's Grounded Nationalisms asks: "Why has nationalism proved to be such a potent, protean, and durable force in the modern age? Why has the nation-state established itself as the central organizing mode of social and political life in the last two hundred years? Why is nationalism still the dominant form of collective subjectivity?" (8) The author draws from several disciplines to tackle these questions, including sociology, political science, history, psychology, demography, and anthropology. In a nutshell, he finds the answer rests in the historical origins and organizational, ideological, and micro-interactional dynamics of nationalist ideologies that evolve and adapt over time. This book is an instant classic of historical sociology arguing that nationalism is the dominant form of modern subjectivity and unlikely to be replaced or shaken by globalization or neoliberalism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Grounded Nationalisms , as its name suggests, provides a rich historical and sociological account concerning the paradoxical persistence of nationalism. What motivates Malešević to write this book is precisely such a paradox, presenting nationalism as an ideologically bereft, anomalous, and exceptional political and social force, and evidence that suggests the contrary. As Malešević argues, "rather than being a historical abnormality and a temporary irritation," nationalism has continued as "the dominant form of modern subjectivity" because it is a cross-cutting "social practice embedded in the everyday life of modern societies" (2019, 3–4). In other words, Malešević's rich historical and sociological perspective provides the evidentiary and analytical flesh to see nationalism as "a super-thick ideology, a meta-ideological doctrine, which penetrates daily interactions of human beings and as such also shapes how modern individuals see and act in their social world" (4). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper examines Im Sun-deuk's two short stories, "Iryoil" (Sunday, 1937) and "Nazuke oya" (A Godmother, 1942). Im, an active participant in Korea's socialist movement in the 1930s, turned to literature as her career at a time when Japanese colonial authorities had tightened their control over Korea to further the Japanese empire's colonial expansion into China. In the process, the Japanese implemented an assimilation policy to mobilize the Korean people into the Japanese war effort. By employing the concept of confession in "Iryoil'' and "Nazuke oya," Im projects an autobiographical self onto her protagonists, both of whom are modern women striving to preserve their identities as socially conscious intellectuals committed to nationalism, socialism, and feminism. By positioning her protagonists as confessors to other characters in the texts, Im's short stories portray intellectuals in colonial Korea as in conflict or harmony with her protagonists. Im's protagonists embody female subjects who find a new kind of womanhood under Japanese colonial rule. However, in "Nazuke oya," Im's protagonist displays a more flexible and open attitude toward Koreans with attitudes and beliefs different from her own. In this sense, the act of confession as presented in Im's texts is an attempt to build a bond and sense of community among the Korean people from a woman's perspective, and at a time when Korean identity risked becoming obsolete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]