Search

Emergency decision-making is vital for nations or communities because it increases emergency management's effectiveness and legitimacy, which in turn greatly minimizes environmental damage, fatalities, and economic loss. The evaluation of emergency judgements must take into account significant inaccuracy, fuzzyness, and ambiguity. While high risk and uncertainty are frequently characteristics of emergency decision-making (EDM) circumstances. The current EDM methodologies do not take into account the psychological behavior of the decision makers in addition to the various emergency situations and the various responses. In this paper, we presented a new method based on a Complex Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Soft Set (CPHFSS) as represented by membership in 2-D with hesitant probability. The idea that is being put forth captures the ambiguity and takes into account emergency situations while also taking into account the psychological state of the decision-makers involved in the EDM procedure. The introduction of a new score function for the CPHFSS serves as the second objective of this paper, which is to address a number of comparability issues. We examine a novel family of hybrid operators for CPHFSS that utilize numerous independent variables as a solution to these unforeseen issues. The group decision-making strategy and EDAS technique are then suggested employing these operators. Later, an emergency decision-making situation involving a major fire in China is used to demonstrate the validity of the algorithms. • Concept of complex probabilistic hesitant fuzzy soft set is presented. • Introduce a new score function for the CPHFSS. • Group decision-making strategy and EDAS technique presented. • Emergency decision-making problems discussed in the study. • Case study related to industrial disaster emergency decision-making discuss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Develop a complete problem-solving approach for group decision making. • Orient complex large-scale groups and time-sensitive emergency decision scenarios. • Design a feasible mechanism of group consensus strategies under time pressure. • Propose feedback recommendation strategies with a subgroup identification method. • A real case study of China's fight against the COVID-19 epidemic. Group Decision Making (GDM) has been well studied in the last two decades. Yet, two challenges exist: (a) how to resolve large-scale groups in GDM and achieve the consensus of preferences and (b) how to conduct GDM under risk and emergency conditions. In this paper, we develop a complete problem-solving approach for GDM that orients twofold settings of the complex large-scale group and the time-sensitive emergency decision scenarios. The crux of the matter is to design a feasible mechanism of group consensus strategies in the environment of time pressure and natural language preferences. To solve this problem, we propose a closed-loop mechanism of feedback recommendation strategies accompanied with a new subgroup identification method. This mechanism is underlain by a fourfold decomposition of complex large-scale groups, which entails multiple thresholds of group consensus, group hesitation, and time-related iteration of loops. Our mechanism and the whole GDM approach thoroughly orient the most intuitive representation of preferences - human natural language, which can be elicited and quantitatively formulated in probability linguistic preference systems. We illustrate the proposed approach through a real case study of China's fight against the COVID-19 epidemic. We verify that our mechanism can perfectly tradeoff between the effectiveness and the efficiency of complex large-scale GDM under risk and emergency. The results of this research provide proposals for mechanisms on large-scale GDM and are expected to contribute to emergency management such as epidemic controls, anti-terrorism, and other man-made or natural hazards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]