15 results on '"Colin Hale"'
Search Results
2. Finding damping loss factor using circle-fit method on Nyquist diagrams
- Author
-
Ricardo De Alba Alvarez, Malcolm Kelly, Colin Hale, and Pete Marinelli
- Abstract
Viscoelastic materials are commonly applied into vehicles sheet metal structures including the roof and doors in order to increase the amount of structural damping. The added damping from viscoelastic materials dissipates a greater amount of vibrational energy, subsequently reducing vibration displacement, structure borne noise, and energy flow to adjacent structures. Because damping treatments have the disadvantage of adding weight to the treated structure, adequate tools to characterize and evaluate their efficiency are necessary. In this paper, natural frequencies and modal damping are determined by applying circle-fit interpolation to measured data. Comparison to traditional peak picking and half-power point methods shows that this geometric approach allows modal frequencies to be identified more clearly, even for measurement systems with reduced frequency resolution and the process can be easily automated.
- Published
- 2022
3. Development, Validation and Application of an LC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Favipiravir in Human Plasma
- Author
-
Elizabeth Challenger, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Colin Hale, Richard Fitzgerald, Lauren Walker, Helen Reynolds, Justin Chiong, Tom Fletcher, Saye Khoo, and Laura Else
- Published
- 2023
4. Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for quantification of favipiravir in human plasma
- Author
-
Elizabeth Challenger, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Colin Hale, Richard Fitzgerald, Lauren Walker, Helen Reynolds, Justin Chiong, Tom Fletcher, Saye Khoo, and Laura Else
- Subjects
Clinical Biochemistry ,Drug Discovery ,Pharmaceutical Science ,Spectroscopy ,Analytical Chemistry - Published
- 2023
5. Molnupiravir versus placebo in unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with early SARS-CoV-2 infection in the UK (AGILE CST-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial
- Author
-
Saye H Khoo, Richard FitzGerald, Geoffrey Saunders, Calley Middleton, Shazaad Ahmad, Christopher J Edwards, Dennis Hadjiyiannakis, Lauren Walker, Rebecca Lyon, Victoria Shaw, Pavel Mozgunov, Jimstan Periselneris, Christie Woods, Katie Bullock, Colin Hale, Helen Reynolds, Nichola Downs, Sean Ewings, Amanda Buadi, David Cameron, Thomas Edwards, Emma Knox, I'ah Donovan-Banfield, William Greenhalf, Justin Chiong, Lara Lavelle-Langham, Michael Jacobs, Josh Northey, Wendy Painter, Wayne Holman, David G Lalloo, Michelle Tetlow, Julian A Hiscox, Thomas Jaki, Thomas Fletcher, Gareth Griffiths, Nicholas Paton, Fred Hayden, Janet Darbyshire, Amy Lucas, Ulrika Lorch, Andrew Freedman, Richard Knight, Stevan Julious, Rachel Byrne, Ana Cubas Atienzar, Jayne Jones, Chris Williams, Anna Song, Jan Dixon, Anja Alexandersson, Parys Hatchard, Emma Tilt, Andrew Titman, Ale Doce Carracedo, Vatsi Chandran Gorner, Andrea Davies, Louis Woodhouse, Nicola Carlucci, Emmanuel Okenyi, Marcin Bula, Kate Dodd, Jennifer Gibney, Lesley Dry, Zalina Rashid Gardner, Amin Sammour, Christine Cole, Tim Rowland, Maria Tsakiroglu, Vincent Yip, Rostam Osanlou, Anna Stewart, Ben Parker, Tolga Turgut, Afshan Ahmed, Kay Starkey, Sujamole Subin, Jennifer Stockdale, Lisa Herring, Jonathon Baker, Abigail Oliver, Mihaela Pacurar, Dan Owens, Alistair Munro, Gavin Babbage, Saul Faust, Matthew Harvey, Danny Pratt, Deepak Nagra, Aashish Vyas, Jaki, Thomas [0000-0002-1096-188X], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,COVID-19 Vaccines ,Adolescent ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 ,Bayes Theorem ,Antiviral Agents ,United Kingdom ,Infectious Diseases ,Treatment Outcome ,Double-Blind Method ,Humans ,Female - Abstract
Background: the antiviral drug molnupiravir was licensed for treating at-risk patients with COVID-19 on the basis of data from unvaccinated adults. We aimed to evaluate the safety and virological efficacy of molnupiravir in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals with COVID-19.Methods: this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 2 trial (AGILE CST-2) was done at five National Institute for Health and Care Research sites in the UK. Eligible participants were adult (aged ≥18 years) outpatients with PCR-confirmed, mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection who were within 5 days of symptom onset. Using permuted blocks (block size 2 or 4) and stratifying by site, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either molnupiravir (orally; 800 mg twice daily for 5 days) plus standard of care or matching placebo plus standard of care. The primary outcome was the time from randomisation to SARS-CoV-2 PCR negativity on nasopharyngeal swabs and was analysed by use of a Bayesian Cox proportional hazards model for estimating the probability of a superior virological response (hazard ratio [HR]>1) for molnupiravir versus placebo. Our primary model used a two-point prior based on equal prior probabilities (50%) that the HR was 1·0 or 1·5. We defined a priori that if the probability of a HR of more than 1 was more than 80% molnupiravir would be recommended for further testing. The primary outcome was analysed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was analysed in the safety population, comprising participants who had received at least one dose of allocated treatment. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04746183, and the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN27106947, and is ongoing.Findings: between Nov 18, 2020, and March 16, 2022, 1723 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 180 were randomly assigned to receive either molnupiravir (n=90) or placebo (n=90) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. 103 (57%) of 180 participants were female and 77 (43%) were male and 90 (50%) participants had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 infections with the delta (B.1.617.2; 72 [40%] of 180), alpha (B.1.1.7; 37 [21%]), omicron (B.1.1.529; 38 [21%]), and EU1 (B.1.177; 28 [16%]) variants were represented. All 180 participants received at least one dose of treatment and four participants discontinued the study (one in the molnupiravir group and three in the placebo group). Participants in the molnupiravir group had a faster median time from randomisation to negative PCR (8 days [95% CI 8-9]) than participants in the placebo group (11 days [10-11]; HR 1·30, 95% credible interval 0·92-1·71; log-rank p=0·074). The probability of molnupiravir being superior to placebo (HR>1) was 75·4%, which was less than our threshold of 80%. 73 (81%) of 90 participants in the molnupiravir group and 68 (76%) of 90 participants in the placebo group had at least one adverse event by day 29. One participant in the molnupiravir group and three participants in the placebo group had an adverse event of a Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or higher severity. No participants died (due to any cause) during the trial.Interpretation: we found molnupiravir to be well tolerated and, although our predefined threshold was not reached, we observed some evidence that molnupiravir has antiviral activity in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals infected with a broad range of SARS-CoV-2 variants, although this evidence is not conclusive.Funding: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Research, the Medical Research Council, and the Wellcome Trust.
- Published
- 2022
6. A Randomised -Controlled Phase 2 trial of Molnupiravir in Unvaccinated and Vaccinated Individuals with Early SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Saye H Khoo, Richard FitzGerald, Geoffrey Saunders, Calley Middleton, Shazaad Ahmad, Christopher J Edwards, Dennis Hadjiyiannakis, Lauren Walker, Rebecca Lyon, Victoria Shaw, Pavel Mozgunov, Jimstan Periselneris, Christie Woods, Katie Bullock, Colin Hale, Helen Reynolds, Nichola Downs, Sean Ewings, Amanda Buadi, David Cameron, Thomas Edwards, Emma Knox, I’ah Donovan-Banfield, William Greenhalf, Justin Chiong, Lara Lavelle-Langham, Michael Jacobs, Wendy Painter, Wayne Holman, David G Lalloo, Michelle Tetlow, Julian A Hiscox, Thomas Jaki, Thomas Fletcher, and Gareth Griffiths
- Abstract
SummaryBackgroundMolnupiravir was licensed for treating high-risk patients with COVID-19 based on data from unvaccinated adults. AGILE CST-2 (NCT04746183) Phase II reports safety and virological efficacy of molnupiravir in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.MethodsAdult out-patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within five days of symptom onset were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive molnupiravir (800mg twice daily for five days) or placebo. The primary outcome was time to swab PCR-negativity, compared using a Bayesian model for estimating the probability of a superior virological response (Hazard Ratio>1) for molnupiravir over placebo. Secondary outcomes included change in viral titre at day 5, safety and tolerability, clinical progression and patient reported outcome measures. We analysed outcomes after the last participant reached day 29.FindingsOf 180 participants randomised (90 molnupiravir, 90 placebo), 50% were vaccinated. Infections with SARS-CoV-2 variants Delta (40%), Alpha (21%), Omicron (21%) and EU1 (16%) were represented. The median time to negative-PCR was 8 versus 11 days for molnupiravir and placebo (HR=1·30, 95% CrI 0·92-1·71, p=0·07 by Logrank and p=0·03 by Breslow-Gehan tests). Although small numbers precluded subgroup analysis, no obvious differences were observed between vaccinated and unvaccinated participants. Using a two-point prior the probability of molnupiravir being superior to placebo (HR>1) was 75·4%, which was just below our defined threshold of 80% for establishing superiority. Using an uninformative continuous prior, the probability of HR>1 was 94·7%. As an exploratory analysis, the change in viral titre on day 5 (end of treatment) was significantly greater with molnupiravir compared with placebo. A total of 4 participants reported severe adverse events (grade 3+), 3 of whom were in the placebo arm.InterpretationWe found molnupiravir to be well-tolerated, with evidence for high probability of antiviral efficacy in a population of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals infected with a broad range of viral variants.FundingFunded by Ridgeback Biotherapeutics and UK National Institute for Health and Care Research infrastructure funding. The AGILE platform infrastructure is supported by the Medical Research Council (grant number MR/V028391/1) and the Wellcome Trust (grant number 221590/Z/20/Z).
- Published
- 2022
7. Pharmacokinetics of ß-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, the parent nucleoside of prodrug molnupiravir, in non-plasma compartments of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
- Author
-
Richard FitzGerald, Laura Dickinson, Laura Else, Thomas Fletcher, Colin Hale, Alieu Amara, Lauren Walker, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Rebecca Lyon, Victoria Shaw, William Greenhalf, Katie Bullock, Lara Lavelle-Langham, Helen Reynolds, Wendy Painter, Wayne Holman, Sean Ewings, Gareth Griffiths, and Saye Khoo
- Subjects
wc_506 ,qv_38 ,human activities - Abstract
ß-d-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), the parent nucleoside of molnupiravir, a COVID-19 antiviral, was quantified at sites of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in twelve patients enrolled in AGILE CST-2 (NCT04746183). Saliva, nasal and tear concentrations were 3, 21 and 22% that of plasma. Saliva and nasal NHC concentrations were significantly correlated with plasma (p
- Published
- 2022
8. Pharmacokinetics of ss-d-N4-Hydroxycytidine, the Parent Nucleoside of Prodrug Molnupiravir, in Nonplasma Compartments of Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection
- Author
-
Richard FitzGerald, Laura Dickinson, Laura Else, Thomas Fletcher, Colin Hale, Alieu Amara, Lauren Walker, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Rebecca Lyon, Victoria Shaw, William Greenhalf, Katie Bullock, Lara Lavelle-Langham, Helen Reynolds, Wendy Painter, Wayne Holman, Sean Ewings, Gareth Griffiths, and Saye Khoo
- Subjects
Parents ,Microbiology (medical) ,Infectious Diseases ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Humans ,Nucleosides ,Prodrugs ,Cytidine ,Hydroxylamines ,Antiviral Agents ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment - Abstract
ß-d-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC), the parent nucleoside of molnupiravir, a COVID-19 antiviral, was quantified at SARS-CoV-2 transmission sites in 12 patients enrolled in AGILE Candidate-Specific Trial-2. Saliva, nasal, and tear NHC concentrations were 3%, 21%, and 22% that of plasma. Saliva and nasal NHC were significantly correlated with plasma (P Clinical Trials Registration. NCT04746183.
- Published
- 2022
9. Smart Rock - Low Cost Water Monitoring
- Author
-
Colin Hale-Brown, Brenda Fasse, Annika Sundstorm, Cameron Whitlow, Cara Walter, Chet Udell, and John Selker
- Published
- 2022
10. An Open Label, Adaptive, Phase 1 Trial of High-Dose Oral Nitazoxanide in Healthy Volunteers: An Antiviral Candidate for SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Michael Fisher, Megan Lawrence, Richard Fitzgerald, Saye Khoo, Laura Else, Andrew Owen, Keira Fines, Michael Jacobs, Thomas Jaki, Rebecca Crook, Christie Woods, Parys Hatchard, Kelly Byrne, Lauren Walker, Gareth Griffiths, Rajith K. R. Rajoli, Sean Ewings, Izabela Eberhart, Pavel Mozgunov, Rebecca Lyon, Colin Hale, Tom Fletcher, Helen Reynolds, Geoffrey Saunders, Henry Pertinez, Emmanuel Okenyi, Timothy Rowland, Lucy Johnson, Karen Martin, Alieu Amara, Sujan Dilly-Penchala, David G. Lalloo, Robert Waugh, Fisher, Michael [0000-0003-2304-6434], Martin, Karen [0000-0002-6362-0501], Reynolds, Helen [0000-0001-7443-4520], Byrne, Kelly [0000-0001-8895-5618], Jaki, Thomas [0000-0002-1096-188X], Khoo, Saye [0000-0002-2769-0967], Owen, Andrew [0000-0002-9819-7651], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,qv_268.5 ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling ,Urine ,Antiviral Agents ,Article ,Cmin ,Young Adult ,Pharmacokinetics ,Internal medicine ,wc_505 ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Adverse effect ,wa_105 ,Pharmacology ,business.industry ,Research ,Drug Repositioning ,Nitazoxanide ,Middle Aged ,Nitro Compounds ,Healthy Volunteers ,COVID-19 Drug Treatment ,Diarrhea ,Thiazoles ,Tolerability ,qw_160 ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Funder: Unitaid, Repurposing approved drugs may rapidly establish effective interventions during a public health crisis. This has yielded immunomodulatory treatments for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but repurposed antivirals have not been successful to date because of redundancy of the target in vivo or suboptimal exposures at studied doses. Nitazoxanide is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved antiparasitic medicine, that physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has indicated may provide antiviral concentrations across the dosing interval, when repurposed at higher than approved doses. Within the AGILE trial platform (NCT04746183) an open label, adaptive, phase I trial in healthy adult participants was undertaken with high-dose nitazoxanide. Participants received 1,500 mg nitazoxanide orally twice-daily with food for 7 days. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, optimum dose, and schedule. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was undertaken day 1 and 5 with minimum concentration (Cmin ) sampling on days 3 and 7. Fourteen healthy participants were enrolled between February 18 and May 11, 2021. All 14 doses were completed by 10 of 14 participants. Nitazoxanide was safe and with no significant adverse events. Moderate gastrointestinal disturbance (loose stools or diarrhea) occurred in 8 participants (57.1%), with urine and sclera discoloration in 12 (85.7%) and 9 (64.3%) participants, respectively, without clinically significant bilirubin elevation. This was self-limiting and resolved upon drug discontinuation. PBPK predictions were confirmed on day 1 but with underprediction at day 5. Median Cmin was above the in vitro target concentration on the first dose and maintained throughout. Nitazoxanide administered at 1,500 mg b.i.d. with food was safe with acceptable tolerability a phase Ib/IIa study is now being initiated in patients with COVID-19.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Safety and immunogenicity of seven COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose (booster) following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK (COV-BOOST): a blinded, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial
- Author
-
Phedra Marius, Lynne Grundy, Nabeela Nazir Ahmed, Margaret Irwin, Jeanette Thorpe, Hannah Robinson, Helen Thorp, Maria Moon, Sadaf Farooqi, Nick Andrews, Louise Haskell, Bea Choi, Helen Beckett, Sharon Davies-Dear, Victoria Cornelius, Tracey Dare, Sunder Chita, Stephen Singh, Chris Twelves, John Haughney, Patrick S. Moore, Maja dabagh, Xinxue Liu, S Bibi, Suzanne Wilkins, Mohammed Khan, Charlotte Trinham, Emily Brunt, Edwin Justice, Hanna Nguyen, Andrew Gowland, Andrew Riordan, Tanveer Bawa, Daniel Pan, Ceri Davies, Suahil Aslam, Chris A Rogers, Dileep Kumar, Yvanne Enever, Siobhan Roche, Karen Bisnauthsing, Hayley Tulloch, Andrew Ustianowski, Steve Hurdover, Ehsaan Qureshi, Akamino Egbo, Ingrid Seath, Jo Salkeld, Carla Ferreira Da Silva, Ray Sheridan, Samantha Keenan, Shama Hamal, Jo Piper, Kerry Godwin, Sara Bennett, Liliana Cifuentes, Nicholas Ronan, Nicki Lakeman, Lona Tudor Jones, Ian Bentley, Rachel White, Chloe McDonnell, Nina Parungao, Emma Plested, Kyra Holliday, Lisa Berry, Christine Minnis, Victoria Graham, Christopher J Edwards, Beth Giddins, Tara Watson, Suzie Colquhoun, Johanna Mouland, Marion K Campbell, Rostam Osanlou, Carlota Pereira Dias Alves, Simon Fowler, Becky Mansfield, Sally Batham, Orod Osanlou, Arpan Guha, Stephen Saich, Kush Naker, Marcin Bula, Igor Starinskij, Bassam Hallis, Sonia Baryschpolec, Shirley Todd, Agatha A. van der Klaauw, Claire Brown, Emma Snashall, Andrew Seaton, Helen Radford, John Hladkiwskyj, Rachael Drake-Brockman, Matilda lang, Linda Harndahl, Holly Burton, Tim Whitbred, Sue Charlton, Mushiya Mpelembue, Anna Stewart, Anil Shenoy, Zalina Rashid-Gardner, Joseph Newman, John Gavin, Mary Savage, Julie Evans, Aidan Lingwood, Lauren Allen, Parvinder K. Aley, Rebecca Lyon, Rachel Bousfield, Robert C. Read, Joanne Spencer, David Baxter, Anastasia de la Haye, James Calderwood, Emily Chiplin, Evgenia Kourampa, Helen Gutteridge, Jade Gouriet, Trishna Champaneri, Javier Magan, Luke Vamplew, Abigail Oliver, Sally Reeder, Sunil Sharma, Nicola Turner, Yukari Sakagami, Mikayala King, Steve Thomas, Chanice Knight, Samantha Broadhead, Erica Peters, Dennyl Vail, Marta Merida-Morillas, Emily Locke, Krishna Chatterjee, Debbie Suggitt, Sara Fraser, Mihaela Pacurar, Kerry Hughes, Jessica Hailstone, Eleni Ladikou, Leah Richmond, Wythehi Ambihapathy, Kari Nightingale, Chris Cooper, Victoria Wenn, Kimberley Driver, Rachel Hughes, Filipa Dos Santos, Michael Singh, Ben Gardside, Donna Wixted, Jessica Lewis-Taylor, Jason Domingo, Scott Elliott, Wiesia Woodyatt, Jonathan Kwok, Subarna Roy, Amisha Desai, Iryna Boubriak, Helen Haydock, Arabella Stuart, Amy Ross-Russell, Rossana Romani, Lauren Fox, Gillian McMillan, Angela M. Minassian, Ann Sturdy, R. A. James, Valerie Renals, Stephanie Leung, Lillian Goncalves cordeiro, Fran Westwell, Robert Shaw, Anna L. Goodman, Katrina Cathie, Ryan Stephen Elliott, Adrian Palfreeman, Phillip Brown, Kim En Lee, Farida khan, Suzanne Tasker, Anna Hardy, Elisa Nanino, Donald van Welsenes, Adam Farrier, Antonette Andrews, Jacqueline Brandon, Alicja Kownacka, Jennifer Murira, Kate Dodd, Emily Horsfall, Chantelle Moorbey, Alison Hogan, Lynda Wagstaff, Gita Patel, Rebecca Cutts, Matthew D. Snape, Karen Regan, Beverley Longhurst, Saul N. Faust, Vincenzo Libri, Andrea Mazzella, Michael Stackpoole, Carool Osuji, Jonathan Baker, Teona Serafimova, Tumena Corrah, Sophie E. Moore, Sarah Warren, Christopher Herbert, Laura Presland, Daniel R. Owens, Colin Hale, Beth Jackson, Fran Hall, Debbie Branney, Martha Nabunjo, Mehmood Mughal, Laura Longshaw, Holly Baker, Elizabeth A. Clutterbuck, Eloise Summerton, Rowena Weighell, Fiona Makia, Alexander Hicks, Leila Janani, Matthew Stokes, Amanda Buadi, E. Thomson, Jennifer Gibney, Jane Hall, Tricia Coughlan, Bridget Tandy, Kelly Littlewood, Christopher A Green, Mary Ramsay, Lorinda Pickup, Karren Buttigieg, Gavin Babbage, Todd Rawlins, Simon Tunstall, Dominique Barker, Martin J. Llewelyn, James Cullinane, Judith Bell, Elizabeth Gordon, Andrew L. Freedman, Martin Wiselka, Mohammed Kamal, Sarah Whittley, Natalie Baker, Jorden Frankham, Malathi Munusamy, Karen Underwood, Dinesh Saralaya, Olivia Chalwin, Tommy Rampling, Rachael Phillips, Sarah Garrahy, Yee Ting Nicole Yim, Charlotte Sabine, Haniah Habash-Bailey, Ashley Whittington, Benjamin Welham, Patrick Kinch, Avril Bonnaud, Jonathan Macdonald, NinaSimone Hopkins, Kim Storton, Stephen Hughes, Enya Cooney, Alasdair Munro, Christine Cole, John Paul Seenan, Kim Appleby, Laurence John, David J. Smith, Lara Barcella, Imam Shaik, Kate Ellis, Olumide Adebambo, Jane Stockport, Gertraud Morshead, Paminder Lall, Stephen E. Cox, Daniel Hansen, Jonathan Perkins, Yama F Mujadidi, Thomas Honey, Alan Magee, Jonathan S. Nguyen-Van-Tam, Mwila Kasanyinga, Marivic Ricamara, Jaimie Wilson-Goldsmith, Alastair McGregor, Djamila Shamtally, Helena Baker, Tom Eadsforth, Dee Mullan, Karishma Gokani, Kirsty Adams, and Dominic Galvin
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Population ,Immunization, Secondary ,Department of Error ,Group A ,Group B ,COV-BOOST study group ,Medicine, General & Internal ,Immunogenicity, Vaccine ,General & Internal Medicine ,ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 ,Internal medicine ,Safety, immunogenicity, COVID-19, vaccines, booster ,Humans ,Medicine ,Adverse effect ,education ,Pandemics ,BNT162 Vaccine ,11 Medical and Health Sciences ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,education.field_of_study ,Science & Technology ,Booster (rocketry) ,Reactogenicity ,SARS-CoV-2 ,business.industry ,Immunogenicity ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,Articles ,Middle Aged ,United Kingdom ,Female ,Patient Safety ,business ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Abstract
Background: \ud Few data exist on the comparative safety and immunogenicity of different COVID-19 vaccines given as a third (booster) dose. To generate data to optimise selection of booster vaccines, we investigated the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of seven different COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (Oxford–AstraZeneca; hereafter referred to as ChAd) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNtech, hearafter referred to as BNT).\ud \ud Methods: \ud COV-BOOST is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial of third dose booster vaccination against COVID-19. Participants were aged older than 30 years, and were at least 70 days post two doses of ChAd or at least 84 days post two doses of BNT primary COVID-19 immunisation course, with no history of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. 18 sites were split into three groups (A, B, and C). Within each site group (A, B, or C), participants were randomly assigned to an experimental vaccine or control. Group A received NVX-CoV2373 (Novavax; hereafter referred to as NVX), a half dose of NVX, ChAd, or quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACWY) control (1:1:1:1). Group B received BNT, VLA2001 (Valneva; hereafter referred to as VLA), a half dose of VLA, Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen; hereafter referred to as Ad26) or MenACWY (1:1:1:1:1). Group C received mRNA1273 (Moderna; hereafter referred to as m1273), CVnCov (CureVac; hereafter referred to as CVn), a half dose of BNT, or MenACWY (1:1:1:1). Participants and all investigatory staff were blinded to treatment allocation. Coprimary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity and immunogenicity of anti-spike IgG measured by ELISA. The primary analysis for immunogenicity was on a modified intention-to-treat basis; safety and reactogenicity were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included assessment of viral neutralisation and cellular responses. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 73765130.\ud \ud Findings: \ud Between June 1 and June 30, 2021, 3498 people were screened. 2878 participants met eligibility criteria and received COVID-19 vaccine or control. The median ages of ChAd/ChAd-primed participants were 53 years (IQR 44–61) in the younger age group and 76 years (73–78) in the older age group. In the BNT/BNT-primed participants, the median ages were 51 years (41–59) in the younger age group and 78 years (75–82) in the older age group. In the ChAd/ChAD-primed group, 676 (46·7%) participants were female and 1380 (95·4%) were White, and in the BNT/BNT-primed group 770 (53·6%) participants were female and 1321 (91·9%) were White. Three vaccines showed overall increased reactogenicity: m1273 after ChAd/ChAd or BNT/BNT; and ChAd and Ad26 after BNT/BNT. For ChAd/ChAd-primed individuals, spike IgG geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between study vaccines and controls ranged from 1·8 (99% CI 1·5–2·3) in the half VLA group to 32·3 (24·8–42·0) in the m1273 group. GMRs for wild-type cellular responses compared with controls ranged from 1·1 (95% CI 0·7–1·6) for ChAd to 3·6 (2·4–5·5) for m1273. For BNT/BNT-primed individuals, spike IgG GMRs ranged from 1·3 (99% CI 1·0–1·5) in the half VLA group to 11·5 (9·4–14·1) in the m1273 group. GMRs for wild-type cellular responses compared with controls ranged from 1·0 (95% CI 0·7–1·6) for half VLA to 4·7 (3·1–7·1) for m1273. The results were similar between those aged 30–69 years and those aged 70 years and older. Fatigue and pain were the most common solicited local and systemic adverse events, experienced more in people aged 30–69 years than those aged 70 years or older. Serious adverse events were uncommon, similar in active vaccine and control groups. In total, there were 24 serious adverse events: five in the control group (two in control group A, three in control group B, and zero in control group C), two in Ad26, five in VLA, one in VLA-half, one in BNT, two in BNT-half, two in ChAd, one in CVn, two in NVX, two in NVX-half, and one in m1273.\ud \ud Interpretation: \ud All study vaccines boosted antibody and neutralising responses after ChAd/ChAd initial course and all except one after BNT/BNT, with no safety concerns. Substantial differences in humoral and cellular responses, and vaccine availability will influence policy choices for booster vaccination.\ud \ud Funding: \ud UK Vaccine Taskforce and National Institute for Health Research.
- Published
- 2021
12. Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a Phase I, open-label, dose-escalating, randomized controlled study
- Author
-
Kim Mallard, William Greenhalf, Lauren Walker, Susannah Condie, Ellice Marwood, Michael Jacobs, Tom Fletcher, Gareth Griffiths, Geoffrey Saunders, Sean Ewings, Victoria Shaw, Richard Fitzgerald, Kerensa Thorne, Olana Tansley-Hancock, Andrew Owen, Lucy Johnson, Sara Yeats, David G. Lalloo, Wendy Painter, Helen Reynolds, Henry Pertinez, Thomas Jaki, Christie Woods, Keira Fines, Emma Wrixon, Colin Hale, Andrea Corkhill, Katie Bullock, Mike Radford, Emily R. Adams, Nichola Downs, Saye Khoo, Justin Chiong, Wayne Holman, Rebecca Lyon, Pavel Mozgunov, Marcin D Bula, and Jennifer L Gibney
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Research design ,Adult ,qv_268.5 ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Article ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,Pharmacokinetics ,law ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Symptom onset ,Adverse effect ,Pharmacology ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 ,Bayes Theorem ,w_20.5 ,Infectious Diseases ,Clinical research ,Treatment Outcome ,Research Design ,Toxicity ,qw_160 ,business - Abstract
Objectives AGILE is a Phase Ib/IIa platform for rapidly evaluating COVID-19 treatments. In this trial (NCT04746183) we evaluated the safety and optimal dose of molnupiravir in participants with early symptomatic infection. Methods We undertook a dose-escalating, open-label, randomized-controlled (standard-of-care) Bayesian adaptive Phase I trial at the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Clinical Research Facility. Participants (adult outpatients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptom onset) were randomized 2:1 in groups of 6 participants to 300, 600 and 800 mg doses of molnupiravir orally, twice daily for 5 days or control. A dose was judged unsafe if the probability of 30% or greater dose-limiting toxicity (the primary outcome) over controls was 25% or greater. Secondary outcomes included safety, clinical progression, pharmacokinetics and virological responses. Results Of 103 participants screened, 18 participants were enrolled between 17 July and 30 October 2020. Molnupiravir was well tolerated at 300, 600 and 800 mg doses with no serious or severe adverse events. Overall, 4 of 4 (100%), 4 of 4 (100%) and 1 of 4 (25%) of the participants receiving 300, 600 and 800 mg molnupiravir, respectively, and 5 of 6 (83%) controls, had at least one adverse event, all of which were mild (≤grade 2). The probability of ≥30% excess toxicity over controls at 800 mg was estimated at 0.9%. Conclusions Molnupiravir was safe and well tolerated; a dose of 800 mg twice daily for 5 days was recommended for Phase II evaluation.
- Published
- 2021
13. The development and validation of a novel LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of Molnupiravir and its metabolite ß-d-N4-hydroxycytidine in human plasma and saliva
- Author
-
Colin Hale, Saye Khoo, Lauren Walker, Sujan Dilly Penchala, Richard Fitzgerald, Alieu Amara, Laura Else, Rebecca Lyons, and Tom Fletcher
- Subjects
Analyte ,Saliva ,qv_268.5 ,Metabolite ,Clinical Biochemistry ,Pharmaceutical Science ,Cytidine ,Antiviral therapy ,Hydroxylamines ,Tandem mass spectrometry ,Article ,Analytical Chemistry ,Plasma ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Tandem Mass Spectrometry ,Drug Discovery ,wc_505 ,Humans ,Protein precipitation ,LC-MS/MS ,Acetonitrile ,Spectroscopy ,Chromatography ,SARS-CoV-2 ,Chemistry ,COVID-19 ,Reproducibility of Results ,N4-hydroxycytidine ,Coronavirus ,Linear range ,Molnupiravir ,Ammonium acetate ,Chromatography, Liquid - Abstract
In light of the recent global pandemic, Molnupiravir (MPV) or EIDD-2801, developed for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated influenza, is now being trialled for the treatment of infections caused by highly pathogenic coronaviruses, including COVID-19. A sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantification of MPV and its metabolite s-d-N4-hydroxycytidine (NHC) in human plasma and saliva. The analytes were extracted from the matrices by protein precipitation using acetonitrile. This was followed by drying and subsequently injecting the reconstituted solutions onto the column. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a polar Atlantis C18 column with gradient elution of 1 mM Ammonium acetate in water (pH4.3) and 1 mM Ammonium acetate in acetonitrile. Analyte detection was conducted in negative ionisation mode using SRM. Analysis was performed using stable isotopically labelled (SIL) internal standards (IS). The m/z transitions were: MPV (328.1→126.0), NHC (258.0→125.9) and MPV-SIL (331.0→129.0), NHC-SIL (260.9→128.9). Validation was over a linear range of 2.5–5000 ng/ml for both plasma and saliva. Across four different concentrations, precision and accuracy (intra- and inter-day) were 15%; and recovery of both analytes from plasma and saliva was between 95% and 100% and 65–86% respectively. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies are underway utilising this method for determination of MPV and its metabolite in patients with COVID-19 infection.
- Published
- 2021
14. An open label, adaptive, phase 1 trial of high-dose oral nitazoxanide in healthy volunteers: an antiviral candidate for SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Robert Waugh, Rebecca Lyon, Timothy Rowland, Kelly Byrne, Rebecca Crook, Michael Fisher, Sean Ewings, Megan Lawrence, Sujan Dilly-Penchala, Henry Pertinez, Laura Else, Helen Reynolds, Thomas Jaki, Rajith K. R. Rajoli, Richard Fitzgerald, Andrew Owen, Pavel Mozgunov, Lauren Walker, Saye Khoo, Colin Hale, Parys Hatchard, Karen Martin, Keira Fines, Izabela Eberhart, Alieu Amara, Lucy Johnson, Gareth Griffiths, David G. Lalloo, Tom Fletcher, Geoffrey Saunders, Michael Jacobs, and Christie Woods
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling ,business.industry ,Bilirubin ,Nitazoxanide ,Urine ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Cmin ,chemistry ,Pharmacokinetics ,Tolerability ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,business ,Adverse effect ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Repurposing approved drugs may rapidly establish effective interventions during a public health crisis. This has yielded immunomodulatory treatments for severe COVID-19, but repurposed antivirals have not been successful to date because of redundancy of the target in vivo or suboptimal exposures at studied doses. Nitazoxanide is an FDA approved antiparasitic medicine, that physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling has indicated may provide antiviral concentrations across the dosing interval, when repurposed at higher than approved doses. Within the AGILE trial platform (NCT04746183) an open label, adaptive, phase 1 trial in healthy adult participants was undertaken with high dose nitazoxanide. Participants received 1500mg nitazoxanide orally twice-daily with food for 7 days. Primary outcomes were safety, tolerability, optimum dose and schedule. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was undertaken day 1 and 5 with Cmin sampling on day 3 and 7. Fourteen healthy participants were enrolled between 18th February and 11th May 2021. All 14 doses were completed by 10/14 participants. Nitazoxanide was safe and well tolerated with no significant adverse events. Moderate gastrointestinal disturbance (loose stools) occurred in 8 participants (57.1%), with urine and sclera discolouration in 12 (85.7%) and 9 (64.3%) participants, respectively, without clinically significant bilirubin elevation. This was self-limiting and resolved upon drug discontinuation. PBPK predictions were confirmed on day 1 but with underprediction at day 5. Median Cmin was above the in vitro target concentration on first dose and maintained throughout. Nitazoxanide administered at 1500mg BID with food was safe and well tolerated and a phase 1b/2a study is now being initiated in COVID-19 patients.
- Published
- 2021
15. Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a phase 1, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study
- Author
-
Kerensa Thorne, Andrew Owen, Justin Chiong, Thomas Jaki, Michael Jacobs, Gareth Griffiths, Sara Yeats, Tom Fletcher, Keira Fines, Susannah Condie, Geoffrey Saunders, Kim Mallard, Colin Hale, Jennifer L Gibney, Mike Radford, Nichola Downs, Olana Tansley-Hancock, Pavel Mozgunov, Marcin D Bula, Andrea Corkhill, Katie Bullock, Wendy Painter, Christie Woods, Victoria Shaw, William Greenhalf, Lauren Walker, David G. Lalloo, Wayne Holman, Richard Fitzgerald, Rebecca Lyon, Lucy Johnson, Henry Pertinez, Ellice Marwood, Sean Ewings, Emma Wrixon, Saye Khoo, Emily R. Adams, and Helen Reynolds
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Clinical research ,Pharmacokinetics ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,business.industry ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,Internal medicine ,Toxicity ,Medicine ,In patient ,Adverse effect ,business ,Excess toxicity - Abstract
BackgroundAGILE is a phase Ib/IIa platform for rapidly evaluating COVID-19 treatments. In this trial (NCT04746183) we evaluated the safety and optimal dose of molnupiravir in participants with early symptomatic infection.MethodsWe undertook a dose-escalating, open-label, randomised-controlled (standard-of-care) Bayesian adaptive phase I trial at the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen Clinical Research Facility. Participants (adult outpatients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 5 days of symptom onset) were randomised 2:1 in groups of 6 participants to 300mg, 600mg and 800mg doses of molnupiravir orally, twice daily for 5 days or control. A dose was judged unsafe if the probability of 30% or greater dose-limiting toxicity (the primary outcome) over controls was higher than 25%. Secondary outcomes included safety, clinical progression, pharmacokinetics and virologic responses.ResultsOf 103 volunteers screened, 18 participants were enrolled between 17 July and 30 October 2020. Molnupiravir was well tolerated at 400, 600 or 800mg doses with no serious or severe adverse events. Overall, 4 of 4 (100%), 4 of 4 (100%) and 1 of 4 (25%) of the participants receiving 300, 600 and 800mg molnupiravir respectively, and 5 of 6 (83%) controls, had at least one adverse event, all of which were mild (≤grade 2). The probability of ≥30% excess toxicity over controls at 800mg was estimated at 0.9%.ConclusionMolnupiravir was safe and well tolerated; a dose of 800mg twice-daily for 5 days was recommended for Phase II evaluation.
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.