Search

Multi-energy systems can provide a constant level of service to end-use energy demands, while deriving delivered energy from a variety of primary/secondary energy sources. This fuel-switching capability can be used to reduce operating expenses, reduce environmental impacts, improve flexibility to accommodate renewable energy, and improve reliability. This paper presents four frameworks for incentivizing energy hub equipment investments for low-carbon operation targets. These frameworks vary in the measures taken to achieve low-carbon operation (explicit constraint versus carbon pricing) and in the relationship between the hub builder and operator (cooperative versus uncoordinated). The underlying energy hub model upon which these frameworks are built is an enhanced greenfield model, introducing “energy buses” to reduce dimensionality. A case study is conducted for a campus being designed in Beijing, and results from each framework are compared to illustrate their relative costs. When the operator cannot be trusted to cooperate in controlling emissions, the system must be “overbuilt” with more expensive equipment to ensure emissions target are met. A taxation-based approach increases overall costs at moderate emissions targets, but this effect decreases at aggressive targets. This paper also compares the cost of less efficient institutional frameworks with the most efficient approach, i.e., cooperation between builder and operator with constraints on emissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]