Search

The delta-lognormal distribution is a combination of binomial and lognormal distributions, and so rainfall series that include zero and positive values conform to this distribution. The coefficient of variation is a good tool for measuring the dispersion of rainfall. Statistical estimation can be used not only to illustrate the dispersion of rainfall but also to describe the differences between rainfall dispersions from several areas simultaneously. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to construct simultaneous confidence intervals for all pairwise differences between the coefficients of variation of delta-lognormal distributions using three methods: fiducial generalized confidence interval, Bayesian, and the method of variance estimates recovery. Their performances were gauged by measuring their coverage probabilities together with their expected lengths via Monte Carlo simulation. The results indicate that the Bayesian credible interval using the Jeffreys' rule prior outperformed the others in virtually all cases. Rainfall series from five regions in Thailand were used to demonstrate the efficacies of the proposed methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The log-normal distribution is often used to analyze environmental data like daily rainfall amounts. The rainfall is of interest in Thailand because high variable climates can lead to periodic water stress and scarcity. The mean, standard deviation or coeffi- cient of variation of the rainfall in the area is usually estimated. The climate moisture index is the ratio of plant water demand to precipitation. The climate moisture index should use the coefficient of variation instead of the standard deviation for comparison between areas with widely different means. The larger coefficient of variation indicates greater dispersion, whereas the lower coefficient of variation indicates the lower risk. The common coefficient of variation, is the weighted coefficients of variation based on k areas, presents the average daily rainfall. Therefore, the common coefficient of variation is used to describe overall water problems of k areas. In this paper, we propose four novel approaches for the confidence interval estimation of the common coefficient of variation of log-normal distributions based on the fiducial generalized confidence interval (FGCI), method of variance estimates recovery (MOVER), computational, and Bayesian approaches. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the coverage probabilities and average lengths of the confidence intervals. In terms of coverage probability, the results show that the FGCI approach provided the best confidence interval estimates for most cases except for when the sample case was equal to six populations (k D6) and the sample sizes were small (nI <50), for which the MOVER confidence interval estimates were the best. The efficacies of the proposed approaches are illustrated with example using real-life daily rainfall datasets from regions of Thailand. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coefficient of variation is often used to illustrate the variability of precipitation. Moreover, the difference of two independent coefficients of variation can describe the dissimilarity of rainfall from two areas or times. Several researches reported that the rainfall data has a delta-lognormal distribution. To estimate the dynamics of precipitation, confidence interval construction is another method of effectively statistical inference for the rainfall data. In this study, we propose confidence intervals for the difference of two independent coefficients of variation for two delta-lognormal distributions using the concept that include the fiducial generalized confidence interval, the Bayesian methods, and the standard bootstrap. The performance of the proposed methods was gauged in terms of the coverage probabilities and the expected lengths via Monte Carlo simulations. Simulation studies shown that the highest posterior density Bayesian using the Jeffreys' Rule prior outperformed other methods in virtually cases except for the cases of large variance, for which the standard bootstrap was the best. The rainfall series from Songkhla, Thailand are used to illustrate the proposed confidence intervals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper proposes the novel approaches to construct confidence intervals for the common coefficient of variation (CV) of several normal populations using the concepts of the adjusted generalized confidence interval (adjusted GCI) approach and the computational approach. The coverage probability and average length of the proposed approaches were evaluated by a Monte Carlo simulation and compared with that of the existing approaches; the generalized confidence interval (GCI) approach and the adjusted method of variance estimates recovery (adjusted MOVER) approach. The results showed that the coverage probability of the adjusted GCI approach is above the nominal confidence level of 0.95 and better than the other approaches when the sample case is small ( k ≤ 6) for all sample sizes, except when the sample sizes are very small. However, the coverage probability of the computational approach provides much better confidence interval estimate than the other approaches when the sample case is large ( k ≥ 10). The proposed approaches and the existing approaches are illustrated using three medical science data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Birnbaum–Saunders (BS) distribution, which is asymmetric with non-negative support, can be transformed to a normal distribution, which is symmetric. Therefore, the BS distribution is useful for describing data comprising values greater than zero. The coefficient of variation (CV), which is an important descriptive statistic for explaining variation within a dataset, has not previously been used for statistical inference on a BS distribution. The aim of this study is to present four methods for constructing confidence intervals for the CV, and the difference between the CVs of BS distributions. The proposed methods are based on the generalized confidence interval (GCI), a bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI), a Bayesian credible interval (BayCI), and the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. A Monte Carlo simulation study was conducted to evaluate their performances in terms of coverage probability and average length. The results indicate that the HPD interval was the best-performing method overall. PM 2.5 concentration data for Chiang Mai, Thailand, collected in March and April 2019, were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods, the results of which were in good agreement with the simulation study findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to establish new confidence intervals for the single coefficient of variation of an inversegamma distribution using Bayesian methods based on the Jeffreys, reference, and uniform priors and compare them with the Wald method. The Bayesian methods are constructed with either the credible confidence interval or the highest posterior density (HPD) interval. These concepts were extended to find the difference between the coefficients of variation for two independent inverse-gamma populations. The performances of the proposed confidence intervals were evaluated using coverage probabilities and expected lengths via Monte Carlo simulations. The results indicate that the Bayesian HPD interval based on the reference prior can be recommended for constructing confidence intervals for the coefficient of variation of a single inverse-gamma distribution and the Bayesian HPD interval based on the Jeffreys prior can be recommended for constructing confidence intervals for the difference between the coefficients of variation of two inverse-gamma distributions. Rainfall data from northern Thailand were used to illustrate the efficacies of the proposed methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]