17 results on '"D’Imporzano, S"'
Search Results
2. A national survey on the current status of minimally invasive gastric practice on behalf of GIRCG
- Author
-
Milone, M, D'Amore, A, Alfieri, S, Ambrosio, M, Andreuccetti, J, Ansaloni, L, Antonucci, A, Arganini, M, Baiocchi, G, Barone, M, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Boccia, L, Boni, L, Braga, M, Cianchi, F, Cipollari, C, Contine, A, Cotsoglou, C, D'Imporzano, S, De Manzoni, G, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Degiuli, M, Donini, A, Elmore, U, Ercolani, G, Ferrari, G, Fumagalli, R, Garulli, G, Gelmini, R, Graziosi, L, Gualtierotti, M, Guglielmi, A, Inama, M, Maffeis, F, Maione, F, Manigrasso, M, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Massobrio, A, Moretto, G, Moukachar, A, Navarra, G, Nigri, G, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Papis, D, Parise, P, Pedrazzani, C, Petri, R, Pignata, G, Pisano, M, Rausei, S, Reddavid, R, Rocco, G, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossit, L, Rottoli, M, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Scabini, S, Scaringi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Taglietti, L, Torre, B, Ubiali, P, Uccelli, M, Uggeri, F, Vertaldi, S, Viganò, J, De Palma, G, Giacopuzzi, S, Milone, Marco, D'Amore, Anna, Alfieri, Sergio, Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Ansaloni, Luca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Arganini, Marco, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Barone, Mirko, Bencini, Lapo, Bencivenga, Maria, Boccia, Luigi, Boni, Luigi, Braga, Marco, Cianchi, Fabio, Cipollari, Chiara, Contine, Alessandro, Cotsoglou, Christian, D'Imporzano, Simone, De Manzoni, Giovanni, De Pascale, Stefano, De Ruvo, Nicola, Degiuli, Maurizio, Donini, Annibale, Elmore, Ugo, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fumagalli, Romario Uberto, Garulli, Gianluca, Gelmini, Roberta, Graziosi, Luigina, Gualtierotti, Monica, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Inama, Marco, Maffeis, Federica, Maione, Francesco, Manigrasso, Michele, Marchesi, Federico, Marrelli, Daniele, Massobrio, Andrea, Moretto, Gianluigi, Moukachar, Aballah, Navarra, Giuseppe, Nigri, Giuseppe, Olmi, Stefano, Palaia, Raffaele, Papis, Davide, Parise, Paolo, Pedrazzani, Corrado, Petri, Roberto, Pignata, Giusto, Pisano, Michele, Rausei, Stefano, Reddavid, Rossella, Rocco, Giuseppe, Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, Riccardo, Rossit, Luca, Rottoli, Matteo, Roviello, Franco, Santi, Stefano, Scabini, Stefano, Scaringi, Stefano, Solaini, Leonardo, Staderini, Fabio, Taglietti, Lucio, Torre, Beatrice, Ubiali, Paolo, Uccelli, Matteo, Uggeri, Fabio, Vertaldi, Sara, Viganò, Jacopo, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, Giacopuzzi, Simone, Milone, M, D'Amore, A, Alfieri, S, Ambrosio, M, Andreuccetti, J, Ansaloni, L, Antonucci, A, Arganini, M, Baiocchi, G, Barone, M, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Boccia, L, Boni, L, Braga, M, Cianchi, F, Cipollari, C, Contine, A, Cotsoglou, C, D'Imporzano, S, De Manzoni, G, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Degiuli, M, Donini, A, Elmore, U, Ercolani, G, Ferrari, G, Fumagalli, R, Garulli, G, Gelmini, R, Graziosi, L, Gualtierotti, M, Guglielmi, A, Inama, M, Maffeis, F, Maione, F, Manigrasso, M, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Massobrio, A, Moretto, G, Moukachar, A, Navarra, G, Nigri, G, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Papis, D, Parise, P, Pedrazzani, C, Petri, R, Pignata, G, Pisano, M, Rausei, S, Reddavid, R, Rocco, G, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossit, L, Rottoli, M, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Scabini, S, Scaringi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Taglietti, L, Torre, B, Ubiali, P, Uccelli, M, Uggeri, F, Vertaldi, S, Viganò, J, De Palma, G, Giacopuzzi, S, Milone, Marco, D'Amore, Anna, Alfieri, Sergio, Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Ansaloni, Luca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Arganini, Marco, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Barone, Mirko, Bencini, Lapo, Bencivenga, Maria, Boccia, Luigi, Boni, Luigi, Braga, Marco, Cianchi, Fabio, Cipollari, Chiara, Contine, Alessandro, Cotsoglou, Christian, D'Imporzano, Simone, De Manzoni, Giovanni, De Pascale, Stefano, De Ruvo, Nicola, Degiuli, Maurizio, Donini, Annibale, Elmore, Ugo, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fumagalli, Romario Uberto, Garulli, Gianluca, Gelmini, Roberta, Graziosi, Luigina, Gualtierotti, Monica, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Inama, Marco, Maffeis, Federica, Maione, Francesco, Manigrasso, Michele, Marchesi, Federico, Marrelli, Daniele, Massobrio, Andrea, Moretto, Gianluigi, Moukachar, Aballah, Navarra, Giuseppe, Nigri, Giuseppe, Olmi, Stefano, Palaia, Raffaele, Papis, Davide, Parise, Paolo, Pedrazzani, Corrado, Petri, Roberto, Pignata, Giusto, Pisano, Michele, Rausei, Stefano, Reddavid, Rossella, Rocco, Giuseppe, Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, Riccardo, Rossit, Luca, Rottoli, Matteo, Roviello, Franco, Santi, Stefano, Scabini, Stefano, Scaringi, Stefano, Solaini, Leonardo, Staderini, Fabio, Taglietti, Lucio, Torre, Beatrice, Ubiali, Paolo, Uccelli, Matteo, Uggeri, Fabio, Vertaldi, Sara, Viganò, Jacopo, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, and Giacopuzzi, Simone
- Abstract
Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), during the 2013 annual Consensus Conference to gastric cancer, stated that laparoscopic or robotic approach should be limited only to early gastric cancer (EGC) and no further guidelines were currently available. However, accumulated evidences, mainly from eastern experiences, have supported the application of minimally invasive surgery also for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of our study is to give a snapshot of current surgical propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons in performing minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer in order to answer to the question if clinical practice overcome the recommendation. Experts in the field among the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) were invited to join a web 30-item survey through a formal e-mail from January 1st, 2020, to June 31st, 2020. Responses were collected from 46 participants out of 100 upper gastrointestinal surgeons. Percentage of surgeons choosing a minimally invasive approach to treat early and advanced gastric cancer was similar. Additionally analyzing data from the centers involved, we obtained that the percentage of minimally invasive total and partial gastrectomies in advanced cases augmented with the increase of surgical procedures performed per year (p=0.02 and p=0.04 respectively). It is reasonable to assume that there is a widening of indications given by the current national guideline into clinical practice. Propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons was to perform minimally invasive surgery not only for early but also for advanced gastric cancer. Of interest volume activity correlated with the propensity of surgeons to select a minimally invasive approach.
- Published
- 2023
3. Robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for distal esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer: A prospective study
- Author
-
Pallabazzer, G., primary, Belluomini, M., additional, D''Imporzano, S., additional, Solito, B., additional, and Santi, S., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Prospective, observational, multicenter study on minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery compared on operative and follow-up outcomes - IMIGASTRIC II study protocol: IMIGASTRIC II
- Author
-
Desiderio J, Lin JX, Norero E, Borghi F, Marano A, Cianchi F, Badii B, Qi F, Liu T, Reim D, Novotny A, Coratti A, Guerra F, Nguyen NT, Alimoglu O, Ozemir IA, Brower S, Bazzocchi F, Avanzolini A, Solaini L, Ioannidis O, Chatzakis C, Loutzidou L, Isik A, Cesari M, Pernazza G, Azagra JS, Goergen M, Zhou Y, Cao S, Gagnière J, Pezet D, D’Imporzano S, Saint-Marc O, Sindayigaya R, Zang L, Coburn NG, Kayaalp C, Arcuri G, Giovanardi F, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Zheng CH, Huang CM., and Desiderio J, Lin JX, Norero E, Borghi F, Marano A, Cianchi F, Badii B, Qi F, Liu T, Reim D, Novotny A, Coratti A, Guerra F, Nguyen NT, Alimoglu O, Ozemir IA, Brower S, Bazzocchi F, Avanzolini A, Solaini L, Ioannidis O, Chatzakis C, Loutzidou L, Isik A, Cesari M, Pernazza G, Azagra JS, Goergen M, Zhou Y, Cao S, Gagnière J, Pezet D, D’Imporzano S, Saint-Marc O, Sindayigaya R, Zang L, Coburn NG, Kayaalp C, Arcuri G, Giovanardi F, Trastulli S, Parisi A, Zheng CH, Huang CM.
- Subjects
robotic gastrectomy, gastric cancer registry, minimally invasive gastrectomy, open gastrectomy - Abstract
Background: Several meta-analyses have tried to defi ne the role of minimally invasive approaches. However, further evidence to get a wider spread of these methods is necessary. Current studies describe minimally invasive surgery as a possible alternative to open surgery but deserving further clarifi cation. However, despite the increasing interest, the difficulty of planning prospective studies of adequate size accounts for the low level of evidence, which is mostly based on retrospective experiences. A multi-institutional prospective study allows the collection of an impressive amount of data to investigate various aspects of minimally invasive procedures with the opportunity of developing several subgroup analyses. A prospective data collection with high methodological quality on minimally invasive and open gastrectomies can clarify the role of diff erent procedures with the aim to develop specifi c guidelines. Methods and analysis: a multi-institutional prospective database will be established including information on surgical, clinical and oncological features of patients treated for gastric cancer with robotic, laparoscopic or open approaches and subsequent follow-up. The study has been shared by the members of the International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for GASTRIc Cancer (IMIGASTRIC) The database is designed to be an international electronic submission system and a HIPPA protected real time data repository from high volume gastric cancer centers.
- Published
- 2019
5. P210 HYBRID LAPAROSCOPIC ROBOT-ASSISTED MINIMALLY-INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY: A PROSPECTIVE EXPERIENCE IN A REFERRAL CENTER
- Author
-
Santi, S, primary, Belluomini, M, additional, D'Imporzano, S, additional, Pallabazzer, G, additional, Solito, B, additional, Bellomini, M, additional, and Zenzaro, M, additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Clinical and pathophysiological outcomes of the robotic-assisted Heller–Dor myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience
- Author
-
Pallabazzer, G., primary, Peluso, C., additional, de Bortoli, N., additional, Solito, B., additional, D’Imporzano, S., additional, Belluomini, M. A., additional, Bellomini, M. G., additional, Giusti, P., additional, Gianetri, D., additional, and Santi, S., additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. 2372 Is there a role for palliative gastrectomy in asymptomatic metastatic gastric cancer?
- Author
-
Musettini, G., primary, Caparello, C., additional, Pasquini, G., additional, Vivaldi, C., additional, Lencioni, M., additional, Petrini, I., additional, Fabrini, M.G., additional, Pallabazzer, G., additional, D'Imporzano, S., additional, Solito, B., additional, Santi, S., additional, Fornaro, L., additional, Vasile, E., additional, and Falcone, A., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Hybrid Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (laparoscopy and thoracotomy) ensures low complications and guarantees oncological results. A prospective study
- Author
-
Pallabazzer, G., primary, Santi, S., additional, Solito, B., additional, D'Imporzano, S., additional, and Giannotti, S., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A national survey on the current status of minimally invasive gastric practice on behalf of GIRCG
- Author
-
Marco Milone, Anna D’Amore, Sergio Alfieri, Maria Raffaella Ambrosio, Jacopo Andreuccetti, Luca Ansaloni, Adelmo Antonucci, Marco Arganini, Gianluca Baiocchi, Mirko Barone, Lapo Bencini, Maria Bencivenga, Luigi Boccia, Luigi Boni, Marco Braga, Fabio Cianchi, Chiara Cipollari, Alessandro Contine, Christian Cotsoglou, Simone D’Imporzano, Giovanni De Manzoni, Stefano De Pascale, Nicola De Ruvo, Maurizio Degiuli, Annibale Donini, Ugo Elmore, Giorgio Ercolani, Giovanni Ferrari, Romario Uberto Fumagalli, Gianluca Garulli, Roberta Gelmini, Luigina Graziosi, Monica Gualtierotti, Alfredo Guglielmi, Marco Inama, Federica Maffeis, Francesco Maione, Michele Manigrasso, Federico Marchesi, Daniele Marrelli, Andrea Massobrio, Gianluigi Moretto, Aballah Moukachar, Giuseppe Navarra, Giuseppe Nigri, Stefano Olmi, Raffaele Palaia, Davide Papis, Paolo Parise, Corrado Pedrazzani, Roberto Petri, Giusto Pignata, Michele Pisano, Stefano Rausei, Rossella Reddavid, Giuseppe Rocco, Fausto Rosa, Riccardo Rosati, Luca Rossit, Matteo Rottoli, Franco Roviello, Stefano Santi, Stefano Scabini, Stefano Scaringi, Leonardo Solaini, Fabio Staderini, Lucio Taglietti, Beatrice Torre, Paolo Ubiali, Matteo Uccelli, Fabio Uggeri, Sara Vertaldi, Jacopo Viganò, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Simone Giacopuzzi, Milone, Marco, D'Amore, Anna, Alfieri, Sergio, Ambrosio, Maria Raffaella, Andreuccetti, Jacopo, Ansaloni, Luca, Antonucci, Adelmo, Arganini, Marco, Baiocchi, Gianluca, Barone, Mirko, Bencini, Lapo, Bencivenga, Maria, Boccia, Luigi, Boni, Luigi, Braga, Marco, Cianchi, Fabio, Cipollari, Chiara, Contine, Alessandro, Cotsoglou, Christian, D'Imporzano, Simone, De Manzoni, Giovanni, De Pascale, Stefano, De Ruvo, Nicola, Degiuli, Maurizio, Donini, Annibale, Elmore, Ugo, Ercolani, Giorgio, Ferrari, Giovanni, Fumagalli, Romario Uberto, Garulli, Gianluca, Gelmini, Roberta, Graziosi, Luigina, Gualtierotti, Monica, Guglielmi, Alfredo, Inama, Marco, Maffeis, Federica, Maione, Francesco, Manigrasso, Michele, Marchesi, Federico, Marrelli, Daniele, Massobrio, Andrea, Moretto, Gianluigi, Moukachar, Aballah, Navarra, Giuseppe, Nigri, Giuseppe, Olmi, Stefano, Palaia, Raffaele, Papis, Davide, Parise, Paolo, Pedrazzani, Corrado, Petri, Roberto, Pignata, Giusto, Pisano, Michele, Rausei, Stefano, Reddavid, Rossella, Rocco, Giuseppe, Rosa, Fausto, Rosati, Riccardo, Rossit, Luca, Rottoli, Matteo, Roviello, Franco, Santi, Stefano, Scabini, Stefano, Scaringi, Stefano, Solaini, Leonardo, Staderini, Fabio, Taglietti, Lucio, Torre, Beatrice, Ubiali, Paolo, Uccelli, Matteo, Uggeri, Fabio, Vertaldi, Sara, Viganò, Jacopo, De Palma, Giovanni Domenico, Giacopuzzi, Simone, Milone, M, D'Amore, A, Alfieri, S, Ambrosio, M, Andreuccetti, J, Ansaloni, L, Antonucci, A, Arganini, M, Baiocchi, G, Barone, M, Bencini, L, Bencivenga, M, Boccia, L, Boni, L, Braga, M, Cianchi, F, Cipollari, C, Contine, A, Cotsoglou, C, D'Imporzano, S, De Manzoni, G, De Pascale, S, De Ruvo, N, Degiuli, M, Donini, A, Elmore, U, Ercolani, G, Ferrari, G, Fumagalli, R, Garulli, G, Gelmini, R, Graziosi, L, Gualtierotti, M, Guglielmi, A, Inama, M, Maffeis, F, Maione, F, Manigrasso, M, Marchesi, F, Marrelli, D, Massobrio, A, Moretto, G, Moukachar, A, Navarra, G, Nigri, G, Olmi, S, Palaia, R, Papis, D, Parise, P, Pedrazzani, C, Petri, R, Pignata, G, Pisano, M, Rausei, S, Reddavid, R, Rocco, G, Rosa, F, Rosati, R, Rossit, L, Rottoli, M, Roviello, F, Santi, S, Scabini, S, Scaringi, S, Solaini, L, Staderini, F, Taglietti, L, Torre, B, Ubiali, P, Uccelli, M, Uggeri, F, Vertaldi, S, Viganò, J, De Palma, G, and Giacopuzzi, S
- Subjects
GIRCG ,Gastric cancer ,Minimally invasive surgery ,Upper GI surgery ,Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE ,Surgery - Abstract
Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), during the 2013 annual Consensus Conference to gastric cancer, stated that laparoscopic or robotic approach should be limited only to early gastric cancer (EGC) and no further guidelines were currently available. However, accumulated evidences, mainly from eastern experiences, have supported the application of minimally invasive surgery also for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of our study is to give a snapshot of current surgical propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons in performing minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer in order to answer to the question if clinical practice overcome the recommendation. Experts in the field among the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) were invited to join a web 30-item survey through a formal e-mail from January 1st, 2020, to June 31st, 2020. Responses were collected from 46 participants out of 100 upper gastrointestinal surgeons. Percentage of surgeons choosing a minimally invasive approach to treat early and advanced gastric cancer was similar. Additionally analyzing data from the centers involved, we obtained that the percentage of minimally invasive total and partial gastrectomies in advanced cases augmented with the increase of surgical procedures performed per year (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 respectively). It is reasonable to assume that there is a widening of indications given by the current national guideline into clinical practice. Propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons was to perform minimally invasive surgery not only for early but also for advanced gastric cancer. Of interest volume activity correlated with the propensity of surgeons to select a minimally invasive approach.
- Published
- 2022
10. Visual and Hearing Impairment Are Associated With Delirium in Hospitalized Patients: Results of a Multisite Prevalence Study
- Author
-
Alessandro Morandi, Marco Inzitari, Cristina Udina, Neus Gual, Miriam Mota, Elena Tassistro, Anita Andreano, Antonio Cherubini, Simona Gentile, Enrico Mossello, Alessandra Marengoni, Anna Olivé, Francesc Riba, Domingo Ruiz, Elisabet de Jaime, Giuseppe Bellelli, A. Tarasconi, M. Sella, S. Auriemma, G. Paternò, G. Faggian, C. Lucarelli, N. De Grazia, C. Alberto, A. Margola, L. Porcella, I. Nardiello, E. Chimenti, M. Zeni, A. Giani, S. Famularo, E. Romairone, C. Minaglia, C. Ceccotti, G. Guerra, G. Mantovani, F. Monacelli, T. Candiani, A. Ballestrero, F. Santolini, M. Rosso, V. Bono, S. Sibilla, P. Dal Santo, M. Ceci, P. Barone, T. Schirinzi, A. Formenti, G. Nastasi, G. Isaia, D. Gonella, A. Battuello, S. Casson, D. Calvani, F. Boni, A. Ciaccio, R. Rosa, G. Sanna, S. Manfredini, L. Cortese, M. Rizzo, R. Prestano, A. Greco, M. Lauriola, G. Gelosa, V. Piras, M. Arena, D. Cosenza, A. Bellomo, M. LaMontagna, L. Gabbani, L. Lambertucci, S. Perego, G. Parati, G. Basile, V. Gallina, G. Pilone, C. Giudice, F. De, L. Pietrogrande, B. De, M. Mosca, I. Corazzin, P. Rossi, V. Nunziata, F. D'Amico, A. Grippa, S. Giardini, R. Barucci, A. Cossu, L. Fiorin, M. Distefano, M. Lunardelli, M. Brunori, I. Ruffini, E. Abraham, A. Varutti, E. Fabbro, A. Catalano, G. Martino, D. Leotta, A. Marchet, G. Dell'Aquila, A. Scrimieri, M. Davoli, M. Casella, A. Cartei, G. Polidori, D. Brischetto, S. Motta, R. Saponara, P. Perrone, G. Russo, D. Del, C. Car, T. Pirina, S. Franzoni, A. Cotroneo, F. Ghiggia, G. Volpi, C. Menichetti, M. Bo, A. Panico, P. Calogero, G. Corvalli, M. Mauri, E. Lupia, R. Manfredini, F. Fabbian, A. March, M. Pedrotti, M. Veronesi, E. Strocchi, C. Borghi, A. Bianchetti, A. Crucitti, V. DiFrancesco, G. Fontana, L. Bonanni, F. Barbone, C. Serrati, G. Ballardini, M. Simoncelli, G. Ceschia, C. Scarpa, R. Brugiolo, S. Fusco, T. Ciarambino, C. Biagini, E. Tonon, M. Porta, D. Venuti, M. DelSette, M. Poeta, G. Barbagallo, G. Trovato, A. Delitala, P. Arosio, F. Reggiani, G. Zuliani, B. Ortolani, E. Mussio, A. Girardi, A. Coin, G. Ruotolo, A. Castagna, M. Masina, R. Cimino, A. Pinciaroli, G. Tripodi, U. Cannistrà, F. Cassadonte, M. Vatrano, L. Scaglione, P. Fogliacco, C. Muzzuilini, F. Romano, A. Padovani, L. Rozzini, A. Cagnin, F. Fragiacomo, G. Desideri, E. Liberatore, A. Bruni, G. Orsitto, M. Franco, L. Bonfrate, M. Bonetto, N. Pizio, G. Magnani, G. Cecchetti, A. Longo, V. Bubba, L. Marinan, M. Cotelli, M. Turla, M. Sessa, L. Abruzzi, G. Castoldi, D. LoVetere, C. Musacchio, M. Novello, A. Cavarape, A. Bini, A. Leonardi, F. Seneci, W. Grimaldi, F. Fimognari, V. Bambara, A. Saitta, F. Corica, M. Braga, E. Ettorre, C. Camellini, G. Bellelli, G. Annoni, A. Marengoni, A. Crescenzo, G. Noro, R. Turco, M. Ponzetto, L. Giuseppe, B. Mazzei, G. Maiuri, D. Costaggiu, R. Damato, M. Formilan, G. Patrizia, M. Gallucci, M. Paragona, P. Bini, D. Modica, C. Abati, M. Clerici, I. Barbera, F. NigroImperiale, A. Manni, C. Votino, C. Castiglioni, M. Di, M. Degl'Innocenti, G. Moscatelli, S. Guerini, C. Casini, D. Dini, E. D'Imporzano, S. DeNotariis, F. Bonometti, C. Paolillo, A. Riccardi, A. Tiozzo, M. DiBari, S. Vanni, A. Scarpa, D. Zara, P. Ranieri, M. Alessandro, F. Di, D. Pezzoni, C. Platto, V. D'Ambrosio, C. Ivaldi, P. Milia, F. DeSalvo, C. Solaro, M. Strazzacappa, M. Cazzadori, S. Confente, M. Grasso, E. Troisi, V. Guerini, B. Bernardini, C. Corsini, S. Boffelli, A. Filippi, K. Delpin, B. Faraci, E. Bertoletti, M. Vannucci, F. Tesi, P. Crippa, A. Malighetti, D. Bettini, F. Maltese, G. Abruzzese, D. Cosimo, M. Azzini, M. Colombo, G. Procino, S. Fascendini, F. Barocco, P. Del, A. Mazzone, E. Riva, D. Dell'Acqua, M. Cottino, G. Vezzadini, S. Avanzi, C. Brambilla, S. Orini, F. Sgrilli, A. Mello, L. Lombardi, E. Muti, B. Dijk, S. Fenu, C. Pes, P. Gareri, M. Passamonte, R. Rigo, L. Locusta, L. Caser, G. Rosso, S. Cesarini, R. Cozzi, C. Santini, P. Carbone, I. Cazzaniga, R. Lovati, A. Cantoni, P. Ranzani, D. Barra, G. Pompilio, S. Dimori, S. Cernesi, C. Riccò, F. Piazzolla, E. Capittini, C. Rota, F. Gottardi, L. Merla, A. Barelli, A. Millul, G. De, G. Morrone, M. Bigolari, M. Macchi, F. Zambon, C. Pizzorni, G. DiCasaleto, G. Menculini, M. Marcacci, G. Catanese, D. Sprini, T. DiCasalet, M. Bocci, S. Borga, P. Caironi, C. Cat, E. Cingolani, L. Avalli, G. Greco, G. Citerio, L. Gandini, G. Cornara, R. Lerda, L. Brazzi, F. Simeone, M. Caciorgna, D. Alampi, S. Francesconi, E. Beck, B. Antonini, K. Vettoretto, M. Meggiolaro, E. Garofalo, S. Notaro, R. Varutti, F. Bassi, G. Mistraletti, A. Marino, R. Rona, E. Rondelli, I. Riva, A. Scapigliati, A. Cortegiani, F. Vitale, L. Pistidda, R. D'Andrea, L. Querci, P. Gnesin, M. Todeschini, M. Lugano, G. Castelli, M. Ortolani, A. Cotoia, S. Maggiore, L. DiTizio, R. Graziani, I. Testa, E. Ferretti, C. Castioni, F. Lombardi, R. Caserta, M. Pasqua, S. Simoncini, F. Baccarini, M. Rispoli, F. Grossi, L. Cancelliere, M. Carnelli, F. Puccini, G. Biancofiore, A. Siniscalchi, C. Laici, E. Mossello, M. Torrini, G. Pasetti, S. Palmese, R. Oggioni, V. Mangani, S. Pini, M. Martelli, E. Rigo, F. Zuccalà, A. Cherri, R. Spina, I. Calamai, N. Petrucci, A. Caicedo, F. Ferri, P. Gritti, N. Brienza, R. Fonnesu, M. Dessena, G. Fullin, D. Saggioro, Morandi, A, Inzitari, M, Udina, C, Gual, N, Mota, M, Tassistro, E, Andreano, A, Cherubini, A, Gentile, S, Mossello, E, Marengoni, A, Olivé, A, Riba, F, Ruiz, D, de Jaime, E, Bellelli, G, Alessandro Morandi, Marco Inzitari, Cristina Udina, Neus Gual, Miriam Mota, Elena Tassistro, Anita Andreano, Antonio Cherubini, Simona Gentile, Enrico Mossello, Alessandra Marengoni, Anna Olivé, Francesc Riba, Domingo Ruiz, Elisabet de Jaime, Giuseppe Bellelli, Italian Study Group of Delirium, Claudio Borghi, Morandi, Alessandro, Inzitari, Marco, Udina, Cristina, Gual, Neu, Mota, Miriam, Tassistro, Elena, Andreano, Anita, Cherubini, Antonio, Gentile, Simona, Mossello, Enrico, Marengoni, Alessandra, Olivé, Anna, Riba, Francesc, Ruiz, Domingo, de Jaime, Elisabet, Bellelli, Giuseppe, and A Tarasconi, M Sella, S Auriemma, G Paternò, G Faggian, C Lucarelli, N De Grazia, C Alberto, A Margola, L Porcella, I Nardiello, E Chimenti, M Zeni, A Giani, S Famularo, E Romairone, C Minaglia, C Ceccotti, G Guerra, G Mantovani, F Monacelli, C Minaglia, T Candiani, A Ballestrero, C Minaglia, F Santolini, C Minaglia, M Rosso, V Bono, S Sibilla, P Dal Santo, M Ceci, P Barone, T Schirinzi, A Formenti, G Nastasi, G Isaia, D Gonella, A Battuello, S Casson, D Calvani, F Boni, A Ciaccio, R Rosa, G Sanna, S Manfredini, L Cortese, M Rizzo, R Prestano, A Greco, M Lauriola, G Gelosa, V Piras, M Arena, D Cosenza, A Bellomo, M LaMontagna, L Gabbani, L Lambertucci, S Perego, G Parati, G Basile, V Gallina, G Pilone, C Giudice, F De, L Pietrogrande, B De, M Mosca, I Corazzin, P Rossi, V Nunziata, F D'Amico, A Grippa, S Giardini, R Barucci, A Cossu, L Fiorin, M Arena, M Distefano, M Lunardelli, M Brunori, I Ruffini, E Abraham, A Varutti, E Fabbro, A Catalano, G Martino, D Leotta, A Marchet, G Dell'Aquila, A Scrimieri, M Davoli, M Casella, A Cartei, G Polidori, G Basile, D Brischetto, S Motta, R Saponara, P Perrone, G Russo, D Del, C Car, T Pirina, S Franzoni, A Cotroneo, F Ghiggia, G Volpi, C Menichetti, M Bo, A Panico, P Calogero, G Corvalli, M Mauri, E Lupia, R Manfredini, F Fabbian, A March, M Pedrotti, M Veronesi, E Strocchi, C Borghi, A Bianchetti, A Crucitti, V DiFrancesco, G Fontana, L Bonanni, F Barbone, C Serrati, G Ballardini, M Simoncelli, G Ceschia, C Scarpa, R Brugiolo, S Fusco, T Ciarambino, C Biagini, E Tonon, M Porta, D Venuti, M DelSette, M Poeta, G Barbagallo, G Trovato, A Delitala, P Arosio, F Reggiani, G Zuliani, B Ortolani, E Mussio, A Girardi, A Coin, G Ruotolo, A Castagna, M Masina, R Cimino, A Pinciaroli, G Tripodi, U Cannistrà, F Cassadonte, M Vatrano, L Scaglione, P Fogliacco, C Muzzuilini, F Romano, A Padovani, L Rozzini, A Cagnin, F Fragiacomo, G Desideri, E Liberatore, A Bruni, G Orsitto, M Franco, L Bonfrate, M Bonetto, N Pizio, G Magnani, G Cecchetti, A Longo, V Bubba, L Marinan, M Cotelli, M Turla, M Brunori, M Sessa, L Abruzzi, G Castoldi, D LoVetere, C Musacchio, M Novello, A Cavarape, A Bini, A Leonardi, F Seneci, W Grimaldi, F Seneci, F Fimognari, V Bambara, A Saitta, F Corica, M Braga, E Ettorre, C Camellini, G Bellelli, G Annoni, A Marengoni, A Bruni, A Crescenzo, G Noro, R Turco, M Ponzetto, L Giuseppe, B Mazzei, G Maiuri, D Costaggiu, R Damato, E Fabbro, M Formilan, G Patrizia, M Gallucci, C Minaglia, M Paragona, P Bini, D Modica, C Abati, M Clerici, I Barbera, F NigroImperiale, A Manni, C Votino, C Castiglioni, M Di, M Degl'Innocenti, G Moscatelli, S Guerini, C Casini, D Dini, E D'Imporzano, S DeNotariis, F Bonometti, C Paolillo, A Riccardi, A Tiozzo, A Riccardi, C Paolillo, M DiBari, S Vanni, A Scarpa, D Zara, P Ranieri, M Alessandro, P Calogero, G Corvalli, F Di, D Pezzoni, C Platto, V D'Ambrosio, C Ivaldi, P Milia, F DeSalvo, C Solaro, M Strazzacappa, M Bo, A Panico, M Cazzadori, S Confente, M Bonetto, M Grasso, E Troisi, G Magnani, G Cecchetti, V Guerini, B Bernardini, C Corsini, S Boffelli, A Filippi, K Delpin, B Faraci, E Bertoletti, M Vannucci, F Tesi, P Crippa, A Malighetti, D Bettini, F Maltese, M Formilan, G Abruzzese, C Minaglia, D Cosimo, M Azzini, M Cazzadori, M Colombo, G Procino, S Fascendini, F Barocco, P Del, F D'Amico, A Grippa, A Mazzone, E Riva, D Dell'Acqua, M Cottino, G Vezzadini, S Avanzi, C Brambilla, S Orini, F Sgrilli, A Mello, L Lombardi, E Muti, B Dijk, S Fenu, C Pes, P Gareri, A Castagna, M Passamonte, F De, R Rigo, L Locusta, L Caser, G Rosso, S Cesarini, R Cozzi, C Santini, P Carbone, I Cazzaniga, R Lovati, A Cantoni, P Ranzani, D Barra, G Pompilio, S Dimori, S Cernesi, C Riccò, F Piazzolla, E Capittini, C Rota, F Gottardi, L Merla, A Barelli, A Millul, G De, G Morrone, M Bigolari, C Minaglia, M Macchi, F Zambon, F D'Amico, F D'Amico, C Pizzorni, G DiCasaleto, G Menculini, M Marcacci, G Catanese, D Sprini, T DiCasalet, M Bocci, S Borga, P Caironi, C Cat, E Cingolani, L Avalli, G Greco, G Citerio, L Gandini, G Cornara, R Lerda, L Brazzi, F Simeone, M Caciorgna, D Alampi, S Francesconi, E Beck, B Antonini, K Vettoretto, M Meggiolaro, E Garofalo, A Bruni, S Notaro, R Varutti, F Bassi, G Mistraletti, A Marino, R Rona, E Rondelli, I Riva, A Scapigliati, A Cortegiani, F Vitale, L Pistidda, R D'Andrea, L Querci, P Gnesin, M Todeschini, M Lugano, G Castelli, M Ortolani, A Cotoia, S Maggiore, L DiTizio, R Graziani, I Testa, E Ferretti, C Castioni, F Lombardi, R Caserta, M Pasqua, S Simoncini, F Baccarini, M Rispoli, F Grossi, L Cancelliere, M Carnelli, F Puccini, G Biancofiore, A Siniscalchi, C Laici, E Mossello, M Torrini, G Pasetti, S Palmese, R Oggioni, V Mangani, S Pini, M Martelli, E Rigo, F Zuccalà, A Cherri, R Spina, I Calamai, N Petrucci, A Caicedo, F Ferri, P Gritti, N Brienza, R Fonnesu, M Dessena, G Fullin, D Saggioro
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Activities of daily living ,Cross-sectional study ,Hearing loss ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Visual impairment ,Psychological intervention ,visual impairment ,Socio-culturale ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,Hearing impairment, delirium, older, sensory deficits, visual impairment ,sensory deficit ,Hearing impairment ,03 medical and health sciences ,delirium ,older ,sensory deficits ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Activities of Daily Living ,mental disorders ,medicine ,Humans ,Dementia ,030212 general & internal medicine ,LS4_4 ,Hearing Loss ,General Nursing ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Health Policy ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,nervous system diseases ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Italy ,Emergency medicine ,Delirium ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Objective: Sensory deficits are important risk factors for delirium but have been investigated in single-center studies and single clinical settings. This multicenter study aims to evaluate the association between hearing and visual impairment or bi-sensory impairment (visual and hearing impairment) and delirium. Design: Cross-sectional study nested in the 2017 "Delirium Day" project. Setting and participants: Patients 65 years and older admitted to acute hospital medical wards, emergency departments, rehabilitation wards, nursing homes, and hospices in Italy. Methods: Delirium was assessed with the 4AT (a short tool for delirium assessment) and sensory deficits with a clinical evaluation. We assessed the association between delirium, hearing and visual impairment in multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for: Model 1, we included predisposing factors for delirium (ie, dementia, weight loss and autonomy in the activities of daily living); Model 2, we added to Model 1 variables, which could be considered precipitating factors for delirium (ie, psychoactive drugs and urinary catheters). Results: A total of 3038 patients were included; delirium prevalence was 25%. Patients with delirium had a higher prevalence of hearing impairment (30.5% vs 18%; P < .001), visual impairment (24.2% vs 15.7%; P < .01) and bi-sensory impairment (16.2% vs 7.5%) compared with those without delirium. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the presence of bi-sensory impairment was associated with delirium in Model 1 [odds ratio (OR) 1.5, confidence interval (CI) 1.2-2.1; P = .00] and in Model 2 (OR 1.4; CI 1.1-1.9; P = .02), whereas the presence of visual and hearing impairment alone was not associated with delirium either in Model 1 (OR 0.8; CI 0.6-1.2, P = .36; OR 1.1; CI 0.8-1.4; P = .42) or in Model 2 (OR 0.8, CI 0.6-1.2, P = .27; OR 1.1, CI 0.8-1.4, P = .63). Conclusions and implications: Our findings support the importance of routine screening and specific interventions by a multidisciplinary team to implement optimal management of sensory impairments and hence prevention and the management of the patients with delirium.
- Published
- 2021
11. Efficacy of multivitamin support following bariatric surgery in patients with obesity: a prospective observational study.
- Author
-
Basolo A, Bechi Genzano S, Vitti J, Salvetti G, Gilio D, Ceccarini G, Scartabelli G, Lippi C, Bellini R, Mancini R, D'Imporzano S, Moretto C, Angeli V, Troiani D, Fierabracci P, Jaccheri R, Calderone A, Poma AM, Chiovato L, Saponati G, and Santini F
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Female, Adult, Male, Prospective Studies, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Obesity, Morbid surgery, Dietary Supplements, Weight Loss, Micronutrients administration & dosage, Micronutrients therapeutic use, Bariatric Surgery, Vitamins therapeutic use, Vitamins administration & dosage
- Abstract
Purpose: Bariatric surgery (BS), an effective treatment for severe obesity and its comorbidities, may result in micronutrient and vitamin deficiencies. This monocentric prospective observational study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a specifically designed vitamin/mineral formula (Bariatrifast, BIOITALIA S.r.l., Italy) for preventing and treating micronutrient deficiencies in patients submitted to BS., Methods: Twenty patients with severe obesity (mean weight and BMI: 123.5 kg (range 88-174) and 43.3 kg/m
2 (range 37-54) respectively) underwent BS (10 vertical sleeve gastrectomy VSG, 10 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, RYGB). The mean age was 49.9 years (range 27-68). After a presurgical visit (V0), follow-up visits were performed at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery (V1-V4). Recorded data included weight, height and BMI. A complete blood count, measurement of ferritin, folic acid, vitamin B12, ionized calcium, 25 OH vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH) were obtained. Following BS, patients started the daily oral multivitamin and mineral supplement., Results: All patients achieved a significant weight loss (mean - 34.7 ± 11.8 kg). No deficiencies of various vitamins/micronutrients were detected during the entire study period. The serum concentrations of vitamin B12, 25-OH Vitamin D and folic acid increased over the follow-up period compared with V0 (mean increase 243 ng/L, 23 µg /L, 8 µg/L, respectively). Compared to RYGB, patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy showed higher levels of 25-OH vitamin D at V2, V3 and V4 (all p < 0.05), and higher levels of Vitamin B12 and folic acid at V4 (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively). No adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Following VSG or RYGB, Bariatrifast administration was associated with normal values of essential micronutrients, and it was well-tolerated without evidence of gastrointestinal side effects. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifiers NCT06152965., (© 2024. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Open vs robotic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis on 1469 patients from the IMIGASTRIC prospective database.
- Author
-
Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Lin JX, Reim D, Zheng CH, Borghi F, Cianchi F, Norero E, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Brower ST, Pernazza G, D'Imporzano S, Azagra JS, Zhou YB, Cao SG, Guerra F, Liu T, Arcuri G, González P, Staderini F, Marano A, Di Nardo D, Parisi A, Huang CM, and Tebala GD
- Subjects
- Humans, Propensity Score, Gastrectomy, Lymph Node Excision, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications surgery, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Laparoscopy, Stomach Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Background: Comparative data on D2-robotic gastrectomy (RG) vs D2-open gastrectomy (OG) are lacking in the Literature. Aim of this paper is to compare RG to OG with a focus on D2-lymphadenectomy., Study Design: Data of patients undergoing D2-OG or RG for gastric cancer were retrieved from the international IMIGASTRIC prospective database and compared., Results: A total of 1469 patients were selected for inclusion in the study. After 1:1 propensity score matching, a total of 580 patients were matched and included in the final analysis, 290 in each group, RG vs OG. RG had longer operation time (210 vs 330 min, p < 0.0001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (155 vs 119.7 ml, p < 0.0001), time to liquid diet (4.4 vs 3 days, p < 0.0001) and to peristalsis (2.4 vs 2 days, p < 0.0001), and length of postoperative stay (11 vs 8 days, p < 0.0001). Morbidity rate was higher in OG (24.1% vs 16.2%, p = 0.017)., Conclusion: RG significantly expedites recovery and reduces the risk of complications compared to OG. However, long-term survival is similar., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. A national survey on the current status of minimally invasive gastric practice on behalf of GIRCG.
- Author
-
Milone M, D'Amore A, Alfieri S, Ambrosio MR, Andreuccetti J, Ansaloni L, Antonucci A, Arganini M, Baiocchi G, Barone M, Bencini L, Bencivenga M, Boccia L, Boni L, Braga M, Cianchi F, Cipollari C, Contine A, Cotsoglou C, D'Imporzano S, De Manzoni G, De Pascale S, De Ruvo N, Degiuli M, Donini A, Elmore U, Ercolani G, Ferrari G, Fumagalli RU, Garulli G, Gelmini R, Graziosi L, Gualtierotti M, Guglielmi A, Inama M, Maffeis F, Maione F, Manigrasso M, Marchesi F, Marrelli D, Massobrio A, Moretto G, Moukachar A, Navarra G, Nigri G, Olmi S, Palaia R, Papis D, Parise P, Pedrazzani C, Petri R, Pignata G, Pisano M, Rausei S, Reddavid R, Rocco G, Rosa F, Rosati R, Rossit L, Rottoli M, Roviello F, Santi S, Scabini S, Scaringi S, Solaini L, Staderini F, Taglietti L, Torre B, Ubiali P, Uccelli M, Uggeri F, Vertaldi S, Viganò J, De Palma GD, and Giacopuzzi S
- Subjects
- Humans, Gastrectomy methods, Surveys and Questionnaires, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures methods, Stomach Neoplasms surgery, Robotic Surgical Procedures methods, Laparoscopy methods
- Abstract
Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG), during the 2013 annual Consensus Conference to gastric cancer, stated that laparoscopic or robotic approach should be limited only to early gastric cancer (EGC) and no further guidelines were currently available. However, accumulated evidences, mainly from eastern experiences, have supported the application of minimally invasive surgery also for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of our study is to give a snapshot of current surgical propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons in performing minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer in order to answer to the question if clinical practice overcome the recommendation. Experts in the field among the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) were invited to join a web 30-item survey through a formal e-mail from January 1st, 2020, to June 31st, 2020. Responses were collected from 46 participants out of 100 upper gastrointestinal surgeons. Percentage of surgeons choosing a minimally invasive approach to treat early and advanced gastric cancer was similar. Additionally analyzing data from the centers involved, we obtained that the percentage of minimally invasive total and partial gastrectomies in advanced cases augmented with the increase of surgical procedures performed per year (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 respectively). It is reasonable to assume that there is a widening of indications given by the current national guideline into clinical practice. Propensity of expert Italian upper gastrointestinal surgeons was to perform minimally invasive surgery not only for early but also for advanced gastric cancer. Of interest volume activity correlated with the propensity of surgeons to select a minimally invasive approach., (© 2022. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Robotic Heller-Dor for Idiopathic Achalasia: the Pisa experience.
- Author
-
Santi S, Belluomini MA, D'Imporzano S, Bellomini MG, Solito B, Gianetri D, Giusti P, and Pallabazzer G
- Subjects
- Fundoplication, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Esophageal Achalasia diagnosis, Esophageal Achalasia surgery, Laparoscopy, Robotic Surgical Procedures
- Abstract
Achalasia is a rare motility disorder of the esophagus. According to the Chicago Classification criteria, there are three clinical types of Achalasia and the treatment is patient-tailored. Laparoscopic Heller-Dor is the gold-standard treatment for the most frequent types of Achalasia. However, robotic surgery is able to combine the clinical advantages of minimally invasive surgery with a powerful dexterity on complex anatomic structures. The aim of this study is to report the institutional experience developed in a referral center of esophageal surgery in the treatment of Achalasia by Robotic Heller-Dor. We retrospectively analyzed data of patients that consecutively underwent Robotic Heller-Dor at our institution between January 2012 and January 2020 using the Da Vinci
® Surgical System. Sixty-nine patients underwent Robotic Heller-Dor. Among the patients, 35 (51%) were classified as type I, 29 (42%) as type II, and 5 (7%) as type III. The Da Vinci® SI HD Surgical System and the Da Vinci® XI HD Surgical System were used in 56 (81%) and 13 (19%) patients, respectively. No mucosal perforation was observed and post-operative mortality was absent. The mean follow-up was 23.3 months (6-84). Ten patients (14.5%) reported post-operative complaints. In our opinion, Robotic Heller-Dor is an effective tool in the treatment of Achalasia. Robotic Heller-Dor may be a suitable procedure for learning and teaching robotic surgery in the perspective of pursing more complex esophago-gastric surgical procedures., (© 2021. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Laparoscopic Compared with Open D2 Gastrectomy on Perioperative and Long-Term, Stage-Stratified Oncological Outcomes for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the IMIGASTRIC Database.
- Author
-
Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Lin JX, Reim D, Zheng CH, Borghi F, Cianchi F, Norero E, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Brower ST, Pernazza G, D'Imporzano S, Azagra JS, Zhou YB, Cao SG, Garofoli E, Mosillo C, Guerra F, Liu T, Arcuri G, González P, Staderini F, Marano A, Terrenato I, D'Andrea V, Bracarda S, Huang CM, and Parisi A
- Abstract
Background: The laparoscopic approach in gastric cancer surgery is being increasingly adopted worldwide. However, studies focusing specifically on laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature. This retrospective study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer., Methods: The protocol-based, international IMIGASTRIC (International study group on Minimally Invasive surgery for Gastric Cancer) registry was queried to retrieve data on patients undergoing laparoscopic or open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer with curative intent from January 2000 to December 2014. Eleven predefined, demographical, clinical, and pathological variables were used to conduct a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to investigate intraoperative and recovery outcomes, complications, pathological findings, and survival data between the two groups. Predictive factors of long-term survival were also assessed., Results: A total of 3033 patients from 14 participating institutions were selected from the IMIGASTRIC database. After 1:1 PSM, a total of 1248 patients, 624 in the laparoscopic group and 624 in the open group, were matched and included in the final analysis. The total operative time (median 180 versus 240 min, p < 0.0001) and the length of the postoperative hospital stay (median 10 versus 14.8 days, p < 0.0001) were longer in the open group than in the laparoscopic group. The conversion to open rate was 1.9%. The proportion of patients with in-hospital complications was higher in the open group (21.3% versus 15.1%, p = 0.004). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the laparoscopic approach (median 32 versus 28, p < 0.0001), and the proportion of positive resection margins was higher ( p = 0.021) in the open group (5.9%) than in the laparoscopic group (3.2%). There was no significant difference between the groups in five-year overall survival rates (77.4% laparoscopic versus 75.2% open, p = 0.229)., Conclusion: The adoption of the laparoscopic approach for gastric resection with D2 lymphadenectomy shortened the length of hospital stay and reduced postoperative complications with respect to the open approach. The five-year overall survival rate after laparoscopy was comparable to that for patients who underwent open D2 resection. The types of surgical approaches are not independent predictive factors for five-year overall survival.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery.
- Author
-
Parisi A, Reim D, Borghi F, Nguyen NT, Qi F, Coratti A, Cianchi F, Cesari M, Bazzocchi F, Alimoglu O, Gagnière J, Pernazza G, D'Imporzano S, Zhou YB, Azagra JS, Facy O, Brower ST, Jiang ZW, Zang L, Isik A, Gemini A, Trastulli S, Novotny A, Marano A, Liu T, Annecchiarico M, Badii B, Arcuri G, Avanzolini A, Leblebici M, Pezet D, Cao SG, Goergen M, Zhang S, Palazzini G, D'Andrea V, and Desiderio J
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Italy epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Laparoscopy statistics & numerical data, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Robotic Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Stomach Neoplasms surgery
- Abstract
Aim: To investigate the role of minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer and determine surgical, clinical, and oncological outcomes., Methods: This is a propensity score-matched case-control study, comparing three treatment arms: robotic gastrectomy (RG), laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), open gastrectomy (OG). Data collection started after sharing a specific study protocol. Data were recorded through a tailored and protected web-based system. Primary outcomes: harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, complications rate. Among the secondary outcomes, there are: operative time, R0 resections, POD of mobilization, POD of starting liquid diet and soft solid diet. The analysis includes the evaluation of type and grade of postoperative complications. Detailed information of anastomotic leakages is also provided., Results: The present analysis was carried out of 1026 gastrectomies. To guarantee homogenous distribution of cases, patients in the RG, LG and OG groups were 1:1:2 matched using a propensity score analysis with a caliper = 0.2. The successful matching resulted in a total sample of 604 patients (RG = 151; LG = 151; OG = 302). The three groups showed no differences in all baseline patients characteristics, type of surgery ( P = 0.42) and stage of the disease ( P = 0.16). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the LG (95.93 ± 119.22) and RG (117.91 ± 68.11) groups compared to the OG (127.26 ± 79.50, P = 0.002). The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was similar between the RG (27.78 ± 11.45), LG (24.58 ± 13.56) and OG (25.82 ± 12.07) approach. A benefit in favor of the minimally invasive approaches was found in the length of hospital stay ( P < 0.0001). A similar complications rate was found ( P = 0.13). The leakage rate was not different ( P = 0.78) between groups., Conclusion: Laparoscopic and robotic surgery can be safely performed and proposed as possible alternative to open surgery. The main highlighted benefit is a faster postoperative functional recovery., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Prognostic Significance of 2-Deoxy-2-[18F]-Fluoro-D-Glucose PET/CT in Patients With Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Before Surgery: A Nonparametric Approach.
- Author
-
Giorgetti A, Pallabazzer G, Ripoli A, Solito B, Genovesi D, Lencioni M, Fabrini MG, D'Imporzano S, Pieraccini L, Marzullo P, and Santi S
- Subjects
- Aged, Body Composition, Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant methods, Esophageal Neoplasms pathology, Esophageal Neoplasms therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Statistics, Nonparametric, Esophageal Neoplasms mortality, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 administration & dosage, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Radiopharmaceuticals administration & dosage, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
- Abstract
To investigate the prognostic value of tumor metabolism measurements on serial 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Forty-five patients (63 ± 7 years, 6 female) treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy before surgery were followed up for 24 ± 18 months (range 4-71). Positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans were obtained within 1 week before the start (PET1) and 1 month after the completion of the treatment (PET2). Total body tumor metabolic activity was measured as the sum of the parameters: SUVmax, SUV corrected for lean body mass, and total lesion glycolysis (TLG40/50/70%). Then, delta values for the parameters between PET1 and PET2 were calculated and expressed as percentage of PET1 results. At the time of the analysis, 27 patients were dead and 18 were alive. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of age, sex, site of the disease, histology, and the presence/absence of linfonodal metastases (P = NS). Survival random forest analysis (20,000 trees) resulted in an estimate of error rate of 36%. The nonparametric approach identified ΔTLG40 as the most predictive factor of survival (relative importance 100%). Moreover, T (17%), N (5%), and M (5%) stage of the disease, cancer histology (11%), TLG70 (5%) at the end of chemioradioterapy, and ΔTLG(50-70) (17%-5%) were positively associated with patient outcome. The nonparametric analysis confirmed the prognostic importance of some clinical parameters, such as TNM stage and cancer histology. Moreover, ΔTLG resulted to be the most important factor in predicting outcome and should be considered in risk stratification of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.