Search

International audience; Background: Identification of cardiogenic shock severity is a critical step to adapt the management level upon admission. Peripheral tissue perfusion signs, simple and reliable markers of tissue hypoperfusion have never been extensively assessed during cardiogenic shock.Methods: All consecutive patients admitted in ICU for cardiogenic shock of two tertiary teaching hospitals were included in a prospective observational study. Macro-hemodynamic parameters (such as heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index) and peripheral tissue perfusion signs such as capillary refill time on the index fingertip, mottling and Pv-aCO2 (the difference between partial pressure of CO2 in venous blood and arterial blood) were recorded at inclusion (H0), H6, H12, H24 and H48. The composite primary endpoint was the association between 90-day mortality or the need for venoarterial-ECMO support.Results: 61 patients were included; at inclusion, simplified acute physiology score II was 64 (52-77) points. The primary endpoint was met by 42% of patients. Capillary refill time values were significantly higher at all time-points in non survivors or patients needing venoarterial-ECMO support. In univariate analysis, capillary refill time > 3 sec at inclusion was associated with 90-day all-cause mortality or venoarterial-ECMO support (Hazard Ratio of 12.38; 95% CI 2.91 to 52.71). Capillary refill time at inclusion was poorly associated with macrocirculatory parameters but significantly correlated with microcirculatory parameters. Further, capillary refill time added incremental value to Cardshock score, with an AUC combination at 0.93.Conclusion: In patients admitted in ICU for cardiogenic shock, our preliminary data suggest that a prolonged capillary refill time > 3 sec was associated with an early prediction of 90-day mortality or the need for venoarterial-ECMO support

La coagulation intravasculaire disséminée (CIVD) est une complication fréquente du sepsis et du choc septique. Alors que l’activation de la coagulation au cours d’un sepsis, conjointement à la mise en jeu de l’immunité innée, participe à la défense de l’hôte contre le pathogène (immunothrombose), son activation dérégulée avec un défaut des systèmes régulateurs anticoagulants et fibrinolytiques dans la CIVD, aboutit à la formation de microthromboses multiples contribuant à la défaillance multiviscérale et à la surmortalité de ces patients. Cette revue de la littérature fait état des dernières avancées physiopathologiques, diagnostiques et thérapeutiques dans la CIVD septique.

A common and potent consideration has recently entered the landscape of the novel coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19): venous thromboembolism (VTE). COVID-19 has been associated to a distinctive related coagulopathy that shows unique characteristics. The research community has risen to the challenges posed by this « evolving COVID-19 coagulopathy » and has made unprecedented efforts to promptly address its distinct characteristics. In such difficult time, both national and international societies of thrombosis and hemostasis released prompt and timely responses to guide recognition and management of COVID-19-related coagulopathy. However, latest guidelines released by the international Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) on May 27, 2020, followed the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) on June 2, 2020 showed some discrepancies regarding thromboprophylaxis use. In this forum article, we would like to offer an updated focus on thromboprophylaxis with current incidence of VTE in ICU and non-ICU patients according to recent published studies; highlight the main differences regarding ISTH and CHEST guidelines; summarize and describe which are the key ongoing RCTs testing different anticoagulation strategies in patients with COVID-19; and finally set a proposal for COVID-19 coagulopathy specific risk factors and dedicated trials.

Background and Objective: Host defence mechanisms to counter virus infection include the activation of the broncho-alveolar haemostasis. Fibrin degradation products secondary to extravascular fibrin breakdown could contribute to the marked increase in D-Dimers during COVID-19. We sought to examine the prognostic value on lung injury of D-Dimers in non-critically ill COVID-19 patients without thrombotic events. Methods: This study retrospectively analysed hospitalized COVID-19 patients classified according to a D-Dimers threshold following the COVID-19 associated haemostatic abnormalities (CAHA) classification at baseline and at peak (Stage 1: D-Dimers less than three-fold above normal, Stage 2: D-Dimers three- to six-fold above normal, Stage 3: D-Dimers six-fold above normal). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of critical lung injuries on chest computed tomography. The secondary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death or transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: Among the 123 patients included, critical lung injuries were evidenced in 8 (11.9%) patients in Stage 1, 6 (20%) in Stage 2 and 15 (57.7%) in Stage 3 (p = 0.001). D-Dimers staging at peak was an independent predictor of critical lung injuries regardless of the inflammatory burden assessed by CRP levels (OR 2.70, 95% CI (1.50&ndash, 4.86), p &lt, 0.001) and was significantly associated with increased in-hospital death or ICU transfer (14.9 % in Stage 1, 50.0% in Stage 2 and 57.7% in Stage 3 (p &lt, 0.001)). D-Dimers staging at peak was an independent predictor of in-hospital death or ICU transfer (OR 2.50, CI 95% (1.27&ndash, 4.93), p = 0.008). Conclusions: In the absence of overt thrombotic events, D-Dimers quantification is a relevant marker of critical lung injuries and dismal patient outcome.

Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological disease affecting 1 in 10 reproductive-age women. It is defined as the presence of endometrium-like tissue outside the uterus. Beyond this placid anatomical definition, endometriosis is a complex, hormonal, inflammatory, and systemic condition that poses significant familial, psychological, and economic burden. The interaction between the cardiovascular system and endometriosis has become a field of interest as the underlying mutual mechanisms become better understood. On the basis of accumulating fundamental and clinical evidence, it is likely that there exists a close relationship between endometriosis and the cardiovascular system. Therefore, investigating the endometriosis—cardiovascular interaction is highly clinically significant. In this review, we highlight our current understanding of the pathophysiology of endometriosis with systemic hormonal, pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, immunologic, and genetic processes beyond the peritoneal microenvironment. Additionally, we provide current clinical evidence about how endometriosis interacts with cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD). To date, only small associations between endometriosis and CVD have been reported in observational studies, inherently limited by the potential influence of unmeasured confounding. Cardiovascular disease in women with endometriosis remains understudied, under-recognized, and underdiagnosed. More detailed study of the cardiovascular-endometriosis interaction is needed to fully understand its clinical relevance, underlying pathophysiology, possible means of early diagnosis and prevention.

Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) (also termed thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome or vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia or vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia) is characterized by (i) venous or arterial thrombosis; (ii) mild to severe thrombocytopenia; (iii) positive antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)–polyanion antibodies or anti-PF4-heparin antibodies detected by the HIT (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) ELISA assay (iv) occurring 5 to 30 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) or Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) vaccination. VITT’s incidence is 1 per 100.000 vaccinated people irrespective of age and up to 1 in 50.000 for people < 50 years of age with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. The exact mechanism by which adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines trigger this syndrome is still unclear, as for the increased risk for acute cerebral sinus venous thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis as compared to other locations of venous thrombotic events. VITT is associated with the detection of anti-PF4 antibodies, unrelated to previous use of heparin therapy. PF4 antibodies are sought to activate platelets via the platelet FcγRIIA receptors leading to further platelet activation that causes thrombosis and thrombocytopenia., Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract

Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been recognized as a major determinant of Covid-19 vulnerability and severity. We sought to compare demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes for Covid-19 in a large cohort of chronic CAD patients living in Strasbourg's cluster region ( Fig. 1 ). Methods Follow-up was conducted by telephone interviews performed by cardiologists one month after the start of the French lockdown. The primary outcome was the composite of death or hospitalization related to Covid-19 infection. Secondary endpoints included Covid-19 related death, Covid-19 related hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, allcause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality and healthcare compliance. Results Out of 891 patients included, twenty CAD patients (2.2%) had RT-PCR confirmed Covid-19 infection. Confirmed or suspect cases were evidenced in 48 patients (5.4%). Covid-19 patients showed lower left ventricular ejection fraction, were more frequently obese, less likely to smoke or follow lipid lowering therapy. The composite of death or hospitalization related to Covid-19 was 90%. Mortality rate was 30% among confirmed Covid-19 patients. Drugs’ discontinuation rate was low (1.1%) during the confinement. Reticence to consult a healthcare professional occurred in 6.4%. Postponement or cancellation of non-essential medical visits occurred in 15,7% ( Table 1 ). Conclusions Coronary patients from a large French cluster of COVID-19 showed a high risk of Covid-19 infection and worse in-hospital outcomes.

Introduction. Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is a frequent condition in patients with COVID-19 and is associated with worse outcomes. Previous studies suggested an immunothrombosis instead of a thrombus embolism, but the precise mechanisms remain unknown. Objective. To assess the determinants and prognosis of APE during COVID-19. Methods. We retrospectively included all consecutive patients with APE confirmed by computed tomography pulmonary angiography hospitalized at Strasbourg University Hospital from 1 March to 31 May 2019 and 1 March to 31 May 2020. A comprehensive set of clinical, biological, and imaging data during hospitalization was collected. The primary outcome was transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Results. APE was diagnosed in 140 patients: 59 (42.1%) with COVID-19, and 81 (57.9%) without COVID-19. A 812% reduction of non-COVID-19 related APE was registered during the 2020 period. COVID-19 patients showed a higher simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) score (1.15 ± 0.76 vs. 0.83 ± 0.83, p = 0.019) and were more frequently transferred to the ICU (45.8% vs. 6.2%, p &lt, 0.001). No difference regarding the most proximal thrombus localization, Qanadli score (8.1 ± 6.9 vs. 9.0 ± 7.4, p = 0.45), the proportion of subsegmental (10.2% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.86), and segmental pulmonary embolism (35.6% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.16) was evidenced between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 APE. In COVID-19 patients with subsegmental or segmental APE, thrombus was, in all cases (27/27 patients), localized in areas with COVID-19-related lung injuries. Marked inflammatory and prothrombotic biological markers were associated with COVID-19 APE. Conclusions. APE patients with COVID-19 have a particular clinico–radiological and biological profile and a dismal prognosis. Our results emphasize the preeminent role of inflammation and a prothrombotic state in these patients.

Among the distinctive features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), numerous reports have stressed the importance of vascular damage associated with coagulopathy onset [1]. Histological analysis of pulmonary vessels in patients with COVID-19 revealed severe endothelial injury associated with intracellular severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and disrupted endothelial cell membranes together with widespread thrombosis and occlusion of alveolar capillaries. Microparticles (MPs) shed by apoptotic/stimulated cells of various cellular lineages, including platelets, leukocytes, macrophages or endothelial cells, are reliable markers of vascular damage [2] released upon pro-inflammatory conditions and behave as active participants in the early steps of clot formation [3]. Circulating MPs promote procoagulant responses due to the exposure of tissue factor, the physiological activator of the coagulation cascade, and of negatively charged phospholipids, such as phosphatidylserine, required for the assembly of the tenase and prothrombinase coagulation complexes ultimately leading to thrombin generation, through which they can precisely be quantified [4]. MPs carry angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)1 and upregulate ACE1 expression in neighbouring endothelial cells [5]. By contrast, exosomes were recently reported to convey ACE2, the cell-entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2 [4], in the vasculature [6]. ACE2 converts angiotensin II (Ang II) into angiotensin 1–7 (Ang 1–7), which by virtue of its actions on the Mas receptor, limits the noxious effects of Ang II. Pioneering data have demonstrated that the renin–angiotensin system has a crucial role in severe acute injury and that ACE2 has a protective role in acute lung injury mediated by SARS-CoV [7]. According to this paradigm, the loss of ACE2 function following binding by SARS-CoV-2 may contribute to unopposed Ang II accumulation that further exacerbates tissue injury and promotes inflammation, MPs release and thrombosis. During SARS-CoV-2 infection, we hypothesised that various factors including inflammatory burden, Ang II, altered shear stress and hypoxic vasoconstriction, could enhance MPs shedding by various cell lineages including the alveolar vascular endothelium and contribute to clot formation., Procoagulant microparticles are associated with the extent of lung injuries in #COVID19 and pulmonary thrombosis https://bit.ly/3eX2LPc

AIMS: Cardiovascular disease has been recognized as a major determinant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vulnerability and severity. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2 is a functional receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and is up-regulated in patients with heart failure. We sought to examine the potential association between reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of the 1162 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between February 2014 and October 2018, we enrolled 889 patients with available clinical follow-up data. Follow-up was conducted by telephone interviews 1 month after the start of the French lockdown which began on 17 March 2020. Patients were divided into two groups according to LVEF 60;40% (reduced LVEF) (n = 91) or ≥40% (moderately reduced + preserved LVEF) (n = 798). The incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalization or death was significantly higher in the reduced LVEF group as compared with the moderately reduced + preserved LVEF group (9% vs. 1%, P 60; 0.001). No association was found between discontinuation of ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blockers and COVID-19 test positivity. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, reduced LVEF was an independent predictor of COVID-19 hospitalization or death (odds ratio: 6.91, 95% confidence interval: 2.60 to 18.35, P 60; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with previous ACS, reduced LVEF was associated with increased susceptibility to COVID-19. Aggressive COVID-19 testing and therapeutic strategies may be considered for patient with impaired heart function.

We developed a score, with easily accessible data (age, sex, body mass index, dyspnea, inflammatory parameters), to predict the risk of rapid progression to severe coronavirus disease 2019. Using a cutoff of >6 points, the negative predictive value was 87%.

This is the first study to show a stepwise increase in venous thrombotic events according to COVID-19 coagulopathy (COVID-19-associated hemostatic abnormalities [CAHA]) staging and lung injuries assessed by chest computed tomography. Excess mortality and/or transfer to intensive care unit according to CAHA staging.