Search

The Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCAM) is used by the Australian Government for international reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and to predict carbon stock changes for carbon abatement projects. It is also used by landowners, companies and researchers, and is therefore regularly applied at local to continental scales. FullCAM is a stand level model with daily, monthly or annual temporal resolutions, depending on the users' preference. FullCAM has been developed over the past 20 years, however, no studies have reviewed and described the current structure, parameters, calibration, and uses of FullCAM, which was the objective of this study. We also discuss the potential for further developments that could improve FullCAM's ability to model responses to disturbances and climate, while also increasing its local accuracy. • FullCAM simulates carbon follows between live biomass, standing dead, debris and soil. • FullCAM is used at local, regional and continental scales, and daily, monthly or annual steps. • FullCAM is used for native forests, woodlands and savannas, as well as plantations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was completed for the FullCAM model. • Carbon stock outputs were most sensitive to background mortality rates, age, site conditions, decomposition/turnover parameters and stand structure. • Model applications showed the importance of background mortality in relation to fire and harvesting. • Sensitivity of FullCAM outputs is very context dependent in relation to age and site conditions. • Implications for further developing FullCAM are discussed. In Australia, the Full Carbon Accounting Model (FullCAM) is used by the Australian Government for international reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and to predict carbon stock changes for carbon abatement projects. Consequently, over the last 20 years, it has been routinely applied at continental, regional and local scales, and has been subject to on-going development to improve its accuracy and representativeness. Given its importance, a sensitivity analysis could facilitate our understanding of model behaviour and aid the planning of future work and data collection. In particular, the sensitivity of a given model parameter is often context dependent such that it depends on the level of other parameters or variables. Key FullCAM parameters have generally been calibrated using data from empirical studies, with differing levels of confidence based on the sample size and data quality. The objective of this study was to apply a sensitivity analysis to examine (i) the sensitivity of FullCAM carbon stock outputs to its parameters and inputs, and how the sensitivity indices compare with the sample sizes used to calculate the respective parameters, (ii) the context dependency in terms of how the sensitivity varies with age, potential maximum biomass (a key FullCAM parameter), and disturbance severity or type, and (iii) to identify the implications for further development of FullCAM for woody vegetation systems. Of the 67 parameters tested, FullCAM carbon stock outputs were most sensitive to background mortality rates, age, potential maximum biomass, climate variability, age of maximum growth, decomposition or turnover parameters, and stand structure (regenerating or mature). The context dependency of the sensitivity analysis followed a consistent pattern depending on two main conditions, such that the sensitivity was higher when (i) the carbon stock was large and (ii) the parameter had a strong influence on that carbon stock. Several strong context dependencies occurred because the size of carbon stocks often vary through space and time within an ecosystem, and different processes (i.e. parameters) are more important at different times and locations. There was a strong context dependency in relation to age and potential maximum biomass, and FullCAM simulations indicated an interaction between fire disturbances and vegetation types. Lastly, background mortality was one of the least available inputs, but one to which FullCAM outputs were very sensitive. FullCAM was applied to show that the long-term contributions of low rates of background mortality to standing dead and debris C stocks were often as large as those from frequent (every 30 years) and intense harvesting and fire events because of the regular (annual) contribution of mortality and its accumulating influence of C stocks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights • Over 2000 measurements of plant belowground biomass were compiled. • Accurate generic allometric models could be developed. • These models were validated across stands where whole-plot excavation data were available. • Gains in prediction efficiencies using species-specific models were negligible. Abstract Accurate quantification of below-ground biomass (BGB) of woody vegetation is critical to understanding ecosystem function and potential for climate change mitigation from sequestration of biomass carbon. We compiled 2054 measurements of planted and natural individual tree and shrub biomass from across different regions of Australia (arid shrublands to tropical rainforests) to develop allometric models for prediction of BGB. We found that the relationship between BGB and stem diameter was generic, with a simple power-law model having a BGB prediction efficiency of 72–93% for four broad plant functional types: (i) shrubs and Acacia trees, (ii) multi-stemmed mallee eucalypts, (iii) other trees of relatively high wood density, and; (iv) a species of relatively low wood density, Pinus radiata D. Don. There was little improvement in accuracy of model prediction by including variables (e.g. climatic characteristics, stand age or management) in addition to stem diameter alone. We further assessed the generality of the plant functional type models across 11 contrasting stands where data from whole-plot excavation of BGB were available. The efficiency of model prediction of stand-based BGB was 93%, with a mean absolute prediction error of only 6.5%, and with no improvements in validation results when species-specific models were applied. Given the high prediction performance of the generalised models, we suggest that additional costs associated with the development of new species-specific models for estimating BGB are only warranted when gains in accuracy of stand-based predictions are justifiable, such as for a high-biomass stand comprising only one or two dominant species. However, generic models based on plant functional type should not be applied where stands are dominated by species that are unusual in their morphology and unlikely to conform to the generalised plant functional group models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]