Search

Three federal appellate courts have reached different conclusions on the appropriate level of review for laws that prohibit gender-affirming care for transgender minors. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit applied a rational basis review and upheld bans in Alabama and Tennessee, respectively. However, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit applied intermediate scrutiny and affirmed an injunction against an Arkansas law. The Eighth Circuit's decision was supported by leaders of the ABA Litigation Section, who criticized the other appellate decisions. The cases involve laws that criminalize the prescription of drugs to transgender minors, with some states citing concerns about long-term consequences and lack of medical studies. The plaintiffs argue that the laws infringe on their constitutional rights, particularly under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Eighth Circuit found that the Arkansas law failed to pass intermediate scrutiny and violated the Equal Protection Clause, while the Sixth and Eleventh Circuits held that the laws were rationally related to the states' legitimate interest in protecting minors' safety and did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. The courts also disagreed on whether transgender people constitute a suspect class and whether the laws violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The decisions highlight the importance of the level of scrutiny applied and the differing perspectives on parental rights and the First Amendment. [Extracted from the article]

A federal appellate court recently issued a decision in Arkansas State Conference NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment that has significant implications for voting rights. The court dismissed a challenge to state legislative district maps brought by private plaintiffs under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, ruling that only the U.S. attorney general has the authority to enforce the law. This decision diverges from the interpretation of other courts and highlights the need for lawyers to adapt to changing judicial trends. The dissenting opinion in this case, as well as decisions from other circuits, argue for the existence of a private right of action under Section 2. This ruling serves as a reminder for lawyers to thoroughly research and consider the current state of the law when presenting their cases. [Extracted from the article]

A coalition of Black publishers, booksellers, and distributors is advocating for a posthumous pardon for Marcus Mosiah Garvey, a prominent Black figure who fought for Pan-African unity and independence. Garvey was wrongly charged by the U.S. government and imprisoned in 1923. The coalition is collecting signatures for a petition to secure a presidential pardon for Garvey, and while the outcome is uncertain, the collaboration among the publishing sectors is significant and may pave the way for future joint efforts against racism and injustice. The article also addresses the lack of diversity and anti-Black racism in the publishing industry, acknowledging recent efforts to address these issues and the role of organizations like People of Color in Publishing and LatinX in Publishing in challenging the status quo. The author expresses optimism that the current momentum will bring about lasting change in the industry. [Extracted from the article]

Silver: 1964 Agency Brooklyn-based 1964 Agency helps big brands with multicultural storytelling Brooklyn-based 1964 Agency, which takes its name from the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is helping big brands connect with diverse audiences by amplifying multicultural and LGBTQ+ stories. PR Gold: Boden Boden boosted Hispanic visibility for PepsiCo and McDonald's Miami-based communications shop Boden - founded in 2008 by Honduran immigrant Natalie Boden - lives by the mantra of "atrevidos", which means bold or daring in Spanish. Boden also helped organize philanthropic programs in Phoenix around the 2023 Super Bowl that included Latino actor, producer and activist Wilmer Valderrama - surprising two local small business owners with $10,000 checks. [Extracted from the article]

The court then cited dicta for theproposition that Rule 41(b) permits dismissal "not only onmotion of the defendant, but also on the court's own motion." CIVIL PROCEDURE UPDATE An attorney's failure to comply with local rules is nota considered rationale for a court's sua sponte dismissalof the case pursuant to Federal Rule of CivilProcedure 41(b), according to the U.S. Court ofAppeals for the Fifth Circuit. Answering inthe affirmative, the court distinguished Berry v. CIGNA/RSI-CIGNA, in which that plaintiff's counsel failed to complywith a local rule that required a plaintiff to move for adefault judgment. [Extracted from the article]

Abortion The Court voted 5-4 not to impede SB 8, a Texas law considered the nation's most restrictive anti-abortion measure. LITIGATION NEWS ASSOCIATE EDITOR U.S. SUPREME COURT Second Amendment The Court will consider whether a state gun law violates the Second Amendment by restricting licensure for carrying concealed firearms outside the home. STATES North Carolina -- Voting Rights A North Carolina state court, in a 2-1 vote, has blocked SB 824, which requires photo identification to vote. [Extracted from the article]

AND MORE U.S. SUPREME COURT/ JUDICIARY First Amendment Clause In prior rulings, the Court held the ministerial exception under the religion clauses of the First Amendment forecloses the adjudication of employment discrimination claims of Catholic school teachers. LGBTQ & Workplace Rights In a 6-3 ruling, the Court ruled federal civil rights laws provide LGBTQ employees nationwide protection from workplace discrimination. + Funded Trading Accounts Are Security-Based Swaps Requiring Registration + DOJ to Bain: Turn Over the Documents!. [Extracted from the article]

The article reports that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Winfield Rubber Manufacturing Co. for dismissing manager, as he terminated a sexual harasser in the U.S. It mentions that the company violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It mentions that the retaliation claims can be added to cases related to sexual harassment or race discrimination.

The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled on June 17, 2020 blocking the government's effort to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program which provides immigration status for the nearly 700,000 Dreamers brought to the U.S. as children.

The article focuses on the working of federal court reagrding administrative resolution. It mentions the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit court case Arrigo v. Link reagrding first impression in that jurisdiction. It mentions the use of Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Americans with Disabilities Act and Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The article focuses on sexual harassment in the workplace. Topics discussed include cases of sexual harassment being highlighted in media involving high profile personalities, sexual harassment prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and need for interactive training for employees and supervisors for preventing sexual harassment.

The article discusses how the strategic enforcement plan of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is aiming to mold the legal landscape in the future. Topics discussed include two lawsuits filed by the EEOC on September 25, 2014 to protect transgender workers under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the concept of gender-based stereotyping, and financial incentive for participation being offered by employee wellness programs.

The offers information on the rates for the advertisements to be published in the periodical. It mentions the closing dates for the classified advertisement, information about the rates of the display advertisement and conditions for the recruitment advertisement. Also mentioned is the important notices about the employment practices of American Chemical Society (ACS) and on the laws against discrimination the such as the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits discrimination in employment.

In this article, the author reflects on the importance of the Civil Rights Movement for the development of Atlanta, Georgia. Topics discussed include the Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial in Washington, D.C. and contributions made by congressman John Lewis. Other topics discussed include the passage of the U.S. Civil Rights Act and the need to improve surroundings of Auburn Avenue in Atlanta.