Search

Recycling tasks are the most effective method for reducing waste generation, protecting the environment, and boosting the overall national economy. The productivity and effectiveness of the recycling process are strongly dependent on the cleanliness and precision of processed primary sources. However, recycling operations are often labor intensive, and computer vision and deep learning (DL) techniques aid in automatically detecting and classifying trash types during recycling chores. Due to the dimensional challenge posed by pre-trained CNN networks, the scientific community has developed numerous techniques inspired by biology, swarm intelligence theory, physics, and mathematical rules. This research applies a new meta-heuristic algorithm called the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA) to solving the waste classification problem based on feature selection. However, the performance of the AHA is barely satisfactory; it may be stuck in optimal local regions or have a slow convergence. To overcome these limitations, this paper develops two improved versions of the AHA called the AHA-ROBL and the AHA-OBL. These two versions enhance the exploitation stage by using random opposition-based learning (ROBL) and opposition-based learning (OBL) to prevent local optima and accelerate the convergence. The main purpose of this paper is to apply the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL to select the relevant deep features provided by two pre-trained models of CNN (VGG19 & ResNet20) to recognize a waste classification. The TrashNet dataset is used to verify the performance of the two proposed approaches (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL). The effectiveness of the suggested methods (the AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL) is compared with that of 12 modern and competitive optimizers, namely the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA), Harris hawks optimizer (HHO), Salp swarm algorithm (SSA), aquila optimizer (AO), Henry gas solubility optimizer (HGSO), particle swarm optimizer (PSO), grey wolf optimizer (GWO), Archimedes optimization algorithm (AOA), manta ray foraging optimizer (MRFO), sine cosine algorithm (SCA), marine predators algorithm (MPA), and rescue optimization algorithm (SAR). A fair evaluation of the proposed algorithms' performance is achieved using the same dataset. The performance analysis of the two proposed algorithms is applied in terms of different measures. The experimental results confirm the two proposed algorithms' superiority over other comparative algorithms. The AHA-ROBL and AHA-OBL produce the optimal number of selected features with the highest degree of precision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The heap-based optimizer (HBO) is an innovative meta-heuristic inspired by human social behavior. In this research, binary adaptations of the heap-based optimizer B _ H B O are presented and used to determine the optimal features for classifications in wrapping form. In addition, HBO balances exploration and exploitation by employing self-adaptive parameters that can adaptively search the solution domain for the optimal solution. In the feature selection domain, the presented algorithms for the binary Heap-based optimizer B _ H B O are used to find feature subsets that maximize classification performance while lowering the number of selected features. The textitk-nearest neighbor (textitk-NN) classifier ensures that the selected features are significant. The new binary methods are compared to eight common optimization methods recently employed in this field, including Ant Lion Optimization (ALO), Archimedes Optimization Algorithm (AOA), Backtracking Search Algorithm (BSA), Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), Levy flight distribution (LFD), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Slime Mold Algorithm (SMA), and Tree Seed Algorithm (TSA) in terms of fitness, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, F-score, the number of selected features, and statistical tests. Twenty datasets from the UCI repository are evaluated and compared using a set of evaluation indicators. The non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine whether the proposed algorithms' results varied statistically significantly from those of the other compared methods. The comparison analysis demonstrates that B _ H B O is superior or equivalent to the other algorithms used in the literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]