Thanks to that, the book should be comprehensible to all readers interested in either Patocka or theology, or both; there is no need for any previous knowledge of either Patocka or the theological turn in contemporary philosophy. Subsequently, he explores Patocka's critique of metaphysics by developing a theological reading of Patocka's famous essay "Negative Platonism": Patocka overcomes onto-theology, yet his approach is neither non-metaphysical nor anti-metaphysical. Shortly put, regarding the contribution of Patocka to theology, I would appreciate a more elaborate discussion of what might be I lacking i , both factually and methodically, in a theology inspired by Patocka. [Extracted from the article]