Search

Aims: No data are available on early initiation of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the real world. This study investigates the effects of PCSK9i started at time of ACS hospitalization on lipid control and major cardiovascular (CV) events in the real world., Methods and Results: The lipid control outcome was the percentage of patients reaching the LDL-C target of <55 mg/dL at first lipid control. The clinical outcome was the incidence of composite major CV events (all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and ischaemia-driven revascularization) during a follow-up in relation to quartiles of LDL-C at first lipid control. We included 771 patients with ACS from the AT-TARGET-IT registry, receiving PCSK9i prescription during hospitalization or at discharge. Median LDL-C was 137 mg/dL and decreased to 43 mg/dL at first lipid control. 527 (68.3%) patients achieved LDL-C target at the first lipid control at a median time of 37 days from hospitalization; of them, 404 (76.8%) were discharged on statin plus ezetimibe background therapy. Event curves through a median follow-up of 11 months across quartiles of LDL-C showed a stepwise lower risk of 4P-MACE, 3P-MACE, all-cause mortality, and ischaemia-driven revascularization in lower quartile of LDL-C values at first lipid control (<23 mg/dL) and in patients reaching LDL-C < 55 mg/dL., Conclusion: Intensive and early lipid-lowering therapy using PCSK9i in patients with ACS (strike early-strike strong strategy) is safe and effective in clinical practice and associated with a reduction of residual CV risk., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Older general population-based studies found an inverse association between serum HDL-cholesterol and both cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and mortality, but more recent data have suggested a U-shaped relationship. Whether this applies to type 2 diabetes is uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations in representative, community-based participants from the Fremantle Diabetes Study Phase II (FDS2)., Methods: We followed 1,479 FDS2 participants with confirmed type 2 diabetes (713 females, mean age 65.6 years; 763 males, mean age 65.9 years) from entry (2008-2011) to death/end-2021. Major adverse cardiovascular events (non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular death; 3-point MACE), and all-cause mortality were ascertained from prospectively collected data and validated administrative databases. Independent associates of 3-point MACE by sex, excluding participants with prior MI/stroke, were assessed using Cox and competing risk models with sex-specific quintiles of HDL-cholesterol added to the most parsimonious models. Predictors of all-cause mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards modelling., Results: In females, with baseline serum HDL-cholesterol quintile 2 (1.04-1.22 mmol/L) as reference, both quintiles 1 (< 1.04 mmol/L) and 5 (> 1.59 mmol/L) were significant independent predictors of 3-point MACE (P < 0.027) and all-cause death (P < 0.019) after adjustment for a full range of demographic, clinical and laboratory variables. In males, serum HDL-cholesterol quintile did not add to the most parsimonious model for 3-point MACE, but quintile 1 (< 0.90 mmol/L) was a significant predictor of death (P = 0.026 versus quintile 4 (1.15-1.31 mmol/L) as reference) after adjustment. Competing risk analyses for 3-point MACE showed similar results to the Cox models for both sexes., Conclusion: There was a significant U-shaped relationship between serum HDL-cholesterol and both 3-point MACE and all-cause death in females with type 2 diabetes after adjustment for confounders. There was no such relationship for 3-point MACE in males but a low HDL-cholesterol was associated with all-cause mortality. These data have sex-specific implications for assessment of serum lipid profiles in the clinical management of type 2 diabetes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are effective in reducing cardiovascular events, but their impact on all-cause mortality and medical utilization compared to statins is unclear. This study investigated PCSK9 inhibitor use and its impact on mortality and medical utilization vs. statins, using TriNetX database data with up to 9 years of follow-up., Methods and Results: This retrospective cohort study analysed TriNetX data spanning 1 July 2015, to 31 December 2023, including 79 194 PCSK9 inhibitor users (alirocumab, evolocumab, inclisiran) and 5 437 513 statin users with hyperlipidaemia. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and medical utilization, including hospital inpatient services, emergency department visits, critical care, and mechanical ventilation. Propensity score matching showed that PCSK9 inhibitor use was associated with a 28.3% lower risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.717, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.673-0.763] and significant reductions in medical utilization (hospital inpatient services usage: aHR 0.692, 95% CI: 0.664-0.721; emergency department services: aHR 0.756, 95% CI: 0.726-0.788; critical care services: aHR 0.619, 95% CI: 0.578-0.664; and mechanical ventilation: aHR 0.537, 95% CI: 0.484-0.596) compared to statins. These findings were consistent across various demographics and clinical subgroups. The sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the findings., Conclusion: PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduced all-cause mortality and medical utilization compared to statins, suggesting their important role in dyslipidaemia management, particularly for statin-naïve or intolerant patients. Further research, including randomized controlled trials, is needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Icosapent ethyl lowers triglycerides and significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), though treatment effects may vary between individuals. This study aimed to determine the relative and absolute effects of icosapent ethyl on MACE according to baseline cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD)., Methods and Results: Participants from the Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl-Intervention Trial (REDUCE-IT) with ASCVD were included (n = 5785). The primary outcome was 3-point MACE, i.e. non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. Baseline 5-year risk of MACE was estimated using the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guideline-recommended SMART2 risk score. Modification of the relative treatment effects of icosapent ethyl by baseline risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models, including a treatment-by-risk interaction. Next, treatment effects were assessed stratified by quartiles of baseline risk. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years (interquartile range 3.2-5.3), MACE occurred in 361 vs. 489 patients in the icosapent ethyl vs. placebo group [95% confidence interval (CI)]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.72 (0.63-0.82), absolute risk reduction (ARR) 4.4% (2.6-6.2%), number needed to treat (NNT) 23 (16-38), and 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence reduction (CIR) 5.7% (3.5-7.9%). Icosapent ethyl significantly reduced MACE in all risk quartiles, with an HR (95% CI) of 0.62 (0.43-0.88), 0.66 (0.48-0.92), 0.69 (0.53-0.90), and 0.78 (0.63-0.96), respectively (P for treatment-by-risk interaction = 0.106). The ARR (95% CI) increased across risk quartiles, i.e. was 3.9% (1.0-6.8%), 4.3% (1.2-7.3%), 5.1% (1.4-8.7%), and 5.6% (1.3-10.0%), respectively. This translates to NNTs (95% CI) of 26 (15-98), 24 (14-84), 20 (11-70), and 18 (10-77). The 5-year CIR (95% CI) was 4.8% (1.3-8.2%), 5.0% (1.3-8.7%), 6.1% (1.7-10.5%), and 7.7% (2.3-13.2%), respectively. Consistent results were obtained for 5-point MACE, additionally including coronary revascularization and unstable angina., Conclusion: Among patients with ASCVD and elevated triglyceride levels, icosapent ethyl significantly reduces the risk of MACE irrespective of baseline CVD risk, though absolute benefits are largest for patients at the highest risk., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Aims: We aimed to explore the association between remnant cholesterol (RC) level and risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths among American diabetic adults., Methods and Results: The data of 4,095 diabetic participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1999-2018) were included for analysis. Deaths were ascertained till December 31, 2019. RC level associated with death was assessed on a continuous scale with restricted cubic splines and by pre-defined quartile groups with Cox regression analysis. After a median follow-up of 6.9 years, 1,060 all-cause and 289 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Association between RC and death was U-shaped, and RC level correlated with the lowest risks of both all-cause and cardiovascular deaths was 0.85 mmol/L. After adjusting for confounders, compared with Quartile 3 (0.66-0.93 mmol/L), hazard ratios for all-cause deaths were 1.43 (95%CI 1.18-1.72, P = 0.0002) in Quartile 1 (≤0.47 mmol/L), 1.20 (95%CI 1.00-1.44, P = 0.05) in Quartile 2 (0.47-0.66 mmol/L), and 1.25 (95%CI 1.05-1.49, P = 0.02) in Quartile 4 (>0.93 mmol/L). Higher risk was also observed for cardiovascular deaths in Quartile 1 (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.15-2.41, P = 0.007), Quartile 2 (HR 1.39, 95%CI 0.97-2.00, P = 0.08), and Quartile 4 (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.08-2.19, P = 0.02), as compared with Quartile 3., Conclusion: In US adults with diabetes, low and high levels of RC were associated with increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular deaths, and the lowest risk was observed at RC level of 0.85 mmol/L. These findings suggested that maintaining appropriate RC level may help reduce risk of death in diabetic patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The guidelines recommend statins to prevent cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) however, the importance of baseline LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the association of statin use in T2D patients with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality and whether this association differs by baseline LDL-C levels., Data Synthesis: Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched from inception until January 2022. Observational studies in patients with T2D comparing statin users vs non-users, with reports of the baseline LDL-C levels, were included. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were performed to estimate the overall effect on the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE (a composite of myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and revascularization events) and the modification in the association by baseline LDL-C levels. We categorized studies according to their baseline LDL-C levels into 1) <100 mg/dl (2.59 mmol/l), 2) 100-130 mg/dl (2.59-3.37 mmol/l) and 3) >130 mg/dl (3.37 mmol/l) categories. A total of 9 cohort studies (n = 403,411 individuals) fulfilled our criteria. The follow-up duration ranged from 1.7 to 8 years. The overall combined estimate showed that statin therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACE (Hazard Ratio (HR): 0.70 [95% CI 0.59 to 0.83], Absolute risk reduction percentage (ARR%): 3.19% [95%CI 0.88 to 5.50%) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.60 [95% CI 0.46 to 0.79], ARR%: 5.23% [95% CI 2.18 to 8.28%), but varied, albeit not statistically significant, by baseline LDL-C levels. Studies with baseline LDL-C levels higher than 130 mg/dl had the greatest reduction of MACE (HR: 0.58 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.90]) and all-cause mortality risk (HR: 0.51 [95% CI [ 0.29 to 0.90]). The HRs of MACE in studies with LDL-C levels of 100-130 mg/dl and <100 mg/dl categories were respectively (0.70 [95% CI 0.59 to 0.83]) and (0.83 [95% CI [0.68 to 1.00]); and that of all-cause mortality were respectively (0.62 [95% CI 0.38 to 1.01]) and (0.67 [95% CI [0.44 to 1.02]). Statin use changes the HRs of MACE (0.99 [95%CI, 0.98 to 0.99]; P = 0.04) and all-cause mortality (0.99 [95% CI 0.98 to 1.01]; P = 0.8) per each mg/dl increase in baseline LDL-C level in meta-regression analyses., Conclusion: Statin therapy in patients with T2D was associated with reduced risk of MACE and all-cause mortality. Significant differences across studies with different baseline LDL-C levels were not observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: This study aims to compare the preventive effect of low- or moderate-statin with ezetimibe combination therapy and high-intensity statin monotherapy on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause death in a real-world setting., Methods and Results: Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service datasets, two cohorts comparing high-intensity statin monotherapy with low- or moderate-intensity statin and ezetimibe combination were constructed by 1:1 propensity score matching procedure. Primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and all-cause death. Secondary outcome was an individual event. The study population was followed from baseline until the date of events, or the last health check-ups, whichever came first. Compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination significantly reduced the risk of composite outcome [hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-0.92, P < 0.001] as well as individual MI (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.94, P = 0.005) and stroke (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005), but not all-cause death. Low-intensity statin with ezetimibe also significantly reduced the risk of the composite outcomes (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.97, P = 0.024) compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, but the risk of individual outcome did not differ between two groups. Statin and ezetimibe combination demonstrated consistent effect across various subgroups., Conclusion: Among people without pre-existing CVD, moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination was superior to high-intensity statin monotherapy in preventing composite outcomes as well as each of MI and stroke. In contrast, low-intensity statin with ezetimibe combination reduced the risk of composite but not individual outcomes., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.E.J. reports research support from Kyung Hee University which is her institution. Y.-C.H. research funding from Celltrion Pharm Inc. However, the authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this article., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a life-threatening disease. Considering the availability and accessibility of assessing the serum lipids, this study aims to define the predictive value of lipid profile, as well as the history of lipid disorders, for the mortality of PTE patients., Content: Clinical studies, in which the relation of lipid profile, including triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and total cholesterol, as well as history of imbalance of lipids, with mortality of PTE patients was reported, were included. Non-English articles, reviews, letters, editorials, and non-English papers were excluded. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools and CMA 4 was utilized for the quantitative synthesis. Out of 3,724 records, six studies were included in this systematic review. Lipid profile is suggested as a prognostic marker for survival in patients with PTE so higher initial serum HDL, LDL, and total cholesterol levels were associated with lower mortality rates in PTE patients. In addition, dyslipidemia was found to be associated with mortality of PTE patients. Based on the quantitative synthesis, there was a greater serum level of HDL in the survival group (standardized mean difference: -0.98; 95 % CI: -1.22 to -0.75; p-value<0.01)., Summary and Outlook: Mortality is lower in PTE patients with greater serum lipid levels; therefore, the early prognosis of PTE may be ascertained by measuring serum lipids within the first 24 h of admission., (© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.)

Background: Oxidative stress has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of dyslipidemia. We aimed to investigate the association between the oxidative balance score, and dyslipidemia, as well as to assess the mortality risk associated with oxidative balance score in patients with dyslipidemia., Methods: We performed a mortality follow-up study of a cross-sectional cohort of 26,118 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2018. The total oxidative balance score was calculated by 16 dietary nutrients (dietary oxidative balance score) and four lifestyle factors (lifestyle oxidative balance score). Weighted Cox proportional hazard model was applied to determine the relationship between oxidative balance score and all-cause or cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality within the dyslipidemia group., Results: During a median follow-up of 118 months, 2448 all-cause deaths (766 CVD-related) occurred. A significant negative correlation was observed between total oxidative balance score, dietary oxidative balance score, lifestyle oxidative balance score, and dyslipidemia. The multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs for dyslipidemia were 0.86 (0.77-0.97), 0.80 (0.72-0.91), and 0.63 (0.56-0.70), respectively, when comparing the second, third, and fourth quartiles of total oxidative balance score to the reference lowest quartile (P for trend <0.0001). Increasing total oxidative balance score was inversely associated with all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.99) and CVD-specific mortality (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) in participants with dyslipidemia., Conclusions: Oxidative balance score is inversely associated with dyslipidemia and linked to all-cause and CVD-related mortality, highlighting the potentially protective role of an antioxidant-rich diet against dyslipidemia., (© 2024 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Background: High-intensity statin therapy is currently recommended initial guideline therapy in ACS treatment. However, only a minority of patients are achieving LDL-C attainment goal at 6 months. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are on recommended guideline therapy post-ACS if LDL-C goal attainment is not achieved after high-intensity statin (4-6 weeks) and after the addition of ezetimibe if guideline goal attainment is not achieved after an additional 4-6 weeks. Thus, it has been recommended that PCSK9 inhibitors be considered earlier post-ACS. However, the efficacy of early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients remains uncertain., Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies involving ACS patients who received PCSK9 inhibitors within 48 h of hospitalization were included. Common and random effects models were used to evaluate the pooled effect of early PCSK9 inhibitor administration. Nine RCTs and three cohort studies were included., Results: Early PCSK9 inhibitor administration reduced the incidence of MI, ACS hospitalization, and revascularization at 6-18 months post-ACS. Although there was a drift towards reduced stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular death, no statistically significant reduction was observed. Additionally, PCSK9 inhibitors significantly enhanced lipid control at 4-12 weeks after index hospitalization., Conclusion: Early PCSK9 inhibitors initiation in ACS patients reduces MACE and improves lipid profiles. While the results propose promising benefits in terms of stroke and mortality, further research with longer follow-up is required for more decisive evidence., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline was a paradigm shift in lipid management and identified the four statin-benefit groups. Many have studied the guideline's potential impact, but few have investigated its potential long-term impact on MACE. Furthermore, most studies also ignored the confounding effect from the earlier release of generic atorvastatin in Dec 2011., Methods: To evaluate the potential (long-term) impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release in Nov 2013 in the U.S., we investigated the association of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline with the trend changes in 5-Year MACE survival and three other statin-related outcomes (statin use, optimal statin use, and statin adherence) while controlling for generic atorvastatin availability using interrupted time series analysis, called the Chow's test. Specifically, we conducted a retrospective study using U.S. nationwide de-identified claims and electronic health records from Optum Labs Database Warehouse (OLDW) to follow the trends of 5-Year MACE survival and statin-related outcomes among four statin-benefit groups that were identified in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline. Then, Chow's test was used to discern trend changes between generic atorvastatin availability and guideline potential impact., Results: 197,021 patients were included (ASCVD: 19,060; High-LDL: 33,907; Diabetes: 138,159; High-ASCVD-Risk: 5,895). After the guideline release, the long-term trend (slope) of 5-Year MACE Survival for the Diabetes group improved significantly (P = 0.002). Optimal statin use for the ASCVD group also showed immediate improvement (intercept) and long-term positive changes (slope) after the release (P < 0.001). Statin uses did not have significant trend changes and statin adherence remained unchanged in all statin-benefit groups. Although no other statistically significant trend changes were found, overall positive trend change or no changes were observed after the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release., Conclusions: The 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline release is associated with trend improvements in the long-term MACE Survival for Diabetes group and optimal statin use for ASCVD group. These significant associations might indicate a potential positive long-term impact of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline on better health outcomes for primary prevention groups and an immediate potential impact on statin prescribing behaviors in higher-at-risk groups. However, further investigation is required to confirm the causal effect of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between hyperuricemia and the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in patients with osteoarthritis (OA)., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed on 3,971 patients using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database between 1999 and 2018. OA was diagnosed through specific questions and responses. The weighted COX regression models were used to explore the factors associated with all-cause mortality/CVD mortality in OA patients. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on age, gender, hypertension, dyslipidemia, CVD, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were measured as the evaluation indexes., Results: During the duration of follow-up time (116.38 ± 2.19 months), 33.69% (1,338 patients) experienced all-cause mortality, and 11.36% (451 patients) died from CVD. Hyperuricemia was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41, P = 0.008) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.02-1.72, P = 0.036) in OA patients. Subgroup analyses showed that hyperuricemia was related to the risk of all-cause mortality in OA patients aged >65 years (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.36, P = 0.042), in all male patients (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.10-1.80, P = 0.006), those diagnosed with hypertension (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01-1.37, P = 0.049), dyslipidemia (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.01-1.39, P = 0.041), CVD (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55, P = 0.004), and CKD (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01-1.70, P = 0.046). The association between hyperuricemia and a higher risk of CVD mortality was found in OA patients aged ≤ 65 years (HR: 1.90, 95% CI: 1.06-3.41, P = 0.032), who did not suffer from diabetes (HR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.01-1.86, P = 0.048), who did not suffer from hypertension (HR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.12-5.86, P = 0.026), and who did not suffer from dyslipidemia (HR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.15-4.97, P = 0.020)., Conclusion: These findings emphasize the importance of monitoring serum uric acid levels in OA patients for potentially reducing mortality associated with the disease., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Background: Older people are underrepresented in randomized trials. The association between lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and its intensity after acute myocardial infarction and long-term mortality in this population deserves to be assessed., Methods: The FAST-MI (French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation or Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) program consists of nationwide French surveys including all patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction ≤48 hours from onset over a 1- to 2-month period in 2005, 2010, and 2015, with long-term follow-up. Numerous data were collected and a centralized 10-year follow-up was organized. The present analysis focused on the association between prescription of LLT (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or equivalent, or any combination of statin and ezetimibe) and 5-year mortality in patients aged ≥80 years discharged alive. Cox multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were used to adjust for baseline differences., Results: Among the 2258 patients aged ≥80 years (mean age, 85±4 years; 51% women; 39% ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; 58% with percutaneous coronary intervention), 415 were discharged without LLT (18%), 866 with conventional doses (38%), and 977 with high-dose LLT (43%). Five-year survival was 36%, 47.5%, and 58%, respectively. Compared with patients without LLT, high-dose LLT was significantly associated with lower 5-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.66-0.92]), whereas conventional-intensity LLT was not (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.80-1.09]). In propensity score-matched cohorts (n=278 receiving high-intensity LLT and n=278 receiving no statins), 5-year survival was 52% with high-intensity LLT at discharge and 42% without statins (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.98])., Conclusions: In these observational cohorts, high-intensity LLT at discharge after acute myocardial infarction was associated with reduced all-cause mortality at 5 years in an older adult population. These results suggest that high-intensity LLT should not be denied to patients on the basis of old age., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00673036, NCT01237418, and NCT02566200., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Schiele reports research grants/lecture fees from Amgen, Bayer, Bouchara-Recordati, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, Organon, Bouchara-Recordati, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novartis, and Amarin. Dr Ferrières reports speaking fees for Amgen, Sanofi, Servier, and Merck, Sharp & Dohme. Dr Puymirat has received research grants/lecture fees from Abbott, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bouchara-Recordati, Biotronik, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracco, Cordis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lilly, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier, Sunpharm, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Lemesle reports having received fees for consulting and travel support from Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Organon, Pfizer, Recordati, Sanofi Aventis, and Servier. Dr Cayla has received research grants/lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Edwards, Microport Cardiac Rhythm Management, Medtronic, and Pfizer. Dr Simon reports having received grants or lecture fees or participation in scientific boards from Ablative Solutions,Air Liquide, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Novartis, Servier, and 4Living Biotech Sanofi. Dr Danchin has received personal fees and nonfinancial support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Intercept, Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Servier, Union Chimique Belge Pharmaceuticals, and Vifor, all outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Dyslipidemia is a major cardiovascular risk factor and common in diabetes patients. Most guidelines focus on optimal lipid levels, while variation of lipid profiles is far less discussed. This study aims to investigate the association of visit-to-visit variability in blood lipids with all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: We identified 10,583 type 2 diabetes patients aged ≥ 30 years with follow-up ≥ 3 years and who participated in the Diabetes Care Management Program at a medical center in Taiwan. Variability in lipid profiles within 3 years after entry was calculated using coefficient of variation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate lipid variability in relation to subsequent mortality., Results: Over a mean follow-up of 6.4 years, 1838 all-cause deaths (809 cardiovascular deaths) were observed. For each 10% increase in variability in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of all-cause mortality were 1.30 (1.22-1.37), 1.05 (1.01-1.09), and 1.10 (1.03-1.16), respectively; those of cardiovascular mortality were 1.27 (1.16-1.39), 1.08 (1.02-1.15), and 1.16 (1.07-1.27), respectively. Each 10% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol variability conveyed 31% greater risk of non-cardiovascular mortality. High variability in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased all-cause mortality in subgroups of nonsmoking, regular exercising, non-dyslipidemia, and more severe status of diabetes at baseline., Conclusions: Blood lipid variability except for triglyceride variability was associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Context: The association between remnant cholesterol (remnant-C) and cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and incident diabetic nephropathy remains unclear., Objective: To examinie the association between remnant-C and cardiovascular mortality in patients with T2D, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3 to 5, and newly diagnosed DN., Methods: This study determined the baseline lipid profile and searched for deaths with cardiovascular disease (CVD) within 2 years of baseline among 2282 adults enrolled between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2016, who had T2D, CKD stages 3 to 5, and newly diagnosed DN. Adjusted logistic regression models were used to assess the associations between lipid, especially remnant-C concentration (either as continuous or categorical variables), and risk of cardiovascular mortality., Results: In multivariable-adjusted analyses, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (odds ratio [OR], 1.022; 95% CI, 1.017-1.026, per 10 mg/dL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (OR, 0.929; 95% CI, 0.922-0.936, per 5 mg/dL), non-HDL-C (OR, 1.024; 95% CI, 1.021-1.028, per 10 mg/dL), and remnant-C (OR, 1.115; 95% CI, 1.103-1.127, per 10 mg/dL), but not triglycerides were associated with cardiovascular mortality. Atherogenic dyslipidemia (triglycerides > 150 mg/dL [1.69 mmol/L] and HDL-C < 40 mg/dL in men or < 50 mg/dL in women) was also associated with cardiovascular mortality (OR, 1.073; 95% CI, 1.031-1.116). Remnant-C greater than or equal to 30 mg/dL differentiated patients at a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality from those with lower concentrations, especially with interaction with LDL-C level greater than 100 mg/dL: The highest risk was found in patients with higher levels both of remnant-C and LDL-C (OR, 1.696; 95% CI, 1.613-1.783)., Conclusion: In patients with T2D, CKD stages 3 to 5, and incident DN, remnant-C was associated with a higher risk of death with CVD. Different from the general population, the interaction of remnant-C and LDL-C was associated with the highest risk of cardiovascular mortality., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Previous studies reported the prognostic value of the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) in the course of atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Still, the predictive utility of the AIP is unknown among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Methods: This was a secondary analysis of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study, which randomized 10,251 patients with long-lasting T2DM. ROC curve analysis was used to determine an optimal threshold for AIP, and the study population was divided into high and low AIP groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine the association between AIP and primary (major adverse cardiovascular events [MACEs], including nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and/or death from cardiovascular causes) and secondary outcomes (all-cause mortality). Stratified analyses were performed to control for the confounding factors., Results: AIP was an independent risk factor for the prognosis of T2DM (HR = 1.309; 95% CI 1.084-1.581; P = 0.005). The threshold for AIP was determined to be 0.34 in the study population. After adjustments for confounding factors, multivariable analysis showed that AIP was associated with the risk of MACEs (Model 1: HR = 1.333, 95% CI 1.205-1.474, P < 0.001; Model 2: HR = 1.171, 95% CI 1.030-1.333, P = 0.016; Model 3: HR = 1.194, 95% CI 1.049-1.360, P = 0.007), all-cause mortality (Model 1: HR = 1.184, 95% CI 1.077-1.303, P < 0.001), cardiovascular death (Model 1: HR = 1.422, 95% CI 1.201-1.683, P < 0.001; Model 3: HR = 1.264, 95% CI 1.015-1.573, P = 0.036), and nonfatal myocardial infarction (Model 1: HR = 1.447, 95% CI 1.255-1.669, P < 0.001; Model 2: HR = 1.252, 95% CI 1.045-1.499, P = 0.015; Model 3: HR = 1.284, 95% CI 1.071-1.539, P = 0.007). Subgroup stratified analyses showed that AIP might interact with sex, a classical risk factor of cardiovascular events., Conclusions: This study showed that AIP might be a strong biomarker that could be used to predict the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM., Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00000620., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: Statin therapy is indicated in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines suggest the use of "high intensity" statins, although evidence with PAD specific data are lacking. The effect of statin therapy and dose on outcomes in PAD is investigated., Data Sources: Studies measuring statin use in PAD patients and outcomes were identified based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. The EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were interrogated from January 1957 until February 2020. Twenty-two observational cohort studies and two randomised control trials were included (n = 268 611)., Review Methods: Pooled estimates of dichotomous outcome data were calculated using the odds/hazard ratios (OR/HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-analysis was conducted using the inverse variance or Mantel-Haenszel method. Outcomes included all cause mortality (ACM), cardiovascular mortality (CVM), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and amputation. Subgroup analysis was performed on studies comparing patients taking high dose vs. combined low and moderate doses of statins. The GRADE criteria assessed the quality of evidence for outcomes., Results: Statin therapy (vs. no statins) was significantly protective for ACM: OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.60 - 0.76) (number needed to treat [NNT] = 48), HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.70 - 0.78) (NNT = 10 - 91); MACE: OR 0.84 (95% CI 0.78 - 0.92) (NNT = 53), HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.65 - 0.93) (NNT = 167); and amputations: OR 0.59 (95% CI 0.33 - 1.07) (NNT = 333), HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 - 0.89) (NNT = 50). High doses of statins (vs. combined low and moderate doses) were significantly better protective against ACM OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.43 - 1.09) (NNT = 17), HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.62 - 0.89) (NNT = 16 - 200) but work less significantly for MACE OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.49 - 1.21) (NNT = 25). Amputations were less frequent in patients on high doses HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.69 - 0.90) (NNT = 53 - 1 000)., Conclusion: Higher dosing of statins confers a significant improvement in patient outcomes, especially ACM and amputations, although the quality of the evidence was variable. Such findings require confirmation in larger, PAD specific trials., (Copyright © 2021 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States (U.S.) and incurs significant cost to the healthcare system. Management of cholesterol remains central for ASCVD prevention and has been the focus of multiple national guidelines. In this review, we compare the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Cholesterol guidelines. We review the evidence base that was used to generate recommendations focusing on 4 distinct themes: 1) the threshold of absolute 10-year ASCVD risk to start a clinician-patient discussion for the initiation of statin therapy in primary prevention patients; 2) the utility of coronary artery calcium score to guide clinician-patient risk discussion pertaining to the initiation of statin therapy for primary ASCVD prevention; 3) the use of moderate versus high-intensity statin therapy in patients with established ASCVD; and 4) the utility of ordering lipid panels after initiation or intensification of lipid lowering therapy to document efficacy and monitor adherence to lipid lowering therapy. We discuss why the VA/DoD and AHA/ACC may have reached different conclusions on these key issues., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Salim S. Virani, Research support: Department of Veterans Affairs, World Heart Federation, Tahir and Jooma Family. Honorarium: American College of Cardiology (Associate Editor for Innovations, acc.org). Vijay Nambi, Site PI for study sponsored by AMGEN. Supported by VA MERIT award. Provisional patent along with BCM, Roche on use of biomarkers in prediction of Heart failure, (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background and Aims: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the sole causative agent of coronavirus infectious disease-19 (COVID-19)., Methods and Results: We performed a retrospective single-center study of consecutively admitted patients between March 1st and May 15th , 2020, with a definitive diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary end-point was to evaluate the association of lipid markers with 30-days all-cause mortality in COVID-19. A total of 654 patients were enrolled, with an estimated 30-day mortality of 22.8% (149 patients). Non-survivors had lower total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels during the entire course of the disease. Both showed a significant inverse correlation with inflammatory markers and a positive correlation with lymphocyte count. In a multivariate analysis, LDL-c ≤ 69 mg/dl (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-3.31), C-reactive protein >88 mg/dl (HR 2.44; 95% CI, 1.41-4.23) and lymphopenia <1000 (HR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.91-3.78) at admission were independently associated with 30-day mortality. This association was maintained 7 days after admission. Survivors presented with complete normalization of their lipid profiles on short-term follow-up., Conclusion: Hypolipidemia in SARS-CoV-2 infection may be secondary to an immune-inflammatory response, with complete recovery in survivors. Low LDL-c serum levels are independently associated with higher 30-day mortality in COVID-19 patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2021 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentration and variability are both important factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. We aimed to explore the associations of HDL-C and longitudinal change in HDL-C with risk of mortality., Methods and Results: We recruited a total of 69,163 participants aged ≥40 years and had medical examination records of HDL-C during 2010-2014 from the Yinzhou District, Ningbo, China. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. We observed a non-linear association of HDL-C with risks of non-accidental and CVD mortality. Compared with the moderate concentration group (1.4-1.6 mmol/L), HDL-C <1 mmol/L was associated with a higher risk of non-accidental mortality (HR: 1.13 (95% CI: 1.01-1.27)) and both HDL-C <1 mmol/L and ≥2 mmol/L were associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (HRs: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.01-1.50) and 1.37 (95% CI: 1.03-1.82), respectively). Compared with the stable group ([-0.1, +0.1 mmol/L]), a large decrease ([-0.5, -0.3 mmol/L]) and very large decrease (<-0.5 mmol/L) in HDL-C were associated with a higher risk of non-accidental mortality (HRs: 1.40 (95% CI: 1.21-1.63) and 1.78 (95% CI: 1.44-2.20), respectively). Similar results were observed for CVD mortality and cancer mortality., Conclusion: Extremely low or high HDL-C and a large decrease or very large decrease in HDL-C were associated with a higher risk of cause-specific mortality. Monitoring of HDL-C may have utility in identifying individuals at higher risk of mortality., (Copyright © 2021 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Because of an increasing number and complexity of treatment options for lipid-lowering therapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, guidelines recommend greater active involvement of patients in shared decision-making. However, patients' understanding and perceptions of the benefits, risks, and treatment objectives of lipid-lowering therapy are unknown. Methods and Results Structured questionnaires were conducted in 5006 US outpatients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control (LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL) or on a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitor and in 113 physician providers as a part of the GOULD (Getting to an Improved Understanding of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Dyslipidemia Management) Registry. Mean age of the patients was 68±10 years, 60% were men, and 86% were White race. Across all patients, 63% believed heart disease was the leading cause of death in men and 46% the leading cause of death in women. Only 28% of patients thought the primary reason they were taking lipid-lowering medication was to lower the risk of heart attack or stroke, 68% did not know their approximate LDL-C level, and 69% did not know their LDL-C goal. Patients on PCSK9 inhibitors (versus LDL-C cohort), younger patients (versus age ≥65 years), and men (versus women) were somewhat more knowledgeable about their disease and its management. Most physicians (66%) felt that a lack of understanding of the importance and efficacy of statins was the primary factor contributing to nonadherence, as opposed to costs (9%) or side effects (1%). More education was the most commonly used strategy to address patient-reported side effects. Conclusions A large proportion of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remain unaware of their underlying atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, reasons for taking lipid-lowering medications, current LDL-C levels, or treatment goals. These data highlight a large education gap which, if addressed, may improve shared decision-making and treatment adherence. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.org; Unique identifier: NCT02993120.

Background: The numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and COVID-19 related deaths are still increasing, so it is very important to determine the risk factors of COVID-19. Dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with COVID-19, but the association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19., Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant studies up to August 24, 2020. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. All analysis was performed using Stata 13.1 software and Mantel-Haenszel formula with fixed effects models was used to compare the differences between studies. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies., Results: Twenty-eight studies involving 12,995 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was consisted of 26 cohort studies and 2 case-control studies. Dyslipidemia was associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-1.44, P = 0.038, I 2  = 39.8%). Further, patients with dyslipidemia had a 2.13-fold increased risk of death compared to patients without dyslipidemia (95% CI 1.84-2.47, P = 0.001, I 2  = 66.4%)., Conclusions: The results proved that dyslipidemia is associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, we should monitor blood lipids and administer active treatments in COVID-19 patients with dyslipidemia to reduce the severity and mortality., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background We examined whether primary prevention with statins and high adherence to statins reduce the associated risk of cardiovascular events or death in a low-risk population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Methods and Results Using Danish nationwide registers, we included patients with new-onset T2D, aged 40 to 89 years, between 2005 and 2011, who were alive 18 months following the T2D diagnosis (index date). In patients who purchased statins within 6 months following T2D diagnosis, we calculated the proportion of days covered (PDC) within 1 year after the initial 6-month period. We studied the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or all-cause mortality, whichever came first, with Cox regression. Reported were standardized 5-year risk differences for fixed comorbidity distribution according to statin treatment history, stratified by sex and age. Among 77 170 patients, 42 975 (56%) were treated with statins, of whom 31 061 (72%) had a PDC ≥80%. In men aged 70 to 79 years who were treated with statins, the standardized 5-year risk was 22.9% (95% CI, 21.5%-24.3%), whereas the risk was 29.1% (95% CI, 27.4%-30.7%) in men not treated, resulting in a significant risk reduction of 6.2% (95% CI, 4.0%-8.4%), P <0.0001. The risk reduction associated with statins increased with advancing age group (women: age 40-49 years, 0.0% [95% CI, -1.0% to 1.0%]; age 80-89 years, 10.8% [95% CI, 7.2%-14.4%]). Standardizing to all patients treated with statins, PDC <80% was associated with increased risk difference (reference PDC ≥80%; PDC <20%, 4.2% [95% CI, 2.9%-5.6%]). Conclusions This study supports the use of statins as primary prevention against cardiovascular diseases or death in 18-month surviving low-risk patients with T2D, with the highest effect in the elderly and adherent patients.

Abstract: Statin therapy has been recently suggested as possible adjuvant treatment to improve the clinical outcome in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence of preadmission statin therapy in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to investigate its potential association with acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS) at admission and in-hospital mortality. We retrospectively recruited 467 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the emergency department of 10 Italian hospitals. The study population was divided in 2 groups according to the ARDS diagnosis at admission and in-hospital mortality. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the risk of ARDS at admission and death during hospitalization among patients with COVID-19. A competing risk analysis in patients taking or not statins before admission was also performed. ARDS at admission was reported in 122 cases (26.1%). There was no statistically significant difference for clinical characteristics between patients presenting with and without ARDS. One hundred seven patients (18.5%) died during the hospitalization; they showed increased age (69.6 ± 13.1 vs. 66.1 ± 14.9; P = 0.001), coronary artery disease (23.4% vs. 12.8%; P = 0.012), and chronic kidney disease (20.6% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.018) prevalence; moreover, they presented more frequently ARDS at admission (48.6% vs. 19.4%; P < 0.001). At multivariable regression model, statin therapy was not associated neither with ARDS at admission nor with in-hospital mortality. Preadmission statin therapy does not seem to show a protective effect in severe forms of COVID-19 complicated by ARDS at presentation and rapidly evolving toward death., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The outbreak by SARS-CoV-2 has rapidly spread worldwide. The need for specific treatments to adequately stop the inflammatory response and its sequelae is day by day more urgent and many therapeutic strategies were performed since COVID-19 burst in the last months. Statins were thought to be effective against this novel coronavirus for their anti-inflammatory properties, even if the real effects on COVID patients are still partially unexplored., Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 501 adult patients, consecutively admitted to the two COVID-hospitals of Ferrara's territory, and divided them into two groups: ST = patients on statin therapy on admission and NST=patients not on statin therapy on admission. We searched for differences between groups in terms of anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data and then in terms of COVID-19 outcomes., Results: We found significant differences between groups in terms of age, comorbidities, procalcitonin and CPK serum levels: ST patients were older, more comorbid, with lower procalcitonin and higher CPK serum levels. Male sex was, together with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, an independent predictor of needing intensification of care, while age only was a good predictor of in-hospital and 100-day mortality. Differences were also found in the survival functions between the two groups., Conclusions: After a period of observation of 100 days, ST patients, despite their older age and their greater load of comorbidities, have similar survival functions to NST patients. If adjusted for age and CCI the survival functions of ST group are considerably more favourable than those of the second group.

Cardiovascular disorders are leading mortality causes worldwide, often with a latent evolution. Vascular health depends on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and the presence of atherosclerotic plaques. Preventive medicine deserves special attention, focusing on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, including diet. A diet rich in fruits and vegetables has well-known health benefits, especially due to its polyphenolic components. Anthocyanins, water-soluble flavonoid species, responsible for the red-blue color in plants and commonly found in berries, exert favorable effects on the endothelial function, oxidative stress, inhibit COX-1, and COX-2 enzymes, exert antiatherogenic, antihypertensive, antiglycation, antithrombotic, and anti-inflammatory activity, ameliorate dyslipidemia and arterial stiffness. The present review aims to give a current overview of the mechanisms involved in the vascular protective effect of anthocyanins from the human diet, considering epidemiological data, in vitro and in vivo preclinical research, clinical observational, retrospective, intervention and randomized studies, dietary and biomarker studies, and discussing preventive benefits of anthocyanins and future research directions.

Background: People with peripheral artery disease are at a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Randomized controlled trials suggest that intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors is an effective strategy to prevent these events. This study estimated the potential benefit and cost-effectiveness of administrating PCSK9 inhibitors to a cohort of participants with peripheral artery disease., Methods: A total of 783 participants with intermittent claudication (IC; n = 582) or chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI; n = 201) were prospectively recruited from three hospitals in Australia. Serum LDL-C was measured at recruitment, and the occurrence of MACE and MALE was recorded over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 2.2 years (0.3-5.7 years). The potential benefit of administering a PCSK9 inhibitor was estimated by calculating the absolute risk reduction and numbers needed to treat (NNT) based on relative risk reductions reported in published randomized trials. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life year gained was estimated., Results: Intensive LDL-C lowering was estimated to lead to an absolute risk reduction in MACE of 6.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-9.3; NNT, 16) and MALE of 13.7% (95% CI, 4.3-21.5; NNT, 7) in people with CLTI compared with 3.2% (95% CI, 1.1-4.8; NNT, 32) and 5.3% (95% CI, 1.7-8.3; NNT, 19) in people with IC. The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios over a 10-year period were $55,270 USD and $32,800 USD for participants with IC and CLTI, respectively., Conclusions: This analysis suggests that treatment with a PCSK9 inhibitor is likely to be cost-effective in people with CLTI., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Previous studies link obesity and components of metabolic health, such as hypertension or inflammation, to increased hospitalizations and mortality of patients with COVID-19. Here, in two overlapping samples of over 1,000 individuals from the UK Biobank we investigate whether metabolic health as measured by waist circumference, dyslipidemia, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and systemic inflammation is related to increased COVID-19 infection and mortality rate. Using logistic regression and controlling for confounding variables such as socioeconomic status, age, sex or ethnicity, we find that individuals with worse metabolic health (measured on average eleven years prior to 2020) have an increased risk for COVID-19-related death (adjusted odds ratio: 1.75). We also find that specific factors contributing to increased mortality are increased serum glucose levels, systolic blood pressure and waist circumference., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Morys and Dagher.)

Abstract: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular factor, for which there is no approved specific lowering treatment. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors have been shown to have lowering effects on Lp(a). Aim of this systematic review is to synthesize the current literature and quantify the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on the serum Lp(a) levels in human subjects. Double-blind, phase 2 or 3, randomized-controlled trials comparing PCSK9 inhibitors (alirocumab or evolocumab) to placebo and/or ezetimibe and/or other lipid-lowering therapy were deemed eligible for inclusion. We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science as of 17 June 2020. Quality assessment was performed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Forty-three studies were identified (64,107 patients randomized) and 41 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. PCSK9 inhibitors reduced Lp(a) levels by -26.7% (95% CI, -29.5% to -23.9%) with a significant heterogeneity within studies. There was significant difference in Lp(a) change from baseline according to comparator (placebo: mean -27.9%; 95% CI, -31.1% to -24.6% vs. ezetimibe: mean, -22.2%; 95% CI, -27.2% to -17.2%; P = 0.04) and duration of treatment (≤12 weeks: mean, -30.9%; 95% CI, -34.7% to -27.1% vs. >12 weeks: mean, -21.9%; 95% CI, -25.2% to -18.6%; P < 0.01). Meta-regression analysis showed that only the mean percentage change from baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol due to the intervention is significantly associated with the effect size difference (P < 0.0001). PCSK9 inhibitors reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by -54% (95% CI -57.6% to -50.6%). There is substantial efficacy of the currently approved PCSK9 inhibitors in the lowering of Lp(a) levels. Dedicated randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the benefit of this intervention., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This meta-analysis based on prospective cohort studies aimed to evaluate the associations of lipid profiles with the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD)., Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were systematically searched for prospective cohort study published through December 2019, and the pooled results were calculated using the random-effects model., Results: Twenty-one studies with a total of 76,221 patients with CHD met the inclusion criteria. The per standard deviation (SD) increase in triglyceride was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Furthermore, the per SD increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac death, whereas patients with lower HDL-C were associated with an increased risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiac death. Finally, the risk of MACE was significantly increased in patients with CHD with high lipoprotein(a) levels., Conclusions: The results of this study suggested that lipid profile variables could predict major cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality in patients with CHD.

Background: Current guidelines strongly recommend high-intensity statin therapy after acute myocardial infarction., Aims: To analyse the relationship between prescription of high-intensity statin therapy at discharge and long-term clinical outcomes according to risk level defined by the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS-2P) after acute myocardial infarction., Methods: We used data from the FAST-MI 2005 and 2010 registries - two nationwide French surveys including 7839 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction. Level of risk was stratified in three groups using the TRS-2P score: Group 1 (low risk; TRS-2P=0-1); Group 2 (intermediate risk; TRS-2P=2); and Group 3 (high risk; TRS-2P≥3)., Results: Among the 7348 patients discharged alive with a TRS-2P available, high-intensity statin therapy was used in 41.3% in Group 1, 31.3% in Group 2 and 18.5% in Group 3. After multivariable adjustment, high-intensity statin therapy was associated with a non-significant decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events (death, stroke or recurrent myocardial infarction) at 5 years in the overall population compared with that in patients receiving intermediate- or low-intensity statins or without a statin prescription (14.3% vs 29.6%; hazard ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.09; P=0.42). In absolute terms, the decrease in major adverse cardiovascular events was positively correlated with risk level (Group 1: 8.1% vs 10.7%; Group 2: 14.8% vs 21.6%; Group 3: 30.8% vs 51.6%). However, after adjustment, the benefits of high-intensity statin therapy were associated with lower mortality only in high-risk patients (hazard ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.97; P=0.02)., Conclusions: High-intensity statin therapy at discharge after acute myocardial infarction was associated in absolute terms with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events at 5 years, regardless of atherothrombotic risk stratification, although the highest absolute reduction was found in the high-risk TRS-2P class., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To estimate the average outcome postponement (gain in days to an event) for cardiovascular outcomes in a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled statin trials, including any myocardial infarction, any stroke and cardiovascular death., Design: Systematic review of large randomized, placebo-controlled trials of statin use, including a random-effects meta-analysis of all included trials., Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE (15 July 2019) and ClinicalTrials.gov (16 October 2019)., Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of statin use that included at least 1000 participants. We identified 15 cardiovascular outcomes that were reported in more than 2 trials., Results: We included 19 trials. The summary outcome postponements for the 15 cardiovascular outcomes varied between -1 and 38 days. For four major outcomes, the summary outcome postponement in days was as follows: cardiovascular mortality, 9.27 days (95% CI: 3.6 to 14.91; I 2  = 72%; 9 trials) non-vascular and non-cardiovascular mortality, 1.5 days (95% CI: -2.2 to 5.3; I 2  = 0%; 6 trials) any myocardial infarction 18.0 days (95% CI; 12.1 to 24.1; I 2  = 92%; 15 trials); and any stroke, 6.1 days (95% CI; 2.86 to 9.39; I 2  = 66%; 14 trials)., Conclusion: Statin treatment provided a small, average postponement of cardiovascular outcomes during trial duration., (© 2020 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).)

Background: Atherogenic dyslipidaemia has been implicated in the residual risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, which remains despite attainment of LDL cholesterol goals especially in individuals with type 2 diabetes. However, its relationship with all-cause death has not been sufficiently explored. This analysis evaluated the independent association of increased triglycerides and triglyceride:HDL cholesterol ratio (TG:HDL) and decreased HDL cholesterol with total mortality and the possible modifying effect of gender in a large cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes., Methods: This observational, prospective study enrolled 15,773 patients in 19 Diabetes Clinics throughout Italy in the years 2006-2008. Triglycerides and total and HDL cholesterol were measured by colorimetric enzymatic methods. Vital status was retrieved on 31 October 2015 for 15,656 patients (99.3%). Participants were stratified by quartiles of triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and TG:HDL., Results: There were 3,602 deaths over a follow-up 7.42 ± 2.05 years (31.0 × 1000 person-years). In the unadjusted analyses, the highest TG:HDL (but not triglyceride) and the lowest HDL cholesterol quartile were associated with increased death rate and mortality risk. When sequentially adjusting for confounders, including total, LDL, or non-HDL cholesterol and lipid-lowering treatment, mortality risk was significantly higher in the highest triglyceride (hazard ratio 1.167 [95% confidence interval 1.055-1.291], p = 0.003) and TG:HDL (1.192 [1.082-1.314], p < 0.0001) and the lowest HDL cholesterol (1.232 [1.117-1.360], p < 0.0001) quartile, though the association of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol disappeared after further adjustment for each other. Interaction with gender was significant only for HDL cholesterol (p = 0.0009). The relationship with death was stronger for triglycerides in males and HDL cholesterol in females, with these associations remaining significant even after adjustment for HDL cholesterol (1.161 [1.019-1.324], p = 0.025, for the highest vs the lowest triglyceride quartile) and triglycerides (1.366 [1.176-1.587], p < 0.0001, for the lowest vs the highest HDL cholesterol quartile)., Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes, higher triglycerides and TG:HDL and lower HDL cholesterol were independently associated with increased all-cause mortality, with a modifying effect of gender for triglycerides and HDL cholesterol. These data suggest that atherogenic dyslipidaemia, especially TG:HDL, may serve as predictor of all-cause death in these individuals. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00715481, 15 July, 2008.

Background and Aims: Hemorrhagic stroke (HS) could damage human health and impose heavy social and economic burden around the world. An accumulating number of studies revealed the effect of lipid levels on HS, whereas the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between lipid levels and HS., Methods and Results: We searched the databases for relative cohort studies, which were published before April 2020. We pooled adjusted effect size and performed the dose-response analysis by random-effect model. 31 eligible studies with 2,291,643 participants and 12,147 hemorrhagic stroke cases were included. An inverse association was observed between the risk of hemorrhagic stroke and total cholesterol (TC) (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.64-0.82) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (RR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.89). Additionally, in dose-response analysis, the non-linear trend was also found between TC, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and risk of HS. When the level of TC and HDL-C was about 6 and 1.3 mmol/L separately, the risk of HS was decreased to the lowest. And we found a linear trend that for every 1 mmol/L triglyceride (TG) increase, the risk of HS decreased by 7%., Conclusion: TC and LDL-C were both inversely related to the risk of HS. In dose-response analysis of TG, we also found the inverse linear trend. Furthermore, the non-linear trend suggested the level of TC and HDL-C was about 6 and 1.3 mmol/L separately could lead to the lowest risk of HS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Aims: Whether the prognostic value of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is modified by patients' dyslipidemia status is unknown. The aim of present study was to evaluate the prognostic effect of MMP-9 among ischemic stroke patients stratified by dyslipidemia status., Methods and Results: MMP-9 levels were measured for 2977 acute ischemic stroke patients from 26 participating hospitals across China, and data of clinical outcomes within one year after ischemic stroke was collected. The primary outcome was a composite outcome of major disability and death at one year after stroke onset, and secondary outcomes were major disability, death, vascular events and recurrent stroke. The association between MMP-9 and primary outcome was appreciably modified by dyslipidemia status (P interaction  = 0.048). After multivariate adjustment, increased MMP-9 level was associated with increased risk of primary outcome at one year after ischemic stroke in the patients with dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.79), but not in those without dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.68). Increased MMP-9 was also significantly associated with major disability, death and vascular events in the patients with dyslipidemia but not in those without dyslipidemia (P for interaction < 0.05 for all)., Conclusion: Increased MMP-9 was associated with poor prognosis within one-year after stroke only in patients with dyslipidemia, suggesting that the prognostic value of MMP-9 be modified by dyslipidemia status of ischemic stroke patients. Further prospective study from other populations and randomized clinical trials are needed to verify our findings and clarify the potential mechanisms., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is characterized by a proinflammatory state with high mortality. Statins have anti-inflammatory effects and may attenuate the severity of COVID-19. Methods and Results An observational study of all consecutive adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to a single center located in Bronx, New York, was conducted from March 1, 2020, to May 2, 2020. Patients were grouped as those who did and those who did not receive a statin, and in-hospital mortality was compared by competing events regression. In addition, propensity score matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were used in survival models to examine the association between statin use and death during hospitalization. A total of 4252 patients were admitted with COVID-19. Diabetes mellitus modified the association between statin use and in-hospital mortality. Patients with diabetes mellitus on a statin (n=983) were older (69±11 versus 67±14 years; P <0.01), had lower inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, 10.2; interquartile range, 4.5-18.4 versus 12.9; interquartile range, 5.9-21.4 mg/dL; P <0.01) and reduced cumulative in-hospital mortality (24% versus 39%; P <0.01) than those not on a statin (n=1283). No difference in hospital mortality was noted in patients without diabetes mellitus on or off statin (20% versus 21%; P =0.82). Propensity score matching (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P <0.01) and inverse probability treatment weighting (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92; P <0.01) showed a 12% lower risk of death during hospitalization for statin users than for nonusers. Conclusions Statin use was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality from COVID-19 in patients with diabetes mellitus. These findings, if validated, may further reemphasize administration of statins to patients with diabetes mellitus during the COVID-19 era.

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease, which is the leading cause of death globally. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a common cause of death, accounting for nearly half of the global burden of CV mortality. Epidemiologic studies have identified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as an independent CV risk factor, and this is now the primary target for initiating and adjusting lipid-lowering therapies in most current guidelines. Evidence from pivotal studies supports the use of high-intensity statin therapy and a lower level for optimal LDL-C in secondary prevention of atherosclerotic CV disease, especially in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, current research has identified a gap between the target LDL-C goal attainment and target LDL-C levels recommended by the guidelines. Statins have proven benefits in the management of CV disease and are the cornerstone of lipid-lowering management in patients with ACS. Recent randomized controlled trials have also demonstrated the benefits of cholesterol absorption inhibitors and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors. This review summarizes the current evidence for LDL-lowering therapy in patients with ACS, with an emphasis on the importance of LDL-C goal attainment, rapid LDL-C lowering, and duration of LDL-C-lowering therapy.

Purpose: This study sought to investigate gender-based disparities in statin prescription rates and adherence among patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (ICVD)., Methods: We identified patients with PAD or ICVD seeking primary care between 2013 and 2014 in the VA healthcare system. We assessed any statin use, high-intensity statin (HIS) use, and statin adherence among women with PAD or ICVD compared with men. We also compared proportion of days covered (PDC) as a measure of statin adherence; PDC ≥ 0.8 deemed a patient statin adherent. Association between statin use (or adherence) and odds of death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 12-month follow-up was also ascertained., Results: Our analyses included 192,219 males and 3188 females with PAD and 331,352 males and 10,490 females with ICVD. Women with PAD had lower prescription rates of any statin (68.5% vs. 78.7%, OR 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-0.75), HIS (21.1% vs. 23.7%, OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79-0.97), and lower statin adherence (PDC ≥ 0.8: 34.6% vs. 45.5%, OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.69-0.82) compared with men. Similar disparities were seen in ICVD patients. Among female patients with PAD or ICVD, statin adherence was associated with lower odds of MI (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.98), while use of any statin (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91) and HIS (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.97) was associated with lower odds of death at 12 months., Conclusions: Women with PAD or ICVD had lower odds of receiving any statins, HIS, or being statin adherent. Targeted clinician- and patient-level interventions are needed to study and address these disparities among patients with PAD and ICVD.

Background and Aim: Results have been mixed and uncertainty still remains regarding the impact of statin adherence on premature deaths. Thus, we investigated the association between statin adherence and risks of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality among dyslipidemia patients in South Korea., Methods and Results: We used data from the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) National Sample Cohort for the years 2003-2013, which included data on 107,954 middle-aged and elderly dyslipidemia patients. Among these patients, a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality depending on proportion of days covered (PDC) by statin medication. A total of 3073 (2.85%) individuals died within the study period. Of these individuals, 1143 (1.06%) died from cancer, and 687 (0.64%) died from cardiovascular diseases. Relative to good medication adherence (>80%), moderate (50-80%) (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-1.43) and poor (<50%) (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.41-1.78) adherence were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Poor adherence was also associated with increased risk of cancer (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.16-1.52) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.06-1.51) mortality., Conclusion: Such findings reveal that relative to good statin adherence, moderate and/poor adherence is associated with increased risks of all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality. Clinicians should assess for dyslipidemia, link statin adherence problems to potential mortality risk, and monitor outcomes in both medication adherence and disease complications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the main cause of mortality worldwide. Risk factors of CVD can be classified into modifiable (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia) through lifestyle changes or taking drug therapy and not modifiable (age, ethnicity, sex and family history). Elevated total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have a lead role in the development of coronary heart disease (CHD), while high levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) seem to have a protective role.The current treatment for dyslipidemia consists of lifestyle modification or drug therapy even if not pharmacological treatment should be always considered in addition to lipid-lowering medications.The use of lipid-lowering nutraceuticals alone or in association with drug therapy may be considered when the atherogenic cholesterol goal was not achieved.These substances can be classified according to their mechanisms of action into natural inhibitors of intestinal cholesterol absorption, inhibitors of hepatic cholesterol synthesis and enhancers of the excretion of LDL-C. Nevertheless, many of them are characterized by mixed or unclear mechanisms of action.The use of these nutraceuticals is suggested in individuals with borderline lipid profile levels or with drug intolerance, but cannot replace standard lipid-lowering treatment in patients at high, or very high CVD risk.Nutraceuticals can also have vascular effects, including improvement in endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness, as well as antioxidative properties. Moreover, epidemiological and clinical studies reported that in patients intolerant of statins, many nutraceuticals with demonstrated hypolipidemic effect are well tolerated.

Background: Whether plasma proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) levels is a predictor for cardiovascular outcomes has currently been controversial. No data is currently available regarding the relation of PCSK9 to cardiovascular metabolic markers (CVMMs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with diabetes or without diabetes., Methods: A total 1225 untreated patients with stable CAD were consecutively enrolled and their baseline plasma PCSK9 levels were determined by ELISA. Patients were divided into high and low PCSK9 groups according to PCSK9 median. All patients followed up for the occurrence of MACEs and received standard therapy after admission. The associations of PCSK9 with CVMMs and MACEs were evaluated., Results: PCSK9 levels were positively correlated with multiple CVMMs including total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A 1c at baseline (all p < 0.05). During a median follow-up of 3.3 years, 103 (8.4%) events occurred. PCSK9 levels were higher in patients with events compared to those without (p < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis displayed that patients in high PCSK9 group had lower event-free survival than that in low group (p < 0.05). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that PCSK9 levels were independently associated with MACEs in diabetic patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.361, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.037-1.785, p < 0.05). When added the combination of PCSK9 levels and diabetic status to stratifying factors, patients in high PCSK9 group appeared to have extremely high risk of subsequent MACEs with diabetes (adjusted HR: 5.233, 95% CI: 2.546-10.757, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: The present study firstly showed that elevated PCSK9 levels were related to multiple CVMMs and MACEs in stable CAD with diabetes, suggesting that plasma PCSK9 measurement could help to identify diabetic patients with CAD at higher cardiovascular risk. More studies may be needed to confirm our findings.

The efficacy and safety of statin and ezetimibe combination therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. To assess the effect of statin and ezetimibe combination therapy on controlling lipid profiles and reducing cardiovascular events in patients with CKD, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing this combination therapy with statin monotherapy or placebo in patients with CKD from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases published before September 1, 2018 on the Internet. Eight articles on seven studies, with a total of 14,016 patients with CKD, were selected from 412 full-text articles. Statin and ezetimibe combination therapy had beneficial effects on serum total cholesterol (weighted mean difference (WMD) -20.31 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval (CI), -26.87 to -13.75 mg/dL, P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (WMD -17.22 mg/dL, 95% CI, -18.93 to -15.51 mg/dL, P < 0.001), and triglycerides (WMD -15.08 mg/dL, 95% CI, -23.41 to -6.75 mg/dL, P < 0.001) compared with statin monotherapy. Statin and ezetimibe combination therapy significantly reduced all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (risk ratio 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97, P = 0.01). The incidence of adverse events was low, with no significant difference between statin and ezetimibe combination therapy and statin monotherapy. In conclusion, the statin and ezetimibe combination therapy significantly improved serum lipid profiles and reduced risks of all-cause deaths and major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the control group in patients with CKD., (© 2020 The Authors Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2020 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background and Aims: Triglyceride (TG) to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio may play a role in predicting cardiovascular events. We aimed to prospectively explore the association between the TG/HDL-C ratio and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ischemic stroke, as well as coronary heart disease (CHD) in a Chinese population., Methods and Results: This prospective cohort study included 9368 participants from four Chinese populations in the People's Republic of China-United States of America (PRC-USA) Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Epidemiology. Over a follow-up period of 20 years, 624 cases of ASCVD events including 458 ischemic stroke events and 166 CHD events were recorded. The relationship between the TG/HDL-C ratio and the endpoints was evaluated through multivariate Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for potential confounding variables, including age, sex, urban or rural residence, northern or southern China, occupational type, education, physical exercise, smoking status, drinking status, body mass index, hypertension, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes, and antihypertensive medication use at baseline. With the lowest TG/HDL-C tertile as the reference, the middle and highest tertiles had the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.13 (0.91, 1.40), 1.36 (1.10, 1.67) respectively for ASCVD (p for trend = 0.0028), and 1.19 (0.93, 1.54),1.47 (1.15, 1.87) respectively for ischemic stroke (p for trend = 0.0016). However, no significant association was found for CHD events., Conclusion: TG/HDL-C ratio was positively associated with the risk of ASCVD and ischemic stroke events in the Chinese population., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: The influence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on mortality may be influenced by age- and gender-related changes affecting the impact of individual MetS components. We investigated gender differences in the association between MetS components and mortality in community-dwelling older adults., Methods and Results: Prospective studies were identified through a systematic literature review up to June 2019. Random-effect meta-analyses were run to estimate the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality associated with the presence of MetS components (abdominal obesity, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, high fasting glycemia, and high blood pressure) in older men and women. Meta-analyses considering all-cause (103,859 individuals, 48,830 men, 55,029 women; 10 studies) and CV mortality (94,965 individuals, 44,699 men, 50,266 women; 8 studies) did not reveal any significant association for abdominal obesity and high triglycerides in either gender. Low HDL was associated with increased all-cause (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.02-1.32) and CV mortality (RR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.03-1.74) among women, while weaker results were found for men. High fasting glycemia was associated with higher all-cause mortality in older women (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22-1.50) more than in older men (RR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.13-1.30), and CV mortality only in the former (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04-1.78). Elevated blood pressure was associated with increased all-cause mortality (RR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32) and showed marginal significant results for CV death only among women., Conclusions: The impact of MetS components on mortality in older people present some gender differences, with low HDL cholesterol, hyperglycemia, and elevated blood pressure being more strongly associated to all-cause and CV mortality in women., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

To the best of our knowledge, there is no published study on the use of interferon β-1a (IFN β-1a) in the treatment of severe COVID-19. In this randomized clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of IFN β-1a were evaluated in patients with severe COVID-19. Forty-two patients in the interferon group received IFN β-1a in addition to the national protocol medications (hydroxychloroquine plus lopinavir-ritonavir or atazanavir-ritonavir). Each 44-μg/ml (12 million IU/ml) dose of interferon β-1a was subcutaneously injected three times weekly for two consecutive weeks. The control group consisted of 39 patients who received only the national protocol medications. The primary outcome of the study was time to reach clinical response. Secondary outcomes were duration of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, 28-day mortality, effect of early or late administration of IFN on mortality, adverse effects, and complications during the hospitalization. Between 29 February and 3 April 2020, 92 patients were recruited, and a total of 42 patients in the IFN group and 39 patients in the control group completed the study. As the primary outcome, time to the clinical response was not significantly different between the IFN and the control groups (9.7 ± 5.8 versus 8.3 ± 4.9 days, respectively, P  = 0.95). On day 14, 66.7% versus 43.6% of patients in the IFN group and the control group, respectively, were discharged (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 6.37). The 28-day overall mortality was significantly lower in the IFN than the control group (19% versus 43.6%, respectively, P = 0.015). Early administration significantly reduced mortality (OR, 13.5; 95% CI, 1.5 to 118). Although IFN did not change the time to reach the clinical response, adding it to the national protocol significantly increased discharge rate on day 14 and decreased 28-day mortality. (This study is in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials under identifier IRCT20100228003449N28.)., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.)

Evidence to support the use of steroids in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is lacking. We aim to determine the impact of steroid use for COVID-19 pneumonia on hospital mortality. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in a university hospital in Madrid, Spain, during March of 2020. To determine the role of steroids in in-hospital mortality, patients admitted with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia and treated with steroids were compared to patients not treated with steroids, and we adjusted with a propensity score for patients on steroid treatment. Survival times were compared using the log rank test. Different steroid regimens were compared and adjusted with a second propensity score. During the study period, 463 out of 848 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia fulfilled inclusion criteria. Among them, 396 (46.7%) patients were treated with steroids and 67 patients were not. Global mortality was 15.1%. The median time to steroid treatment from symptom onset was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8 to 13 days). In-hospital mortality was lower in patients treated with steroids than in controls (13.9% [55/396] versus 23.9% [16/67]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.51 [95% confidence interval, 0.27 to 0.96]; P = 0.044). Steroid treatment reduced mortality by 41.8% relative to the mortality with no steroid treatment (relative risk reduction, 0.42 [95% confidence interval, 0.048 to 0.65]). Initial treatment with 1 mg/kg of body weight/day of methylprednisolone versus steroid pulses was not associated with in-hospital mortality (13.5% [42/310] versus 15.1% [13/86]; odds ratio [OR], 0.880 [95% confidence interval, 0.449 to 1.726]; P  = 0.710). Our results show that the survival of patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is higher in patients treated with glucocorticoids than in those not treated. Rates of in-hospital mortality were not different between initial regimens of 1 mg/kg/day of methylprednisolone and glucocorticoid pulses., (Copyright © 2020 Fernández-Cruz et al.)

Background and Aim: The association of serum cholesterol levels with the occurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality during a follow-up of 50 years was rarely investigated previously. Thus, we took advantage of results at hand in 10 pooled cohorts of men aged 40-59 years from the Seven Countries Study (9063 individuals and 2057 CHD fatal events) and we assessed this., Methods and Results: Cox proportional hazards models were run with CHD fatal events (as dependent variable) and cholesterol levels (as independent variables) at years 0, 10, and 25 (in 5 cohorts). Cumulative events during subsequent decades (cumulative approach: CA) and separately in each subsequent decade (partitioned approach: PA) were analyzed. The ecological correlation of average baseline serum cholesterol levels with CHD mortality was very high (R = 0.97). Serum cholesterol and CHD mortality for 50 years were associated at the individual level, and the association estimated by the Cox's coefficients (and related hazards ratios) was initially strong in both CA and PA, but slightly declined during later decades. Hazards ratios (for a difference of 40 mg/dl) ranged from 1.39 to 1.20 for CA and from 1.39 to 0.80 for PA. Coefficients were larger for CA than for PA and the decline was more evident for the latter. Partitioned coefficient became negative and significant in the last decade (from year 40-50). Coefficients derived from cholesterol levels measured at year 10 of follow-up showed similar trends but their magnitude was smaller., Conclusion: Thus, the relationship of serum cholesterol levels with CHD mortality remained relatively stable during at least 40 years after a single cholesterol measurement at baseline in middle-aged men., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In the pandemic "Corona Virus Disease 2019" (COVID-19) people with diabetes have a high risk to require ICU admission. The management of diabetes in Intensive Care Unit is always challenging, however, when diabetes is present in COVID-19 the situation seems even more complicated. An optimal glycemic control, avoiding acute hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and glycemic variability may significantly improve the outcome. In this case, intravenous insulin infusion with continuous glucose monitoring should be the choice. No evidence suggests stopping angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-renin-blockers or statins, even it has been suggested that they may increase the expression of Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor, which is used by "Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to penetrate into the cells. A real issue is the usefulness of several biomarkers, which have been suggested to be measured during the COVID-19. N-Terminal-pro-Brain Natriuretic-Peptide, D-dimer and hs-Troponin are often increased in diabetes. Their meaning in the case of diabetes and COVID-19 should be therefore very carefully evaluated. Even though we understand that in such a critical situation some of these requests are not so easy to implement, we believe that the best possible action to prevent a worse outcome is essential in any medical act.