Search

An Extended Triple Collocation for maximized Correlation (ETCC) method was proposed with a unique correlation function, the purpose of which is to maximize the correlation between the merged product and unknown truth. The method was tested over quasi‐global land by combining three independent precipitation products. The performance of the ETCC‐merged product was then evaluated against three reference data sets and compared with the existing Triple Collocation (TC) merging. The merged product was found to be generally superior to each contributor. Moreover, the ETCC method is better able to improve the correlation of merged product compared with the TC approach. Other improvements are also shown in the absolute difference of the ETCC‐merged product, such as regional validation for central North America and mainland China. These demonstrate the effectiveness of the ETCC method, and accordingly, it can provide a promising solution for maximizing the correlation of merged product without the truth. Plain Language Summary: Precipitation plays a significant role in global atmospheric and hydrological modeling systems. Owing to uncertainties in precipitation estimates from a single satellite or reanalysis product, it is necessary and challenging to blend multi‐source precipitation information to improve the quality of precipitation estimates. The present study proposed a new merging method, called Extended Triple Collocation for maximized Correlation (ETCC), which aims at maximizing the correlation of the merged product against unknown truth. The ETCC‐merged product combined three independent precipitation information derived from the satellite and reanalysis products, and then, was evaluated using three reference data sets. Meanwhile, we compared ETCC's performance with that of the original Triple Collocation (TC) merging. Results show that ETCC method not only performs better than each contributor, but also is more effective in improving precipitation accuracy relative to the TC approach especially in central North America and mainland China. Key Points: A new method is proposed for maximizing the correlation between the merged product and unknown truthThe merged product is more accurate than each contributorThe new method performs better than the original triple collocation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Four daily precipitation datasets were integrated based on the modifiable Bayesian model averaging (BMA) framework. • Seven blended precipitation products were generated by considering different inputs. • Some BMA products outperformed the representative merged product, MSWEP. • Impacts of the ensemble members on BMA predictions were quantitatively analyzed. Selection of the number and which of multisource precipitation datasets is crucially important for precipitation fusion. Considering the effects of different inputs, this study proposes a new framework based on the Bayesian model averaging (BMA) algorithm to integrate precipitation information from gauge-based analysis CPC, reanalysis-derived dataset ERA5, and satellite-retrieval products IMERG-E and GSMaP-RT. The BMA weights were optimized for the period 2001–2010 using daily measurements and then applied to the period 2011–2015 for model validation. Seven BMA-merged precipitation products (i.e., MCE, MCI, MCG, MCEI, MCEG, MCIG, and MCEIG) were thoroughly evaluated across mainland China and then compared against the state-of-the-art ensemble-based product, MSWEP. The results indicate that the BMA predictions performed substantially better than the reanalysis and satellite precipitation datasets in both daily statistics and seasonal analyses. MCE, MCI, and MCEG demonstrated better performances relative to CPC in terms of individual metrics. Moreover, MCI, MCG, and MCEI generally outperformed MSWEP over the entire study area, particularly in local regions, such as southwestern China and the eastern Tibetan Plateau. During Typhoon Rammasun in 2014, MCG and MCEG provided greater detail for heavy rainfall events than the four ensemble members and the MSWEP product. Thus, the performance of the BMA predictions exhibited evident differences because of various input sources. CPC was the major internal influencing factor with the highest weight score. Meanwhile, the increased-input CPC dataset into the BMA-based schemes exerted a significant influence on the precipitation estimates, which markedly facilitated the performance improvement of the fusion model, and its improved degree (greater than 14 %) was obtained using a 'changed-initial' comparison method. Our results demonstrate that the developed modifiable BMA framework is useful for analyzing the impacts of ensemble members on BMA predictions and suggests that it is considerate in the use of different input sources for generating ensemble-based precipitation products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]