Search

Contemporary agricultural systems can be generalized as highly specialized operations that are fueled by mechanization; supplied with external nutrients to maximize production; crops protected by petrochemicals to fight against weed, disease, and insect pressures; and livestock protected by therapeutics to ward off virus and bacterial infections when managed in confinement. Such specialized systems have led to low levels of diversity, elevated environmental risks from contamination, loss of soil organic matter, ecological instability, and limited adaptability to climate change. More diversified farming systems are possible, but research required to characterize them in a holistic manner as an alternative to contemporary, specialized systems remains challenging to fund and sustain over time, primarily because they require more labor, management skills, and accessible markets to achieve additional ecological, environmental, and social goals. We share some perspectives as to (1) how specialized systems became the norm and (2) what changes could be made to reverse some ecological risks and environmental declines associated with specialization, acknowledging there is no panacea. Strong evidence exists for perennial forages to restore soil organic carbon (C) and nitrogen, but system‐level analyses of the net balance in greenhouse gas emissions remain to be characterized in the myriad of potential integrated crop–livestock systems that might be deployed across the diversity of edaphic, environmental, and socio‐economic conditions. We suggest there are abundant opportunities for more sustainable agricultural production to sequester soil organic C, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and develop more climate‐resilient agricultural systems that will be needed in a future dominated by climate change issues. Core Ideas: Forage‐based crop rotations are a proven practice for conserving nutrients and improving soil health.Diversity on farms in the United States is low and could be enhanced with integrated crop–livestock systems.Structural barriers to integrated crop–livestock systems are present but could be overcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] Integrated crop-livestock systems are effectively implemented in every region of the U.S. [•] New technologies facilitate successful adoption of crop-livestock systems. [•] Adoption of crop-livestock systems in the U.S. occurs primarily among livestock managers. [•] Cash crop managers have few current incentives to incorporate livestock into their crop systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]