Search

Continuous structural parameterization (CSP) is a proposed method for approximating different numerical model parameterizations of the same process as functions of the same grid‐scale variables. This allows systematic comparison of parameterizations with each other and observations or resolved simulations of the same process. Using the example of two convection schemes running in the Met Office Unified Model (UM), we show that a CSP is able to capture concisely the broad behavior of the two schemes, and differences between the parameterizations and resolved convection simulated by a high resolution simulation. When the original convection schemes are replaced with their CSP emulators within the UM, basic features of the original model climate and some features of climate change are reproduced, demonstrating that CSP can capture much of the important behavior of the schemes. Our results open the possibility that future work will estimate uncertainty in model projections of climate change from estimates of uncertainty in simulation of the relevant physical processes. Plain Language Summary: Numerical models are used to provide estimates of future weather and climate change. The models contain "parameterizations," which are algorithms that simulate the effect of processes too small or poorly understood to represent using physical equations. Although they are based as much as possible on physics, parameterizations are a large source of modeling uncertainty because there can be large disagreements on how to best represent a given process. The method and even the variables used by two different parameterizations may differ. It is therefore very difficult to know how different parameterizations cause numerical models to produce different results and whether the parameterizations we have are adequate and span the range of uncertainty concerning our knowledge of the processes they represent. Using the example of small‐scale atmospheric convection linked to rain and thunderstorms, this paper describes a mathematical method for expressing different parameterizations within the same framework. This allows easy but formal mathematical comparison of different parameterizations and gives future work the potential to understand whether our parameterizations perform as they should in conjunction with future observations. Key Points: CSP is a method for expressing GCM parameterizations as functions of the same grid‐scale variablesThe broad behavior and differences between representations of convection are capturedIf parameterizations are replaced with their CSP emulators in a GCM, stable climates are retrieved [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Stochastically Perturbed Parametrization Tendencies (SPPT) scheme is used at weather and climate forecasting centres worldwide to represent model uncertainty that arises from simplifications involved in the parametrization process. It uses spatio-temporally correlated multiplicative noise to perturb the sum of the parametrized tendencies. However, SPPT does not distinguish between different parametrization schemes, which do not necessarily have the same error characteristics. A generalization to SPPT is proposed, whereby the tendency from each parametrization scheme can be perturbed using an independent stochastic pattern. This acknowledges that the forecast errors arising from different parametrizations are not perfectly correlated. Two variations of this 'independent SPPT' (iSPPT) approach are tested in the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS). The first perturbs all parametrized tendencies independently, while the second groups tendencies before perturbation. The iSPPT schemes lead to statistically significant improvements in forecast reliability in the Tropics in medium-range weather forecasts. This improvement can be attributed to a large, beneficial increase in ensemble spread in regions with significant convective activity. The iSPPT schemes also lead to improved forecast skill in the extratropics for a set of cases in which the synoptic initial conditions were more likely to result in European 'forecast busts'. Longer 13 month simulations are also considered to indicate the effect of iSPPT on the mean climate of the IFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Forecast verification is important across scientific disciplines, as it provides a framework for evaluating the performance of a forecasting system. In the atmospheric sciences, probabilistic skill scores are often used for verification, as they provide a way of ranking the performance of different probabilistic forecasts unambiguously. In order to be useful, a skill score must be proper: it must encourage honesty in the forecaster and reward forecasts that are reliable and have good resolution. A new score, the error-spread score (ES), is proposed, which is particularly suitable for evaluation of ensemble forecasts. It is formulated with respect to the moments of the forecast. The ES is confirmed to be a proper score and is therefore sensitive to both resolution and reliability. The ES is tested on forecasts made using the Lorenz ′96 system and found to be useful for summarizing the skill of the forecasts. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble prediction system (EPS) is evaluated using the ES. Its performance is compared with a perfect statistical probabilistic forecast: the ECMWF high-resolution deterministic forecast dressed with the observed error distribution. This generates a forecast that is perfectly reliable if considered over all time, but does not vary from day to day with the predictability of the atmospheric flow. The ES distinguishes between the dynamically reliable EPS forecasts and the statically reliable dressed deterministic forecasts. Other skill scores are tested and found to be comparatively insensitive to this desirable forecast quality. The ES is used to evaluate seasonal range ensemble forecasts made with the ECMWF System 4. The ensemble forecasts are found to be skilful when compared with climatological or persistence forecasts, though this skill is dependent on the region and time of year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]