Search

Little information exists about horse-related injury admissions to Level 1 trauma centers in the Western United States. This study describes injury patterns in this population, to reveal potential areas for injury prevention initiatives. A retrospective database review of 512 non-fatal equine-related injuries over a 15-year period was conducted, using a Level 1 hospital trauma registry. To determine patterns of injury, patients injured by riding or being near a horse were classified according to age, sex, helmet use, abbreviated injury score, anatomical region injured, and length of stay. Equine-related injury was more frequent among females than males, the anatomical region most at risk among adults was the lower extremity (including pelvis), and among children and youth, the head. 75% of head-injured patients were not wearing a helmet at the time of injury and those with the most severe head injuries were least likely to be wearing a helmet. Preventable equine-related injuries occur across all ages, are more frequent among females, and affect all regions of the body. Despite head-injury risks associated with horse activities, helmet use was not common among most of the injured. Decreasing the risk of these injuries requires use of appropriate protective equipment and enhanced education campaigns aimed at those in the horse industry and the general public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Launched in 1989, the Scottish Motor Neuron Disease Register (SMNDR) has provided a resource for prospective clinical data collection. However, in 2015 we aimed to evolve a system to allow: i) A patient-centered approach to care based on recognized standards, ii) Harmonized data sharing between Scottish health professionals in "real-time", iii) Regular audit of care to facilitate timely improvements in service delivery, and iv) Patient participation in a diverse range of observational and interventional research studies including clinical trials. Methods: We developed a standardized national electronic data platform—Clinical Audit Research and Evaluation of MND (CARE-MND) which integrates clinical audit and research data fields. Data completion pre- and post-CARE-MND were compared, guided by recently published National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommendations. Statistical difference in data capture between time periods was assessed using Z-test of proportions. Results: Data field completion for the historical 2011–2014 period ranged from 4 to 95%; median 50%. CARE-MND capture ranged from 32 to 98%; median 87%. 15/17 fields were significantly more complete post-CARE-MND (p < 0.001). All MND nurse/allied health specialists in Scotland use the CARE-MND platform. Management of MND in Scotland is now coordinated through a standardized template. Conclusions: Through CARE-MND, national audits of MND care and interventions have been possible, leading to protocols for harmonized service provision. Stratification of the MND population is facilitating participation in observational and interventional studies. CARE-MND can act as a template for other neurological disorders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]