Search

The Biden administration has introduced a two-part initiative to address the presence of PFAS chemicals in drinking water. The first part involves implementing a national drinking water standard for PFAS, which will require public water systems to monitor and reduce levels of these chemicals. The second part provides nearly $1 billion in funding for states and territories to detect and treat PFAS contamination. While environmental groups and some lawmakers support these measures, water organizations and critics have expressed concerns about the cost and potential lawsuits. The new standard sets limits for five types of PFAS, including PFOA and PFOS, and aims to protect millions of people from PFAS exposure. [Extracted from the article]

The article focuses on the regulatory actions that damage biosolids recycling programs and composting facilities are triggered by fears and uncertainties about Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). It refers to Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) as the most common and most toxic PFAS.

The article offers news briefs on environmental remediation plans of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS).It discusses how notoriously challenging it is to eliminate these chemicals and how they have been associated with different diseases. It presents comments from wastewater utilities and construction group advocates on how the action might put them in a worse liability situation.

The article discusses regulations restricting concentrations of compounds like PFOA and PFOS in biosolids and compost. It mentions that several states are attempting to set their own limits in the absence of more clarity on a federal level. It refers to the association of PFOS and PFOA with low birth weight, certain types of cancers and other illnesses.

The article offers information on topics related to perfluorinated alkyl acid, a man-made fluorochemicals. Topics mentioned include the use of perfluorinated alkyl acid in the manufacture of several products including textiles, coating additives, and cleaning products, its quality that resist environmental degradation, and the effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) in human health and environment.

The article discusses findings of a study on the solid-phase extraction system of a perfluoralkylated substance (PFC) in water and its adverse effects in the environment. The study explores the effects of PFC in human health due to chemicals of perfluorooctane sulphonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) as possible contaminants. The study also cites the effectiveness of FMS TurboTrace PFC SPE system equipment for analysis of PFC.

The article discusses the actions taken by the Chinese government in the production and management of perfluorooctane sulfonates (PFOS) in the country. It states that a majority of enterprises are still focusing more on the economic benefits and ignore the effects of PFOS. It cites that the government is investigating the issue on PFOS in terms of environmental protection. However, the country lacks mature testing methods in identifying PFOS content in products.