Search

The sociological study of intellectual recognition has tended to focus on highly cited and highly acclaimed authors and perspectives, while reserving some interest for those who are "forgotten." We know much less about the liminal cases: authors who are in-between fame and oblivion. This paper proposes a way to study intellectual recognition, by examining the liminal case of sociologist Charles H. Cooley. Based on a multilayered (quantitative and qualitative) citation analysis of Cooley's classic work, Human Nature and the Social Order (HNSO), we study the role of intellectual deference in accounting for this liminality. Specifically, we identify two distinct deference processes: acknowledgment and involvement. We argue that Cooley has survived intellectual oblivion by standing on the shoulders of citers, as he has received substantial acknowledgment but decreasing involvement. In the conclusion, we discuss the implications of our paper for the understanding of the making of sociological theory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives This paper explores the emergence of dementia within interpersonal interactions as a matter of deviance and visibility. The sociology of deviance suggests that we rely on assumptions of normal behaviour to help us develop interpretations of other people when interacting with them. When a person acts within expectation, we deem them normal. When a person transgresses expectation, we deem them deviant. In this way, dementia is revealed. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven community-dwelling people with dementia and 26 carers living in the East Midlands, United Kingdom. Carers were selected for inclusion by participating people with dementia. Interview data was analysed using thematic analysis informed by symbolic interactionism. Results Four ways in which audiences may interpret a person as having a dementia are outlined: speech, temporality, conflict and novelty. These four mechanisms of visibility represent key moments in which dementia emerges in interaction. Discussion Examining dementia in terms of deviance and visibility positions dementia within social processes. This externalisation of dementia, relocating it within a combination of action, situation and audience, may suggest new possibilities for mediating its negative repercussions. Highlights • Dementia can be theorised as a deviance, breeching shared situational expectations. • Deviance emerges through a process of visibility, whereby actions fail to satisfy situational expectations and are interpreted by an audience as indicating deviance. • Four mechanisms of visibility are speech, temporality, conflict and novelty. • Through these visibility mechanisms, a 'person' becomes a 'person with dementia'. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]