Search

Resumen Introduccion La endocarditis infecciosa (EI) sobre transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) es una complicacion emergente. Existen datos incompletos y dispares sobre su incidencia. Se aporta la experiencia en nuestro centro sobre incidencia, mortalidad y factores asociados de la EI post-TAVI y se compara con datos de la literatura. Metodos Estudio retrospectivo observacional de los casos de EI diagnosticados en pacientes que habian recibido TAVI, entre el 1 de junio de 2009 y el 1 de noviembre de 2017, en un centro universitario tras una mediana de seguimiento de 15,3 meses (rango intercuartil [RIC] 9,1-36,2). Se analizaron la incidencia, los datos clinicos, microbiologicos y pronosticos, y los factores asociados a EI post-TAVI. Resultados Se detectaron 11 pacientes con EI de 200 TAVI. Incidencia global: 5,5% (2,77 casos por 100 anos-paciente). La mediana de tiempo hasta la EI post-TAVI fue de 112 dias (RIC 36-578), la tasa de mortalidad intrahospitalaria fue del 36,4% y la mortalidad al ano, del 54,5%. Todos los microorganismos identificados fueron grampositivos (4 Enterococcus faecalis, 3 Staphylococcus coagulasa negativo). Los pacientes con EI post-TAVI eran significativamente mas jovenes (mediana 78, RIC 73-80, frente a 82, RIC 79-84, p = 0,002), tenian un EuroSCORE mayor (5,1 ± 2,4 frente a 3,2 ± 1,2, p Conclusiones En nuestro medio, la incidencia de EI post-TAVI es mayor que la descrita en series multicentricas, lo que concuerda con la tendencia publicada en la literatura. Conlleva una elevada mortalidad y se asocia con una peor situacion clinica basal.

Background When permanent pacemaker implantation is not possible or advisable via superior venous access (i.e., axillary or subclavian veins), safe and feasible surgical alternatives are required. The femoral approach is relatively unknown and seldom studied. This single-center study analyzed 10-year outcomes of a femoral implantation approach. Methods Data about the implantation procedure (indication, approach, lead and pacemaker models, complications), patient characteristics (age, sex, medications, comorbidities), and follow-up were analyzed for all permanent pacemaker implantations using the femoral approach between June 2001 and June 2011. Results A permanent pacemaker was implanted with the femoral approach in 50 patients (mean age, 76 years [range: 45-96], 31 [61%] men). The most frequent indication was atrioventricular block, associated with sinus rhythm in 30 patients and with atrial fibrillation in eight patients. Overall, 20 patients (40%) were treated with oral anticoagulants postimplantation. Mean implantation time was 64 minutes (range: 20-210) and mean fluoroscopy time was 6.7 minutes (range: 0.2-50). Minimum follow-up window was 1 year (June 2012), with a mean of 50 months [range: 1-113]). No deaths, septic episodes, or severe complications were associated with the procedure, acute or long-term. Follow-up data were available for 46 patients, of who 21 (46%) died during follow-up (mean age, 87 years [range: 73-101]). No cause of death was associated with the femoral technique. Conclusion Permanent pacemaker implantation through femoral access is not difficult for an experienced implant surgeon. Outcomes were comparable to systems implanted by superior venous approach, and no severe complications were observed at 10-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND A left ventricular (LV) endocardial lead implant to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is feasible when a conventional implant failed due to anatomical or technical issues or when the venous implant was performed but the patient did not respond to the therapy. METHODS Data about the implantation procedure (age, sex, clinical characteristics, anticoagulant use, and previous devices), patient characteristics (indication, technique used, lead model, complications), and follow-up (clinical and echocardiographic outcome, LV lead electrical measurements) were analyzed for all CRT systems implanted using LV endocardial lead, due to failed conventional implant or nonresponse, between April 2011 and November 2016. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were implanted with an active fixation LV endocardial lead during the study period, without significant complications. There were no dislodgements or severe complications related to the implant procedure in the follow-up period (36 ± 20 months) and a high percentage of patients responded to therapy, as assessed by several indicators. CONCLUSIONS An LV endocardial lead implant was feasible when the conventional technique had previously failed or was not effective. A high rate of response was achieved without any significant complications.

We present a case of a 52 year old female who suffered from a sudden syncope. A coronariography was performed and spontaneous coronary dissection was diagnosed in the posterior descending artery after an optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed. A conservative management was decided. During hospitalization the patient presented with an episode of chest pain with an anterior ST elevation on ECG. Coronariography showed total occlusion of the left descending artery and again a dissection was diagnosed by OCT. This time, 2 stents were implanted in the affected artery. The hypothesis that the coronary adventitial volume of vasa vasorum is higher in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection has been demonstrated in a recent small study and it was observed in this patient. Conservative management is preferred in most cases, proceeding to revascularization for patients with ongoing chest pain, hemodynamic instability and ST elevation, mostly if it affects major arteries.

When permanent pacemaker implantation is not possible or advisable via superior venous access (i.e., axillary or subclavian veins), safe and feasible surgical alternatives are required. The femoral approach is relatively unknown and seldom studied. This single-center study analyzed 10-year outcomes of a femoral implantation approach.Data about the implantation procedure (indication, approach, lead and pacemaker models, complications), patient characteristics (age, sex, medications, comorbidities), and follow-up were analyzed for all permanent pacemaker implantations using the femoral approach between June 2001 and June 2011.A permanent pacemaker was implanted with the femoral approach in 50 patients (mean age, 76 years [range: 45-96], 31 [61%] men). The most frequent indication was atrioventricular block, associated with sinus rhythm in 30 patients and with atrial fibrillation in eight patients. Overall, 20 patients (40%) were treated with oral anticoagulants postimplantation. Mean implantation time was 64 minutes (range: 20-210) and mean fluoroscopy time was 6.7 minutes (range: 0.2-50). Minimum follow-up window was 1 year (June 2012), with a mean of 50 months [range: 1-113]). No deaths, septic episodes, or severe complications were associated with the procedure, acute or long-term. Follow-up data were available for 46 patients, of who 21 (46%) died during follow-up (mean age, 87 years [range: 73-101]). No cause of death was associated with the femoral technique.Permanent pacemaker implantation through femoral access is not difficult for an experienced implant surgeon. Outcomes were comparable to systems implanted by superior venous approach, and no severe complications were observed at 10-year follow-up.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an increasingly common procedure for the treatment of aortic stenosis in elderly patients with comorbidities that prevent the use of standard surgery. It has been shown that implantation without aortic regurgitation is related to lower mortality. Mild paravalvular regurgitation is inevitable in some cases due to calcification of the aortic annulus and its usually somewhat elliptical shape. Central regurgitation is less common, but has been associated with valve overdilatation in cases in which reduction of paravalvular regurgitation was attempted after the initial inflation. However, there are no reported cases of central prosthetic aortic regurgitation due to acute LV dysfunction. We report a case in which central aortic regurgitation occurred due to transient ventricular dysfunction secondary to occlusion of the right coronary artery by an embolus. The regurgitation disappeared after thrombus aspiration and normal ventricular function was immediately recovered. Resumo: A substituição percutânea de válvula aórtica (transcatheter aortic valve replacement – TAVR) tem-se tornado cada vez mais frequente para o tratamento da estenose aórtica em pacientes idosos com doenças associadas, para evitar a cirurgia convencional. Sabe-se que, não havendo refluxo aórtico após o implante, a mortalidade será mais baixa. Em alguns casos, contudo, um refluxo paravalvular moderado é inevitável, devido à calcificação do ânulo-aórtico e à sua configuração geralmente elíptica. O refluxo central é mais raro, tendo sido associado à excessiva dilatação da válvula em casos em que se tentou redução do refluxo paravalvular, após a inflação inicial. Entretanto, não foram referidos casos de refluxo aórtico central por disfunção ventricular esquerda aguda. Referimos um caso em que ocorreu refluxo aórtico central por disfunção ventricular transitória, secundária à oclusão da artéria coronária direita por êmbolo. O refluxo desapareceu após aspiração do trombo, sendo recuperada imediatamente a função ventricular normal. Keywords: Aortic regurgitation, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement, Coronary occlusion, Palavras-chave: Insuficiência aórtica, Substituição percutânea de válvula aórtica, Oclusâo coronária