Search

This article focuses on the so-called 'Eunomian interpolation' contained in Pseudoclementine Recognitions (= R III 2- 11). A comparative analysis of the Syriac and Latin translations of the lost Greek text will suggest that the Syriac translator (or the author of his Greek Vorlage) tampered with the interpolation, neutralizing its radically subordinationist theological agenda and bringing its contents in line with a broadly Homoiousian perspective. After assessing the ways in which scholarship has dealt with the connections between Heteroousianism ('Eunomianism') and 'Jewish Christianity' emerging in R III 2-11 and other late ancient texts, this paper will use the rich reception history of this section to suggest that fourth-century Trinitarian debates in the Syrian region are to be set against the discursive and institutional backdrop of a Christian-Jewish continuum. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper questions the traditional view which sees a threefold pattern in Clement's literary activity, namely the sequence of Protrepticus, Paedagogus and Stromata (or a different projected but not realized work). A close analysis of Paed. I.1 and a general overview of Clement's remaining writings allow us to individuate two literary domains within his work; on the one hand, rhetorically shaped writings as the Protrepticus, the Paedagogus and the Quis dives salvetur address a large audience, Christian or Heathen, making use of contemporary epideictic style and of mere literal exegesis; on the other hand, writings coming from Clement's teaching activity, as the Stromata, the Eclogae propheticae and the Excerpta ex Theodoto deal with doctrinal issues by means of intellectual speculation and allegorical hermeneutics. In this way it is also possible to contextualize better Clement's literary effort: it aimed to build a complex and multifaceted presentation of Christianity, that could unify the different ways in which Christian tradition was displayed in his days' Alexandria, ranging from radical Jewish Christian communities to elitist and purely intellectual Gnostic teachers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]