Search

Background and Aims: Neurodegeneration underpins the pathological processes of younger‐onset dementia (YOD) and has been implicated in primary psychiatric disorders (PSYs). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL) has been used to investigate neurodegeneration severity through correlation with structural brain changes in various conditions, but has seldom been evaluated in YOD and PSYs. Methods: This retrospective study included patients with YOD or PSYs with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and CSF NfL analysis. Findings from brain MRI were analysed using automated volumetry (volBrain) to measure white matter (WM), grey matter (GM) and whole brain (WB) volumes expressed as percentages of total intracranial volume. Correlations between NfL and brain volume measurements were computed whilst adjusting for age. Results: Seventy patients (47 with YOD and 23 with PSY) were identified. YOD types included Alzheimer disease and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. PSY included schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. MRI brain sequences were either fast spoiler gradient‐echo (FSPGR) or magnetization‐prepared rapid acquisition gradient‐echo (MPRAGE). In the total cohort, higher NfL was associated with reduced WB in the FSPGR and MPRAGE sequences (r = −0.402 [95% confidence interval (CI), −0.593 to −0.147], P = 0.008 and r = −0.625 [95% CI, −0.828 to −0.395], P < 0.001, respectively). Higher NfL was related to reduced GM in FSPGR (r = 0.385 [95% CI, −0.649 to −0.014], P = 0.017) and reduced WM in MPRAGE (r = −0.650 [95% CI, −0.777 to −0.307], P < 0.001). Similar relationships were seen in YOD, but not in PSY. Conclusion: Higher CSF NfL is related to brain atrophy in YOD, further supporting its use as a nonspecific marker of neurodegeneration severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the clinical assessment of tremor for diagnosing and treating patients. It discusses the revised guidelines for tremor classification and provides recommendations for history-taking and examination. The article also highlights different causes of tremor and management options, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment.

Objective: Deep brain stimulation can be of benefit in carefully selected patients with severe intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder. The aim of this paper is to describe the outcomes of the first seven deep brain stimulation procedures for obsessive-compulsive disorder undertaken at the Neuropsychiatry Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital. The primary objective was to assess the response to deep brain stimulation treatment utilising the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale as a measure of symptom severity. Secondary objectives include assessment of depression and anxiety, as well as socio-occupational functioning. Methods: Patients with severe obsessive-compulsive disorder were referred by their treating psychiatrist for assessment of their suitability for deep brain stimulation. Following successful application to the Psychosurgery Review Board, patients proceeded to have deep brain stimulation electrodes implanted in either bilateral nucleus accumbens or bed nucleus of stria terminalis. Clinical assessment and symptom rating scales were undertaken pre- and post-operatively at 6- to 8-week intervals. Rating scales used included the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Obsessive Compulsive Inventory, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale and Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale. Results: Seven patients referred from four states across Australia underwent deep brain stimulation surgery and were followed for a mean of 31 months (range, 8–54 months). The sample included four females and three males, with a mean age of 46 years (range, 37–59 years) and mean duration of obsessive-compulsive disorder of 25 years (range, 15–38 years) at the time of surgery. The time from first assessment to surgery was on average 18 months. All patients showed improvement on symptom severity rating scales. Three patients showed a full response, defined as greater than 35% improvement in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score, with the remaining showing responses between 7% and 20%. Conclusion: Deep brain stimulation was an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder in these highly selected patients. The extent of the response to deep brain stimulation varied between patients, as well as during the course of treatment for each patient. The results of this series are comparable with the literature, as well as having similar efficacy to ablative psychosurgery techniques such as capsulotomy and cingulotomy. Deep brain stimulation provides advantages over lesional psychosurgery but is more expensive and requires significant multidisciplinary input at all stages, pre- and post-operatively, ideally within a specialised tertiary clinical and/or academic centre. Ongoing research is required to better understand the neurobiological basis for obsessive-compulsive disorder and how this can be manipulated with deep brain stimulation to further improve the efficacy of this emerging treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In spite of the recognized physical and psychosocial effects of caring for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), caregiver burden (CB) in this setting is poorly understood. The objective of this research was to identify factors that were associated with CB in an Australian population of PD caregivers using a novel instrument - the Parkinson's Disease Caregiver Burden (PDCB) questionnaire.Methods: Fifty patient-caregiver couples were recruited from three movement disorders clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Burden on caregivers was rated using the PDCB questionnaire. Burden scores were correlated with patient factors, including motor symptom severity (Unified Parkinson's Disease Ratings Scale and Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) scale), patient cognition (Neuropsychiatry Unit Cognitive Assessment Tool; NUCOG), presence of impulsive and compulsive behaviors (Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease), and patient olfaction. Caregiver and patient demographics, as well as results for depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS), were also examined for their relationship with CB.Results: H&Y stage, depression or anxiety in either caregiver or patient, and decreased patient NUCOG score were significantly associated with higher PDCB score. Multiple linear regression analysis identified caregiver and patient depression score and patient score for the visuoconstructional subscale of NUCOG to predict burden score. In addition, disease duration, duration of caregiving, and increased hours per day spent in giving care were significantly associated with increased burden.Conclusions: We found psychiatric and cognitive factors to be the most relevant factors in the perception of burden in PD caregivers. On top of this, we found deficits in the domain of visuoconstruction predicted burden - a relationship not yet described in literature. Targeting depression and anxiety in this setting as well as identifying caregivers at high risk of burden may give clinicians the chance to optimize care of patients with PD through the caregiver. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Accurate diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disorder, in particular distinguishing primary psychiatric from neurological disorders, can be challenging. There is a need for biomarkers to reduce the diagnostic odyssey and improve outcomes. Neurofilament light (NfL) has shown promise as a biomarker for diagnosis, staging and prognosis in a wide range of disorders. Our 'Biomarkers in Younger Onset Neurocognitive Disorders' (BeYOND) and 'Markers in Neuropsychiatric Disorders' (MiND) studies aim to build on our pilot study (Eratne et al, 2019, ANZJP), to explore the diagnostic and broader utility of plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) NfL, in a broad range of psychiatric and neurodegenerative/neurological disorders. Method: These studies assess plasma and/or CSF NfL concentrations using Simoa technology in a broad range of cohorts, including: patients assessed for neurocognitive/psychiatric symptoms at Neuropsychiatry and Melbourne Young Onset Dementia service; Australian National Creutzfeldt‐Jakob Disease Registry (ANCJDR); treatment trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD); treatment‐resistant schizophrenia (TRS) biobank; FTD; autoimmune encephalitis; Niemann‐Pick Type C; epilepsy; and patients in primary care with cognitive or psychiatric symptoms. The most recent primary consensus diagnosis informed by established diagnostic criteria is categorised: psychiatric disorder (PSY), neurodegenerative/neurological disorder (NND), or healthy controls (HC). Result: As of January 2020, data from 485 patients/participants (NND:325, PSY:100, HC:60) demonstrates significantly elevated plasma and/or CSF NfL levels in a broad range of NND compared to a broad range of PSY, and HC, with areas under the curve of>0.90 and sensitivity and specificity>90%: improving on results from our pilot study. As recruitment, sample analysis, data collection is ongoing, more detailed, up to date results will be presented from over 600 patients/participants, including in‐depth findings from TRS, ANCJDR, AD and FTD treatment trials, and general practice cohorts. Conclusion: NfL shows great promise as a diagnostic test to assist with the common, but challenging diagnostic dilemma of distinguishing psychiatric from neurodegenerative and neurological disorders. A significantly elevated NfL concentration in a patient with a psychiatric diagnosis should prompt consideration of neurological or neurodegenerative differentials. Plasma NfL could dramatically alter clinical care of patients with neurological/neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders, improving outcomes for patients, their families, the healthcare system, and clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Impulse control disorders (ICDs) and related impulsive and compulsive behaviors (together called ICBs) have been increasingly recognized in the context of Parkinson's disease (PD) and treatment. The International Parkinson's and Movement Disorder Society commissioned a task force to assess available clinical screening instruments and rating scales, including their clinimetric properties, make recommendations regarding their utility, and suggest future directions in scale development and validation. The literature was systematically searched for scales measuring a range of reported ICBs in PD. A scale was designated "recommended" if the scale had been employed in PD studies, been used beyond the group that developed it, and had adequate clinimetric data published for PD. Numerous diagnostic screening tools and severity rating scales were identified for a range of ICBs, including compulsive medication use, punding/hobbyism, walkabout, pathological gambling, hypersexuality, compulsive or binge eating, compulsive buying, reckless driving, compulsive exercise, pyromania, trichotillomania, hoarding, kleptomania, intermittent explosive disorder, and internet addiction. For screening across the range of ICBs (except compulsive medication use), the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's disease (QUIP) and QUIP-Rating Scale (QUIP-RS) are recommended, and for severity rating across the range of ICBs the QUIP-RS and the Ardouin Scale of Behavior in Parkinson's Disease are recommended. The Scale for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease-Psychiatric Complications is recommended for rating of hypersexuality and the compulsive behaviors gambling/shopping. Further testing of established scales against gold standard diagnostic criteria is urgently required for all other individual ICBs in PD. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society., (© 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.)