Search

A method of para‐selective borylation of aromatic amides is described. The borylation proceeded via an unprecedented substrate–ligand distortion between the twisted aromatic amides and a newly designed ligand framework (defa) that is different from the traditionally used ligand (dtbpy) for the C−H borylation reactions. The designed ligand framework (defa) has led to the development of a new type of catalytic system that shows excellent para selectivity for a range of aromatic amides. Moreover, the designed ligand has shown excellent reactivity and selectivity for a range of heterocyclic aromatic amides. The identification of key transition states and intermediates using the DFT computations associated with the three regio‐isomeric pathways revealed that the most efficient catalytic pathway with the defa ligand leads to the para borylation while in the case of bpy the borylation at the para and meta sites compete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A method of para‐selective borylation of aromatic amides is described. The borylation proceeded via an unprecedented substrate–ligand distortion between the twisted aromatic amides and a newly designed ligand framework (defa) that is different from the traditionally used ligand (dtbpy) for the C−H borylation reactions. The designed ligand framework (defa) has led to the development of a new type of catalytic system that shows excellent para selectivity for a range of aromatic amides. Moreover, the designed ligand has shown excellent reactivity and selectivity for a range of heterocyclic aromatic amides. The identification of key transition states and intermediates using the DFT computations associated with the three regio‐isomeric pathways revealed that the most efficient catalytic pathway with the defa ligand leads to the para borylation while in the case of bpy the borylation at the para and meta sites compete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new concept for the meta‐selective borylation of aromatic amides is described. It has been demonstrated that while esters gave para borylations, amides lead to meta borylations. For achieving high meta selectivity, an L‐shaped bifunctional ligand has been employed and engages in an O⋅⋅⋅K noncovalent interaction with the oxygen atom of the moderately distorted amide carbonyl group. This interaction provides exceptional control for meta C−H activation/borylation. L‐Shaped: A new concept for the meta borylation of aromatic amides is described. It has been shown that while esters give para borylations, amides result in meta borylations. For achieving high meta selectivity, an L‐shaped ligand is used and engages in an O⋅⋅⋅K noncovalent interaction with the moderately distorted amide carbonyl group, providing exceptional control for meta C−H activation/borylation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new concept for the meta‐selective borylation of aromatic amides is described. It has been demonstrated that while esters gave para borylations, amides lead to meta borylations. For achieving high meta selectivity, an L‐shaped bifunctional ligand has been employed and engages in an O⋅⋅⋅K noncovalent interaction with the oxygen atom of the moderately distorted amide carbonyl group. This interaction provides exceptional control for meta C−H activation/borylation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A method of para‐selective borylation of aromatic amides is described. The borylation proceeded via an unprecedented substrate–ligand distortion between the twisted aromatic amides and a newly designed ligand framework (defa) that is different from the traditionally used ligand (dtbpy) for the C−H borylation reactions. The designed ligand framework (defa) has led to the development of a new type of catalytic system that shows excellent para selectivity for a range of aromatic amides. Moreover, the designed ligand has shown excellent reactivity and selectivity for a range of heterocyclic aromatic amides. The identification of key transition states and intermediates using the DFT computations associated with the three regio‐isomeric pathways revealed that the most efficient catalytic pathway with the defa ligand leads to the para borylation while in the case of bpy the borylation at the para and meta sites compete. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]