Search

Background: Busulfan is widely used in conditioning regimens to prepare patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical due to large inter- and intra-individual variability in busulfan pharmacokinetics, and the risk of adverse consequences of toxicity including hepatic veno-occlusive disease. Busulfan is most commonly measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is not as widely available in clinical laboratories as automated routine clinical chemistry analyzers. The objective was to perform analytical verification of a busulfan immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform., Methods: The MyCare Oncology busulfan immunoassay was configured as a third-party reagent on the Abbott Alinity c. Imprecision, linearity, sample carryover, and onboard stability of reagent studies were evaluated. The performance of the busulfan immunoassay using the Abbott Alinity c was compared to the Beckman Coulter AU480 using sodium heparinized plasma, as well as to LC-MS/MS using lithium heparinized plasma., Results: The imprecision goal of 8% was met, and linearity within the analytical measurement range of 240 to 1700 ng/mL was verified. Sample carryover was negligible, and the reagents were stable onboard for at least 84 days. The busulfan immunoassay correlated well with LC-MS/MS (slope = 0.949, y-intercept = -7.8 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9935) and the Beckman Coulter AU480 (slope = 1.090, y-intercept = -34.5 ng/mL, r2 = 0.9988)., Conclusions: This study demonstrated successful analytical verification of a busulfan third-party immunoassay on the Abbott Alinity c platform. The ability to perform TDM of busulfan on a routine clinical chemistry analyzer will positively impact turnaround times to improve patient outcomes., (© Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine 2024. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of busulfan (BU) is currently performed by plasma sampling in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Saliva samples are considered a noninvasive TDM matrix. Currently, no salivary population pharmacokinetics (PopPKs) model for BU available. This study aimed to develop a PopPK model that can describe the relationship between plasma and saliva kinetics in patients receiving intravenous BU. The performance of the model in predicting the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state (AUC ss ) based on saliva samples is evaluated. Sixty-six patients with HSCT were recruited and administered 0.8 mg/kg BU intravenously. A PopPK model for saliva and plasma was developed using the nonlinear mixed effects model. Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) optimization was used to estimate the model's predictive performance. Plasma and saliva PKs were adequately described with a one-compartment model and a scaled central compartment. Body surface area correlated positively with both clearance and apparent volume of distribution (Vd), whereas alkaline phosphatase correlated negatively with Vd. Simulations demonstrated that the percentage root mean squared prediction error and lower and upper limits of agreements reduced to 10.02% and -16.96% to 22.86% based on five saliva samples. Saliva can be used as an alternative matrix to plasma in TDM of BU. The AUC ss can be predicted from saliva concentration by Bayesian MAP optimization, which can be used to design personalized dosing for BU., (© 2023 The Authors. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Personalizing busulfan doses to target a narrow plasma exposure has improved the efficacy and lowered the toxicity of busulfan-based conditioning regimens used in hematopoietic cell transplant. Regional regulations guide interlaboratory proficiency testing for busulfan concentration quantification and monitoring. To date, there have been no comparisons of the busulfan pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendation protocols used in these laboratories. Here, in collaboration with the Dutch Association for Quality Assessment in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology, a novel interlaboratory proficiency program for the quantitation in plasma, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dosing of busulfan was designed. The methods and results of the first 2 rounds of this proficiency testing are described herein., Methods: A novel method was developed to stabilize busulfan in N,N-dimethylacetamide, which allowed shipping of the proficiency samples without dry ice. In each round, participating laboratories reported their results for 2 proficiency samples (one low and one high busulfan concentrations) and a theoretical case assessing their pharmacokinetic modeling and dose recommendations. All participants were blinded to the answers; descriptive statistics were used to evaluate their overall performance. The guidelines suggested that answers within ±15% for busulfan concentrations and ±10% for busulfan plasma exposure and dose recommendation were to be considered accurate., Results: Of the 4 proficiency samples evaluated, between 67% and 85% of the busulfan quantitation results were accurate (ie, within 85%-115% of the reference value). The majority (88% round #1; 71% round #2) of the dose recommendation answers were correct., Conclusions: A proficiency testing program by which laboratories are alerted to inaccuracies in their quantitation, pharmacokinetic modeling, and dose recommendations for busulfan in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients was developed. These rounds of proficiency testing suggests that additional educational efforts and proficiency rounds are needed to ensure appropriate busulfan dosing., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To apply therapeutic drug monitoring and dose-individualization of intravenous Busulfan to paediatric patients and evaluate the impact of syringe-pump induced Busulfan infusion lag-time after in vitro estimation., Methods: 76 children and adolescents were administered 2 h intravenous Busulfan infusion every 6 h (16 doses). Busulfan plasma levels, withdrawn by an optimized sampling scheme and measured by a validated HPLC-PDA method, were used to estimate basic PK parameters, AUC, Cmax, kel, t1/2, applying Non-Compartmental Analysis. In vivo infusion lag-time was simulated in vitro and used to evaluate its impact on AUC estimation., Key Findings: Mean (%CV) Busulfan AUC, Cmax, clearance and t1/2 for pediatric population were found 962.3 μm × min (33.1), 0.95 mg/L (41.4), 0.27 L/h/kg (33.3), 2.2 h (27.8), respectively. TDM applied to 76 children revealed 6 (7.9%) being above and 25 (32.9%) below therapeutic-range (AUC: 900-1350 μm × min). After dose correction, all patients were measured below toxic levels (AUC < 1500 μm × min), no patient below 900 μm × min. Incorporation of infusion lag-time revealed lower AUCs with 17.1% more patients and 23.1% more younger patients, with body weight <16 kg, being below the therapeutic-range., Conclusions: TDM, applied successfully to 76 children, confirmed the need for Busulfan dose-individualization in paediatric patients. Infusion lag-time was proved clinically significant for younger, low body-weight patients and those close to the lower therapeutic-range limit., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Busulfan (Bu) is commonly used in myeloablative conditioning regimens for children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The standard target area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of Bu is approximately 900-1500 µM min. In previous studies using five fixed doses (0.8-1.2 mg/kg) for Bu without dose adjustment, 75% patients achieved the target AUC. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the percentage of target AUC for intravenous (IV) Bu in Thai children. IV Bu was administered every 6 h over 16 doses. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis after the first, ninth, and thirteenth doses of Bu. Seven patients (2-14 years; median 6 years) were diagnosed with thalassemia ( n  = 4), acute myeloid leukemia ( n  = 2), and pure red cell aplasia. Three, two, and two patients received Bu at 1.1, 1.2, and 0.8 mg/kg, respectively. The AUC of Bu varied from 292-1714 µM min (median = 804). Nine (42.86%), eleven (52.38%), and one (4.76%) AUC values were within, below, and above the target, respectively. The median (range) Bu clearance was 5.93 (1.91-14.65) mL/min/kg. In this study, 42.86% AUC value achieved the target, which was lower than that in previous studies. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu should be considered in Thai children receiving five fixed doses of IV Bu, and dose adjustment should be performed as necessary. Further PK studies for Bu with a larger sample size are warranted for confirming the necessity of TDM in every step dose of Bu.(Trial registration numbers; TCTR20190528003).

Background and Objectives: Busulfan (Bu) is an old drug, but is still well recommended as an alkylating agent during conditioning therapy, before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Although its dose administration is standardized and based on patient weight, therapeutic drug monitoring is required in order to maintain its exposure [as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to infinity AUC 0-∞ ] within a narrow therapeutic range and, if necessary, to adjust the dose with as short a lead time as possible. The aim of the study is to evaluate the agreement (as calculated AUC) between a gold standard analytical method and a new one that is faster and easier., Methods: We analyzed 221 plasma samples from 37 children (0.25-16 years; 4-62.5 kg) and 11 adults (21-59 years; 45-80 kg), corresponding to 52 AUC values (ng h/mL). The drug exposure was calculated, simultaneously, by two validated analytical methods. The reference method was a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay combined with an ultraviolet detector (UV). The test method had a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) as detector; the clean-up procedures of the samples were different and faster., Results: The agreement between the two methods (reference and test) was evaluated in terms of Bu exposure differences based on Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and represented by the Bland-Altman plot. The CCC between the AUC of the two methods was excellent (0.868; 95% CI: 0.802-0.935). The precision of the measures (expressed by Pearson's italic "r") was 0.872, and the accuracy (accounted by the bias correction factor) was 0.996., Conclusions: We can conclude that the HPLC-MS/MS assay represents a very good alternative to the reference.

A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative detection of busulfan (BU) in children's hemolytic samples by HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was established. In this study, the sample preparation procedure involved a one-step protein precipitation with acetonitrile (ACN) solution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method used Hypersil GOLD C 18 . The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution (containing 0.1% formic acid) and ACN with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Multiple reaction monitoring modes were used for quantitative analysis and the ion pairs of BU and BU-d8 were m/z 263.9 → 150.9 and 272.0 → 159.0, respectively. BU had a good linearity in the range of 0.01-10 μg mL -1 . The intra- and inter-day relative error was between -7.21% and 8.26%, and the coefficient of variation was less than 12.64%. The average extraction recovery rate in plasma samples was 99.76% ± 6.53%, and the matrix in normal plasma and hemolyzed plasma had no significant effect on the detection results. Normal and hemolytic samples could maintain good stability at 4, 25 and -40°C. As a result, this method is particularly suitable for determining BU in hemolytic samples from children with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and this study provides the methodological basis for further research on the pharmacokinetics of BU in children with HSCT., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent commonly used in preparative regimens for hematologic malignant and non-malignant patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The objective of the present study was to develop an UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of Bu in human plasma. A total of 55 patients with hematologic malignancies (n = 34) and non- malignancies (n = 21) received myeloablative Bu therapy prior to HSCT. A tandem mass spectrometric method was developed and validated to quantify Bu levels in these patients. The method was fully validated over the concentration range of 25-2000 ng/mL (r > 0.99). The assay method demonstrated good precision and accuracy. Stability studies indicated that the drug was stable in various conditions. Incurred sample reanalysis findings were within acceptable ranges (<15% of the nominal concentration). Based on the 1 st dose AUC results, one third of hematologic malignant patients and half of non-malignant patients needed dose adjustment. However, in subsequent doses (5 th , 9 th , and 13 th ), 77%, 82% and 82%, respectively, of hematologic malignant patients and 71%, 67% and 86%, respectively, of non-malignant patients achieved the target range of Bu AUC. The suitability of the developed method for routine TDM of Bu in HSCT patients was demonstrated. The study suggests that the pharmacokinetic profile of Bu varies in both groups.

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for busulfan supports dose adjustment during conditioning for stem cell transplantation. The authors aimed to develop and validate limited sampling strategies (LSS) of 4-5 samples for a precise estimation of the area under concentration (AUC)-time curve of busulfan, in plasma as an alternative to an intensive sampling strategy (ISS) requiring 9-10 samples., Methods: ISS TDM data from 297 patients (≤18 years of age) were used. AUCLSS was calculated using the trapezoidal rule and multiple linear regression (MLR). Unlike more complex modeling methods, MLR does not require sophisticated software or advanced training of personnel. MLR coefficients were estimated in the development subset containing randomly selected 50% of the records and were then used to calculate the AUCLSS of the remaining records (the validation subset). The agreement between dose adjustment recommendations (DAR) based on ISS and LSS, in the validation subset, was evaluated by a Bland-Altman analysis. A DAR deviating from an ISS-based reference by <15% was deemed acceptable., Results: Twelve LSSs were acceptable. Sampling at 0, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the start of the second infusion (LSS15) yielded the best performance, with DAR deviating from the reference by <10% for 95% of cases; the AUCLSS was determined as follows: AUCLSS = 74.7954 × C(0) + 81.8948 × C(120) + 38.1771 × C(180) + 138.1404 × C(240) + 54.1837. This LSS and LSS13 performed similarly well in an independent external validation., Conclusions: MLR-based estimates of AUCLSS provide DARs that deviate minimally from the reference. LSSs allow the reduction of patient discomfort, a ∼50% reduction of TDM-related workload for nursing staff and blood loss and a ∼25% reduction in laboratory workload. These benefits may encourage wider use of busulfan TDM, supporting safe and efficacious personalized dosing.

Bone marrow transplantation is used to treat particular types of cancers such as lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Appropriate dosing of busulfan during the preparative phase is critical for a successful allograft; if blood concentrations get too high significant liver toxicity can occur, if blood concentrations are too low, then graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) can develop. Busulfan monitoring in blood allows hospitals with the opportunity to provide individualized medicine to patients and improve overall patient outcome. Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is an important analytical method for quantification of busulfan in plasma in order to optimize the dose. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Analysis of busulfan by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Determination of busulfan concentration in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation is necessary in order to reduce toxic effects and/or graft rejection due to unadjusted dose exposure. A new extraction method namely dispersive micro solid phase extraction (DMSPE) based on mesoporous sorbent was used for cleaning-up the plasma samples. DMSPE coupling with liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was implemented for the determination of busulfan dosage in plasma samples. The linear range was found from 10 to 2000 ng/ml. The precision and accuracy were found better than 15% according to Food and drug Administration (FDA) guideline. This method was successfully used to determine the busulfan in patients administrated busulfan as part of the preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Busulfan (Bu) is one of the conditioning regimen components for pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bu therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential for a successful treatment outcome and toxicity evasion. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a rapid and simple method for Bu TDM, compared with conventional plasma sampling. This study evaluated the feasibility of using the DBS method for Bu TDM. The hematocrit (Hct) and conditioning day were also examined for their impact on the DBS method's performance., Methods: Venous blood collected from 6 healthy volunteers was diluted, using their plasma into 4 samples of varying Hct values. Each sample was spiked with Bu calibrators (300, 600, and 1400 ng/mL), prepared using DBS and dried plasma spot (DPS) sampling and analyzed using a validated liquid-chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry method. Clinical blood samples (n = 153) from pediatric patients (n = 15) treated with Bu (mainly from doses 1, 2, 5, and 9) were used to prepare paired volumetric DBS and DPS samples. A Bland-Altman plot and Deming regression were used to define the agreement between the paired DBS and DPS measurements. Passing-Bablok regression analyses investigated the effects of Hct and conditioning day on the linearity between both methods., Results: In vitro analyses showed good agreement between DBS and DPS measurements, with a mean difference of -5.4% and a 95% confidence interval on the limits of agreement of -15.3% to 4.6%. Clinical samples showed good correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.96; slope = 1.00) between the DBS and DPS methods. The DBS method met the clinical acceptance limits for clinical samples, with a bias <±20%. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement, with only 5.8% of paired measurements exceeding the limits of agreement (±1.96 SD), although within its 95% confidence interval. Hct observations ranged from 21.7% to 34.7% and did not affect Bu concentrations measured from DBS in either the in vitro or in vivo studies., Conclusions: These results show that DBS is a useful method for Bu TDM, provided samples are analyzed on the collection day. DBS sampling offers advantages over traditional plasma sampling in infants and younger children because only small volumes of blood are required.

Busulfan and melphalan are cytotoxic DNA alkylating agents that are used in many hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) conditioning regimens. We report the development of an assay using turbulent flow liquid chromatography (TFLC) and tandem mass spectrometry to simultaneously measure the concentration of busulfan (Bu) and melphalan (Mel) in human plasma. The method involves precipitating proteins in the plasma specimen with an organic solvent containing deuterated internal standards of both compounds. Following centrifugation, an aliquot of the supernatant was injected into the TFLC mass spectrometry system operated in the positive ion mode. The analytical measurement range for both compounds was 10-5000 ng/mL, and with validated dilutions the reportable range was extended to 25,000 ng/mL. Intra-day and inter-day (n = 20 day) precision studies showed a coefficient of variation (CV) of <7% at several concentrations across the measurement range. To determine accuracy recovery studies were performed at several concentrations spanning the measurement range. Recoveries for both compounds were between 98 and 103%. Additionally, busulfan was compared with an existing assay and showed excellent correlation. Experiments were conducted to rule out matrix effects, carryover and interference from endogenous substances. The validated clinically reportable range (CRR) and assay precision will allow this assay to be used clinically to monitor and adjust Mel and Bu levels to ensure better therapeutic outcomes and also to support clinical trials aimed at better defining therapeutic ranges., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A methodology is proposed, based on Raman spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis, to determine the Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for therapeutic drug monitoring in human serum, using the examples of Busulfan, a cell cycle non-specific alkylating antineoplastic agent, and, Methotrexate, a chemotherapeutic agent and immune system suppressant. In this study, ultrafiltration is employed to fractionate spiked human pooled serum to efficiently recover the drug in the filtrate prior to performing Raman analysis. The drug concentration ranges were chosen to encompass the recommended therapeutic ranges and toxic levels in patients. Raman spectra were collected from the filtrates in the liquid form, using an inverted backscattering microscopic geometry, using 532 nm as source. Finally, prediction models were built by using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and LOD and LOQ were calculated directly from the linear prediction models. The LOD calculated for Busulfan is 0.0002 ± 0.0001 mg mL-1, 30-40 times lower than the level of toxicity, enabling the application of this method in target dose adjustment of Busulfan for patients undergoing, for example, bone marrow transplantation. The LOD and LOQ calculated for Methotrexate are 7.8 ± 5 μM and 26 ± 5 μM, respectively, potentially enabling high dose monitoring. The promising results obtained from this study suggest the potential of Raman spectroscopy for therapeutic drug monitoring of drugs in bodily fluids.

This study aimed to predict the area under the curve (AUC) of the initial busulfan dose using a test dose with the sparse sampling scheme in adult patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplant. A test dose of 0.8 mg/kg busulfan was used 2 days before twice-daily intravenous busulfan-based conditioning regimens were administered. The AUC and the clearance (CL) were calculated for both the test dose and the first dose (AUC T , CL T , AUC 1, and CL 1 ) by noncompartmental analysis. The sparse sampling schemes of the test dose were developed by Bayesian method based on the population pharmacokinetic model. The optimal sparse sampling schemes were determined by evaluating the mean prediction error, the root mean square error, the absolute mean prediction error, and Bland-Altman plot. The mean AUC 1 was 7.20 ± 1.48 mg • h/L, which ranged from 4.70 to 9.46 mg • h/L. The AUC 1 was below the therapeutic concentration of 7.38 mg • h/L in 45% (9 of 20) of the patients. The CL T of 3.05 ± 0.56 mL/min/kg was not significantly different with the CL 1 of 3.03 ± 0.69 mL/min/kg (P = .901). A sampling scheme at 2 and 6 hours after the test dose was developed to predict the AUC T (mean prediction error of 1.64%, root mean square error of 6.17%, and absolute mean prediction error of 4.94%). Additionally, the Bland-Altman plot showed that the 2-sampling scheme provided an acceptably accurate prediction of the AUC 1 . A test dose with a 2-sampling scheme was sufficient to personalize the initial busulfan dosing in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Pharmacokinetics (PK) is the study of the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs. Many chemotherapeutic agents have a sensitive PK index, in which a small margin in blood concentrations is the difference between nontherapeutic, therapeutic, and adverse outcomes., Objectives: This article will provide an overview of evidence-based approaches to the collection of PK samples, monitoring of PK levels, and the resulting management of patients undergoing PK testing., Methods: A case study involving busulfan, an alkylating agent used in the pre-stem cell transplantation setting, will highlight the cross-contamination of samples while a drug is being infused through a central venous catheter with PK sample collection from a proximal peripherally inserted central catheter. The influence of false elevations in drug concentrations on PK-guided dose adjustments will also be emphasized., Findings: Imprecise blood collections or cross-contamination of samples may lead to inaccurate drug concentration results and, subsequently, undesired low or high drug dosage calculations.

Objective: Busulfan, frequently used as a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, has a narrow therapeutic range and wide intra-and interpatient variabilities. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan is necessary to ensure that the drug concentrations of patients are within a targeted therapeutic range. In this study, we developed a simple and accurate method for measuring busulfan concentrations using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)., Methods: Separation and detection of busulfan was performed using T3 column equipped with LC-MS/MS. Busulfan was isolated from 50 μL human plasma after mixing with busulfan -2 H 8 (internal standard) solution, calibrator, and quality-control material. The sample was eluted and gradated with a mobile phase composed of ammonium acetate, formic acid, and water or methanol. The busulfan concentration was quantified using a six-point standard curve. Busulfan and busulfan -2 H 8 were detected in positive-ion multiple-reaction-monitoring mode. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guideline, we verified the precision, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), and carryover., Results: Busulfan and busulfan -2 H 8 were detected at m/z 264.1>151.1 and 272.2>159.1. The total run time was 3 min. Both intra-and inter-assay coefficients of variation were <3%. The calibration curve was linear at 25-5,000 ng/mL. The LOD and LOQ were 2.5 ng/mL and 25 ng/mL, respectively. The recoveries ranged from 92.0-104.8% and the carryover was-0.02%., Conclusions: Our method for busulfan reduces total run time and has excellent analytical performance. It will be a useful method for therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan in clinical laboratories., (© 2019 by the Association of Clinical Scientists, Inc.)

Background and Objectives: Treosulfan is a prodrug applied in the treatment of ovarian cancer and conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. So far, the bioanalysis of treosulfan in either whole blood or red blood cells (RBC) has not been carried out. In this work, the RBC/plasma partition coefficient (K e/p ) of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide was determined for the first time., Methods: Male and female 10-week-old Wistar rats (n = 6/6) received an intraperitoneal injection of treosulfan at the dose of 500 mg/kg body weight. The concentrations of treosulfan and its monoepoxide in plasma (C p ) and RBC were analyzed with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method., Results: The mean K e/p of treosulfan and its monoepoxide were 0.74 and 0.60, respectively, corresponding to the blood/plasma partition coefficient of 0.88 and 0.82. The Spearman test demonstrated that the K e/p of the prodrug correlated with its C p , but no correlation between the K e/p and C p of the active monoepoxide was observed., Conclusions: Treosulfan and its monoepoxide achieve higher concentrations in plasma than in RBC; therefore, the choice of plasma for bioanalysis is rational as compared to whole blood. The distribution of treosulfan into RBC may be a saturable process at therapeutic concentrations.

Currently, there is an urgent need to establish the optimal dosing of TREO in conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, especially in children. For that purpose, pharmacokinetic analyses are ongoing within clinical phase II and III trials. In this paper, HPLC methods for determination of prodrug treosulfan and/or its biologically active epoxides in human plasma or serum are reviewed for the first time, including the spectrum of analytes being quantified, detection type, and derivatization methodology. The major focus is addressed to the stability of TREO and its monoepoxide related with different strategies of patients' blood processing, e.g. blood pH lowering to different values, no pH adjustment; centrifugation of blood immediately after collection or within a few hours later. This issue is crucially important for the robust bioanalysis because the epoxytransformation of TREO is a nonenzymatic, highly pH and temperature-dependent reaction. In-depth analysis of the literature results demonstrates that some methodologies of blood treatment could produce the systematic underestimation of TREO concentrations. Consequently, the drug clearance and volume of distribution will be overestimated, which might false the association of the drug exposure with the regimen-related toxicity and clinical outcomes. The paper indicates the deficiencies of the blood processing strategies and offers hints for their refinement. The provided information ought to be important in the current investigations of the personalized TREO pharmacokinetics., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Busulfan is commonly used as a conditioning regimen before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There is a big inter-individual variability in busulfan exposure and the narrow therapeutic index, especially in pediatric population. Therefore, to achieve therapeutic efficacy and safety concurrently, personalized busulfan dosing, guided by pharmacokinetic study with serial plasma samples, is needed a few hours afterwards., Methods: A fast, sensitive, and accurate method for busulfan measurement was developed, validated, and implemented with liquid-chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). The sample preparation procedure involves only protein precipitation and dilution, and the HPLC-MS/MS method takes 3 min/sample. The assay was linear from 10 ng/ml to 7500 ng/ml (R 2  = 0.99). Recoveries were above 90%. The precision was determined at 3 levels (30, 300 and 4000 ng/ml): the intra-day variability (%CV) ranged from 1.4% to 2.5% (n = 20); the inter-day variability ranged from 2.2% to 5.5% (n = 20). The accuracy of the HPLC-MS/MS test was evaluated with an old HPLC-fluorescence method (n = 84), and a Correlation Coefficient (R) of 0.99 was observed., Conclusions: The analytical performance of the assay allows for timely dose adjustment and has been implemented in clinical service for better clinical outcome., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: The aim of this report is to describe the experience in the management of busulphan-based conditioning regimen administered before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in children., Methods: We report the values of the first dose AUC (area under the concentration-time curve, normal target between 3600 and 4800 ng·h/mL) in children treated with oral and intravenous busulphan, and we analyze the impact of some clinical variables in this cohort of patients., Results: 82 children treated with busulphan before HSCT were eligible for the study: 57 received oral busulphan with a mean AUC of 3586 ng·h/mL, while 25 received intravenous busulphan with a mean AUC of 4158 ng·h/mL. Dose adjustment was based on first dose AUC. The dose was increased in 36 children (43.9%) and decreased in 26 patients (31.7%). Age at HSCT (P = 0.015), cumulative dose of busulphan as mg/m 2 (P < 0.001), busulphan dose prescribed as mg/Kg (P = 0.001), intravenous busulphan administration (P < 0.001), type of stem source cells (P = 0.016), and type of HSCT (P = 0.03) were associated with AUC levels. No statistically significant differences were found between transplant-related toxicity, acute and chronic graft versus host disease, engraftment, and AUC levels., Conclusions: We concluded that older age at HSCT, intravenous administration of busulphan, cumulative, and prescribed dose of busulphan are associated with higher AUC levels. The absence of significant correlations between toxic events, graft failure, and AUC suggests the efficacy of busulphan concentrations monitoring in our patients.

Background: Busulfan (Bu) is an alkylating agent used as part of the conditioning regimen in pediatric patients before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Despite intravenous (IV) administration and dosing recommendations based on age and weight, reports have revealed interindividual variability in Bu pharmacokinetics and the outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this context, adjusting doses to Bu's narrow therapeutic window is advised. We aimed to assess the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Bu in children, the reliability of Bu quantification methods, and its stability in plasma when stored for up to 5 years., Methods: Eighteen patients from our TDM center (252 samples) were included. All of them received a 2-hour Bu IV infusion 4 times daily for a total of 16 doses. The first dose of Bu was age/weight-based, and the subsequent doses were adjusted from third or fifth dose onward based on the estimated first dose pharmacokinetic parameters to target steady-state concentrations (Css) of 600-900 ng/mL. The performance of our unit's high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method was assessed using a quality control (QC, 35 series) chart. International, multicenter, cross-validation test (n = 21) was conducted to validate different analytical methods. To assess Bu stability, regression analyses and Bland-Altman plots were performed on measurements at repeated time points on samples stored at -80°C for up to 5 years., Results: We observed a 4.2-fold interindividual variability in Bu Css after the first dose, with only 28% of children having a Css within the target range. During the 4 days of conditioning, 83% of children had their doses modified according to TDM recommendations. This achieved a Css within the target range in 75% of the children. Routine QC measurements were generally within the ±15% range around theoretical values, showing the optimal robustness of our center's analytical method. Two of the 21 Bu TDM centers returned inadequate results during cross-validation testing; both used a UV detection method. Storage at -80°C led to a fall in Bu content of 14.9% ± 13.4% at 2-4 years and of 20% ± 5% by 5 years (roverall = 0.92)., Conclusions: We conclude that TDM is an effective method of achieving targeted Bu levels in children. QC programs are crucial to monitoring and maintaining the quality of an analytical method.

Parenteral administration of Busulfan (BU) conquers the bioavailability and biovariability related issues of oral BU by maintaining the plasma drug concentration in therapeutic range with minimal fluctuations thereby significantly reducing the side effects. Busulfex ® is the only commercially available parenteral formulation of BU composed of organic solvents N, N-dimethylacetamide and polyethylene glycol 400. Since, BU is highly susceptible to hydrolytic degradation; Busulfex ® has poor physical and chemical stability in IV fluids. It is quintessential to develop organic solvent free formulation of BU using parenterally acceptable excipients to enhance its solubility and stability in IV fluids. The Proliposomal formulation of BU was prepared by adsorption-sonicaton method using egg phosphotidylcholine, cholesterol, tween 80 and mannitol. Vesicle size and entrapment efficiency were optimized using 2 4 full factorial design and characterized by DSC, PXRD and TEM. Optimized formulation spontaneously forms 74.0 ± 1.7 nm sized nanovesicles with 72.9 ± 1.5 % entrapment efficiency. DSC and PXRD studies revealed that BU was present in phospholipid bilayer in amorphized form and TEM images confirmed the multi lamellar vesicular structure. Physicochemical stability of BU was significantly enhanced with proliposomal formulation. In-vivo studies in Sprague Dawley rats showed proliposomal formulation has comparable immunosuppression activity and 110.62 % relative bioavailability as compared to marketed Busulfan formulation i.e. Busulfex ® ., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There is an increasing interest in use of treosulfan (TREO), a structural analogue of busulfan, as an agent in conditioning regimens prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both in pediatric and adult populations. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model and to establish limited sampling strategies (LSSs) enabling accurate estimation of exposure to this drug., Methods: The study included 15 pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases, undergoing conditioning regimens prior to HSCT including TREO administered as a 1 h or 2 h infusion at daily doses of 10, 12, or 14 g/m 2 . A population pharmacokinetic model was developed by means of non-linear mixed-effect modeling approach in Monolix® software. Multivariate regression analysis and Bayesian method were used to develop 2- and 3-point strategies for estimation of exposure to TREO., Results: Pharmacokinetics of TREO was best described with a two-compartmental linear model with proportional residual error. Following sampling schedules allowed accurate estimation of exposure to TREO: 1 h and 6 h or 1 h, 2 h, and 6 h for a TREO dose 12 g/m 2 in a 1 h infusion, or at 2 h and 6 h or 2 h, 4 h, and 8 h for a TREO dose of 12 g/m 2 and 14 g/m 2 in a 2 h infusion., Conclusions: A two-compartmental population pharmacokinetic model of TREO was developed and successfully used to establish 2- and 3-point LSSs for accurate and precise estimation of TREO AUC 0→∞ .

Treosulfan-based conditioning is increasingly employed in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Data on treosulfan pharmacokinetics in children are scarce, and the relationship between treosulfan exposure, toxicity and clinical outcome is unresolved. In this multicentre prospective observational study, we studied treosulfan pharmacokinetics and the drug's relationship with regimen-related toxicity and early clinical outcome in 77 paediatric patients. Treosulfan dose was 30 g/m 2 , administered over 3 consecutive days in infants <1 year old (n = 12) and 42 g/m 2 in children ≥1 year old (n = 65). Mean day 1 treosulfan exposure was 1744 ± 795 mg*h/l (10 g/m 2 ) and 1561 ± 511 mg*h/l (14 g/m 2 ), with an inter-individual variability of 56 and 33% in the respective groups. High treosulfan exposure (>1650 mg*h/l) was associated with an increased risk of mucosal [Odds ratio (OR) 4·40; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·19-16·28, P = 0·026] and skin toxicity (OR 4·51; 95% CI 1·07-18·93, P = 0·040). No correlation was found between treosulfan exposure and the early clinical outcome parameters: engraftment, acute graft-versus-host disease and donor chimerism. Our study provides the first evidence in a large cohort of paediatric patients of high variability in treosulfan pharmacokinetics and an association between treosulfan exposure and early toxicity. Ongoing studies will reveal whether treosulfan exposure is related to long-term disease-specific outcome and late treatment-related toxicity., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

For the recent years, the application of treosulfan (TREO)-based conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been increasing as an alternative to busulfan-based therapy, especially for patients presenting high risk of developing hepato-, pulmo-, and neurotoxicity. So far, the penetration of TREO and its epoxy-derivatives into central nervous system and aqueous humor of the eye has been investigated. However, lacking knowledge on the compounds distribution into the other key tissues precludes comprehensive understanding and assessment of TREO clinical efficacy and toxicity. In this paper, the disposition of TREO and its active monoepoxide (S,S-EBDM) in a bone marrow, liver, lungs, brain, and quadriceps femoris was studied in an animal model. Male and female adult Wistar rats (n=48/48) received an intraperitoneal injection of TREO at the dose of 500mg/kg b.w. Concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM in tissues were determined with a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic calculations were performed in WinNonlin using a noncompartmental analysis. Mean values of the maximal concentrations of TREO and S,S-EBDM in the organs were sex-independent and ranged from 61 to 1650μM and 25-105μM, respectively. No quantifiable levels of S,S-EBDM were found in the liver. Average tissue/plasma area under the curve (AUC) ratio for unbound TREO increased in the sequence: brain (0.10)

Background Optimization of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of busulfan, an essential component of conditioning regimens, improves the outcomes in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Traditional sampling methods for calculating AUC require multiple sampling. Objective To establish a limited sampling strategy for predicting the AUC 0-12 of intravenous busulfan for Chinese adult patients prior to HSCT. Methods The pharmacokinetics of twice-daily intravenous busulfan was studied in forty-five Chinese adult patients. Limited sampling models were established by the multiple linear regression analysis. The prediction error (PE) and the absolute prediction error (APE) were calculated to evaluate predictive accuracy. The agreement between the predicted and actual AUC 0-12 was investigated by the Bland-Altman analysis. The accuracy and robustness of the models was validated by the bootstrap analysis. Results The AUC 0-12 values of the 1st and 7th doses of busulfan were 1491 ± 403.7 and 1908 ± 518.5 μmol L -1  min, respectively. The 2-sample model suggested that the predicted AUC 0-12 of twice-daily intravenous busulfan could be calculated using the following equation: AUC 0-12  = 40.017 + 0.955 × C 3  + 1.088 × C 6 with r 2  = 0.919. The mean PE and APE of the model were 0.52 ± 7.67 and 6.32 ± 4.27%, respectively. Conclusion The 2-sample model is an effective and reliable approach to predict the AUC 0-12 of twice-daily intravenous busulfan in Chinese adult patients.

In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) it has been shown that over- or underexposure to conditioning agents have an impact on patient outcomes. Conditioning regimens combining busulfan (Bu) and fludarabine (Flu) with or without clofarabine (Clo) are gaining interest worldwide in HCT. To evaluate and possibly adjust full conditioning exposure a simultaneous analysis of Bu, F-ARA-A (active metabolite of Flu) and Clo in one analytical run would be of great interest. However, this is a chromatographical challenge due to the large structural differences of Bu compared to F-ARA-A and Clo. Furthermore, for the bioanalysis of drugs it is common to use stable isotope labelled standards (SILS). However, when SILS are unavailable (in case of Clo and F-ARA-A) or very expensive, standard addition may serve as an alternative to correct for recovery and matrix effects. This study describes a fast analytical method for the simultaneous analysing of Bu, Clo and F-ARA-A with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) including standard addition methodology using 604 spiked samples. First, the analytical method was validated in accordance with European Medicines Agency guidelines. The lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) were for Bu 10μg/L and for Clo and F-ARA-A 1μg/L, respectively. Variation coefficients of LLOQ were within 20% and for low medium and high controls were all within 15%. Comparison of Bu, Clo and F-ARA-A standard addition results correspond with those obtained with calibration standards in calf serum. In addition for Bu, results obtained by this study were compared with historical data analysed within TDM. In conclusion, an efficient method for the simultaneous quantification of Bu, Clo and F-ARA-A in plasma was developed. In addition, a robust and cost-effective method to correct for matrix interference by standard addition was established., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

There are several reports describing population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models of busulfan (BU). However, limited information is available in Chinese hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients. The present study aimed to establish a popPK model of intravenous BU in Chinese HSCT patients for individualized drug therapy. The popPK model of BU was developed from a total of 284 concentration-time points from 53 patients. The effects of demographic and biochemical covariates were investigated by nonlinear mixed effect model (NONMEM) software. Plots, visual predictive check (VPC), bootstrap and normalized prediction distribution error (NPDE) were performed to determine the stability and the reliability of the final model. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination process was confirmed as the final structural model for BU. For a typical patient whose body surface area (BSA) is 1.7 m 2 , the population typical values of CL and Vd were 11.86 L/h, and 48.2 L, respectively. The result suggested BSA showed significant influence on CL and Vd (P<.001). Plots revealed the final model was performing a goodness fit. The steady rate verified by bootstrap was 100%, relative deviation was less than 4.00%, estimated value of final model was in the 95% confidence interval (CI). The VPC results showed the observed values were almost all positioned within the 5th and 95th CIs. The mean and variance of the NPDE were 0.0363 (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 0.298) and 0.877 (Fisher variance test, 0.134; SW test of normality, 0.108), respectively. The global adjusted P value was 0.305, which indicated that the prediction of the BU popPK model was adequate. A physician-friendly Microsoft Excel-base tool was implemented using the final popPK model for designing individualized dosing regimens., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

This study investigated the importance of an oral test dose for busulfan (BU) dose adjustment before a conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and the effect of fludarabine (FLU) on the oral BU pharmacokinetics evaluated after the fifth treatment dose (first BU dose on day 2 of treatment). Twenty-eight patients treated with oral BU (1 mg/kg every 6 hours for 4 days) were divided into 2 groups according to the concomitant administration of FLU (n = 15; 30 mg/m 2 for 5 days) or subsequent administration of cyclophosphamide (CY) (n = 13; 60 mg/kg for 2 days). On the day prior to the beginning of the conditioning regimen, blood samples were collected (0-6 hours) after administration of an oral BU test dose of 0.25 mg/kg. Busulfan was quantified in plasma samples by LC-MS/MS, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software. Blood samples were collected between the fifth and sixth treatment dose to confirm the mean plasma steady-state concentration (C ss ) of BU. The AUC 0-6 and apparent clearance of BU did not differ (P < .05) between the groups receiving FLU and CY. In 81% of the patients who received BU doses adjusted based on the test dose (n = 21), the C ss was within the target range of 600-900 ng/mL. No association was observed between BU AUC 0-6 and clinical outcome in the study group (n = 28). The results suggest that in concomitant administration of FLU and BU during conditioning regimens for HSCT, changes in BU dose should be considered only after the administration of the fifth BU dose., (© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The dried blood spot (DBS) method, which is a simple technique for blood sample processing involving the placement of a drop of whole blood onto filter paper, has been used recently in clinical pharmacology to determine blood concentrations of various drugs. This study examined the feasibility of the clinical application of the DBS method for individual busulfan dose adjustments. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of blood samples for busulfan measurements determined using the DBS method were compared with those using plasma separation (the conventional method). Blood samples were collected from patients receiving i.v. busulfan as a conditioning regimen before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Toranomon Hospital, Japan. Samples collected 2, 4, and 6 hours after the start of the first drip infusion were processed by DBS or the conventional method. The area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and other PK parameters were calculated to compare the 2 methods. Divergence of <20% in each parameter was considered acceptable. The divergence range for each parameter was as follows: blood concentration at 2 hours after the start of drip infusion, .6 to 8.2%; at 4 hours, .3 to 10.0%; at 6 hours, .3 to 14.2%; and AUC 0-∞ , .0 to 10.3%. None of the PK parameters showed a divergence between the DBS method and the conventional method exceeding 20%, suggesting that both methods are well correlated. The clinical application of blood sample processing with the DBS method in the measurement of blood busulfan concentration may therefore be feasible, but further studies are needed to confirm these findings., (Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treosulfan (l-threitol-1,4-di-methanesulfonate) is a prodrug of a bifunctional alkylating agent that is being used increasingly in pediatric bone marrow transplantation regimens. The activation pathway is a complex reaction, which consists of two consecutive reactions leading to epoxybutane derivatives which are responsible for DNA alkylation. A simple, sensitive high performance liquid chromatography method for the determination of the sum of treosulfan and its epoxy metabolites by UV detection after derivatization with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate in human plasma was developed and validated. Plasma samples containing treosulfan and epoxy metabolites were converted into thiocarbamate derivative with 10% sodium diethyldithiocarbamate. Dinitrobiphenyl was used as an internal standard. The analysis was carried out using a reversed phase C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of methanol-water (65:35, v/v) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The eluent was monitored at 254 nm. The standard calibration curve was established between 2.5 and 50 µg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9987. Intra- and interday precision and accuracy of the method was <8% and met the analytical criteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in six children who received intravenous treosulfan (dose range 12-24 g/m(2)) in combination with fludarabine prior to blood or marrow transplantation., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

A simple, rapid, specific and precise liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrophotometric (LC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for quantification of busulfan, in human plasma. busulfan d8 was used as internal standard, added to plasma sample prior to extraction using acetonitrile as a precipitating agent. Chromatographic separation was achieved on phenomenex kinetex C18 column (50mm×2.1mm, 2.6μm) with acteonitrile: 10mM ammonium formate buffer (80:20v/v) as an isocratic mobile phase with a flow rate of 0.5mLmin(-1). Quantitation was performed by transition of 264.1→151.1 (m/z) for busulfan and 272.1→159.1 (m/z) for busulfan d8. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.2ngmL(-1) with a 100μL plasma sample. The concentrations of nine working standards showed linearity between 0.2 and 100ngmL(-1) (r(2)≥0.9986). Chromatographic separation was achieved within 2.0min. The average extraction recoveries of 3quality control concentrations were 92.52% for busulfan and 90.75% for busulfan d8. The coefficient of variation was ≤15% for intra- and inter-batch assays. The developed method was successfully applied for the determination of Busulfan pharmacokinetics after oral administration., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Busulfan is a commonly used antineoplastic agent to condition/ablate bone marrow cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplant. While intravenous (IV) formulations of busulfan are now available and have lower incidences of toxicity and treatment related mortality compared to oral dosing, it still displays large pharmacokinetic variability. As a result, studies have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring is clinically useful to minimize graft failure, disease reoccurrence, and toxicities like veno-occlusive disease and neurologic toxicity. Current methods for assaying busulfan include the use of GC/MS, HPLC, and LC-MS/MS. The clinical need for faster turnaround times and increased testing volumes has required laboratories to develop faster methods of analysis for higher throughput of samples. Therefore, we present a method for the quantification of busulfan in plasma using an ultrafast SPE-MS/MS which has much faster sample cycle times (<20 s per sample) and comparable analytical results to GC/MS.

Busulfan is an alkylating agent widely used in the ablation of bone marrow cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Due to large intraindividual and interindividual variations, and narrow therapeutic window, therapeutic drug monitoring of busulfan is warranted. A quick and reliable HPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the assay of plasma busulfan. HPLC involved C18 column, and MS/MS was used in electrospray ionization (ESI) positive mode. Quantitation and identification of busulfan was made using various multiple reactions monitoring (MRMs). Isotopic labeled busulfan-d8 was used as the internal standard. The method is linear from 50 to 2500 ng/mL and has with-in run and between-run imprecision of <10 %.

Aim: The aim of this investigation was to develop a model-based dosing algorithm for busulfan and identify an optimal sampling scheme for use in routine clinical practice., Methods: Clinical data from an ongoing study (n = 29) in stem cell transplantation patients were used for the purposes our analysis. A one compartment model was selected as basis for sampling optimization and subsequent evaluation of a suitable dosing algorithm. Internal and external model validation procedures were performed prior to the optimization steps using ED-optimality criteria. Using systemic exposure as parameter of interest, dosing algorithms were considered for individual patients with the scope of minimizing the deviation from target range as determined by AUC(0,6 h)., Results: Busulfan exposure after oral administration was best predicted after the inclusion of adjusted ideal body weight and alanine transferase as covariates on clearance. Population parameter estimates were 3.98 h(-1), 48.8 l and 12.3 l h(-1) for the absorption rate constant, volume of distribution and oral clearance, respectively. Inter-occasion variability was used to describe the differences between test dose and treatment. Based on simulation scenarios, a dosing algorithm was identified, which ensures target exposure values are attained after a test dose. Moreover, our findings show that a sparse sampling scheme with five samples per patient is sufficient to characterize the pharmacokinetics of busulfan in individual patients., Conclusion: The use of the proposed dosing algorithm in conjunction with a sparse sampling scheme may contribute to considerable improvement in the safety and efficacy profile of patients undergoing treatment for stem cell transplantation., (© 2015 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide (Cy) are frequently included in conditioning regimens before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both drugs are detoxified by glutathione transferases (GST), and GST gene variants may explain some of the interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity., Methods: The study investigated adult patients (n = 114) receiving oral Bu pre-HSCT. Bu doses were adjusted to obtain an average steady-state concentration (Css) of 900 mcg/L., Results: Median first dose Bu Css was 1000 mcg/L (600-1780 mcg/L). Patients carrying 1 and 2 GSTA1*B (rs3957357) alleles demonstrated median 12% and 16% higher Bu Css (P ≤ 0.05). Bu exposure (average Css; odds ratio = 1.009, 95% confidence interval = 1.002-1.017, P = 0.013) and GSTM1 gene copy number (odds ratio = 17.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.46-201, P = 0.024) were significant predictors of mortality ≤30 days. The mortality was 25% versus 2% among carriers of 2 versus no GSTM1 copies (P = 0.021). Mortality ≤3 months was associated with higher first dose Bu exposure (1090 versus 980 mcg/L, P = 0.021). GSTM1 expression and high Bu exposure may increase Cy toxicity by reducing intracellular glutathione., Conclusions: GST genotyping before HSCT may allow better prediction of Bu pharmacokinetics and drug toxicity, and thereby improve outcome after BuCy conditioning.

Background: Busulfan is an alkylating agent used to ablate bone marrow cells before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because of its highly variable pharmacokinetics, studies have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring is clinically useful for patients undergoing bone marrow transplant so that toxic effects associated with high drug exposure could be reduced and improve clinical outcomes. Current methods for assaying busulfan include the use of gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS), high-performance liquid chromatography, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The clinical need for faster turnaround times and increased testing volumes has required laboratories to develop faster methods of analysis for higher throughput of samples. Therefore, we present a method for the quantification of busulfan in plasma using an ultrafast solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry, which has much faster sample cycle times and similar analytical results to GC/MS., Method: Calibration standards, quality controls, and patient samples after addition of busulfan-d4 internal standard were extracted into n-butyl chloride from plasma. The organic fraction was dried and reconstituted in 600 μL of water containing ammonium acetate, trifluoroacetic acid, and formic acid. Sample analysis was performed at a rate of less than 20 seconds per sample using a Rapidfire 300 system coupled to an Agilent 6490 MS/MS using electrospray ionization in positive ion mode. Concentrations were calculated based on a 5-point calibration curve using a 1/x linear curve fit., Results: The analytical method shows excellent precision, sensitivity, and specificity. Minimal ion suppression or enhancement due to the matrix effect was observed. No significant carryover was seen following a sample containing 15,000 ng/mL of busulfan. Seventy-two patient samples were cross-validated with a current GC/MS method. All patient results throughout the analytical range correlated within the acceptance criteria of ±20%. The linear regression demonstrated the following: slope = 1.0067, r = 0.9964, and intercept = -6.2., Conclusions: A simple, fast, and robust method was developed for the quantitation of busulfan in plasma with solid-phase extraction/tandem mass spectrometry cycle times of <20 seconds per sample.

In Japan, intravenous busulfan (ivBu) is usually given four times per day as an infusion at 0.8 mg/kg over 2 h. However, as this requires a midnight administration, a once-daily infusion of ivBu at 3.2 mg/kg over 3 h has been investigated as a more convenient and safer method. In this study, 20 Japanese patients received once-daily ivBu in conditioning regimens before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and blood samples were obtained just before, and 3, 3.5, 5, 7, 10, and 24 h after the initiation of ivBu infusion. The outcomes of HSCT were evaluated prospectively. The median area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of Bu was 5272 μmol × min/L (range 3491-6284 μmol × min/L), and was similar to those in previous once-daily ivBu studies and to the estimated daily AUC in previous 4-times-daily ivBu studies. All of the patients but two, who died early due to infection, achieved neutrophil engraftment at a median of 25 days after transplantation. No patient was diagnosed with veno-occlusive disease according to the criteria established by Jones. No regimen-related toxicity was significantly associated with AUC. In conclusion, once-daily administration of ivBu has a stable pharmacokinetic profile, and was safely performed in Japanese patients.

Pro-drug treosulfan (TREO) is currently evaluated in randomized phase III clinical trials as a conditioning agent prior to HSCT. In the present paper pharmacokinetics of both TREO and its biologically active monoepoxide (S,S-EBDM) was investigated in pediatric patients for the first time. The studies were carried out in 16 children (median age 7.5 years) undergoing TREO-based preparative regimen prior to HSCT, who received 10, 12 or 14 g/m(2) of the drug as a 1h or 2h intravenous infusion. Plasma concentrations of TREO as well as S,S-EBDM were determined using the validated HPLC-MS/MS method. The changes in S,S-EBDM concentration over time followed TREO levels. The area under the curve (AUC) of TREO was 100-fold higher than AUC of S,S-EBDM. No statistically significant dependency of the dose-normalized AUC of either TREO or S,S-EBDM on the patients' age and body surface area was stated. Moreover, plasma C(max) as well as AUC of S,S-EBDM demonstrated linear correlation with the C(max) and AUC of TREO, respectively. The biological half-lives of TREO and S,S-EBDM were similar. This indicates that S,S-EBDM was completely eliminated from the patients' blood within relatively short time, comparable to TREO., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)