Search

Double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) viruses remain important causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). As treatment options are limited, adoptive therapy with virus-specific T cells (VST) is promising in restoring immunity and thereby preventing and treating virus infections. Here we review current evidence and recent advances in the field of VST for dsDNA viruses in allogeneic HCT recipients.Four different protocols for VST generation are currently used in clinical trials, and various products including multivirus-specific and off-the-shelf products are under investigation for prophylaxis, preemptive therapy or treatment. Data from nearly 1400 dsDNA-VST applications in allogeneic HCT patients have been published and demonstrated its safety. Although Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and adenovirus-specific T-cell therapy studies have predominated over the past 25 years, additional human herpes viruses were added to multivirus-specific T cells over the last decade and clinical evidence for polyomavirus-specific VST has just recently emerged. Response rates of around 70-80% have been reported, but cautious interpretation is warranted as data are predominantly from phase 1/2 studies and clinical efficacy needs to be confirmed in phase 3 studies.Investigation on the 'ideal' composition of VST is ongoing. Several products recently entered phase 3 trials and may allow widespread clinical use in the near future.

The unprecedented success of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy in the management of B-cell malignancies comes with a price of specific side effects. Healthy B-cell depletion is an anticipated 'on-target' 'off-tumor' side effect and can contribute to severe and prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia. Evidence-based guidelines for the use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IGRT) for infection prevention are lacking in this population.This article reviews the mechanisms and epidemiology of hypogammaglobulinemia and antibody deficiency, association with infections, and strategies to address these issues in CD19- and BCMA-CAR-T-cell recipients.CD19 and BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy result in unique immune deficits due to depletion of specific B-lineage cells and may require different infection prevention strategies. Hypogammaglobulinemia before and after CAR-T-cell therapy is frequent, but data on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of IGRT are lacking. Monthly IGRT should be prioritized for patients with severe or recurrent bacterial infections. IGRT may be more broadly necessary to prevent infections in BCMA-CAR-T-cell recipients and children with severe hypogammaglobulinemia irrespective of infection history. Vaccinations are indicated to augment humoral immunity and can be immunogenic despite cytopenias; re-vaccination(s) may be required. Controlled trials are needed to better understand the role of IGRT and vaccines in this population.

CLAG-M (cladribine, high-dose cytarabine [HiDAC], G-CSF, mitoxantrone)/CLAG are contemporary intensive chemotherapy regimens associated with higher and deeper complete remission rates than 7+3 (cytarabine, anthracycline)/HiDAC, but with greater myelosuppression and potential infection risks. Here, we compared the cumulative incidence (CI) and patterns of invasive fungal disease (IFD) between these regimens by identifying proven/probable and possible cases of IFD following CLAG-M (n=332) and 7+3 (n=115) chemotherapy and subsequent treatment cycles in adults ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms between 2006 and 2018. By 90 days (D90) after initiating treatment, the CI of proven/probable IFD was 20% with CLAG-M and 12% with 7+3 (p=0.17). There was no significant difference in the CI of IFD between ND CLAG-M and R/R CLAG-M. Without mold-active prophylaxis, the D90 CI of proven/probable IFD was significantly higher in the CLAG-M than the 7+3 cohort (28% versus 11%; p=0.007), but this difference was mitigated with mold-active prophylaxis (CLAG-M, 7.5%; 7+3, 0%; p=0.65). After each chemotherapy treatment cycle, the CI of newly diagnosed IFD was similar, ranging from 15-20%. Use of mold-active prophylaxis was the only factor associated with reduced IFD risk in adjusted models (HR, 0.32; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.56). Together, these data indicate that the IFD risk with CLAG-M is higher than with 7+3 in the absence of mold-active prophylaxis; use of mold-active prophylaxis mitigates this risk.

BACKGROUND Little is known about pathogen-specific humoral immunity after chimeric antigen receptor–modified T (CAR-T) cell therapy for B cell malignancies. METHODS We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of CD19-targeted or B cell maturation antigen–targeted (BCMA-targeted) CAR-T cell therapy recipients at least 6 months posttreatment and in remission. We measured pathogen-specific IgG against 12 vaccine-preventable infections and the number of viral and bacterial epitopes to which IgG was detected (“epitope hits”) using a serological profiling assay. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with IgG levels above a threshold correlated with seroprotection for vaccine-preventable infections. RESULTS We enrolled 65 children and adults a median of 20 months after CD19- (n = 54) or BCMA- (n = 11) CAR-T cell therapy. Among 30 adults without IgG replacement therapy (IGRT) in the prior 16 weeks, 27 (90%) had hypogammaglobulinemia. These individuals had seroprotection to a median of 67% (IQR, 59%–73%) of tested infections. Proportions of participants with seroprotection per pathogen were comparable to population-based studies, but most individuals lacked seroprotection to specific pathogens. Compared with CD19-CAR-T cell recipients, BCMA-CAR-T cell recipients were half as likely to have seroprotection (prevalence ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.18–1.25) and had fewer pathogen-specific epitope hits (mean difference, –90 epitope hits; 95% CI, –157 to –22). CONCLUSION Seroprotection for vaccine-preventable infections in adult CD19-CAR-T cell recipients was comparable to the general population. BCMA-CAR-T cell recipients had fewer pathogen-specific antibodies. Deficits in both groups support the need for vaccine and immunoglobulin replacement therapy studies. FUNDING Swiss National Science Foundation (Early Postdoc Mobility grant P2BSP3_188162), NIH/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) (U01CA247548 and P01CA018029), NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grants (P30CA0087-48 and P30CA015704-44), American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, and Juno Therapeutics/BMS., In this prospective study, we investigated antibodies against vaccine-preventable infections and other pathogen-specific antibodies in individuals with remission after CAR-T cell therapy for B lineage malignancies.

Recipients of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell therapies for B-cell malignancies are immunocompromised and at risk for serious infections. Vaccine immunogenicity is unknown in this population. We conducted a prospective observational study of the humoral immunogenicity of 2019-2020 inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) in children and adults immediately prior to (n=7) or 13-57 months after (n=15) CD19-, CD20-, or BCMA-targeted CAR-T-cell therapy, as well as controls (n=8). Individuals post-CAR-T-cell therapy were in remission. We tested for antibodies to 4 vaccine strains at baseline and ≥1 time point after IIV using neutralization and hemagglutination inhibition assays. An antibody response was defined as a ≥4-fold titer increase from baseline at the first post-vaccine time point. Baseline A(H1N1) titers in the CAR-T cohorts were significantly lower compared to controls. Antibody responses to ≥1 vaccine strain occurred in 2 (29%) individuals before CAR-T-cell therapy; one individual maintained a response for >3 months post-CAR-T-cell therapy. Antibody responses to ≥1 vaccine strain occurred in 6 (40%) individuals vaccinated after CAR-T-cell therapy. An additional 2 (29%) and 6 (40%) individuals had ≥2-fold increases (at any time) in the pre- and post-CAR-T cohorts, respectively. There were no identified clinical or immunologic predictors of antibody responses. Neither severe hypogammaglobulinemia nor B-cell aplasia precluded antibody responses. These data support consideration for vaccination before and after CAR-T-cell therapy for influenza and other relevant pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of hypogammaglobulinemia or B-cell aplasia. Larger studies are needed to determine correlates of vaccine immunogenicity and durability in CAR-T-cell therapy recipients.Key PointsInfluenza vaccination was immunogenic pre- and post-CAR-T-cell therapy, despite hypogammaglobulinemia and B-cell aplasia.Vaccination with inactivated vaccines can be considered before CAR-T-cell therapy and in individuals with remission after therapy.

Introduction Infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. The contemporary regimen of CLAG-M (cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, mitoxantrone) has favorable hematologic outcomes compared to '7+3' (standard-dose cytarabine, anthracycline) in some studies but may be more myelosuppressive. The aim of this investigation was to determine and compare the incidence and spectrum of infections after CLAG-M and 7+3. Methods For this retrospective cohort study, we identified microbiologically documented moderate to severe infections (grade ≥2 infections; Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network Technical Manual of Procedures (BMT CTN MOP) guideline) after the first cycle of CLAG-M for newly-diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms (≥10% blasts in marrow or peripheral blood) and compared these findings to adults receiving 7+3 for ND disease. We recorded infections for up to 90 days from the start of chemotherapy or until the start of a second cycle or death, whichever occurred first. We compared the cumulative incidence probability of time-to-first infection between cohorts using Gray's test with start of additional therapy and death as competing risk events. Infection rates, defined as average number of infections per 1000 patient days-at-risk, were compared between cohorts using Poisson regression. Results The study included 442 individuals consisting of 196 with ND disease and 131 with R/R disease receiving CLAG-M, and 115 with ND disease receiving 7+3 (Table 1). Fifty-four (28%), 65 (50%), and 19 (17%) individuals per cohort had one or more moderate to severe microbiologically documented infection, respectively. The absolute neutrophil count was Conclusions Moderate to severe microbiologically documented infections are common after the first cycle of chemotherapy for ND or R/R AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. CLAG-M may be associated with more moderate to severe microbiologically documented infections than 7+3 for ND disease. Individuals with R/R disease are at the highest risk. Invasive fungal infections were relatively frequent but may be significantly reduced by mold-active azole prophylaxis. New approaches to improve neutrophil recovery and function may reduce infection risk. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Halpern: Abbvie: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Imago Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Nohla Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Delaney: Deverra Therapeutics: Current Employment, Other: Founder, CSO. Pergam: Chimerix, Inc: Research Funding; Global Life Technologies, Inc: Research Funding; Merck & Co.: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Boeckh: Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; AlloVir: Consultancy; SymBio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Helocyte: Consultancy; Evrys Bio: Consultancy; Moderna: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy. Walter: BMS: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amphivena: Consultancy, Other: ownership interests; Selvita: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Kite: Consultancy; Aptevo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding. Hill: Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karius: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy; Allovir: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amplyx: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allogene therapeutics: Consultancy; CRISPR therapeutics: Consultancy; CLS Behring: Consultancy; OptumHealth: Consultancy.

Recipients of chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell therapies for B cell malignancies have profound and prolonged immunodeficiencies and are at risk for serious infections, including respiratory virus infections. Vaccination may be important for infection prevention, but there are limited data on vaccine immunogenicity in this population. We conducted a prospective observational study of the humoral immunogenicity of commercially available 2019–2020 inactivated influenza vaccines in adults immediately prior to or while in durable remission after CD19-, CD20-, or B cell maturation antigen-targeted CAR-T-cell therapy, as well as controls. We tested for antibodies to all four vaccine strains using neutralization and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) assays. Antibody responses were defined as at least fourfold titer increases from baseline. Seroprotection was defined as a HAI titer ≥40. Enrolled CAR-T-cell recipients were vaccinated 14–29 days prior to (n=5) or 13–57 months following therapy (n=13), and the majority had hypogammaglobulinemia and cellular immunodeficiencies prevaccination. Eight non-immunocompromised adults served as controls. Antibody responses to ≥1 vaccine strain occurred in 2 (40%) individuals before CAR-T-cell therapy and in 4 (31%) individuals vaccinated after CAR-T-cell therapy. An additional 1 (20%) and 6 (46%) individuals had at least twofold increases, respectively. One individual vaccinated prior to CAR-T-cell therapy maintained a response for >3 months following therapy. Across all tested vaccine strains, seroprotection was less frequent in CAR-T-cell recipients than in controls. There was evidence of immunogenicity even among individuals with low immunoglobulin, CD19+ B cell, and CD4+ T-cell counts. These data support consideration for vaccination before and after CAR-T-cell therapy for influenza and other relevant pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, irrespective of hypogammaglobulinemia or B cell aplasia. However, relatively impaired humoral vaccine immunogenicity indicates the need for additional infection-prevention strategies. Larger studies are needed to refine our understanding of potential correlates of vaccine immunogenicity, and durability of immune responses, in CAR-T-cell therapy recipients.

Background Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy for B cell hematologic malignancies results in prolonged B cell depletion. Little is known about the effects of CAR-T cell therapy on pre-existing pathogen-specific humoral immunity. Methods We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study of children and adults treated with CD19- or BCMA-CAR-T cell therapy. Eligible patients were ≥ 6 months post-CAR-T cell infusion and in remission without subsequent chemoimmunotherapy. We measured total immunoglobulin G (IgG), pathogen-specific IgG levels for 12 vaccine-preventable infections, and B cell subsets from blood. Seroprotective antibody titers were based on standard thresholds. We described the proportion of patients with seroprotective titers and tested for associations between clinical factors and seroprotection using generalized estimating equations. Results We enrolled 65 patients who received CD19- (n=54) or BCMA- (n=11) CAR-T cell therapy. Seven patients were < 18 years old. Samples were collected a median of 20 months (range, 7–68) after CAR T cell infusion. Seroprotection to vaccine-preventable pathogens was generally comparable to the U.S. population (Fig 1) even though blood CD19+ B cell counts were low (< 20 cells/mm3) in 60% of patients. Among 30 patients without IgG replacement in the prior 16 weeks (4 half-lives of IgG), 27 (90%) had hypogammaglobulinemia. Despite this, these individuals had seroprotection to a median of 67% (IQR, 59%-73%) of tested pathogens (Fig 2A). The proportion of patients with seroprotection was lowest for mumps, hepatitis A and B, H. influenzae type B (Hib), S. pneumoniae, and B. pertussis. Patients receiving BCMA-CAR-T cells had seroprotection to fewer pathogens than those receiving CD19-CAR-T cells (Fig 2B), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig 3). There were no significant differences by other variables. Figure 1. Proportion of CAR-T cell recipients with seroprotection to vaccine-preventable infections compared to the U.S. population, stratified by receipt of IgG replacement in the previous 16 weeks. Figure 2 A-B. Percentage of pathogens with seroprotective antibody titers among patients without IgG replacement in the previous 16 weeks. Figure 3. Association of clinical factors with seroprotection to vaccine-preventable infections among patients without IgG replacement in the previous 16 weeks (n=30) Conclusion Seroprotection for vaccine-preventable infections after CD19-CAR-T cell therapy was comparable to the general population. BCMA-CAR-T cell recipients may benefit most from replacement IgG. Vaccinations after CAR-T cell therapy should be considered and prioritized for S. pneumoniae, Hib, hepatitis viruses, and B. pertussis. Disclosures Justin J. Taylor, PhD, Vir Biotechnology (Grant/Research Support) Damian J. Green, MD, Cellectar Biosciences (Grant/Research Support)GSK (Advisor or Review Panel member)Juno Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Royalities)Seattle Genetics (Grant/Research Support, Advisor or Review Panel member) Michael Boeckh, MD PhD, AlloVir (Consultant)EvrysBio (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, share options)Gilead (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)GSK (Consultant)Helocyte (Advisor or Review Panel member, Shareholder)Lophius (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)SymBio (Consultant)VirBio (Consultant, Grant/Research Support) David G. Maloney, MD, PhD, A2 Biotherapeutics (Consultant, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock Options)Bioline Rx (Consultant)Celgene (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Gilead (Consultant)Juno Therapeutics (Consultant, Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, four pending patents, not issued, licensed, no royalities, no licensees)Kite Pharma (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Novartis (Consultant)Pharmacyclics (Consultant) Cameron J. Turtle, MBBS, PhD, Allogene (Other Financial or Material Support, Ad hoc advisory board (last 12 months))ArsenalBio (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock/options)AstraZeneca (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Ad hoc advisory board (last 12 months))Caribou Biosciences (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock/options)Century Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member)Eureka Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock/options)Juno Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Patent: Licensed to Juno Therapeutics)Myeloid Therapeutics (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock/options)Nektar Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Ad hoc advisory board (last 12 months))PACT Pharma (Other Financial or Material Support, Ad hoc advisory board (last 12 months))Precision Biosciences (Advisor or Review Panel member, Other Financial or Material Support, Stock/options)TCR2 Therapeutics (Grant/Research Support)T-CURX (Advisor or Review Panel member) Joshua A. Hill, MD, Allogene (Consultant)Allovir (Consultant)Gilead (Consultant)Karius (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)Takeda (Grant/Research Support, Scientific Research Study Investigator)