Search

Understanding the environmental evolution of mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) is critical for forecasting weather in West Africa. This study investigated the thermodynamic and synoptic environments of MCSs over West Africa on 26 (storm 1) and 28 (storm 2) June 2018. Primary datasets used to assess the diurnal evolution of the storms were obtained from ERA5. The results showed a trapped gravity wave, enhanced by a well‐established African Easterly Jet and monsoon trough, was responsible for the initiation of storm 1. Both storms also initiated in the presence of several moist lower (925–850 hPa) to mid‐tropospheric (600 hPa) cyclonic and anticyclonic vortices, controlling inland moisture advection. The lower troposphere was moistened through moisture advection by the West African westerly jet for storm 1 and the nocturnal low‐level jet prior to initiation for storm 2. For both storms, the evolution of outgoing longwave radiation showed a consistent atmosphere of deep afternoon convection. Boundary layer height increased significantly during storm evolution to support the increasing ascent of warm air. Vegetation cover differences may have also likely aided the evolution of storm 2. The passage of gravity waves from decaying storms can aid forecasters to nowcast likely regions of afternoon convection with high accuracy. Under the GCRF African Science for Weather Information and Forecasting Techniques (SWIFT), these findings are crucial in fulfilling the project's aims of improving weather forecasting capability and communication over West Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability of any climate model to reproduce present-day climate fields is very important for the confidence in the projections of the future state of the same fields. It is against this background that the performance of the Global Coupled configuration 2 (GC2) of the Unified Model (UM), a Global Climate Model (GCM), was evaluated over the West African region (a climate-sensitive region) for two periods on 3 climatological time scales for precipitation (using the Global Precipitation Climatology Center data) and 2-m temperature where the Climate Research Unit Time Series dataset was used. The GC2's performance is also compared with 4 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) GCMs. Results indicate that spatial biases are of similar patterns across the domain for the two study periods for both variables, demonstrating the consistency of the model in reproducing the two climate variables over West Africa (WA). The simulation of temperature by the UM is better than precipitation. Biases are larger in the UM and the CMIP6 GCMs than the levels of observational uncertainties for precipitation, but for temperature, biases in all the models are within the levels of uncertainties found in the observations. Also, the holistic performance of the UM in the two fields is relatively better than the 4 CMIP6 GCMs. The two variables are also simulated better in the southern parts of the region than the northern parts of the domain by the UM. The analysis of the UM suggests a strong linkage between the two variables and therefore, a detailed investigation in how the model reproduces precipitation and temperature-based processes over WA is recommended in order to enhance the model's simulations of these climate variables. Also, the model is recommended for future investigations of precipitation and temperature climatologies over WA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 26-year simulation (1980-2005) was performed with the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model over the Volta Basin in West Africa. This was to investigate the ability of a climate version of WRF to reproduce present day temperature and precipitation over the Volta Basin. The ERA-Interim reanalysis and one realization of the ECHAM6 global circulation model (GCM) data were dynamically downscaled using two nested domains within the WRF model. The outer domain had a horizontal resolution of 50 km and covered the whole of West Africa while the inner domain had a horizontal resolution of 10 km. It was observed that biases in the respective forcing data were carried over to the RCM, but also the RCM itself contributed to the mean bias of the model. Also, the biases in the 50-km domain were transferred unchanged, especially in the case of temperature, to the 10-km domain, but, for precipitation, the higher-resolution simulations increased the mean bias in some cases. While in general, WRF underestimated temperature in both the outer (mean biases of −1.6 and −2.3 K for ERA-Interim and ECHAM6, respectively) and the inner (mean biases of −0.9 K for the reanalysis and −1.8 K for the GCM) domains, WRF slightly underestimated precipitation in the coarser domain but overestimated precipitation in the finer domain over the Volta Basin. The performance of the GCM, in general, is good, particularly for temperature with mean bias of −0.7 K over the outer domain. However, for precipitation, the added value of the RCM cannot be overlooked, especially over the whole West African region on the annual time scale (mean biases of −3% for WRF and −8% for ECHAM6). Over the whole Volta Basin and the Soudano-Sahel for the month of April and spring (MAM) rainfall, respectively, mean bias close to 0% was simulated. Biases in the interannual variability in both temperature and precipitation over the basin were smaller in the WRF than the ECHAM6. High spatial pattern correlations between 0.7 and 0.8 were achieved for the autumn precipitation and low spatial correlation in the range of 0.0 and 0.2 for the winter season precipitation over the whole basin and all the three belts over the basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]