Search

• Research is needed on the effectiveness of telehealth group interventions • We evaluated a telehealth adaptation of group CBT for social anxiety disorder • The adapted intervention was acceptable to participants • Group members were highly engaged and satisfied with treatment • Group members reported decreases in social anxiety and associated symptoms In light of the growing interest in, and need for, the telehealth delivery of health care, additional research is needed on the acceptability and effectiveness of these types of interventions. This study examined the acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness of an adapted telehealth-delivered group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention for adults with social anxiety disorder (SAD). This report describes the adaptation and subsequent implementation of an 8-week telehealth-delivered group treatment designed to reduce symptoms of SAD. Specific adaptations for delivering treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent enactment of social distancing measures are discussed. Posttreatment data indicated that the intervention was feasible to implement in an outpatient mental health clinic, acceptable to participants, and associated with reduction in symptoms of social anxiety, general anxiety, depression, and stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Yoga-based practices, derived from ancient Eastern mind-body practices, have grown in popularity in the West over the past several decades. Increasing evidence supports the antidepressant effects of yoga-based interventions (YBIs). However, despite yoga's promise as a potential treatment for depression, the literature to date is marked by substantial methodological limitations, which remain a barrier to the integration of YBIs into conventional clinical care. We highlight five key areas of study that need further investigation to fill crucial gaps in the literature-base to advance yoga research and yoga's potential as an effective evidence-based treatment for depression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Yoga interventions offer promise for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), yet their safety and potential impact on suicidal ideation (SI) have not been well documented. This study evaluated the safety of a randomized controlled dose-finding trial of Iyengar yoga plus coherent breathing for individuals with MDD, as well as the potential effects of the intervention on SI without intent.Methods: Participants with Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores ≥14 and a diagnosis of MDD (using DSM-IV criteria) were randomized to either a low dose group (LDG) or high dose group (HDG) and received a 12-week manualized intervention. The LDG included two 90-min yoga classes plus three 30-min homework sessions weekly. The HDG offered three 90-min classes plus four 30-min homework sessions weekly.Results: Thirty-two individuals with MDD were randomized, of which 30 completed the protocol. At screening, SI without intent was endorsed on the BDI-II by 9 participants; after completing the intervention, 8 out of 9 reported resolution of SI. There were 17 adverse events possibly-related and 15 definitely-related to the intervention. The most common protocol-related adverse event was musculoskeletal pain, which resolved over the course of the study.Conclusions: The Iyengar yoga plus coherent breathing intervention was associated with the resolution of SI in 8 out of 9 participants, with mild side effects that were primarily musculoskeletal in nature. This preliminary evidence suggests that this intervention may reduce SI without intent and be safe for use in those with MDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Hatha yoga has dramatically increased in popularity in the United States and a growing body of evidence points to yoga's ability to successfully manage both physical and mental health conditions. Concurrently, the delivery of telehealth interventions also continues to rise. The online-delivery of yoga lies at this intersection, and to date, no study has systematically reviewed the existing literature of empirical studies involving the online delivery of yoga.Design: This study systematically reviews the literature for evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of online yoga interventions and provides a qualitative synthesis. A total of 10 articles which represent eight unique empirical studies were included in the final review.Results: Across the eight studies, participants expressed overall satisfaction with an online yoga intervention. Online yoga was found to be feasible, based on attendance and practice rates, and acceptable. Although groups vary in degree of initial engagement. Results also found preliminary evidence that online yoga can help manage symptoms associated with a range of disorders.Conclusions: Understanding this innovative approach to delivering yoga interventions will allow future research to include online yoga as a lower-cost, non-invasive intervention for a wide variety of physical and mental health disorders, as well as provide preliminary evidence to support the integration of online yoga interventions into routine clinical care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dropout from psychotherapy is common and can have negative effects for patients, providers, and researchers. A better understanding of when and why patients stop treatment early, as well as actionable factors contributing to dropout, has the potential to prevent it. Here, we examined dropout from a large randomized controlled trial of transdiagnostic versus single-diagnosis cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for patients with anxiety disorders (n = 179; Barlow et al., 2017). We aimed to characterize the timing of and reasons for dropout and test whether participants who dropped out had different symptom trajectories than those who completed treatment. Results indicated that overall, the greatest risk of dropout was prior to the first treatment session. In single-diagnosis CBT, dropout risk was particularly elevated before the first session and after other early sessions, whereas in transdiagnostic CBT, dropout risk was low and stable before and during treatment. Participants most often dropped out due to failure to comply with study procedures or dissatisfaction with or desiring alternative treatment. Results from multilevel models showed that trajectories of anxiety symptoms did not significantly differ between dropouts and completers. These findings suggest that there may be specific time windows for targeted and timely interventions to prevent dropout from CBT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine whether the Unified Protocol (UP) remains equivalent to single-disorder protocols (SDPs) in the treatment of anxiety disorders at 12-month follow-up. We report results from the 12-month follow-up of a recent randomized equivalence trial [1]. Data are from 179 participants (55.31% female sex, 83.24% White, average age 30.66) who met criteria for a principal anxiety disorder and were randomized to either the UP or SDP conditions. Consistent with the parent trial, the primary outcome was principal diagnosis clinician severity rating (CSR) from the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS). Secondary outcomes included anxiety, depression, and impairment. Missing data were accommodated using multiple imputation (10,000 imputed data sets) under a missing at random assumption. Equivalence between the UP and SDPs was tested using slope difference scores from latent growth models and 95% confidence interval of between-condition effect sizes. The results indicated that the UP and SDP conditions remained equivalent with regard to principal diagnosis clinician severity rating at 12-month follow-up. In addition, there were no significant differences between conditions on secondary outcomes at 12-month follow-up. The UP continues to yield outcomes comparable to SDPs at 12-month follow-up, and therefore provides a single intervention that can be used to treat the most commonly occurring psychiatric disorders with durable effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]