Search

Moral distress is a term used to describe the cognitive-emotional dissonance that is experienced when one is compelled to act contrary to one's moral requirements. This occurs as a result of systemic constraints that prevent an individual from taking actions that they perceive as morally right, resulting in a perceived violation of one's core values and duties. There has been a growing interest in the prevalence of moral distress in healthcare, particularly as a root cause of burnout. A recent national survey on moral distress in radiology found that 98% of respondents experienced at least some degree of moral distress with 18% of respondents having left a position due to moral distress. One of the scenarios associated with the highest degree of moral distress related to the conflict that arises when one feels unable to fulfill teaching responsibilities due to high clinical demands. Now more than ever, clinician-educators are asked to do more with less time, fewer resources, and in an increasingly demanding work environment that is often discordant with providing quality education to their learners. In this manuscript, we aim to discuss the factors contributing to moral distress in radiologist clinician-educators as a framework to better understand the implications of these drivers, and to offer our perspective on potential mitigating measures., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The National Academy of Medicine Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being identifies seven priority areas, including creating positive work environments, addressing burnout and stress, promoting transparency and equity in compensation, providing education and training to promote resilience, enhancing community and social support systems, addressing the stigma associated with seeking help for mental health and substance use disorders and fostering leadership commitment and accountability for workforce well-being. This paper will explore the National Plan for Health Workforce Well-Being, providing an overview of the seven priority areas and offering strategies for implementation in radiology., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

What is play and why does it matter for radiologists? Play can take many forms in the workplace, including organic, managed, task-related, diversionary, and resistive forms of play, and play may also take the form of authentic self-expression and creation. In this review article, we will discuss the benefits of play including improved problem solving, gaining perspective, and stress reduction, and also provide low-tech and high-tech examples of beneficial play for the radiology team in work and personal contexts., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Veterans suffer substantial morbidity and mortality from lung cancer. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) can reduce mortality. Guidelines recommend counseling and shared decision-making (SDM) to address the benefits and harms of screening and the importance of tobacco cessation before patients undergo screening., Observations: We implemented a centralized LCS program at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center with a nurse program coordinator (NPC)-led telephone visit. Our multidisciplinary team ensured that veterans referred from primary care met eligibility criteria, that LDCT results were correctly coded by radiology, and that pulmonary promptly evaluated abnormal LDCT. The NPC mailed a decision aid to the veteran and scheduled a SDM telephone visit. We surveyed veterans after the visit using validated measures to assess knowledge, decisional conflict, and quality of decision making. We conducted 105 SDM visits, and 91 veterans agreed to LDCT. Overall, 84% of veterans reported no decisional conflict, and 59% reported high-quality decision making. While most veterans correctly answered questions about the harms of radiation, false-positive results, and overdiagnosis, few knew when to stop screening, and most overestimated the benefit of screening and the predictive value of an abnormal scan. Tobacco cessation interventions were offered to 72 currently smoking veterans., Conclusions: We successfully implemented an LCS program that provides SDM and tobacco cessation support using a centralized telehealth model. While veterans were confident about screening decisions, knowledge testing indicated important deficits, and many did not engage meaningfully in SDM. Clinicians should frame the decision as patient centered at the time of referral, highlight the importance of SDM, and be able to provide adequate decision support., Competing Interests: Author disclosures The study was supported by a grant from the Office of Rural Health (ORH) (NOMAD #03526) awarded to Richard Hoffman. The funding body did not play a role in the design of the study or the collection and analysis of data. Lisa Lowenstein and Robert Volk are supported by a grant funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, USA, under award number P30CA016672, using the Shared Decision-Making Core, and by a grant from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RP160674). None of the other authors have any disclosures. None of the authors have conflicts of interest with the work., (Copyright © 2023 Frontline Medical Communications Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.)

Radiology is among the medical specialties that have made the fewest gains in closing the gap in underrepresented minorities and women. Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives are important for promoting healthy learning environments for trainees, health equity for patients, and equitable career development opportunities for employees, all of which contribute to innovation in today's competitive health care environment. DEI committees can self-organize or form from institutional directives. These committees can implement impactful projects in multiple domains in education, recruitment and retention, department culture, and health equity research. This article describes the formation of a grassroots DEI committee, key initiatives and strategies, and structures for accountability. © RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Purpose: The purpose of the article is to evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of microwave ablation for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)., Materials and Methods: From September 2011 to December 2016, 33 mRCC were ablated in 18 patients using percutaneous microwave ablation. Sites of mRCC include retroperitoneum (n = 12), contralateral kidney (n = 6), liver (n = 6), lung (n = 5), adrenal gland (n = 5). Technical success, local, and distant tumor progression, and complications were assessed at immediate and follow-up imaging. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis., Results: Technical success was achieved for 33/33 (100%) mRCC tumors. Ablation provided durable local control for 28/30 (93%) mRCC tumors in 17 patients at a median duration of clinical and imaging follow-up of 1.6 years (IQR 0.7-3.6) and 0.8 years (IQR 0.5-2.7), respectively. In-hospital and perioperative mortality was 0%. There were 5 (15%) procedure-related complications including one high-grade event (Clavien-Dindo III). Four patients have died from mRCC at a median of 1.3 years (range 0.7-5.1) following ablation. Estimated OS (95% CI number still at risk) at 1, 2, and 5 years were 86% (53-96%, 11), 75% (39-92%, 8), and 75% (39-92%, 3), respectively., Conclusions: Microwave ablation of oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma is safe and provides durable local control in appropriately selected patients.