Search

Modular multilevel converters are increasingly being considered or used for various medium voltage applications. Multiple control methods have been proposed for the control of the direct to three-phase modular multilevel converter. They differ one from another in the way the capacitor voltage ripples are handled, i.e., either neglected, estimated, reconstructed by filtering or measured. This has implications on the performance level that can be obtained. This paper provides insights on the advantages and drawbacks of each control method, in inverter and rectifier mode, with a fair and thorough assessment supported by extensive simulations, with converter ratings that are realistic for medium voltage applications. Finally, this works highlights the impact of the higher dynamics for medium voltage direct current (dc) applications compared to high voltage dc ones on the choice of the control method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For dc–ac modular multilevel converters (MMCs) in double-star configuration, this paper proposes a fast closed-loop control method based on optimized pulse patterns (OPPs). Thanks to the direct manipulation of the OPP switching instants, OPPs with discontinuous switching angles can be used, and the intrinsic cell capacitor voltage ripple is compensated for to preserve the OPPs’ superior harmonic performance. This model predictive pulse pattern controller is combined with a fast acting dead-beat circulating current controller and linked to an upper layer voltage balancing control scheme. The proposed control and modulation method is particularly suitable for medium voltage MMCs with a low number of cells. Despite operation at very low switching frequencies close to and including the fundamental frequency, a superior harmonic performance can be achieved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During the design phase of a modular multilevel converter (MMC), an accurate loss evaluation of the submodule (SM) plays an important role. In this paper, a method based on the analytical description of the MMC key waveforms that allows to directly obtain the average semiconductor and capacitor losses that each SM will experience is introduced, under different operating conditions or control schemes. To verify the proposed concept, the results are compared with the losses obtained from a switched model with closed-loop control, where the analytical MMC key waveforms are approached in steady state. The proposed method provides a great flexibility and a significant reduction of the simulation/computational time otherwise needed to evaluate SM losses under various operating conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]