Search

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) typically respond initially, but usually develop resistance to therapy. We utilised transcriptome analysis to identify gene expression changes during development of sunitinib resistance in a RCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model.Methods: RCC tumours were harvested during pre-treatment, response and escape phases. Direct anti-proliferative effects of sunitinib plus MEK inhibitor were assessed. Activation status (phosphorylation) of MEK1/2 and ERK1/2 was determined, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) sub-fractions were quantitated and G-CSF was measured by ELISA.Results: During the response phase, tumours exhibited 91% reduction in volume, characterised by decreased expression of cell survival genes. After 4-week treatment, tumours developed resistance to sunitinib, associated with increased expression of pro-angiogenic and cell survival genes. During tumour escape, cellular movement, inflammatory response and immune cell trafficking genes were induced, along with intra-tumoural accumulation of MDSC. In this PDX model, either continuous treatment with sunitinib plus MEK inhibitor PD-0325901, or switching from sunitinib to PD-0325901 was effective. The combination of PD-0325901 with TKI suppressed intra-tumoural phospho-MEK1/2, phospho-ERK1/2 and MDSC.Conclusions: Continuous treatment with sunitinib alone did not maintain anti-tumour response; addition of MEK inhibitor abrogated resistance, leading to improved anti-tumour efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cancer immunotherapy has emerged as one of the most important new treatments for cancer in many years, moving rapidly to front-line therapy for several cancers. Cancer immunotherapy is based on treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), which are monoclonal antibodies directed toward immunoregulatory proteins including PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4. ICI inhibit interactions between these proteins and their ligands, disabling physiologic immune regulatory networks and enhancing anti-tumor immunity. However, since the immune response cannot be directed specifically to the tumor, ICI are associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) resulting from immune-mediated attack of normal tissues. We and others have reported a high incidence of thrombosis in patients treated with ICI, which may approach 20%. Given the rapidly increasing use of ICIs, it is clear that I CI- A ssociated T hrombosis (IAT) is a major emerging clinical problem. However, there is a remarkable knowledge gap concerning mechanisms of IAT. IAT may be a composite irAE resulting from activation of blood and vascular cells, leading to thromboinflammation. Cancer itself is an inflammatory disorder, and inducing further inflammation through ICI administration may stimulate procoagulant activity by multiple cell types. Moreover, some blood and vascular cells express ICI target proteins. Here, we review the results of several studies describing the clinical manifestations of IAT, as well as our recent studies demonstrating that elevated levels of myeloid derived suppressor cells and inflammatory cytokines may serve as biomarkers of IAT. It is hoped that the concepts reviewed here may stimulate further research into this important clinical problem. • Thrombosis, particularly venous, occurs commonly in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI) • Thrombosis my occur after administration of any of the approved immune checkpoint inhibitors • A common risk factor for ICI-associated thrombosis (IAT) is a history of prior thrombosis • There is very little information available on the pathogenesis of IAT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tumor microenvironment (TME) in ovarian cancer (OC) is characterized by immune suppression, due to an abundance of suppressive immune cells populations. To effectively enhance the activity of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), there is a need to identify agents that target these immunosuppressive networks while promoting the recruitment of effector T cells into the TME. To this end, we sought to investigate the effect of the immunomodulatory cytokine IL12 alone or in combination with dual-ICI (anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4) on anti-tumor activity and survival, using the immunocompetent ID8-VEGF murine OC model. Detailed immunophenotyping of peripheral blood, ascites, and tumors revealed that durable treatment responses were associated with reversal of myeloid cell-induced immune suppression, which resulted in enhanced anti-tumor activity by T cells. Single cell transcriptomic analysis further demonstrated striking differences in the phenotype of myeloid cells from mice treated with IL12 in combination with dual-ICI. We also identified marked differences in treated mice that were in remission compared to those whose tumors progressed, further confirming a pivotal role for the modulation of myeloid cell function to allow for response to immunotherapy. These findings provide the scientific basis for the combination of IL12 and ICI to improve clinical response in OC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optimal ex vivo expansion protocols for adoptive cell therapy (ACT) must yield T cells able to effectively home to tumors and survive the inhospitable conditions of the tumor microenvironment (TME), while simultaneously exerting persistent anti-tumor effector functions. Our previous work has shown that ex vivo activation in the presence of IL-12 can induce optimal expansion of murine CD8+ T cells, thus resulting in significant tumor regression after ACT mostly via sustained secretion of IFN-γ. In this report, we further elucidate the mechanism of this potency, showing that IL-12 additionally counteracts the negative regulatory effects of autocrine IFN-γ. IL-12 not only downregulates PD-1 expression by T cells, thus minimizing the effects of IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 upregulation by tumor stromal cells, but also inhibits IFNγR2 expression, thereby protecting T cells from IFN-γ-induced cell death. Thus, the enhanced anti-tumor activity of CD8+ T cells expanded ex vivo in the presence of IL-12 is due not only to the ability of IL-12-stimulated cells to secrete sustained levels of IFN-γ, but also to the additional capacity of IL-12 to counter the negative regulatory effects of autocrine IFN-γ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]