Search

Block copolymer (BCP) self‐assembly‐assisted doping for semiconductors is used to achieve discrete doping with nanometer‐scale junction depth, high throughput, and large area coverage. As devices become smaller and more sophisticated, spatial control of dopants becomes more critical. A variety of doping methods, such as monolayer doping and δ‐doping, have been developed to replace the conventional doping method, ion‐implantation; however, lateral patterning of dopants relies on photo‐ or e‐beam lithography. To address these challenges, a self‐assembling dopant (boron)‐containing BCP is designed to directly pattern dopants on the nanometer scale. This method skips the lithography step and is compatible with directed self‐assembly approaches. The effect of the boron concentration in the BCP on the doping performance is systematically studied by changing the volume fraction of the boron‐containing block while keeping the domain spacing and the mesoscale morphology constant. Successful self‐assembly of the BCP into a hexagonally packed cylindrical morphology is confirmed by small‐angle X‐ray scattering and resonant soft X‐ray scattering with a 26 nm cylinder‐to‐cylinder distance. Doping silicon using these BCPs enables discrete doped areas with shallow (7–13 nm) junction depth as demonstrated by the depth profile of boron, and supported by a sheet resistance study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In organic mixed ionic–electronic conductors (OMIECs), it is critical to understand the motion of ions in the electrolyte and OMIEC. Generally, the focus is on the movement of net charge during gating, and the motion of neutral anion–cation pairs is seldom considered. Uptake of mobile ion pairs by the semiconductor before electrochemical gating (passive uptake) can be advantageous as this can improve device speed, and both ions can participate in charge compensation during gating. Here, such passive ion pair uptake in high‐speed solid‐state devices is demonstrated using an ion gel electrolyte. This is compared to a polymerized ionic liquid (PIL) electrolyte to understand how ion pair uptake affects device characteristics. Using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the passive uptake of ion pairs from the ion gel into the OMIEC is detected, whereas no uptake is observed with a PIL electrolyte. This is corroborated by X‐ray scattering, which reveals morphological changes to the OMIEC from the uptake of ion pairs. With in situ Raman, a reorganization of both anions and cations is then observed during gating. Finally, the speed and retention of OMIEC‐based neuromorphic devices are tuned by controlling the freedom of charge motion in the electrolyte. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Charge transport in poly(3-alkylthiophene)s (P3AT)s is closely linked to the nanoscale organization of crystallites. Block copolymer morphologies provide an ideal platform to study crystallization as the chain ends are tethered at a known interface in a well-defined geometry. The impact of soft versus hard confinement on P3EHT crystallization was studied using poly(3-(2′-ethyl)hexylthiophene) (P3EHT) containing diblocks with both rubbery poly(methyl acrylate) (PMA) and glassy polystyrene (PS) blocks. Here, P3EHT's lower melting point relative to the commonly studied poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) facilitated its confined crystallization and makes it an ideal model system. While transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) revealed well-ordered lamellar morphologies both in the melt and post-crystallization for both sets of diblocks, the glassy blocks inhibit confined crystallization of P3EHT relative to rubbery matrix blocks. Analysis of aligned diblocks by both SAXS and wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) revealed that the P3EHT chain axis aligns perpendicular to domain interfaces, allowing preferential growth of the alkyl-chain and π-π stacking directions parallel to lamellae. Finally, it was shown that following diblock self-assembly in the melt, crystallite growth drives expansion of microdomains to match the P3EHT contour length. It was concluded that P3EHT chains adopted an extended conformation within confined crystallites due to the rigid nature of polythiophenes relative to flexible chain crystalline polymers. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 2016, 54, 205-215 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]