Search

The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is a disaster that has impacted lives globally. The purpose of this paper is to understand the linkage between the COVID 19 disaster and its impact on mental health of older people 70+. To reach this aim we reviewed the literature on disasters, COVID and mental conditions of older people (70+). The mental responses of the COVID disaster are multidimensional and potentially long-lasting. Rates of mental conditions of older persons vary widely due to exposure to COVID, country, population groups and methods used when conducting the study. We identified a multitude of factors contributing to mental conditions in older people, in general. We identified COVID-19 specific factors which have an impact such as threat to own life and threat to life of loved ones, interruption of behaviors and services, and physical as well as social isolation. Additionally, in older age, life events and feelings of being a burden contribute to mental conditions. To better understand the long impact of the COVID disaster on older people's mental health we need to understand also the impact of past life events which may exacerbate the impact of the COVID disaster on mental conditions as well the impact of the current exposure to the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

According to the ‘‘Urban Health Rome Declaration’’ at European meeting ‘‘G7 Health’’ that defines the strategic aspects and actions to improve Urban, Environmental and Public Mental Health into the cities, and referring to the Agenda 2030 in which the 11th SDG argue about ‘‘Sustainable Cities and Communities. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable’’, one of the most expressive syntheses of the challenging relationship between urban planning and Public Health is stated by WHO (2016): ‘‘Health is the precondition of urban sustainable development and the first priority for urban planners’’. Referring to the Healthy Cities & Urban Health definitions, we can consider Public Health not merely an aspect of individual health protection and promotion, but a collective condition, strongly influenced by the environmental context and by the strategies implemented by local Governments. The ‘‘Health in All Policies’’ strategy, clearly underlines how health depend by the quality of outdoor and indoor living environments. In this scenario, the on-going COVID-19 pandemic is a strong reminder that urbanization has changed the way individuals and communities live, work, and interact, and that it’s urgent to make the urban systems and local communities resilient, to prevent the spread of infectious diseases today and tomorrow. Certainly, the on-going urbanization is achieving an increasing attractiveness/appeal, considering that the urban population is expected to rise to the forecasted 70% by 2050 as stated by the UN Population Division Department. The increase in building density will be one of the main global trends, with significant impacts on Public Health and the increase in risk factors affecting the contemporary city, creating a gap between built and green environments, in terms of alarming living conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic is also an accelerator, revelator and amplifier of the on-going urban emergencies in terms of environmental sustainability and Urban Health, with particular reference to the social, environmental and digital issues. Aim of the skills building seminar titled ‘‘(re)FORMING CITIES DUE TO THE COVID CHALLENGE’’, organized by the three EUPHA Section URB+MEN+ENV, it would like to be to build the capacity and knowledge between participants about the main topics and urban features capable to have relevant Public and Mental Health outcomes, with a specific focus about the COVID-19 pandemic period. For this purpose, after the three presentations, 30minutes will be used to create a discussion with the audience, using digital systems (like MENTIMETER, SOCRATIVE, etc.) to collect opinions and create a live discussion about a specific set of questions and topics. The qualitative approach of the second part of this skills building seminar is opposed to the first part, in which the three presentations will share scientific-evidences and data; both approaches can be further summarized in the drafting of a Position Paper. Key messages: • The WP would build the capacity and knowledge between the audience about the main topics and urban features capable to have relevant ENV, URB & MEN outcomes, focusing the COVID-19 pandemic period. • The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the on-going urban emergencies in terms of sustainability, Urban and Public Mental Health, with particular reference to social, environmental and digital issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Green space has been associated with health and mental health. Given the high prevalence of mental disorders and costs of worldwide mental ill health and the concurrent rise in mental disorders during the pandemic, there is a need of a better understanding of the impact of different types of green space on mental health. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of characteristics of green space on mental health in a population in a rural area of Germany. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey based on face-to-face on an online assessment instrument. The instrument consisted of sociodemographic questions (assessing age, gender, income, education), mental health related question (PHQ - 9). Green space was dichotomized into green space with agrarian features and green space without agrarian features and subsequently geocoded using ATkis TN. Results: In total n=484 persons participated (female: 240 (49, 6%), male: N=239 (49, 9%), n= missing). Mean age was 58,17 years (SD: 18,83) with an age range of 19-96 years. Depression symptoms showed n=122 (54.9%) persons. Green space without agrarian features was associated with lower symptom levels of depression (Beta: 0.045, SE: 0.023, p=0.015). However, green space with agrarian features was not related to depression. Discussion: Characteristics of green spaces are associated with better mental health; however, the clear definition of quality green space needs further elaboration. The sample is a rural sample and results need further validation in an urban sample. Outlook: In the post-pandemic era green space itself seems to have no impact on mental health, however quality green space does. These results need further validation in multinational studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

COVID-19 was accompanied by an increase in common mood-anxiety disorders in populations worldwide. This increase is consistent with what has been observed after other prior large-scale disasters but is larger in scale, scope, and duration. This has important implications both for our understanding of population mental health, and for how we may mitigate the mental health consequences of large-scale events [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]