Search

Motivated by applications in graph drawing and information visualization, we examine the planar split thickness of a graph, that is, the smallest k such that the graph is k-splittable into a planar graph. A k-split operation substitutes a vertex v by at most k new vertices such that each neighbor of v is connected to at least one of the new vertices. We first examine the planar split thickness of complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, multipartite graphs, bounded degree graphs, and genus-1 graphs. We then prove that it is NP-hard to recognize graphs that are 2-splittable into a planar graph, and show that one can approximate the planar split thickness of a graph within a constant factor. If the treewidth is bounded, then we can even verify k-splittability in linear time, for a constant k. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 1 -plane graph is a graph embedded in the plane such that each edge is crossed at most once. A NIC-plane graph is a 1-plane graph such that any two pairs of crossing edges share at most one end-vertex. An edge partition of a 1-plane graph G is a coloring of the edges of G with two colors, red and blue, such that both the graph induced by the red edges and the graph induced by the blue edges are plane graphs. We prove the following: ( i ) Every NIC-plane graph admits an edge partition such that the red graph has maximum vertex degree three; this bound on the vertex degree is worst-case optimal. ( ii ) Deciding whether a NIC-plane graph admits an edge partition such that the red graph has maximum vertex degree two is NP-complete. ( iii ) Deciding whether a 1-plane graph admits an edge partition such that the red graph has maximum vertex degree one, and computing one in the positive case, can be done in quadratic time. Applications of these results to graph drawing are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A2-layer drawing of a bipartite graph G is a drawing such that the vertices of each partition set are drawn as points of a distinct horizontal line (called a layer) and the edges are drawn as straight-line segments. We study 2-layer drawings where edges can cross only at right angles; these drawings are called 2-layer right angle crossing drawings (2-layer RAC drawings for short). We focus on the following problem, which we call the maximum 2-layer RAC subgraph (M2LRacS) problem. Given a bipartite graph G, compute a subgraph H of G such that: (i) H admits a 2-layer RAC drawing and (ii) H has the maximum number of edges among the subgraphs of G that satisfy (i). We study this problem both in the no-fixed-layer setting, where no restriction is given on the vertex ordering on each layer, and in the 1-?xed-layer setting, where the ordering of the vertices of one of the two layers is given as part of the input and cannot be changed. The M2LRacS problem is known to be NP-hard in the no-fixed-layer setting (Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Eades, P. and Liotta, G. (2011) 2-Layer Right Angle Crossing Drawings. Proc. IWOCA 2011, Lecturer Notes in Computer Science 7056, pp. 156-169; Di Giacomo, E., Didimo, W., Eades, P. and Liotta, G. (2014) 2-layer right angle crossing drawings. Algorithmica, 68, 954-997), but no algorithm has been proposed so far to solve it. We prove that the M2LRacS problem remains NP-hard even in the 1-?xed-layer setting, and provide different heuristics to solve it in the two settings; one of these heuristics is a 3-approximation algorithm for the no-fixed-layer setting. Also, we present the results of an experimental study that compares our heuristics and shows the effectiveness of the 3-approximation algorithm in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]