Search

This paper addressed the regional and international reasons that prompted Saudi Arabia and Iran to engage in an agreement (Beijing: 10/3/2023). The research derives its importance from the fact that it deals with a topic of great importance and exceptionality, and has a great impact, whether at the level of the region or the world. The historical and analytical approaches were used to address the research problem: What are the regional and international reasons that prompted Saudi Arabia and Iran to engage in the (Beijing) agreement? The study is presented in two parts: the first dealt with the regional causes and the with the international causes. In addition to an introduction, conclusion and recommendations. Among the most prominent search results: -The failure of the Saudi-led military coalition in Yemen since 2015 AD; One of the most important reasons for its rapprochement with Iran. Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman's economic vision 2030 AD; I made him work to zero Saudi Arabia's problems in the region. - Continuing Western-economic sanctions on Iran, and popular discontent with the deterioration of living conditions; They made it converge with Saudi Arabia. -America's military withdrawal from the Middle East region and its indifference to Saudi Arabia's demands; pushed it to an agreement with Iran. -China's sponsorship of the consultations; As a superpower, it had a major role in Saudi Arabia and Iran reaching the agreement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The justice law in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is witnessing development in all legislative and procedural fields. This is confirmed by the issuance of the legal evidence Law, which was included in the legal pleadings Law and the commercial court law. It is independent of a new law that shows differences that demonstrates the Saudi regulator-keeping pace with the developments of the time while preserving the spirit of Sharia, and this research is the core in showing some of the advantages of the new legal evidence law. Experience is one of the means used in the legal evidence law, and its distinction in the new law has been shown by many differences that this research demonstrates. It aims to show the Saudi judicial development and to show the differences in experience between the law of legal pleadings and the law of evidence, in which the comparative analytical inductive approach was taken. It concluded with several results, including: the emergence of the judicial development in Saudi laws and keeping pace with the development in many cases, and reached many differences in experience between the pleadings and evidence law, including that if the opponent does not deposit the amount determined for expertise, the court decides to stop the case, or forfeit his right to The decision to delegate, as well as setting a period of five days for warning the expert after it was only three days, Likewise, if the court does not take into account the expert’s report due to his negligence or error, it orders the return of all or some of what he received, as the case may be, and sets the deadline for returning papers from the expert to ten days. It decides to request the expert’s opinion in writing, and the court determines the date of the session and the method for presenting the opinion, and if the court decides to seek the expert’s opinion in a similar case, it has the right to do so. It was recommended to carry out a number of research projects and fundamental studies of the Evidence Law, assign a number of specialists to show the bright side of these laws, and for universities to adopt draft laws that were not issued. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]