Search

The Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS) Land Product Validation (LPV) subgroup has been established to coordinate the development of standardized validation across the satellite-derived products from different platforms, sensors, and algorithms with reference measurements from the in situ networks. Soil moisture exhibits a high variability in space that challenges the in situ validation. One of the main drivers for this variability is the characteristic heterogeneity in the soil texture. By the machine learning methods using the soil profile measurements and the remotely sensed predictors, spatially continuous maps of basic soil properties such as soil texture and bulk density are available. Those can be used to estimate soil moisture variability within a satellite product grid cell, here exemplarily shown for the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) 36-km product. The soil moisture standard deviation is described as a function of the mean soil moisture, whereby the approach needs the mean and standard deviation of the hydraulic parameters as input. The resulting global data set helps identifying the number of in situ stations necessary to validate the coarse soil moisture products. For most SMAP grid cells, three to four stations are adequate to estimate the mean soil moisture for validation; however, also regions were identified where 80 stations are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of the NASA Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission is to provide global measurements of soil moisture and freeze/thaw states. SMAP integrates L-band radar and radiometer instruments as a single observation system combining the respective strengths of active and passive remote sensing for enhanced soil moisture mapping. Airborne instruments are a key part of the SMAP validation program. Here, we present an airborne campaign in the Rur catchment, Germany, in which the passive L-band system Polarimetric L-band Multi-beam Radiometer and the active L-band system F-SAR of DLR were flown simultaneously on six dates in 2013. The flights covered the full heterogeneity of the area under investigation, i.e., the main land cover types and all experimental monitoring sites. Here, we used the obtained data sets as a test bed for the analysis of three active–passive fusion techniques: 1) estimation of soil moisture by passive sensor data and subsequent disaggregation by active sensor backscatter data; 2) disaggregation of passive microwave brightness temperature by active microwave backscatter and subsequent inversion to soil moisture; and 3) fusion of two single-source soil moisture products from radar and radiometer. Results indicate that the regression parameters $\beta$ are dependent on the radar vegetation index. The best performance was obtained by the fusion of radiometer brightness temperatures and radar backscatter, which was able to reach the same accuracy as single-source coarse-scale radiometer soil moisture retrieval but on a higher spatial resolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]