Search

Due to the successive switching actions in a power electronic system, considerable conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) is generated. This has been a major concern in designing power converters, which requires additional EMI filtering efforts. Passive EMI filters are the most common solutions to EMI reduction but usually consume a large portion of the volume as well as weight in power converters. Active EMI filters (AEFs) or hybrid EMI filters (HEFs) are considered best candidates over traditional passive EMI filters to achieve higher power density in power converters. The utilization of current transformer to sense or to compensate the EMI noise can increase the volume of an AEF. In this article, a transformer-less AEF, sprung from the concept of virtual impedance enhancement, is proposed. The proposed design features feedforward control with current-sensing-voltage-compensating. The operation principle of the proposed AEF is thoroughly introduced, and its performance is evaluated through simulations and experiments. Experimental results with an ac–dc power converter and a dc–ac inverter show that the proposed AEF can be generally applied to reduce conducted EMI on either ac or dc power lines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the major issues with pulsewidth modulation (PWM) is that considerable conducted emissions will be generated from power electronics converters. Random modulations are considered one of the viable solutions to reduce conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI) without adding bulky passive filtering components. Literature that investigates the application of such techniques in active front end (AFE) drives is limited. In this article, a novel random switching frequency PWM (RSF-PWM) is proposed for a grid-tied AFE drive to suppress conducted emissions. The statistical behavior of switching frequency is based on uniform distribution. Simulation and experiments are carried out on a 10-hp AFE drive. Results demonstrate that the proposed RSF-PWM can effectively reduce conducted EMI by approximately 20 dB within low-frequency range, compared with conventional constant switching frequency PWM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]