Search

Background Antibiotic use is associated with collateral damage to the healthy microbiota. Afabicin is a first-in-class prodrug inhibitor of the FabI enzyme that, when converted to the pharmacologically active agent afabicin desphosphono, demonstrates a staphylococcal-specific spectrum of activity. An expected benefit of highly targeted antibiotics such as afabicin is microbiome preservation. Objectives To compare the effects of oral treatment with afabicin and standard-of-care antibiotics upon the murine gut microbiota, and to assess the effects of oral afabicin treatment on the human gut microbiota. Methods Gut microbiota effects of a 10 day oral course of afabicin treatment were monitored in mice and compared with clindamycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin at human-equivalent dose levels using 16S rDNA sequencing. Further, the gut microbiota of healthy volunteers was longitudinally assessed across 20 days of oral treatment with afabicin 240 mg twice daily. Results Afabicin treatment did not significantly alter gut microbiota diversity (Shannon H index) or richness (rarefied Chao1) in mice. Only limited changes to taxonomic abundances were observed in afabicin-treated animals. In contrast, clindamycin, linezolid and moxifloxacin each caused extensive dysbiosis in the murine model. In humans, afabicin treatment was not associated with alterations in Shannon H or rarefied Chao1 indices, nor relative taxonomic abundances, supporting the findings from the animal model. Conclusions Oral treatment with afabicin is associated with preservation of the gut microbiota in mice and healthy subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) infections are increasingly reported in Australian hospitals, but prevalence is unknown. In 2016, Victorian hospitals conducted CPE point-prevalence surveys in high-risk wards (intensive care, haematology, transplant). Forty-three hospitals performed 134 surveys, with 1839/2342 (79%) high-risk patients screened. Twenty-four surveys were also performed in other wards. Inability to obtain patient consent was the leading reason for non-participation. In high-risk wards, no CPE cases were detected; three cases were identified in other wards. Since there is low prevalence in high-risk wards, continuous screening is not recommended. Targeted screening may be enhanced by review of patient consent processes., (Copyright © 2018 The Healthcare Infection Society. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) is associated with genetic changes that may also impact upon pathogenicity. In the current study, we compared the virulence of clinical VISA strains with their isogenic vancomycin-susceptible progenitors (VSSA)., Methods: Production of the critical virulence protein, α toxin, was assessed using Western blot analysis and was correlated to agr activity using a bioluminescent agr-reporter. Cytotoxicity and intracellular persistence were compared ex vivo for VSSA and VISA within non-professional phagocytes (NPP). Virulence and host immune responses were further explored in vivo using a murine model of bacteraemia., Results: VISA isolates produced up to 20-fold less α toxin compared with VSSA, and this was corroborated by either loss of agr activity due to agr mutation, or altered agr activity in the absence of mutation. VISA were less cytotoxic towards NPP and were associated with enhanced intracellular persistence, suggesting that NPP may act as a reservoir for VISA. Infection with VSSA strains produced higher mortality in a murine bacteraemia model (≥90% 7-day mortality) compared with infection with VISA isolates (20% to 50%, p <0.001). Mice infected with VISA produced a dampened immune response (4.6-fold reduction in interleukin-6, p <0.001) and persistent organ bacterial growth was observed for VISA strains out to 7 days., Conclusions: These findings highlight the remarkable adaptability of S. aureus, whereby, in addition to having reduced antibiotic susceptibility, VISA alter the expression of pathogenic factors to circumvent the host immune response to favour persistent infection over acute virulence., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)