Search

Background and Aims: Telemonitoring is increasingly used in the management of IBD patients. We investigated the agreement between patients and physicians on scores of disease activity and burden., Methods: Consecutive outpatients at one IBD clinic were recruited between February and December 2021. Enrolled patients completed a questionnaire for disease activity (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] for Crohn's disease or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] for ulcerative colitis) and a test of disease burden (Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure [PRISM]). They did the tests within 5 days of an outpatient visit, working independently on IBD Tool, a new web-based telemonitoring application. Concomitantly, the senior and junior physicians who examined them completed the same tests. The agreement was tested for every pair of scores., Results: Five hundred and sixty patients (289 Crohn's disease; 271 ulcerative colitis) completed disease questionnaires on IBD Tool (in total, 742 times). By Spearman's correlation, the agreement was substantial both for HBI (rho 0.685-0.837) and SCCAI (rho 0.694-0.888) for comparisons between patients, junior and senior physicians. The agreement was moderate-to-substantial for PRISM (rho 0.406-0.725) for the same comparisons. The correlation between disease activity (HBI/SCCAI) and PRISM scores was substantial for senior (rho 0.757-0.788) or junior (rho 0.746-0.753) physicians and moderate for patients (rho 0.458-0.486). The median PRISM score difference was 2.3-1.6 points lower between patients and senior-junior physicians., Conclusion: Agreement between IBD patients and physicians was substantial for disease activity and moderate for disease impact. The inclusion of disease burden scoring in telemonitoring platforms provides important information for the management of IBD patients.Study highlightsWhat IS known•Continuous response to treatments and patient-reported outcomes became an essential goal for IBD patient management.•The use of tele-monitoring and eHealth technologies allows for regular disease assessments and for managing more efficiently IBD patients; disease questionnaires and tests are key to support eHealth tools.What is new here•Agreement between IBD patients and physicians was substantial for disease activity and moderate for disease burden, while agreement among junior and senior physicians was substantial for both.•PRISM performs as well for ulcerative colitis as for Crohn's patients.•The inclusion of disease burden tests might add to eHealth platforms valuable information, complemental to disease activity questionnaires.

Background and Aims: Post-surgical recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolonic resection is common. Early identification of features associated with recurrence is a standard procedure of postoperative management, but the prognostic role of such features when detected at later time points is unclear. We compared the predictivity for Crohn's disease recurrence of common clinical-instrumental variables when assessed early (<12 months) or late (>36 months) after surgery., Methods: This retrospective study considered CD patients who had ileocolonic resection and were followed for a median of 7.6 years. Clinical characteristics, post-surgical therapy, endoscopy recurrence (Rutgeerts' score ≥i2) and ultrasound features were compared between subgroups who had a early or late post-surgical assessment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify variables associated with recurrence (clinical and surgical)., Results: Of 201 patients, 70 (32%) had a early and 39 (19%) had a late post-surgical assessment. The Early and Late subgroups had similar clinical characteristics. Overall, clinical relapse was observed in 131 patients (66%), surgical relapse in 31 (16%), endoscopic recurrence in 149 (75%) and ultrasonographic recurrence in 132 (66%), without significant differences in frequencies between subgroups. By Cox proportional hazard regression, endoscopic recurrence was a significant predictor of clinical recurrence overall (HR=2.31, P = 0.002) and in the Early (HR=3.85, P = 0.002) but not Late subgroup., Discussion: The most informative postoperative CD assessment is the one done within the first year of surgery. Later endoscopic evaluations have no prognostic value and should be done only for clinical needs or for research purposes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest GDP, MM, MM, CR, PM, MC, CR, EM, EE, AL, RR, AF: reported no conflict of interest to disclose CG: Roche boards MD: Advisory board/Lecturer/Grants/Congress participation from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, SOFAR, Chiesi, Roche, Bioclinica, (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease is treated with anti-TNF agents such as infliximab and its biosimilars, but use of biosimilars is limited due to perceived risks of adverse events., Aim: To explore safety and effectiveness of switching from the infliximab originator to a first biosimilar., Patients and Methods: Clinical and biological outcomes were compared between 53 patients who switched from the infliximab originator to the biosimilar CT-P13 (Switched group) and 13 patients treated with CT-P13 from the beginning (Naïve group). Infliximab trough levels and antidrug antibodies were measured., Results: At enrolment, patients in the Switched group had a longer median duration of infliximab treatment than Naïve (4.0 vs. 0.6 years, p < 0.0001) but similar proportions of patients were in remission (77% and 62%, respectively). Infliximab discontinuation due to adverse events or loss of efficacy was less common in the Switched (26%) than Naïve group (62%, p = 0.017). Variables independently associated with time to discontinuation were disease activity (p < 0.0001) and immunomodulating treatment (p = 0.019) at enrolment. Trough levels and antidrug antibodies were similar between groups during observation., Conclusion: This study confirms that switching from infliximab originator to a first biosimilar is safe and effective. Patients at highest risk of losing treatment efficacy are those with active disease, irrespective of the therapeutic switch., (Copyright © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment with infliximab is a common option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Therapeutic drug monitoring could improve treatment management., Aims: To test inter-test reliability of two commercially available diagnostic kits for infliximab trough levels and infliximab antibodies, and their association with treatment outcomes., Methods: 86 IBD outpatients on infliximab maintenance treatment were enrolled in a prospective cross-sectional study, 115 samples were available for inter-test reliability., Results: Inter-test agreement was good both for trough levels (concordance correlation coefficient 0.78, weighted κ 0.60, Sperman's ρ 0.937) and for infliximab antibodies (weighted κ 0.79) measurement, when comparing Promonitor and ImmunDiagnostik kits. According to manufacturers' cut-off values, trough levels were classified as undetectable (17%), low (21%) or in range (63%). The only significant associations were: mucosal healing (p=0.026; OR 6.50), infliximab antibody status (p=0.0015; OR 0.031) and adverse events (p=0.009; OR 0.115). Higher trough levels were observed among patients on concomitant steroid/immunosuppressive therapy and among patients with dose-intensification. Infliximab antibodies were significantly associated to treatment-related adverse events (p=0.0003, OR 30.42), and to lower trough levels, but not to other clinical variables., Conclusion: The two tests performed equally well. Infliximab antibodies were associated to adverse events, while trough levels were not associated to treatment outcomes., (Copyright © 2015 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)