Search

Background: Optimal treatment regimens for AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma, a frequent contributor to morbidity and mortality among people with HIV, have not been systematically evaluated in low-income and middle-income countries, where the disease is most common. In this study, we aimed to investigate optimal treatment strategies for advanced stage disease in areas of high prevalence and limited resources., Methods: In this open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled people with HIV and advanced stage AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma attending 11 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in Brazil, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) with a centralised computer system to receive either intravenous bleomycin and vincristine or oral etoposide (the investigational arms), or intravenous paclitaxel (the control arm), together with antiretroviral therapy (ART; combined efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) at week 48, using a 15% non-inferiority margin to compare the investigational groups against the active control group. Safety was assessed in all eligible treated study participants. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01435018., Findings: 334 participants were enrolled between Oct 1, 2013, and March 8, 2018, when the study was closed early due to inferiority of the bleomycin and vincristine plus ART arm, as per the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The etoposide plus ART arm also closed due to inferiority in March, 2016, following a DSMB recommendation. Week-48 PFS rates were higher in the paclitaxel plus ART arm than in both investigational arms. The absolute differences in PFS were -30% (95% CI -52 to -8) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (week 48 PFS 50%, 32 to 67; n=59) and etoposide plus ART (20%, 6 to 33; n=59), and -20% (-33% to -7%) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (64%, 55 to 73; n=138) and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART (44%, 35 to 53; n=132). Both CIs overlapped the non-inferiority margin. The most common adverse events, in 329 eligible participants who began treatment, were neutropenia (48 [15%]), low serum albumin (33 [10%]), weight loss (29 [9%]), and anaemia (28 [9%]), occurring at similar frequency across treatment arms., Interpretation: Non-inferiority of either investigational intervention was not shown, with paclitaxel plus ART showing superiority to both oral etoposide plus ART and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART, supporting its use in treating advanced AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma in resource-limited settings., Funding: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is a spindle cell tumor resulting from growth dysregulation in the setting of infection with human herpes virus-8 (also called KS herpes virus). Advanced KS is characterized by poor responses to antiretroviral therapy and some of the chemotherapy readily accessible to patients in low-resource areas. Gemcitabine induced partial and complete regression of AIDS-associated KS (AIDS-KS) in 11 of 24 patients in a pilot study. The current study compares the antimetabolite gemcitabine with the standard care bleomycin and vincristine (BV) in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve patients with AIDS-KS in a resource-limited setting., Patients and Methods: Patients with persistent or progressive KS despite treatment with combined antiretroviral therapy were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 or bleomycin 15 IU/ m 2 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m 2 given twice weekly. The main end point was objective response by bidirectional measurement, adverse events, and quality of life after three cycles of chemotherapy., Results: Of 70 participants enrolled, 36 received gemcitabine and 34 received BV. Complete response was achieved in 12 patients (33.3%) in the gemcitabine arm and six (17.6%) in the BV arm ( P = .175). The partial response rate was 52.8% (n = 19) in the gemcitabine arm and 58.8% (n = 20) in the BV arm. Both study arms reported similar neurologic and hematologic adverse events; there was statistically significant baseline to post-treatment improvement in health-related quality-of-life scores., Conclusion: The results of this randomized, phase IIA trial demonstrate gemcitabine activity in chemotherapy-naïve patients with AIDS-KS, on the basis of response rates, adverse events, and health-related quality-of-life scores.

Purpose: More than 80% of women with breast cancer in Kenya present to medical care with established late-stage disease. We sought to understand why women might not participate in breast cancer screening when it is offered by comparing the views of a cohort of those who attended a screening special event with those of community controls who did not attend., Methods: All residents living close to three health centers in western Kenya were invited to participate in screening. Participants (attendees) underwent clinical breast examination by trained physician oncologists. In addition, women who consented were interviewed by using a modified Breast Cancer Awareness Module questionnaire. Nonattendees were interviewed in their homes the following day., Results: A total of 1,511 attendees (1,238 women and 273 men) and 467 nonattendee women participated in the study. Compared with nonattendees, the women attendees were older, more often employed, knew that breast cancer presented as a lump, and were more likely to have previously felt a lump in a breast. In addition, they were more likely to report previously participating in screening activities, were more likely to have performed breast self-examination, and were less concerned about wasting a doctor's time. Almost all those surveyed (attendees and nonattendees) expressed interest in future breast cancer screening opportunities., Conclusion: The women who volunteer for breast cancer screening in western Kenya are more aware of breast cancer than those who do not volunteer. Screening recruitment should seek to close these knowledge gaps to increase participation., Competing Interests: Authors’ disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and contributions are found at the end of this article.The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc. Naftali Wisindi BusakhalaNo relationship to discloseFredrick Asirwa ChiteNo relationship to discloseJuddy WachiraNo relationship to discloseViolet NaanyuNo relationship to discloseJob Wapangana KisuyaNo relationship to discloseAlfred KeterNo relationship to discloseAnn MwangiNo relationship to discloseEvanjeline NjiruNo relationship to discloseDavid ChumbaNo relationship to discloseLugaria LumaraiNo relationship to disclosePenina BiwottNo relationship to discloseIvan KiplimoNo relationship to discloseGrieven OtienoNo relationship to discloseGabriel KigenNo relationship to disclosePatrick Loehrer SrNo relationship to discloseThomus InuiNo relationship to disclose