Search

Despite steady progress in drug control work, drug-related crimes are ranked third in the total number of criminal cases in China. Based on in-depth interviews with 24 offenders who are now incarcerated for drug offenses, this paper examines the strategies employed by drug offenders to evade detection and mitigate their punishment for drug dealing. Their most frequently-used strategies focus on filtering out risky people, ensuring information asymmetry and knowing when to stop. Exploring how offenders adapt their behavior in response to punishment helps to further our understanding of crime commission and control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, China's anti-tumor drugs has shown a continuous growth trend, and the activity of antitumor research and development in China accounts for a higher proportion in the world. However, further analysis of research and development hotspots show that the research and development of anti-tumor drugs is uneven among different tumor types. Due to the small number of the patients, it is difficult to conduct clinical trials, resulting in less drug development in the field of rare tumors. However, patients' treatment needs will also bring potential opportunities for pharmaceutical companies. The development of basic research and the discovery of new molecular tumor typing make "rare tumors" a dynamic concept. The scope of "rare tumors" may gradually expand with the precise development of treatment; or as the knowledge of tumors gradually develops from histocytology to the molecular level, It is possible that certain tumors with specific mutations can be combined into a group of non-rare "pan-tumors". Rare tumors are characterized by both rare diseases and tumors. Its drug research and development should not only meet the requirements of tumor drug research and development, but also adapt to the characteristics of rare diseases. Therefore, in the drug research and development, we can refer to the research and development principle of rare disease drugs, combine with the characteristics of tumor diseases, make full use of non-rare tumor clinical trials, make full use of scientific tools and exquisite trial design, and realize the promotion of the research and development of rare tumor drugs. This paper will summarize the thoughts in the review of new drugs in the field of rare tumors, in order to provide guidance for the industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For Chinese policymakers, shouldering responsibility is often associated with high liability risk, thus resulting in low-level care for risky and stigmatized populations such as drug users. Therefore, it is crucial to explore ways to improve care access in such an uneasy policy environment. Based on long-term ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Yunnan province in southwestern China from 2013 to 2021, this paper traces the policy-making process of the Yunnan Province Methadone Oral Solution Take-Home Treatment Work Proposal. All stakeholders involved considered this policy attempt "impossible" at first, as the highly addictive methadone becomes an illegal drug once it is taken outside a clinical setting. By analyzing how a group of local government officials, together with medical practitioners and drug users, strive to legitimize and ultimately implement the policy, I argue that people's concern over liability risks strengthens the boundary between methadone as a "drug" and methadone as a "medicine," between methadone solution drinkers as "drug users" and as "patients," and between "inside the clinic" and "outside the clinic." By utilizing a culturalist approach to explore the possibility of care in such a context, this paper reveals that a " heqing heli hefa worthy-of-being-cared-for" discourse is crucial in that it acts as symbolic capital to dissolve the above boundaries embedded in the dominant political culture. Moreover, it is the key cultural logic of the "building" of care. The findings also illustrate how local policymakers negotiate and balance responsibility and liability to create a potential policy space for enabling care practices. Additionally, this study sheds light on the inclusion of care for the most stigmatized and marginalized populations, and has broad implications for policy-making in other contexts. • In the field of drug control, policies often delay and even exclude care for drug users. • Concerns over liability risks hamper users' access to take-home methadone service. • Liability risks affect people's categorizing of methadone as a medicine or a drug. • Privatization of compassion helps to mitigate liability risks. • Policymaking could also be a process of accumulating and building care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]