Search

Introduction: Progressive interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are rare but severe diseases, with high mortality and morbidity, with no effective pharmacological treatment allowing for long-term remission, and therefore no clear therapeutic recommendations. Several ILDs present inflammatory components (ILDic), which may justify the use of anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs, as first-step therapy. Except for systemic sclerosis (SSc)-ILD and sarcoidosis, the evidence in favor of this approach is very weak. The EvER-ILD2 study is the first one to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) versus placebo in a broad range of progressive ILD outside sarcoidosis and connective tissue diseases. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis based on RTX serum concentrations will allow identification of potential factors associated with therapeutic response and/or adverse effects., Methods: EvER-ILD2 study is a French multicentre, prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial. Patients with progressive ILDic will be randomized into 2 groups of treatment: one course of RTX (RTX group) and one course of placebo (Placebo group). The primary outcome is the change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC, mL) from baseline to 6 months. Several clinical, biological, and quality of life secondary outcomes will be measured at 3 and 6 months. A sample size of 126 patients (63 patients per group) would allow to show a 100 mL difference between groups in the change of FVC from baseline to 6 months, based on a common standard deviation for FVC change of 200 mL with a power of 80% and a two-sided alpha of 5%., Ethics and Dissemination: The protocol was approved by the French Research Ethics Committee (CPP Ile de France VI) on September 27, 2022, and by the French competent authority on October 02, 2022. This article refers to protocol V1, dated September 2022. An independent data safety monitoring board will review safety data for the duration of the trial. Results will be disseminated via peer reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences., Trial Registration Number: NCT05596786 (clinicaltrials.gov), EU-CT number 2022-500,375-31-00 (European Medicines agency)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Marchand-adam reports financial support was provided by French Government Ministry of Social Affairs Health and Womens Rights. Marchand-adam reports a relationship with French Government Ministry of Social Affairs Health and Womens Rights that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 SPLF and Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This review aimed to investigate the prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular (CV) complications in various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (IAD)., Recent Findings: Despite recent improvements in the management of IAD, patients with IAD still have an increased CV mortality and CV complications, mostly related to CV risk factors such as hypertension and inflammation. We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE libraries for controlled studies involving hypertension and CV complications in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriasis including psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Sjogren's syndrome (SS), or antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) between January 2000 and March 2022. We extracted data on the prevalence of hypertension and CV complications. Then, random-effects meta-analyses and exploratory multivariate meta-regression were performed to explore factors related to the prevalence of hypertension. Of 2726 studies screened, 122 were selected for the meta-analysis. The prevalence of hypertension was higher among patients with IAD than controls, with an overall unadjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] of 1.67 [1.58-1.76] and an adjusted OR of 1.36 [1.24-1.50]. All diseases were found to be associated with increased risk of hypertension: SLE, adjusted OR 3.40 [1.93-6.00]; psoriasis, OR 1.32 [1.16-1.51]; PsA, OR 1.49 [1.15-1.94]; RA, OR 1.28 [1.04-1.58]; SS, OR 2.02 [1.19-3.44]. Age and female sex were significantly associated with hypertension in patients with IAD. The risk of CV complications was increased: ischemic heart disease, adjusted OR 1.38 [1.21-1.57]; cerebrovascular disease, OR 1.37 [1.03-1.81]; heart failure, OR 1.28 [1.05-1.55]; atherosclerotic plaques presence, OR 2.46 [1.84-3.29]. The prevalence of hypertension and CV complications is higher among patients with IAD. Screening and management of hypertension appears to be of paramount importance in these patients., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Several high-quality, randomized, sham-controlled trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency, ultrasound and alcohol catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for reducing blood pressure (BP). A French clinical consensus document has therefore been developed to propose guidance for the appropriate use of RDN in the management of hypertension along with a dedicated care pathway and management strategy. The French experts group concluded that RDN can serve as an adjunct therapy for patients with confirmed uncontrolled, resistant essential hypertension despite treatment with≥3 antihypertensive drugs, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a renin-angiotensin system blocker and a thiazide/thiazide-like diuretic at maximally tolerated doses. Patients should have (1) an estimated glomerular filtration rate of≥40mL/min/1.73m 2 ; (2) an eligible renal artery anatomy on pre-RDN scans and (3) exclusion of secondary forms of hypertension. Additional indications might be considered for patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. Any indication of RDN should be validated by multidisciplinary hypertension teams consisting of both hypertension specialists and endovascular interventionalists in European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Excellence Centres or ESH-BP clinics. Patients should be informed about the benefit/risk ratio of RDN. Expertise in renal artery interventions and training in RDN techniques are needed for endovascular interventionalists conducting RDN procedures while centres offering RDN should have the necessary resources to manage potential complications effectively. Lastly, all patients undergoing RDN should have their data collected in a nationwide French registry to facilitate monitoring and evaluation of RDN outcomes, contributing to ongoing research and quality improvement efforts., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used to treat interstitial lung disease (ILD), but mycophenolate (MPA) pharmacokinetics was not reported for this use. This ancillary study of the EVER-ILD protocol aimed at describing the pharmacokinetic variability of MPA using population modelling in ILD., Methods: Concentrations of MPA were measured during an 8-h course for 27 ILD patients treated with 1000 mg MMF b.i.d. Absorption, distribution and elimination of MPA were described using population compartment models with first-order transfer and elimination rate constants, while accounting for both absorption peaks using gamma absorption models., Results: The pharmacokinetics of MPA was best described using a two-compartment model and two gamma absorption models, model performances of this model were still similar to those of a one gamma absorption model. This pharmacokinetics seemed to be notably influenced by body weight, renal function and inflammatory status. The distribubtion value area under the concentration curve between two administrations of MMF was AUC 12  = 52.5 mg.h/L in median (interquartile range: 42.2-58.0 mg.h/L)., Conclusion: This is the first study reporting MPA pharmacokinetics in ILD. This pharmacokinetics appears to be similar to other indications and should be further investigated in future studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Société Française de Pharmacologie et de Thérapeutique.)

Introduction: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by inflammatory low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as a first treatment in axSpA. In case of inadequate response to NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be introduced according to the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology. Until 2015, only bDMARD was recommended for axSpA in case of failure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendation proposed to start an alternative bDMARD but without advocating a switch in mode of action as proposed in rheumatoid arthritis. Since 2015, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17 has demonstrated efficacy in axSpA. Then, we designed a randomised multicentre clinical trial to identify the more effective treatment after a first anti-TNF failure in axSpA, comparing an anti-IL-17 to a second anti-TNF., Methods and Analysis: The ROC-SpA (Rotation Or Change of biotherapy after first anti-TNF treatment failure in axSpA patients) study is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, superiority open-label phase IV trial comparing an anti-IL-17 strategy (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to a second TNF blocker in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with an active axSpA (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index >4 or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) >3.5) with inadequate 3 months response to a first anti-TNF and with a stable dose of conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs for at least 1 month are included in 31 hospital centres in France and Monaco. The primary outcome is the ASAS40 response at week 24. The secondary outcomes are ASAS40 at weeks 12 and 52, other clinical scores (ASAS20, partial remission rate, ASDAS major improvement rate) at weeks 12, 24 and 52 with the drugs and anti-drugs concentrations at baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 52. The primary analysis is performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle., Ethics and Dissemination: Ethics approval was obtained from the committee for the protection of persons (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1, 6 February 2018) and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and in EudraCT. Results of this study, whether positive or negative, will be presented at national and international congresses, to national axSpA patient associations and published in a peer-reviewed journal. It could also impact the international recommendation to manage patients with axSpA., Trial Registration Number: NCT03445845 and EudraCT2017-004700-22., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ED, CM, TB-A, FR, MA, LDA and EP declare no competing interests. AF has received grants or contracts (Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, Gilead and BMS), consulting fees (AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Pfizer and Gilead) and honorary payments (BMIS, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and MSD) and participated in advisory boards (Astra-Zeneca, Gilead, Novartis, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, J&J, Mylan and UCB). HM has received grants and contract (Celltrion Healthcare, Lilly, Medac, Nordic Pharma), consulting fees (AbbVie, Accord, Celltrion Healthcare, Johnson and Johnson, UCB) and honorary payments (AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer) and participated in advisory boards (Celltrion Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, UCB)., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Acute myocarditis usually presents as chest pain with rising troponin and normal coronary arteries. Despite frequent favourable evolution at the acute phase, it is associated with heart failure and ventricular rhythm disorders, and is considered the leading cause of sudden cardiac death in young, apparently healthy, adults. There are no specific recommendations for acute myocarditis diagnosis and management, only expert consensus, given the lack of large databases., Aim: The main objective is to describe the contemporary presentation of acute myocarditis, its management and in-hospital outcomes. Secondary objectives are to investigate survival and event-free survival for up to 10years of follow-up, the determinants of prognosis, the modalities of treatment and follow-up and the gaps between expert consensus and real-life management., Methods: MyocarditIRM is a prospective multicentre cohort that enrolled 803 consecutive patients with acute myocarditis in 49 participating centres in France between 01 May 2016 and 28 February 2019. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was acknowledged by cardiac magnetic resonance, using the Lake Louise Criteria. Exclusion criteria were age<18years, lack of health coverage, contraindication to cardiac magnetic resonance and refusal to participate. Detailed information was collected prospectively, starting at admission. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (diagnosis and follow-up) is analysed centrally by the certified core laboratory IHU ICAN. Ten years of follow-up for each patient is ensured by linking with the French National Health Database, and includes information on death, hospital admissions, major clinical events and drug consumption., Conclusion: This prospective cohort with long-term follow-up represents the largest database on acute myocarditis worldwide, and will improve knowledge about its presentation, management and outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Hypertension is a burden for most kidney transplant recipients. Whether respect of hypertension guidelines results in better outcomes is unknown., Methods: In this multicenter study, office blood pressure at 12 months following transplantation (i.e., after > 20 outpatient visits), and survival were assessed over 35 years among 2004 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who received a first kidney graft from 1985 to 2019 (follow-up: 26,232 patient-years)., Results: Antihypertensive medications were used in 1763/2004 (88.0%) patients. Renin-angiotensin-system blockers were used in 35.6% (47.1% when proteinuria was > 0.5 g/day) and calcium-channel blockers were used in 6.0% of patients. Combined treatment including renin-angiotensin-system-blockers, calcium-channel blockers and diuretics was used in 15.4% of patients receiving ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs. Blood pressure was controlled in 8.3%, 18.8% and 43.1%, respectively, depending on definition (BP < 120/80, < 130/80, < 140/90 mmHg, respectively) and has not improved since the year 2001. Two-thirds of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure received < 3 antihypertensive classes. Low sodium intake < 2 g/day (vs ≥ 2) was not associated with better blood pressure control. Uncontrolled blood pressure was associated with lower patient survival (in multivariable analyses) and graft survival (in univariate analyses) vs controlled hypertension or normotension. Low sodium intake and major antihypertensive classes had no influence on patient and graft survival., Conclusions: Pharmacological recommendations and sodium intake reduction are poorly respected, but even when respected, do not result in better blood pressure control, or patient or graft survival. Uncontrolled blood pressure, not the use of specific antihypertensive classes, is associated with reduced patient, and to a lesser extent, reduced graft survival, even using the 120/80 mmHg cut-off., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Italian Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Standard of care for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with a nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) pattern proposes mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as one of the first-step therapies while rituximab is used as rescue therapy., Methods: In a randomised, double-blind, two-parallel group, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02990286), patients with connective tissue disease-associated ILD or idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (with or without autoimmune features) and a NSIP pattern (defined on NSIP pathological pattern or on integration of clinicobiological data and a NSIP-like high-resolution computed tomography pattern) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rituximab (1000 mg) or placebo on day 1 and day 15 in addition to MMF (2 g daily) for 6 months. The primary end-point was the change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline to 6 months analysed by a linear mixed model for repeated measures analysis. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) up to 6 months and safety., Findings: Between January 2017 and January 2019, 122 randomised patients received at least one dose of rituximab (n=63) or placebo (n=59). The least-squares mean change from baseline to 6 months in FVC (% predicted) was +1.60 (se 1.13) in the rituximab+MMF group and -2.01 (se 1.17) in the placebo+MMF group (between-group difference 3.60, 95% CI 0.41-6.80; p=0.0273). PFS was better in the rituximab+MMF group (crude hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.96; p=0.03). Serious adverse events occurred in 26 (41%) patients of the rituximab+MMF group and in 23 (39%) of the placebo+MMF group. Nine infections were reported in the rituximab+MMF group (five bacterial infections, three viral infections, one other) and four bacterial infections in the placebo+MMF group., Interpretation: Combination of rituximab and MMF was superior to MMF alone in patients with ILD and a NSIP pattern. The use of this combination must take into consideration the risk of viral infection., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Caille reports grants from French National Research Agency, outside the submitted work. P. Bonniaud reports grants from AstraZeneca, personal fees and non-financial (reimbursement for national and international conferences) support from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Sanofi and GSK, and non-financial support (reimbursement for national and international conferences) from Chiesi and Stallergene. R. Borie has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from Boehringer, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Savara and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. J. Cadranel reports honoraria for educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. B. Crestani has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Apellis, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Chiesi, outside the submitted work; and has also received equipment/drugs or other services from Translate Bio. M-P. Debray has received or reimbursement for national and international conferences and educational events over the past 3 years from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, outside the submitted work. D. Israel-Biet reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, honoraria for educational events from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche, payments from Galapagos as a member of an adjudication committee, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. S. Jouneau has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AIRB, Bellorophon Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer, Chiesi, Fibrogen, Galecto Biotech, Gilead, LVL, Novartis, Olam Pharm, Pfizer, Pliant Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Savara. J-M. Naccache has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. L. Plantier has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, boards, expert or opinion groups, and research projects over the past 3 years from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Sanofi, Humanair and Arair, outside the submitted work. V. Valentin has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, and boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. L. Wémeau-Stervinou reports personal fees and non-financial (reimbursement for national and international conferences) support from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi and BMS, outside the submitted work. V. Cottin reports grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene/BMS, MSD, CSL Behring, Galapagos, Galecto, Shionogi, Fibrogen, RedX, PureTech and Promedior, outside the submitted work. S. Marchand-Adam has received fees, funding or reimbursement for national and international conferences, and boards from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK and Chiesi, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2023. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have high efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with microsatellite instability (MSI) but not in microsatellite stable (MSS) tumour due to the low tumour mutational burden. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) could enhance neoantigen production thus triggering systemic anti-tumoral immune response (abscopal effect). In addition, Oxalipatin can induce immunogenic cell death and Bevacizumab can decrease the exhaustion of tumour infiltrating lymphocyte. In combination, these treatments could act synergistically to sensitize MSS mCRCs to ICI SIRTCI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, phase II, non-comparative single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SIRT plus Xelox, Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) in patients with liver-dominant MSS mCRC. The primary objective is progression-free survival at 9 months. The main inclusion criteria are patients with MSS mCRC with liver-dominant disease, initially unresectable disease and with no prior oncologic treatment for metastatic disease. The trial started in November 2020 and has included 10 out of the 52 planned patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2022 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Basiliximab, an anti-CD25 chimeric monoclonal antibody, is approved in prevention of acute kidney transplant rejection. This study aims at investigating target-mediated pharmacokinetics of basiliximab., Methods: Data from the IDEALE study, where 16 kidney transplant patients were treated with 2 40- or 80-mg basiliximab injections, were reanalysed. Basiliximab pharmacokinetics was described using a population 2-compartment target-mediated drug disposition model with the quasi-steady-state approximation., Results: Volume of distribution was significantly higher in males (P = .029). Estimated baseline target antigen (CD25) level was lower is patients cotreated with cyclosporine (P = .026)., Conclusion: This analysis allows the first description of the target-mediated nonlinear elimination of basiliximab. Our results suggest that cyclosporine cotreatment is associated with decreased target level and that an optimized dosing regimen may improve basiliximab effects., (© 2022 British Pharmacological Society.)

Background and Objective: Infliximab, an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α monoclonal antibody, has been approved in chronic inflammatory disease, including rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis. This study aimed to investigate and characterise target-mediated drug disposition of infliximab and antigen mass turnover during infliximab treatment., Methods: In this retrospective cohort of 186 patients treated with infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease or ankylosing spondylitis, trough infliximab concentrations were determined from samples collected between weeks 0 and 22 after treatment initiation. Target-mediated pharmacokinetics of infliximab was described using target-mediated drug disposition modelling. Target-mediated elimination parameters were determined for rheumatoid arthritis and Crohn's disease, assuming ankylosing spondylitis with no target-mediated elimination., Results: The quasi-equilibrium approximation of a target-mediated drug disposition model allowed a satisfactory description of infliximab concentration-time data. Estimated baseline TNF-α amounts were similar in Crohn's disease and rheumatoid arthritis (R0 = 0.39 vs 0.46 nM, respectively), but infliximab-TNF complex elimination was slower in Crohn's disease than in rheumatoid arthritis (k int = 0.024 vs 0.061 day -1 , respectively). Terminal elimination half-lives were 13.5, 21.5 and 16.5 days for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis, respectively. Estimated amounts of free target were close to baseline values before the next infusion suggesting that TNF-α inhibition may not be sustained over the entire dose interval., Conclusions: The present study is the first to quantify the influence of target antigen dynamics on infliximab pharmacokinetics. Target-mediated elimination of infliximab may be complex, involving a multi-scale turnover of TNF-α, especially in patients with Crohn's disease. Additional clinical studies are warranted to further evaluate and fine-tune dosing approaches to ensure sustained TNF-α inhibition., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: To identify patient characteristics associated with responsiveness to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Materials and Methods: Individual patient data from 29 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of a TNFi versus placebo or conventional therapy were obtained. Response to treatment was assessed in subgroups according to the following baseline characteristics: smoking status, physical activity, sex, age, body mass index, autoantibody profile, disease duration, high initial disease activity defined by Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28)(C reactive protein (CRP)) >5.1. The primary outcome was the between-treatment group difference in DAS28(CRP) change from baseline to 6 months. The secondary endpoints were the between-treatment group difference in final DAS28(CRP) measured until 6 months and EULAR response criteria until 6 months. Data from each RCT were then pooled by the Mantel-Haenszel method using a random effects model. A linear metaregression was also carried out on two data-sharing platforms separately to support the results., Results: Individual data of 11 617 patients from 29 RCTs were analysed. Until 6 months, a significantly higher EULAR non-response rate was observed in obese patients (OR 0.52 vs 0.36 for non-obese, p=0.01). A multivariable regression model performed on 7457 patients indicated that patients treated by TNFi had a final DAS28(CRP) decreased by 0.02 for each year of disease duration (p<0.001), and a 0.21 decreased for patients with a baseline DAS28(CRP) >5.1 (p<0.001)., Conclusions: In RA, patients who are more responsive to TNFi are those who are non-obese, have a long disease duration and have a high initial disease activity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PG participated on behalf of his institution in clinical trials sponsored by Abbvie, Roche, BMS, Boehringer, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Janssen and MSD; acted as a consultant and given lectures for Abbvie, Biogaran, BMS, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme and UCB; had been invited to attend international congresses by MSD, Roche, BMS and Abbvie. DM acted as a consultant and gave lectures on behalf of his institution for Pfizer, Novartis and Grifols; had been invited to attend an international congress by Janssen-Cilag, GSK and Chugai. His institution received grants for research from the non-governmental organisation Lions Club Tours Val de France. M-AS, JL-W, SD, JD and TB-A declared no conflict of interest in relation with the present work., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Infliximab is an anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody approved in chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study aimed at providing an in-depth description of infliximab target-mediated pharmacokinetics in 133 IBD patients treated with 5 mg/kg infliximab at weeks 0, 2, 14, and 22. A two-compartment model with double target-mediated drug disposition (TMDD) in both central and peripheral compartments was developed, using a rich database of 26 ankylosing spondylitis patients as a reference for linear elimination kinetics. Population approach and quasi-steady-state (QSS) approximation were used. Concentration-time data were satisfactorily described using the double-TMDD model. Target-mediated parameters of central and peripheral compartments were respectively baseline TNF concentrations (R C 0 = 3.3 nM and R P 0 = 0.46 nM), steady-stated dissociation rates (K C SS = 15.4 nM and K P SS = 0.49 nM), and first-order elimination rates of complexes (k C int = 0.17 day -1 and k P int = 0.0079 day -1 ). This model showed slower turnover of targets and infliximab-TNF complex elimination rate in peripheral compartment than in central compartment. This study allowed a better understanding of the multi-scale target-mediated pharmacokinetics of infliximab. This model could be useful to improve model-based therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab in IBD patients.