Search

Using scanning tunneling microscopy, we observe an adlayer structure that is dominated by short rows of S atoms, on unreconstructed regions of a Au(111) surface. This structure forms upon adsorption of low S coverage (less than 0.1 monolayer) on a fully reconstructed clean surface at 300 K, then cooling to 5 K for observation. The rows adopt one of three orientations that are rotated by 30 from the close-packed directions of the Au(111) substrate, and adjacent S atoms in the rows are separated by √ 3 times the surface lattice constant, a. Monte Carlo simulations are performed on lattice-gas models, derived using a limited cluster expansion based on density functional theory energetics. Models which include long-range pairwise interactions (extending to 5a), plus selected trio interactions, successfully reproduce the linear rows of S atoms at reasonable temperatures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using scanning tunneling microscopy, we characterize the size and bias-dependent shape of sulfur atoms on Cu(100) at low coverage (below 0.1 monolayers) and low temperature (quenched from 300 to 5 K). Sulfur atoms populate the Cu(100) terraces more heavily than steps at low coverage, but as coverage approaches 0.1 monolayers, close-packed step edges become fully populated, with sulfur atoms occupying sites on top of the step. Density functional theory (DFT) corroborates the preferential population of terraces at low coverage as well as the step adsorption site. In experiment, small regions with p(2 x 2)-like atomic arrangements emerge on the terraces as sulfur coverage approaches 0.1 monolayer. Using DFT, a lattice gas model has been developed, and Monte Carlo simulations based on this model have been compared with the observed terrace configurations. A model containing eight pairwise interaction energies, all repulsive, gives qualitative agreement. Experiment shows that atomic adsorbed sulfur is the only species on Cu(100) up to a coverage of 0.09 monolayers. There are no Cu-S complexes. In contrast, prior work has shown that a Cu2S3 complex forms on Cu(111) under comparable conditions. On the basis of DFT, this difference can be attributed mainly to stronger adsorption of sulfur on Cu(100) as compared with Cu(111). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]