Search

In analogy to higher plants, eukaryotic microalgae are thought to be incapable of utilizing green light for growth, due to the “green gap” in the absorbance profiles of their photosynthetic pigments. This study demonstrates, that the marine chlorophyte Picochlorum sp. is able to grow efficiently under green light emitting diode (LED) illumination. Picochlorum sp. growth and pigment profiles under blue, red, green and white LED illumination (light intensity: 50–200 μmol m−2 s−1) in bottom-lightened shake flask cultures were evaluated. Green light-treated cultures showed a prolonged initial growth lag phase of one to 2 days, which was subsequently compensated to obtain comparable biomass yields to red and white light controls (approx. 0.8 gDW L−1). Interestingly, growth and final biomass yields of the green light-treated sample were higher than under blue light with equivalent illumination energies. Further, pigment analysis indicated, that during green light illumination, Picochlorum sp. formed unknown pigments (X1-X4). Pigment concentrations increased with illumination intensity and were most abundant during the exponential growth phase. Mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance data indicated, that pigments X1-X2 and X3-X4 are derivatives of chlorophyll b and a, which harbor C=C bonds in the phytol side chain similar to geranylgeranylated chlorophylls. Thus, for the first time, the natural accumulation of large pools (approx. 12 mg gDW−1) of chlorophyll intermediates with incomplete hydrogenation of their phytyl chains is demonstrated for algae under monochromatic green light (Peak λ 510 nm, full width at half maximum 91 nm). The ability to utilize green light offers competitive advantages for enhancing biomass production, particularly under conditions of dense cultures, long light pathways and high light intensity. Green light acclimation for an eukaryotic microalgae in conjunction with the formation of new aberrant geranylgeranylated chlorophylls and high efficiency of growth rates are novel for eukaryotic microalgae. Illumination with green light could enhance productivity in industrial processes and trigger the formation of new metabolites–thus, underlying mechanisms require further investigation.

Made available in DSpace on 2020-12-12T01:32:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020-11-01 Clonal plantations of Eucalyptus are among the most productive forests in the world, with intensification of silviculture and genetic breeding doubling the wood mean annual increments over the past four decades. The TECHS Project demonstrated that even with intensive silviculture, wood production varies by more than two-fold across environmental gradients, and growth of highly selected clones differs by more than two-fold within a site. Wood production accounts for less than half of the photosynthesis of a forest, and we tested two hypotheses about the relation between wood production and the entire carbon balance for five genotypes across four of the TECHS sites, varying in temperature and water availability. We hypothesized that the influence of the environment on carbon fluxes and partitioning related to gross primary production would be consistent across genotypes. We also hypothesized that carbon flux and partitioning would be more sensitive to water stress than temperature. Annual average temperatures ranged from 18 to 27 °C, and annual rainfall ranged from about 600 to 1500 mm yr−1. Water stress was further tested by reduction in rainfall within sites using troughs to capture about 30% of incoming rain. The geographic gradient led to a six-fold range in wood net primary production during the two years of measurement (from age 1.5 to 3.5 years, the period of maximum current annual increment). Gross primary production (GPP) differed only by two-fold, highlighting very large differences among sites in partitioning: wood net primary production (NPP) accounted for 44% of GPP on sites with higher GPP, and only 34% of GPP on lower GPP sites. The average differences for wood NPP among clones was also large, with about half of the differences among clones relating to differences in GPP, and half to differences in the partitioning to wood NPP. The clones showed similar partitioning patterns across sites, supporting our first hypothesis. Differences across sites and clones in partitioning of GPP to wood NPP related inversely to belowground allocation. Belowground partitioning of carbon increased with increasing temperature and increasing water stress. Our second hypothesis was rejected, as patterns across sites related somewhat more strongly to temperature than to water stress. Overall, this ecophysiological investigation in the TECHS Project underscored the importance of understanding how carbon budgets differ across sites (even with intensive silviculture), and why clones can largely differ in wood production. Department of Forest Sciences Federal University of Lavras (UFLA) Department of Forest Soils and Environmental Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP) Forestry Science and Research Institute (IPEF) School of Forestry Northern Arizona University Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Klabin Telêmaco Borba International Paper Suzano Department of Forest Soils and Environmental Sciences São Paulo State University (UNESP)