Search

Error characterisation of satellite-retrieved soil moisture (SM) is crucial for maximizing their utility in research and applications in hydro-meteorology and climatology. It can provide insights for retrieval development and validation, and inform suitable strategies for data fusion and assimilation. Su et al. (2013a) proposed a potential Fourier method for quantifying the errors based on the difference between the empirical power spectra of these SM data and a water balance model via spectral fitting (SF), circumventing the need for any ancillary data. This work first evaluates its utility by estimating the errors in two passive and active microwave satellite SM over Australia, and comparing the results against the triple collocation (TC) estimator. The SF estimator shows very good agreement with TC in terms of error standard deviation and signal-to-noise ratio, with strong linear correlations of 0.80–0.92 but with lower error estimates. As the two estimators are not strictly comparable, their strong agreement suggests a strong complementarity between time-domain and frequency-domain analyses of errors. A better understanding of the spectral characteristics of the error is still needed to understand their differences. Next, spatial analyses of the derived (SF and TC) error maps, in terms of error standard deviation and noise-to-signal ratio, for the two satellite data are performed with principal component analysis to identify influence of vegetation/leaf-area index (LAI), rainfall, soil wetness, and spatial heterogeneity in topography and soil type on retrieval errors. Lastly, seasonal analysis of the errors discovers systematic temporal variability in errors due to variability in rainfall amount, and less so with changing LAI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Knowledge about spatiotemporal error characteristics of remotely sensed soil moisture (SM) products is essential for correctly interpreting observational information and optimally assimilating them into hydrological models. This work aims to (i) investigate the relative difference between time-invariant and time-variant daily SM errors of Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) products and (ii) analyze correlation of the daily SM errors with surface biomass quantified by the Leaf Area Index (LAI) and rainfall. The time-invariant error denotes an aggregate error magnitude during the whole investigation period and the time-variant error at daily time scale also refers to an aggregate error magnitude but for the period of the 100-day time window centered at the day to be processed. The time-invariant and daily SM errors are estimated using the Triple Collocation Analysis (TCA) applied to ASCAT and SMAP SM retrievals along with the Global Land Data Assimilation System version 2.1 (GLDAS2) SM product for the period of April 2015 – January 2020. Results indicate the relative difference between time-invariant and time-variant daily errors is notable for both ASCAT and SMAP SM products. The relative difference in units percentage denotes the ratio of difference value between time-invariant and daily errors to time-invariant error itself. The daily TCA error fluctuated at 43% value from time-invariant error for ASCAT SM and at 47% value for SMAP SM on a global average. When averaged globally, temporal mean of time-variant daily errors was relatively smaller than time-invariant error by -27% for ASCAT SM and -18% for SMAP SM, respectively. In tropical areas, the relative difference between time-invariant and daily errors is large during the dry season and becomes small when rainy season comes. When the peak lagged correlation is used, daily errors exhibit a stronger correlation with rainfall than they do with LAI in 61% of landmass pixels for ASCAT SM and 66% of landmass pixels for SMAP SM. LAI cannot be used to predict temporal variability of time-variant SM errors in barren land. Lagged correlation analysis reveals rainfall peak coincides with SM error peak in areas featured with low vegetation cover, including barren land, grasslands, and open shrublands. By contrast, the LAI peak comes after the SM error peak in all cases. Savannas and woody savannas are a special case as SM error peak comes first, followed by rainfall then LAI peaks. In summary, ASCAT and SMAP time-variant error varies with a large deviation from time-invariant errors and its temporal variation shows a stronger association with rainfall than changing LAI. • Time-variant daily error is globally evaluated for ASCAT and SMAP soil moisture. • Lag correlation analysis for daily soil moisture error, LAI, and rainfall. • Rainfall better explains temporal variability of soil moisture errors than LAI. • Soil moisture error peak comes before rainfall and LAI peaks in savannas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Soil moisture is one of the essential climate variables for the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) that has been prioritized by the ESA's Climate Change Initiative to construct its homogeneous long-term climate record. This requires a consistent characterization of the error structures in the individual data sets, which vary due to changes in instrument configuration and calibration, and retrieval algorithm design. In this paper, the random error and systematic differences in nine passive and active microwave satellite soil moisture products over Australia (time coverage: 1978–present) are estimated in a same manner for SM components at subseasonal and seasonal-to-interannual timescales separately. The multi-scale error structures are found to be non-trivial and vary between the products, giving cause for conducting multi-scale merging with awareness of these differences. Noticeable similarities between the error structures of the satellite products derived from same retrieval algorithm and same measuring frequency however suggest transferability of error parameters between them. Using partial rank correlation analysis, the error maps are linked to statistics on vegetation index, digital elevation, soil moisture and soil temperature, and land cover fractions and mixing in order to explain the observed variability and the similarities between the products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]