Search

Directed evolution of stereo- and regioselective enzymes constitutes a prolific source of catalysts for asymmetric transformations in organic chemistry. In this endeavor (iterative) saturation mutagenesis at sites lining the binding pocket of enzymes has emerged as the method of choice, but uncertainties regarding the question of how to group many residues into randomization sites and how to choose optimal upward pathways persist. Two new approaches promise to beat the numbers problem effectively. One utilizes a single amino acid as building block for the randomization of a 10-residue site, the other also employs only one but possibly different amino acid at each position of a 9-residue site. The small but smart libraries provide highly enantioselective epoxide hydrolase or lipase mutants, respectively.

Directed evolution based on saturation mutagenesis at sites lining the binding pocket is a commonly practiced strategy for enhancing or inverting the stereoselectivity of enzymes for use in organic chemistry or biotechnology. However, as the number of residues in a randomization site increases to five or more, the screening effort for 95 % library coverage increases astronomically until it is no longer feasible. We propose the use of a single amino acid for saturation mutagenesis at superlarge randomization sites comprising 10 or more residues. When used to reshape the binding pocket of limonene epoxide hydrolase, this strategy, which drastically reduces the search space and thus the screening effort, resulted in R,R- and S,S-selective mutants for the hydrolytic desymmetrization of cyclohexene oxide and other epoxides. X-ray crystal structures and docking studies of the mutants unveiled the source of stereoselectivity and shed light on the mechanistic intricacies of this enzyme.